Guy is a total tier legend, it's the little things he says that make huge differences, I remember scratching my head on all the models, he said Albedo, Dynamic pretty much by default, saved me so much wasted time and flip flopping. It's mainly all I use outside of Photoreal, 3D etc. Top guy, top chanel

Thanks so much!

I appreciate that very much, thank you!

Agreed! Honestly other than this new update, the best background remover tool IMO is Canva by far. I always get far better results removing backgrounds in Canva then with Photoshop.

@@metricsmulealso Clipdrop and Starryai have great background removers

Thank you!

You're very welcome!

Glad it was helpful!

Thank you. I've been getting great results when I use the words: vector, logo, octane render, 3D render, or sticker. It does very well

Agreed!

Good question. Yes, it does. What I've been doing is first creating the image and then going directly into universal upscaler and choosing that same image from my recent generations. It works great.

Me too.

Thanks so much

Thank you! I love Midjourney too, but if I had to pick one, it would be Leonardo AI for sure. The constant updates and improvements did it for me, especially one of their newer updates, Motion.

Yeah, I will too every now and then but it has gotten much better. But yes, I do have a video to help with this. I created a negative prompt generator you can use that will provide you with negative keywords specific to the type of design you are creating. Once I get the negative keywords, I'll then plug them into the negative keyword section in Leonardo AI and it usually solves the problem. Here's the video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/baqnhplkuJO1qJ8.htmlsi=KuQlgZlKzUoamapG

​@@metricsmule Thank you for your answer. I just watched the video. My only concern is having to disable PhotoReal, but considering what you say, is it then better to disable it in order to have the ability to add a negative prompt and this would yield better results? I'm certainly going to try this out. Thank you very much.

For sure. I disable PhotoReal all the time, especially when using AlbedoBase XL and Leonardo Kino XL. Try those two models with PhotoReal off, then turn on the negative prompt box and add your keywords. This method works pretty well. Let me know if it worked for you.

@@metricsmule hey there. I've been trying this method, still a lot of issues with hands, it might have helped a bit but I don't think it made a big difference, at least in the type of images that I'm doing. Maybe it works better for images in which hands are not so important I think. However, it was useful to find out, thanks to this method of yours, that PR is not really necessary to achieve amazing results, I'm saving some credits plus I can use a negative prompt. Thank you! In case you're interested to know and try it, I might have came to a potentially good method to fix hands more easily. Now what I'm doing is the following: When I generate the image I want and it comes out with bad hands, first, if hands are really, really messy, I take the image into image to image and proceed to generate similar images, I generally leave the strength slider at 0.3 for this purpose, or maybe raise it just a little bit. Sometimes I do it one time with just one model, sometimes I do it several times using different models. It doesn't take long until I get a very similar image with much better hands. However, I think this step can be skipped, the important one is the following. After that, I take the image I like the most and take it into the Universal Upscaler. I proceed to upscale it leaving the creativity slider on 5 or 4 (I don't think this is relevant for the purpose of fixing hands though). Once I do this, I take the upscaled image into the Canvas Editor and fix the hands. The thing is: The Canvas Editor seems to be way more accurate with images that have been upscaled through the Universal Upscaler. I guess it might be that they are interpreted by the Canvas Editor in a much more accurate way due to having way more detail, idk. But doing this, the Inpaint / Outpaint feature seems to make waaaay less mistakes, and I usually end up with a good result in one or two tries for each section of the image I want to fix, while it usually took me several tries before. And I'm using this method to fix images of groups of people working in the office, so... dealing with lots of hands atm. Keep in mind that this is something that I'm still testing so I might be wrong, but so far, it seems to be working really well for my images.

Good question. You can actually upscale the upscaled version which produces amazing POD results.

I'm in the process of doing a big update today and adding a lot more prompts so there may be a few that temporarily don't have the models or presets assigned yet. They'll be in there today though.

@@metricsmuleThanks mate. No worries. Still doing the great job you do

Yes, good point. The only time I really recommend jpeg is when you're uploading an image on a website and then compressing them.

😂 Should I try it?

@@metricsmule don’t lower yourself to my levels man 😂 we need you to be the pro you are to show us all the ways we can create, learn and monise this tech, not mutaliate children’s cartoons like me 😂❤️

If that ever happens to me, then I'll also just use their background remover tool as a compliment and it usually does a great job. What kind of images are you not getting the results you're looking for? Maybe there are some unique keywords I can provide you with that may help.

@@metricsmuleThank you for the advice, I was trying with illustrations clipart type images, watercolor style, air-brush style. :)

Will do.