תודה רבה לך יישר כוח חיזקת אותי מאוד. תודה על השיעור❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@luztorres41025 ай бұрын
Clamando por la Shalom de Israel y la Casa de Judáh y Casa de Efraim Halelu Yah Mashíach Yahshúa Shalom Alejem ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@user-kd6vc9lz9s5 ай бұрын
חשוב שיעשו עריכה לסרטון ,התמונה רחבה מיד...
@gabrielschwarz90055 ай бұрын
On this occasion, the illuminated try to ponder the diachronic criterion of time according to Judaism, where now is only a means for tomorrow, since the synchronic view of time, that is, of the present, does not allow it to be a deeply reductionist view for the meaning of man. In another order, he accept that every system of ideas that is harmful and negative for man has your underlying cause. On the other hand, in disagreement with evolutionary psychology, which seems to ignore or at least not master, he fail to understand the evolutionary changes in living beings and with a pessimistic view of the world, he understand life as an inexorable path to the kingdom of the heavens. Beyond all disquisition and philosophical digression, the latter is often used as a means to capture the attention of unwary people and seek their adherence through ideas that do not represent, in essence, the central foundation that one wants to defend or justify, without make reference to this specific case that refers to religious themes and that in this sense the noble man as such plays an elemental role; and unlike the traditionalist school, those who, more than researchers, were apologists and defenders of metaphysical ideas without any critical spirit, since rather than conjecturing ideas alien to their geography, they simply adopted them as their own in their search process; and unlike dualistic or dichotomous paradigms, which divide the metaphysical idea of matter, where many of them are labeled as reductionist, due to their clear superficial vision of man in his contact with the environment, Merleau Ponty conceives a rather pluralistic reality where The differences are seen as supplementary rather than reductionist entities. However, man can also be understood as a dual entity, that is, metaphysical-materialist, where the traditional materialist idea of the West merges with the traditional metaphysical idea of the East, since there is no monolithic idea to define them, since in their essence is clearly pluriform. But the obvious question must be able to understand our metaphysical-materialist criterion and whether these differences are really emergent or merely apparent, after all its a question of criterion. - -
@rochellegutman87305 ай бұрын
המוח מסוכן לא לחשוב !
@gabrielschwarz90055 ай бұрын
On this occasion, the illuminated try to ponder the diachronic criterion of time according to Judaism, where now is only a means for tomorrow, since the synchronic view of time, that is, of the present, does not allow it to be a deeply reductionist view for the meaning of man. In another order, he accept that every system of ideas that is harmful and negative for man has your underlying cause. On the other hand, in disagreement with evolutionary psychology, which seems to ignore or at least not master, he fail to understand the evolutionary changes in living beings and with a pessimistic view of the world, he understand life as an inexorable path to the kingdom of the heavens. Beyond all disquisition and philosophical digression, the latter is often used as a means to capture the attention of unwary people and seek their adherence through ideas that do not represent, in essence, the central foundation that one wants to defend or justify, without make reference to this specific case that refers to religious themes and that in this sense the noble man as such plays an elemental role; and unlike the traditionalist school, those who, more than researchers, were apologists and defenders of metaphysical ideas without any critical spirit, since rather than conjecturing ideas alien to their geography, they simply adopted them as their own in their search process; and unlike dualistic or dichotomous paradigms, which divide the metaphysical idea of matter, where many of them are labeled as reductionist, due to their clear superficial vision of man in his contact with the environment, Merleau Ponty conceives a rather pluralistic reality where The differences are seen as supplementary rather than reductionist entities. However, man can also be understood as a dual entity, that is, metaphysical-materialist, where the traditional materialist idea of the West merges with the traditional metaphysical idea of the East, since there is no monolithic idea to define them, since in their essence is clearly pluriform. But the obvious question must be able to understand our metaphysical-materialist criterion and whether these differences are really emergent or merely apparent, after all its a question of criterion. - -