Soft Proof and Sharpening - Printing for Pixel Peepers Pt. 2

Рет қаралды 4,033

4 жыл бұрын

In part two of my series about preparing photos for limited edition printing, I show your my workflow for soft proofing in Lightroom and for Print Sharpening using Nik Output Sharpener. I also show you how I use Gigapixel AI to get the correct output size for the print.
★☆★ in depth video tutorials ★☆★
mibreit-photo.com/tutorials.html
★☆★ equipment I use (Affiliate Links) ★☆★
Camera: amzn.to/2L28cNg (US), amzn.to/2QC0YoD (UK), amzn.to/2QK4UDC (GER)
complete List: mibreit-photo.com/equipment.html
★☆★ Software I use (Affiliate Links) ★☆★
Luminar Flex: macphun.evyy.net/VKr1O
Lumenzia: getdpd.com/cart/hoplink/21529...
Capture One: captureone.sjv.io/c/1424061/5...
★☆★ homepage★☆★
www.mibreit-photo.com

Пікірлер: 15

@Archibald_Quincy_Stanton 4 жыл бұрын

Michael really appreciate this episode. I've never printed anything large until now. So this week struggled to learn everything I did. Sent my file off for printing a few hours ago. After watching this I'm more confident that I have completed the critical steps for a quality result.

@stevemckenzie4731 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks mate for bringing us all those wonderful vlogs throughout the last year. Merry Christmas to you.

@cillyede 4 жыл бұрын

Großartig, dankeschön. Schöne Feiertage.

@ramaswamyranganathan 4 жыл бұрын

Hello Michael, I've noticed that some print labs accept files in AdobeRGB vs the more limited sRGB. Is the color space of the file sent to the print lab inconsequential for getting more accurate colors and gradations as when editing in 16-bit AdobeRGB/ProPhotoRGB? Awesome video series btw :). Kudos!

@mibreit-photo 4 жыл бұрын

For editing use as large of color space and bit depth as possible. Then you have all Flexibility. For lab you have to convert to what they support. If they Support Adobe rgb thats great and you should send them Adobe rgb files. I use WhiteWall who take srgb but I never had isses with that color space for the photos I print.

@michaelhanrahan5349 4 жыл бұрын

@@mibreit-photo Don't forget, if you are editing in Adobe RGB your monitor needs to be able to display in that colour space otherwise you are effectively editing in sRGB.

@Eichetheking 4 жыл бұрын

Großartiges Video! Danke für die ganzen Tipps! Eine Frage, welchen Monitor verwendest du denn und bist du zufrieden damit?

@mibreit-photo 4 жыл бұрын

Hi. Den Monitor den ich nutze gibt's so nicht mehr, ist fast 10 Jahre alt. Eizo 23'' srgb Monitor. Würde wieder einen Eizo kaufen.

@Eichetheking 4 жыл бұрын

@@mibreit-photo Vielen Dank trotzdem für die Antwort! Bin aktuell nämlich auf der Suche nach einem guten Monitor mit möglichst großem Farbumfang. Eizo hatte ich so nicht am Schirm, ich werde mir die mal ansehen, danke!

@sergiypecherskyy1374 4 жыл бұрын

Good video. For me ON1 Resize does a better and quicker job than Topaz for enlargements.

@mibreit-photo 4 жыл бұрын

Haven't tried that yet. If they have a test Version I will give it a try sometime

@elmafudd9703 Жыл бұрын

Many do not but that is poor procedure, If you calibrate the monitor to D65 then the lamp in your room should always be D65. If you calibrate for d50 then D50 applies. Keep it bright well above 1000 lumens. Ideally with know windows.

@mibreit-photo Жыл бұрын

Yes I use daylight Lamp at roughly 6500k which is quite bright.

@elcapitano8417 3 жыл бұрын

Den Teil, in dem du empfiehlst das Bild neu zu berechnen um zu verhindern, dass die DPI-Rate sinkt, würde ich noch einmal überdenken... Dies ist def. kein sinnvoller Tip!

@mibreit-photo 3 жыл бұрын

Warum? Wenn ich das nicht tue, dann wird das beim Drucklabor hochgesampelt oder einfach während dem Drucken interpoliert. Darüber habe ich keine Kontrolle und es ist immer besser, vorher die korrekte Druckauflösung zu gewährleisten. Ich kann hier Selektiv hochsampeln, was optimale Ergebnisse für mich bietet. So habe ich auch kontrolle über das Ausgabeschärfen, da ich das mit der korrekten Auflösung mache.