Richard Wolff has a VERY interesting life also you really have to look hard to find where he talks about it though, Richard Wolff and his late colleague Stephen Resnick are the modern days Marx and Engels

Yes. You’re right Wolff sticks to teaching for the most part. Did u hear about the time Hudson had to fire Alan Greenspan?

Richard Wolff is the CNN/MSNBC of Marxism while Michael Hudson is actually informing you.

Augur Cybernaut hi for some reason I don’t get alerted anymore when I get replies. Does that happen to you? I agree Wolff takes on a salesperson type role. Micheal Hudson is the best. He’s number one on my list. I’m trying to read everything he has written. Right now I’m reading finance as war. I’ve also started capital. If he has read it then I will too. I can’t tell enough to people about him.

Yes Mr. Hudson does baffle us with brilliance

It doesn't spin. Keep searching

Don't leave out Michael Parenti.

The only problem with Mark is that he very naive about the workings of the Deep State . You can call him Deep Economics.

Also Richard Werner

Yeeeeeeesss we need to bring this truth to the masses of bros

What on a smoking session wirh bravo too? Now that would knock them out

Joe is in on it. No way hudson gets on. I'd love to be wrong about this.

Rogan is a puppet. He will shut his mouth when told

I thought I was the only one who found him cute! He’s so disarmingly good natured that if anyone who didn’t know him tried to debate with him they would, likely, not be able to see the danger and would get mauled.

Greed.

It was two years ago and he's still alive 😂

@@mixerD1- i was hoping my satement would cuase shock horror and a bit of googling....yes he is still alive... since watching i have bought his red book and also killing the host... this guy is well worth investing in . a couple more of his books i want but a bit expensive at moment as i am in the uk....j is for junk economics, the bubble and beyond, and Trade, Development and Foreign Debt...but for me that is about 70 pounds or 100 dollars... i am sure they will be worth every cent ..but i already spent about 150 dollars on books this month.

Definitely worth buying...get them for Yerself for Xmas.👍👍

They have to channel the money indirectly, or through a shell office/company, they can't accept it directly into their own place without it being laundered, washed or netted in a foreign office or it will raise questions if it's above a certain limit or volume.

Don't know if you'll read this since it's been a year but let me give it a shot at explaining it. It's not a simple thing to explain, and this is made worse when you get someone like Hudson explaining it who knows all the tiny details. He also uses a lot of terminology that is related to finance, so everything is a lot more clear if you understand the words he is using. But basically what he is saying is that criminals have all this money, cash, gold, etc. but they can't put it into a bank. This is important because if you put your money in a bank things become much more convenient, and there's certain things you can't do unless you have your money in a bank, one example is investing in the stock market, or sending money digitally (unless you want to use crypto which often fluctuates wildly). You don't have to pay for everything with cash, gold, etc., now you can use the digital system, you can pay for things online, you can make large purchases without attracting as much attention. So criminals want a bank they can put their money in, the US wants people to own US dollars, to use US banks you need to buy US dollars with your cash, gold etc., so the banks and the US government make a deal with the criminals. The US wants the criminals to buy US dollars because it increases the value of the US dollar. Think of someone investing in a company's stock. The more people buy it, the more the stock goes up in price. The US had a problem because they were spending all this money on the military, so they needed someone to give them, the US, money. The government wanted to continue the military spending, but they didn't have enough revenue to sustain the spending, so rather than raising taxes, etc. they got criminals to buy US dollars, raising the value of the dollar, increasing the value of the dollar means you can buy more things with that dollar, so they could spend more on the military. Lastly, the banks didn't want a clear line connecting their bank to the criminals, so they used offshore banks. These are basically in the US, since the countries (like panama) use the US dollar as their national currency, but they aren't in the US, so banks in them aren't held to the same strict types of laws, accounting audits, etc. So the offshore banks don't attract as much attention or have to deal with the same laws as the banks taking money directly from the criminals. For instance Chase, or Citi bank taking criminals money. Hopefully that is clear.