He didn't have a choice they gave him that suite...

judging someone’s guilt or innocence based off clothing is ignorance & shallowness at its peak.. it’s always a very easy tactic to mask. you sound like easy bait, definitely not a good thing. regardless though, i don’t believe this brother did this & im praying for him.

His Attorney provides his attire for court…

Doesn't he look hot❤❤❤❤

​@@funDzAmEntalthat's a 🔥 🥵 suite man ur tripping.. sure beats the boring black neutral colours in court we usually see

Why would a black man committing crimes as he says risk his freedom to help a white who he sees sleeping outside, not knowing if she could come to and begin screaming?

Definitely???

are u stupid?

Lololol but he approached a person that appeared to be sleeping outside ? What was he going to do if that person woke up and began screaming?

⁠@@malcriadamedina5358Right, and then he claims he felt on the dead body to see if the person was alive and that’s how he got blood on him. What criminal is going to interrupt their crimeing to check up on a dead boy and get blood all over themselves? His story makes zero sense.

I agree but a liar can definitely remember his story! Especially if it is rehearsed enough times

@@lennysmith8851 not at all they always mess up somewhere…..

@@Sassy-x3r not always.

I do, DNA says he did also.

Why would he approach a sleeping person without knowing how the h would react, risking prison time but for a total stranger lolol

He thinks it’s going to help him get off as he’s been styling in court. A car thief at that, 3x loser knowing he’s never getting out if he’s found guilty. Many think it makes a difference but the devil wears Prada.

@@dudemorris7769 I mean that is why people usually dress in street clothes as opposed to prison garb as it has been known to prejudice the jury, if wearing prison garb. And we must admit he does clean up rather good. This may not come out right but the fact that he is handsome and well dressed may actually play in his favor. It may actually nullify the jury if you find a female on the jury who not only finds him attractive but may use that to argue a valid reasonable doubt or reasonable doubt. All the defense had to do is find one break in the link on the prosecution side and exploit the reasonable doubt. Just from me doing a cursory view of the case, just because one wants a person to be guilty does not mean they are.

😂

Yes they did 😮

The police placed that blood on his jacket and then the book bag later

🤦🏾‍♀️😂

If you saw someone laying in the lawn at four am you would check

You’re clearly a supporter of the ex. Probably wear a stupid little hat every day too.

@@detectivebubblegum9777bb not sure why you keep asking that. You make no damn sense. He didn't want to go prison for a breaking and entering so he unalived her

Shut up lmao

@@malcriadamedina5358 no proof of him in the house. That’s why I keep saying it. Weird confession of exboyfriend is enough for reasonable doubt. Pretty low brow to be like “oh he would break in a car he would kill someone” I think you could be right and he could’ve done what you described but saying it as fact without proof is a slippery slope.

With your mother perhaps?

@@user-gk9ug5hk4y , yep I have watched him on other cases and I would NEVER hire this man to represent me. He may be the reason the guy goes down. I promise this guy us as bad as one representing themselves.... Then who talks to their client on a jail phone? Who does that?

@@SheSh3 im pretty sure he’s a public defender not a private lawyer from a firm.. those lawyers are extremely expensive & he was out there stealing things, jacking cars & working full time just to make ends meet while living in the hood. public defenders are often issued to you, you don’t get to just pick & choose which one you want unfortunately. the system is extremely broken.. the more $$ you have, the better chances you have of winning your case. money literally rules the world & it’s disgusting.

@@srlkillerwell there is a way to navigate around that. Stop committed crimes

@@Ozymandias1291 well yes, that’s just common sense? but unfortunately the justice system is extremely flawed & this case is a perfect example of that. this man does have a criminal history & he did commit petty crimes the night of the murder BUT he’s on trial for first degree murder.. not for property theft, breaking & entering, robbery etc. im not sure if you’ve seen what’s happened today with the case but it’s a hung jury & the judge has dismissed them for the weekend.. they apparently asked for the entire trial transcripts to read over as they could not come to a unanimous decision. it could be just one person saying not guilty OR one person saying guilty against the rest & refusing to alter their decision. or it could be a mixed result. ive studied forensic psychology & criminology, i work in this field for a living & based on everything i have seen (or rather, lack there of) there’s absolutely no way i could convict this man if i was on that jury… theres far too much reasonable doubt & the state hasn’t met the burden of proof, not even close.

@@srlkiller he was facing 25 years if caught on the prowl again so it is not much of a stretch that he would not care to leave witnesses. This is motive. If it was not for the crazy boyfriend I would think this is enough to say guilty. However, the picture looks like the boyfriend was in the vicinity around the time of the murder and this is why the jury is hung. The evidence is not there to convict but I personally think he did do this

You might have a chance. The jury is deadlocked

He caught himself the other day on the stand & isn’t going to be able to get out of it.

@dudemorris7769 caught himself how?

​@@dudemorris7769 how? I want to go back and see it

@@dudemorris7769you keep saying that but never say where he caught himself. Funny it’s only you two who think the story don’t make sense. He was on camera checking cars and stealing items and candy nobody goes right from that to murder. Also they cops got his phone and checked locations and he was never at her house and he was on Videonthat night using his phone so we know he had it with him. Yall speaking on his reaction to the situation rather than evidence that he actually killed her

Is the only evidence the spec of blood on the jacket??

It isn’t considering how the testimony went. It’s likely the police put that blood there

How about he touched the lady and then someway touched his jacket without knowing reasonable doubt for sure

Not really he didn’t deny touching her to check on her

Oh, I thought the ex confessing to murdering her was solid evidence

​@@gillchesterton8614they checked the ex out and he was cleared

it definitely doesn’t, it’s called code switching.. he’s a lot more comfortable having a conversation with his lawyer because he himself is a young black man from the hood in Detroit.. talking to another black man who probably came from a similar background. he’s in a formal courtroom now.. he’s not going to talk with slang, he’s not going to use cuss words, say ‘nigga’ or ‘u feel me?’ etc etc. he went from his neighbourhood to the total opposite side - a predominantly white neighbourhood that’s all upper class citizens with big houses, nice cars etc etc.. & now he’s in a room full of those people all testifying against him & taking the stand talking about their personal lives which he knows absolutely nothing about.. he doesn’t even know these people. code switching is extremely common especially for people of colour & it happens on the daily.. usually when it’s around different people you don’t feel comfortable with, different situations, environments, the workplace etc etc. it has nothing to do with innocence or guilt but i do understand how it could come across as a ‘difference’ as the change in his speaking style, patterns & tone. unfortunately i think that his defense attorney didn’t even consider this fact.. he most likely overlooked it as he thinks everyone does the same thing being a POC himself. i understand what he was TRYING to do by playing the jail call.. but it wasn’t really effective.. the conversation should have been had in person.