In Polish SZ is reading as sh in American or English

can you input a link to download this plz

Atleast it works better then the real shuttle...

ShadowZone сделай ещё меньше самолёт.

can i have a download link or can u send me a the craft file via email

Lol

@@vegasspaceprogram6623lol

Haha

Lol yeah

Lol

A1179125CE mite b cuz erth iz gervtenationerlly stronk ten kirben, ad erso erth lerger ten kirben, woo larb ver, mer dan bentimes larver translation: Might be because Earth is gravitationally stronger than Kerbin, and also Earth is larger than kerbin, way larger, more then 10x larger

Is that why people think the shuttle program was a waste?

Kerbin's gravity is the same as earth, but not size. They both have a gravity of 9.8m/s

@@pluransart1795 The Shuttle Program was a failure. It was much less safe than previous rockets since the crew were strapped to the side of the fuel tank rather than on top with ejection systems if the rocket malfunctioned, and it wasn't really reuseable as refurbishment basically required the reconstruction of the whole vehicle each mission.

@@RookOfOnyx it worked tho.... it wasnt a waste.

But think of the amazing view!

Just close your eyes, you'll be fine.

That's where Kerbal Insurance comes in! Cheap, Splendid care, All you can ask for!

Nah, you will be fine. But before you enter the craft, may I see your insurance papers?

That’s because you’re not a Kerbal

NASA is pretty foreign to this budget concept after the space race ended

Nasa don't have a budget tf you on

@@schwany6703 they have one but its pretty low

After Trump entered, Nasa got the biggest budget augmentation they ever got. And they still dare to call him a bad president. What a joke.....

Why do people need to put politics into everything.

Man, im going to use that as an SSTO. Not going to be easy.

can you top it hazard?

Didn't work.

albert cazares He already kind of did, and it went to Eeloo.

Lisa Green stop talking $#!7 as long as you cannot prove it. Make calculations, and present them being made in public.

I agree but, I can tell you how to get to the mun VERY SMALL LANDER Incase in a fairing Two of the biggest tanks the mammoth Eight radial decouplers Two big tanks and a mammoth on each side Launch Go straight At 10 km go towards 45 degrees At 20 km you should point towards 45 degrees At 35 km stop and plot a maneuver to get into orbit Do the maneuver and decouple the eight mammoth engines Make a maneuver to get a mun encounter Do the maneuver Slow down into a mun orbit Decouple the last mammoth Pick a landing site Land Do science and celebrate Lift off and try to get a mun orbit Leave mun SOI Burn retro grade at apoapsis Land and deploy parachutes

@@jamesthegreatbeast8171 boy mammoth for the mun? Just add 2 big fuel tanks for the terrier and soam reliant for a way easier mission

funny you should say that im a new player and ive been brushing up on my rocket terminology and physics knowledge and i actually have been having dreams about correcting orbits hahaha! its got a steep learning curve but thats why its so fun

I have managed to get to orbit now, still haven't gotten to minmus tho

@But_Its_Broken To where? Lko?

GenesisPlayz Me, i'm disappointed it isn't a ssto but anyways it's still good.

Clonos me

It literally has shuttle in the name.

Me

@Ivan Vingradov got you fam

Madness?? THIS IS KERBIN!!! *kick*

isn't that the ozymandias? (can't guess which version but it's pretty recognizable)

ShadowZone: really like the video man :)

+Sashagamer614 indeed it is! Ozymandias VIII to be exact, the one that went to the outer planets.

the great ozy... sometimes i just rewatch the playlist

Microphone broken? :p

Then get gud damnit

i feelz ya bro

just open the game and start experimenting... thats it

Stef Morojna I end up with a giant rocket engine with a spaceplanes cockpit and tiny wings. I can never get anything into orbit.

Cornelius McMuffin do you use mods? get the mod called kerbal engineer redux, it will give you information about the craft in real time while building and in flight. getting something into orbit is easy, as a start, you need about 4000 ish m/s of delta v, less if you do it just right, so for a beginner maybe just shoot for about 4200 in total. start with a simple rocket, two stages, a big engine on the bottom and a fair amount of fuel, look at the numbers and you should probably have about less than half of your delta v in that stage for a small 2 stage rocket, something like 1500 ish, and the thrust to weight ratio should be around 1.5 to anything above that, just dont go below 1 or it wont move, and if you go too much higher youll just waste energy as speed you dont need in the atmosphere. shooting for around 2 for little rockets is ok. the second stage will have a lot more delta v and a much smaller but more effective engine, the terrier is a good choice, you dont need to worry about the twr (thrust to weight ratio) here as much, as long as you dont burn too late, since youll already be moving fast. about .8 is fine, but again it doesn't really matter, just experiment, it can be as high or as low as you like as long as you can fly it. after that, launch your craft, dont go over 500 ish m/s when below 10,000 meters or youll just waste energy fighting air resistance, and experiment with banking over. for a start, dont worry about anything but pressing d to bank and keeping everything in control. people will tell you 1000 different ways how to do your 'gravity turn' but the truth is it hardly matters, just experiment for what works best in the situation, sometimes controlled bank is best, but what i often do is a tiny bit of a bank and just turning 90 degrees over and just burning straight near apogee. as long as youre putting the energy in the right direction it will work. good luck, always experiment with new things, and dont think you just cant do it, these people are all the same as us, just played around more

+Millitron Big booster? How small are the aircraft you've been making?

I agree, he should have used a fuel tank connected to the orbiter's engines, the entie point is to save money on expensive parts. although you couls say that the point is to have the flight manned for whatever reason, and make it land wherever you wished.

Incognito Burrito For that kind of payload, using a kerbodyne booster defeats the entire point of going ultramicro on the orbiter. You spend 17k on the booster alone, and it's not recoverable. For the cost of three of those launches, you can put together a low-tech SSTO that will deliver 1) a bigger payload 2) for only 2k funds (net) per launch. It's cute, to be sure, but alas kinda pointless.

Millitron because its FUN. dont forget this is a game in the end supposed to makes you have fun.

It wouldnt be as cool though!

I see your profile pic is mad at a duck

This is discrimination

Russia Illuminati confirned

Russia its ksp

Nope. KSC, not KSP. If you mean KSP then it must be Kerbal Space... what? Instead of center, what? you dont put program cuz thats the title.

Russia ты русский?

Not the name of the game, the name of the Space center. Where you launch all your rockets lol. KSC. Illuminati confirmed lol.

Mark Thrimm would need too much electricity but u gave me an idea !

Damn remember when ion sstos were possible and op, could get you to minmus with pretty much no design effort or testing

@@zawseh5969 I know I'm late but... Solar panels?

@@ssstjepannn even later but I think the problem would be lack of battery space, the command seat has none and adding batteries increases the weight

Don't feel bad if you suck for the first 250 hours, that's normal. The solution is lots of googling.

Alexis Finch well, I "landed" a probe on the Mun (and by landed, I mean crashed), but it's still functional! Unfortunately I suck at big rockets/attaining orbit consistently/building aircraft that don't crash while on the runway/the game in general, so I'm too scared to send a Kerbal to the Mun as of now :( but yeah, googling has saved me multiple times

That's a good step. KSP is a game where lots of research goes a long way, but practice is still needed. If you want to test how well something lands on the moon, try launching it to 10,000 meters on kerbin above water and deploying a few drogue chutes. They won't cancel the velocity entirely but they'll simulate the low gravity environment of Mun. The over water part is just in case you mess up. If things start looking bad just deploy the real chute and they'll splash down safely. As for establishing orbit, I've always wanted to make some videos on that, but a text guide will suffice. 1. Burn up at full throttle until 5km or so. 2. Start turning towards the 90* mark. 3. Turn gradually so that you're 45 degrees from vertical at 40km altitude. 4. Once you reach this point open the map. Wait until your Apoapsis reaches 75km. 5. Create a navigation node for a prograde burn at the apoapsis, just drag it slowly and you'll see it end up in a circular orbit. 6. Time warp to when your ship exits the atmosphere. 7. Once the maneuver node is no more than 5 degrees from horizontal just aim for the maneuver node on the navball and just start burning your engines. 8. If you've done it right (keep in mind designing a good launch vehicle is the first step), then you'll be in an at least almost circular equatorial orbit. As for making large rockets, try to make them as simple as possible. One medium fuel tank, one medium engine, decoupler, huge fuel tank, huge engine, SRBs on the sides. And for making space planes. Just remember to put the center of lift just a tiny bit behind the center of mass, or else you'll have no control over it at all.

Alexis Finch Thanks! I've always been turning horizontal around 15km. And as for the spaceplanes, I messed around a bit in sandbox mode, and managed to get a Mk. III into the air. The only problem is I put the oxidizer at the front of the ship, so when I used the closedcycle mode on the RAPIERs, it flips over. I'm currently trying to balance it with extra tanks and messing with wing placements and such.

I definitely can see why you'd want to go for a space plane, they're pretty cool. But in my experience they require an exponentially higher amount of time and effort to design, not to mention are REALLY tricky. You''ll be building spaceplanes in due time, but try to master standard vertical launch rockets before moving into that field. A good benchmark is, say.. once you've landed on duna safely and returned. It's a tough challenge to start off with, and a good goal to aim for.

+ross seifer please do. Would love to see that :)

ShadowZone in ksp u can do anything

ShadowZone #sciencethesh!tourofthis

ross seifer I have an idea. Use probe core with a cone on it, with tiny jet/rocket engine and solid fuel for getting to space.

The oddessy by Bill.

It bears a resemblance to the Komet, yeah. I might try making a micro-interceptor like this, but with a more powerful engine and having more maneuverability. Shouldn't be too hard..

I'll star the petition, WHO'S WITH ME

mine sweeper it wouldn’t be nice on the approach back rho

Forgot to add something in here, you can use control surfaces as wings if you rotate them as apples to using a full wing which was quite handy.