@@HughJassol_ Glad you find it useful. Happy flying.

Lol!! Is that a good thing? Lol

I do!

Omg Zibo is the best

My question too.

Hello, no it does not, unfortunately. The reason: the development version of the A320NX is moving away from the standard "simulation variables" which are accessible via the SimConnect API (and that's the exact reason why other recording & replay apps run into the same issues). That is because many aircraft systems in the A320NX are now "custom built", using "local variables" (which are non-standard / specific to the A320NX and not accessible at all via the official SimConnect API). The last time I checked the "stable" version (0.6 - at least the one which was available in the in-game market place) still worked as expected. Whether the development version will (be able to) support the official "simulation variables" again I cannot tell. And this is outside of the "influence" of Sky Dolly. Also refer to the "Frequently Asked" section on flightsim.to (see link above in the video description). Best, Oliver (author of Sky Dolly) For reference: docs.flightsimulator.com/html/index.htm#t=Programming_Tools%2FSimConnect%2FSimConnect_SDK.htm

@@till-213 Thanks. And thank you for trying to keep up with the this sim. It's appreciated :)

Agreed!

I don't see what not as it records flight data not display data. Should work great

@@OverkillSimulations just tested and this works a treat. Flew in VR switched out and watched back + recorded perfect solution. Even swapped back into VR and carried on flying!

@@closetsimracer But, can you re-watch the replay in VR of the replay made in VR?

If it’s in the Marketplace then yes. If your on Xbox you won’t get to download all this as it’s 3rd party developers and PC based. Flyby wire A320 is on the marketplace. Free

@@jamesscan7408 thanks

negative ghost rider

Some people have been turning their firewall off while playing the game and running it as an administrator. Sorry you’re running into that and I hope this helps!

Until someone else is confirming my answer you have to take the word of the application developer (me ;)) for now: first off, Sky Dolly runs in a complete separate "process", separate from Flight Simulator 2020. Today's CPUs have so many cores that Sky Dolly can perfectly run "in parallel" to FS 2020 (unless FS 2020 would use all available cores to 100%, which is - luckily - not the case). Second, Sky Dolly is very "CPU friendly": it is implemented in C++ and at least on my system (an iMac 27" 2020 with a Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-10700K CPU @ 3.80GHz) it uses less than 1% CPU (of one given core) during recording and replay. Third, Sky Dolly requests data ("simulation variables") from FS 2020 only when their values actually change! And since the variables are "grouped" (e.g. "aircraft handles" such as gear and flaps levers) it happens quite often that an entire group of variables remains "inactive" for a long time (e.g. typically you lower the gears and flaps very rarely during a flight). This not only saves storage space, but (at least theoretically) also CPU cycles (also in FS 2020, which needs to process the data as well). I say "theoretically" here because in practise the difference may not even be measurable: FS 2020 may be able to process hundreds of "simulation variables" requests at the same time without blinking with its eyes. And fourth, you can even lower the "recording sample rate", down to 1 Hz (the default is "automatic" which equals to "record simulation variables for every simulated frame"). But note that during replay the simulation variables are always sent "for each simulated frame": the actually recorded samples are interpolated with cubic interpolation ("spline curves") for a smooth movement. You can actually show all recorded (and replayed) "simulation variables" in Sky Dolly, by pressing the 'V' key, which opens the "Simulation Variables" dialog (this dialog is really just for information purposes only - "for the interested readers", so to speak ;)). Not only do you see all the variables values, but during replay you also see which ones are actually becoming "active" (or "inactive"). But to be fair, I have also tried "Flight Recorder" (another open source app - in fact, I have been in contact with the author as well and initially exchanged tipps and improvements: open source FTW :)), and also with "Flight Recorder" I did not notice any FPS drop. But then again, I am not measuring FPS anyway (I am from the generation that started with 1 FPS flight simulators ;)). The best is you try it out for yourself and see if you notice any performance hit.

Why would anyone choose Xbox version...