I suggest to use Google.

It's the same with the A310, I believe. In this it's not too annoying since flights tend to be a lot shorter, so you wouldn't need to enter more than a handful of waypoints.

@@IncapableKakistocrat Yup I just completed a flight and it went pretty well. FMC is not too complicated and as you said, for a regional aircraft it's not too bad. Doing that with a transcontinental flight would be an absolute pain though. At least is uses the same nav database as Microsoft Flight Simulator, so no need to cross reference with Navigraph data.

Honestly if an aircraft support this feature I would automatically expect its LNAV to be shitty, No high fidelity aircraft does import flight plans from world map.

The developer is Hans Hartmann, but it's officially supported as an MS first-party product. The problem here is that many devs use their own/different code to the one used in the world map etc. So, it means there cannot be direct import of flightplans within the world map. This doesn't mean the LNAV won't work though, that's not how it works since LNAV working properly is based upon the code within the aircraft files themselves. MSFS constantly updates to the latest AIRAC cycle so the nav points are all correct. The BAe146 professional from just flight uses the MSFS code and it works with no issues pretty well.

Yes it can heat up the cabin. It's also being helped by warmer air from avionics compartment that is getting recirculated instead of being dumped out of the plane.

Yikes! But to be fair so did I on another turbo prop in FSX the Dash8

@@MrEthanhines flew using just trim

@@thatguy7085 that's nth level piloting right there ! reminds me of that flight where the hydrolics went out and the crew used thrust only to navigate

I'm inclined to agree. I mean the first thing he does is show us how to start the engines. He didn't run through the steps for getting electrical power and all the other pre start steps