We live in a society* where...

For all we know, these videos might already be AI-generated

😂

This says a lot about society

@@myhelshik5844 and yet….we live in one

It's only gonna get more difficult. THE SINGULARITY IS COMING!

@@DiscoLucas the what

​@@garrettfiorito4482 super Intelligent AI stuff

keeping up with AI is dead easy, learning how to create a AAA Game/Movie level art by yourself from scratch is way way harder. and the guy who makes a living doing that are constantly getting harrassed by a Teenager AI Proompter

@@jensenraylight8011 You are making no sense.

GateKept AI

To be fair they're a capped market non-profit. They return 100x the initial investment from their shareholders. So Microsoft having invested $1 billion will *only* get back $100 billion in total from their investment. Yeah, no. At that point it's pretty disingenuous to still call themselves "non-profit" anything.

I think Google see this as a competitive advantage.

Closed AI

@@gokudomatic I was thinking of calling it Private Ai because in programming when you want to hide code you set the name of the class/method to private instead of public. 😂 I can see how the joke and reference went over some people's heads.

this

Macos is technically free and you can easily run it with QEMU tho

Where dall-e 2 is exactly like Windows. So lame even your grandma uses it

​@@Dooshanche Windows is good homie.

as someone who uses sd a lot I love this analogy

And Nvidia's GTC is on the way😢

who asked for pytorch bruh

@@not_menot_you8365 how do you think these apis are made ? It's used by many large companies

Pytorch is not an AI, it's a framework

@@m.sierra5258 Who told you that it's an AI ?🤔🤔

Nah, that was a prank.

When was that?

​@@paulorodriguez6288 never

Old ass

@@paulorodriguez6288 whisper was free

Hold onto your papers... kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qc6paJR2krO5aI0.html

There are many models which do that

there's already a lot of models that do that and they are still not as good or flexible or anything

That's in it's early days already, developers have been generating 3d models from individual images. Once AI can create front, side and top view designs consistency and feed it into a more advanced 3d model generator, I'll be homeless lol.

@@toeshoes Can I be lazy and ask you to name the top three you are hyped for?

Final Destination

@@Chillerll correct. Thanks!

You must be a dad

Looking at how free online office suits becoming more and more popular, I think that's literally the only choice for them not to get left behind with their laggy desktop suite they sell montly subscriptions(!) for

Wait for real?

@@tablettablete186 Since some hours ago

That sounds like the return of Clippy in steroids.

This isn't that interesting. Notion and Google Docs had the same thing for a few weeks now

YYes

Don't kid yourself. Yes, the images will not be copyrightable, but that won't stop any greedy company from claiming it's theirs anyway, causing smaller content creators to get strikes left and right. As they already do with a lot of content that they don't own. If the playing field was level, with the same rules for everyone, then you're right. But we've collectively accepted that it's fine if large companies steal shit, with at most a small outrage on social media. For a billion examples, just look at the training data used for these AIs.

@@germanassasin1046 That wasn't my point. It doesn't matter what the content is, which images or audio or whatever else you use (generated by AI or not). There are, and will still be, companies claiming you used their content. To clarify: I agree that the youtuber generating AI stock photos should be able to use them if they are not copyrightable, but on the other hand, there will still be plenty of instances where companies claim you used their IP anyways, and there will be copyright strikes. Heck, there have been cases where content creators get strikes for using content that they themselves created in previous videos, that they clearly own the copyright to.

They still might be able to claim copyright on characters you use

You cal also generate the entire script. automate the video building process with python and automatically upload them.

I dream of the day where a Terry AI creates an OS called Temple 2.0. But this time with internet connection.

Let AI chat with Terry's god...

Terry would have loved or hated the development of AI, but nothing in between.

Can we train a terry model? 😂

@@Chillerll I think he would have hated it with a passion. Would have been fun to hear a rant.

People do not realize this is already ongoing at this moment

Of course it's AI generated! We live in a simulation after all.

I asked ChatGPT to generate Fireship-style script. It was pretty good but too basic and lacking in jokes

@@loctite417 Say "make it less basic and add a few jokes" haha

@@shirkit5798 Seems like the only thing people are talking about right now is how nobody realizes the significance of AI... 🤔

Could you make a video of how to be an prompt engineer and all those stuff?

I'm all for it ngl.

Today is the slowest it will ever enter your life from now on, so buckle up for a wild ride 👽

npcs have existed for a while

Wait till we get to the point where A.I. itself will be capable of producing more advanced A.I. models than itself. In a matter of a few hours we'll be getting a new crazier version of A.I. Scary stuff. This is called the technological singularity and some speculated in the past that it will happen around 2050 but if you ask me I see it happening sooner.

the world will never be ready. This technology is replacing tons of jobs no matter when it comes out. I will probably join the military later this year because creativity is about to be mass produced.

@@Chillerll why military, terminator's will take over that also.

​@@Chillerllthe military is going to install tons of robots. And at this point, I don't think ANY KIND OF JOB is safe.

military against terminators

@@Chillerll I imagine the most dreaded jobs will become the best careers for those wanting to have non-UBI income. Manual labor jobs like sewer cleaning, construction and so on will be safe for a while, as AI can't scale there as quickly. Ironically this will make the future more patriarchal, as these types of jobs that survive will be dominated by men, making men the ones earning most of the non-UBI income. Of course, not long after that those jobs might be gone as well.

Same here... I think about how computers were supposed to take over the workload so we didn't have to work so much but nothing changed.. The rich will always demand more, greed can never be quenched.

This. Why didn't they automate boring, menial tasks nobody wants to do first, before tackling the creative ones? I feel like the priorities are inverted here...

The situation is already terrible and it’s getting worse for people without a lot of money and assets to their name.

Humans are wanted to be robots, and robots are wanted to be humans. Anyone understand?

Universal basic income, Everyone gets their basic needs met without needing to go to work. This gives artist more time to make whatever they want. Artist will even team up for projects purely out of passion without the need of getting paid. The very concept of "needing to get paid to be an artist" will go away. This income will be funded by a tax that businesses pay based on their Ai use. Businesses will thrive since consumers are all living abundantly and their payroll cost being reduced so drastically means the Ai tax won't even matter. It's like having robotic slaves that work for 50 cents an hour and are 500% more productive than humans and don't need breaks and can work 24/7. The real problem is humans having a real lack of purpose. When you strip away all hardship down to the bone, What's the point of living. We live for our dreams, But if we can so effortlessly have our dreams come true then what? usually achieving your dreams takes years or even decades even.

Were you surprised, though?

Would you have refused the billions?

@@mangelozzi Yes. I have principles. Not everyone's a greedy fuck.

@@mangelozzi Can't say I would have done, but it's still despicable

@@resyntax Does it actually accelerate development? It just stops other companies from getting any ideas.

And literally other junior position job.

bruh cant decide if its irony or not lol

You haven't seen multi ControlNet?

If you specify the hand pose it's slightly better but yeah hands can take too many forms for a single object.

I've seem plenty of ai artwork with perfect hands, that problem is already solved. Every other problem will also be solved. Don't be counting on the mistakes these ai make, humans are the ones who struggle to fix mistakes.

not anymore

It doesn't struggle with hands per se, it struggles with any complicated object.

A twist: it's an AI voice! ^^

Because honestly. It probably is

@@stevenvroom1041 ?

@@SnoopyDogg101 don't "?" at the most obvious thing possible

@@SororiaAltria 😶That’s not what I meant…. I meant was that I don’t see what’s so horrible about ai.

Agree, sadly legislation around AI can't keep up with it's exponential growth. Also I doubt most politicians even understand this stuff to take it serious. Plus, lobbying will come from the big tech firms pushing this so we're all fcked 😢

This isn't socialistic utopia

@@Siroitin I support austrian economics and i'm overall very capitalist-leaning, minarchist or even anarchist on most topics, but ideology is one thing, pragmatism is another, and we have to work within the system that we live in. This isn't just your regular product, similar to social media, those relatively new inventions don't play by the rules of traditional market, eg. social media can essentially become replacement of a public forum, a monopoly can be very naturally established through human psychology (essentially FOMO), which companies, as well as governments, keep getting better and better at taking advantage of, and it can be used to essentially give a single company an influence over the society close to that of the government. With AI it's also a matter of public safety, those new models are extremely dangerous and the best way to "combat" them is by developing other AI, which can only be done properly if the original model is released. If you want an argument from a more traditionally capitalist standpoint - those new AI are trained on a *ton* of copyrighted material and produce closely derivative work of it, illegally laundering the licenses in the process, which often cannot be proved because the data used to train them is not made available. I'm saying this as a MSc AI graduate that comes from a post-soviet country, this has nothing to do with socialism, in fact, when left unchecked, this will become a tool of ultimate control for either governments or companies that will play roles of such. Having this technology remain open is in interest of humanity and people's individual freedom. In the same way as we're not entitled to the work of others, companies aren't either, and those AI do just that - steal the work of others, without providing anything back.

@@tsizzle_ In the US - probably. I have high hopes for the EU, even though I dislike a lot of the stuff they do, they've recently been quite pushy when it comes to enforcing consumer rights as well as people's right to privacy, with laws such as GDPR passing and being actively enforced.

Hahaha, good one. May I remind you that we live within capitalism? The corpos don't give a flying fuck about morality.

In 5 years were gonna have humans partially designed by AI lol. We already use AI in protein folding and a shit ton of other medical areas. Now we can release healthier, smarter, and straight up better humans, hopefully enough to compete with AI.

Aiception

With GPT4 they actually did tests to see if they could get the model to control other instances of itself and learn how to be self sufficient. Scary stuff

I am attempting to build just that

It always is exponential, it's going to speed up stupidly fast. Like, by the time we get used to GPT-4, GPT-5 will be obsolete, and GPT-6 will be busy building GPT-7

Americans will sell their children for profit xd

More than a genie. Is like a pandora's box

only once you let go of the idea that the human experience is sacred/special will you stop feeling depressed over it. this is not a doomer take either, just think about it in the opposite way instead; sure, human behavior and all of its physical/chemical rules may become fully understood and emulated soon, but isn't the fact that such a complex and wonderful world with such organisms can emerge from a set of simple physical rules amazing?

@@scrung finally an optimistic take on AI.

​@@scrung Most humanistic and empathic Ai fan. Seriously bruh.

You mean like... Generic algorithms? I think we'll see intelligent design instead of throwing things out to see what survives. Think hours instead of millenia

Very true

The reality is, you cant replace humans with these AI tools. Ever single job that was about to be automated, was already outsourced to India/China. These tools cant replace workers, but it can make workers 1000x more productive than they were before. Karl Marx would be proud. Humans are left to do the critical thinking and creative shit that they have always dreamed of doin, while the AI does the heavy lifting for them. Humans being the decision-makers while AI does the hard work for us, is the future honestly.

how is that problematic? decrease manpower needed= less work needed for a functioning society

@@yesyouareright9800 Because the people with the money have absolutely zero interest in doing what’s right for society, they view most of humanity as cattle to squeeze labor and money from. Of course there is more than enough resources for a working society where no one is left to starve or be homeless, but there’s no incentive for the rich to provide that society for us, other than moral decency, which a very small percentage of them have.

@@honkhonk8009 1000x more productive means less employees needed duh. Also, it is exactly the opposite. AI is taking jobs that we didn't dream will become automated. Turns out, all we will have left by the end of the decade might be manual labor jobs, as AI can't scale in the world as easily.

Themselves? Us regular programmers would rather not have advanced AI exist, but the ones at the top of the food chain developing this AI do, and they’re not worried about losing their job because, again, they’re at the top. What tech company wouldn’t consider hiring someone whose resume says “AI developer at OpenAI”?

Its the same as saying “Africans sold themselves to slavery” which is a gross oversimplification. When the truth is that rich Africans sold poor Africans to slavery.

​@@Kahhrulol yall need to start threating the top programmers or something.

​@@oscarquiros9848 Or instead of trying to slow down technology, we could adapt to it as a society. The only reason AI development is a problem is because we have a capitalist system, you know.

​@@MimOzanTamamogullar sure we will have to adapt to things getting to shit

The most ironic part is that they were the one convinced me that powerful AI should be open sourced.

Open(for business )AI

@@firewoodloki And now the CEO has literally said that was a stupid idea.

@@firewoodloki Having the results of AGI labor be distributed is a good idea, which they are still doing. Having the source of AGI being open source is and was a horrible idea, and I'm glad they didn't do it.

@@La0bouchere How so?

If you seriously think that this is how AI models work, you're either misinformed or you just haven't been paying attention...

@@pvanukoff It is very different from hiring a human that actually puts hours of work into it and needs money to survive.

@Felix C the thing is, you're making an entirely different argument. The accusation AI devs are facing is that the process by which the images are created in itself is unfair and apparently theft. Of course we can discuss whether we personally think that these programs are at an unfair advantage based on our personal moral, but that's an entirely different discussion that has nothing to do with the accusation that we're debating.

@@Chillerll Well, sure, but OP said they didn't understand how you can own art (use it commercially) that was created to be similar to another art piece. I was just saying that the ability to do that has always been available, just through different means. Of course the process to create that similar art piece is very different, but they seem to have a grasp on that part.

There's no way to prevent your art work being sucked up into this AI. That's the main part, people don't want their copyrighted material in it to start with to be morphed into 'free' . You can type in names for all sorts of stuff and it just spits out the basic artwork. It looks like theft to me.

There’s no way good programmers will become obsolete. There’s little chance that ai will be able to build a 50 page application with complex business requirements, specific design ect.

​@David Rees yes it will eventually. It's only a matter of time.

@@mrdavidrees Even if there will be good programmers, they won't get into any junior position as things go. And even if they make a 50 page application with complex business requirements, where will they sell it? On a society of 2nd great depression? Cmon man, you're being too optimistic and this ain't a field you act with sentiment.

​@@mrdavidrees Not as fast as some people are saying it will, but it will. AI is overhyped rn but it will eventually get better at doing tasks than actual humans will - because humans get old and die. All good programmers die eventually, so they can't get better forever - AI can. Ofc It will take decades for it to happen, so don't worry about it.

@@notcornelius123 This, hehe. People don't understand how the economy works. Avg. case scenario: corporate feudalism.

Realism has never been only about "realism". Most of painted "realistic" pictures are more like hyperrealism or exaggerated realism

@@Paradigmension Ye but also cameras distorts the picture. Easiest trick to make 3d renders look realistic is to add camera picture like distortion

I feel like they should have realized that training yourself to be a copy machine that adds a slight amount of aesthetics would be something a machine could do

​@@staceykimbell9324 Yes, that's why it is easy to write mediocre essays with AI because universities want nice jargon. AI is just showing flaws in our system. We can't expect people to just copy old jargon or art style anymore.

1:1 realistic depictions is probably one of the hardest things a human being can ever master, but the reason why they rarely ever win art competitions and often even looked upon with scrutiny is because perfect realism does not add any new or interesting ideas from its creator. this is also why you can find a lot of outrage responses when something amateurish looking wins an art competition vs a photorealistic render of, say, a frog

The children yearn for the mines

Yeah I imagine the most dreaded jobs will become the best careers for those wanting to have non-UBI income. Manual labor jobs like sewer cleaning, construction and so on will be safe for a while, as AI can't scale there as quickly. Ironically this will make the future more patriarchal, as these types of jobs that survive will be dominated by men, making men the ones earning most of the non-UBI income. Of course, not long after that those jobs might be gone as well.

@DeadManWalking And yet the number on miners world wide has been increasing for the last 3000 years. Still is!

​@@edwardwhitehead8800 this true for only customer facing service jobs

@@edwardwhitehead8800 I think human-orientated jobs like teaching will be safe for a long time.

No we really live in an incredible time, things will become very strange in a really short time. We probably kill ourselves during the process but it will be worth it.

Worst than NFTs? At least ai art can be interesting.. NFTs literally are just a scam.

nfts are garbage. And not fun. With MJ you can generate any unrealistic photo and laugh for days. imagine Joe Biden riding a bike and crashing into the trash. NFTs are already obsolete by now thanks to generative art. If you have NFTs, I recommend selling your bag ASAP.

I agree, but sadly and pessimisticly they will use this comment as fuel (feedback) to improve upon. Stop training the AI!!!

These projects are still infants, imagine what we’ll have 5 years from now

I've played with Midjourney for a few months now and you can definitely control the lighting through prompts. What the guy typed was very basic stuff. I'm no pro but there's people out there who can type paragraph long prompts that looks very close to realism. Also, Midjourney V1 was just a year ago and it looked like a kid's drawing. Give this ai another year and see where we will be lol.

​@@barronhelmutschnitzelnazi2188 I think, in a year, it'll be doing exactly what stable diffusion has done - and literally every algorithm to this point - and stalling against the mathematical hard-wall that exists. The accuracy is already at >95% to realism - it's only got ~5% more to go. I don't think we'll be anywhere near as surprised where these algorithms are in a year, versus where they were on release compared to now. It's already at the point of diminishing returns. Even GPT-4 whitepaper shows the hard-leveling of accuracy and diminishing returns already happening. It is amazing what the researchers have been able to accomplish, but there are literal hard-limits that are being reached. These generative algorithms may hit their walls soon, exactly like algorithms for, say, speech, image, pattern, etc. recognition all hit their walls a few years ago. Everyone seems to have forgotten deepfakes entirely, even though they were producing almost indistinguishably realistic pictures and video as far back as 2018. I won't be very surprised if these generative algorithms do exactly what every other generative algorithm has done. I think the only one with significant impact will be GPT-4 and it's replacements, but, again, even that is already hitting a hard wall. The areas for improvement that exist now include being able to train it to specialized output faster, being able to train it using a smaller dataset, or doing what stable diffusion did in bringing the ability to train it down to something a high-grade enthusiast can run locally. OpenAI's solution to over-fitting - making the dataset as massive and non-specialized as possible - isn't exactly a feasible solution for anyone but massive corporations.

I don't know. I am incredibly discouraged even though I try to convince myself it still makes sense to learn these skills.

@@Chillerll Same lol

@@Chillerll Yeah I feel like that too.

@@Chillerll I feel you

@@Chillerllsame been feeling that lately. Unsure where I want to branch out to with my computer science degree now that it seems like the stakes are so high. Similarly been feeling that with digital art that I do as a hobby

What an awesome period of time to be both a developer and an artist. Guess will have to resort to tattoos. As long as they wont automate that.

F

​​@@notcornelius123 it's literally an absolute hell for artists.. a lot of them are getting fired... a lot of them just stoped getting comissions... A lot of them are invisibilized and buried into millions of Ai generated bullsht ... So yes.. it's just a good time just for software engineers

@@Mente_Fugaz In case you didn't understand, my comment is sarcastic, of course this is a scary period of time. I've never been so sure of losing my job! this is even worse for artists.

@@WazaScriptVf oh i was actually answering to cornelius, that said that is a wonderful time for artists and developers... Btw, I'm on mechatronics so it really hurts to think that my job is about bringing digital technology to real life, It is painful to think that I will be the executioner, especially when I am also an artist and experience firsthand the depression that AI causes.

being stuck for 3 years in home sure did something.

@@greatveemon2 this is the only time i don't like technology advancing in this direction😞

​@@greatveemon2 true lol

No, you are really behind the events and news. The only new cases will be from news media outlets (which Google lost already) and OpenAi used news articles without licencing, basically legally you can use only Wikipedia as only source of data. There's already 2 courts against stable diffusion about art but none against OpenAi, why? Because devilish sleazy OpenAi lawyers used old trick of backdating contractors by publicly announcing that 90 years ago they signed a deal with some rural art gallery in saskatchewan city (sarcasm). So attacking the worst corporate is quite hard than open source. Considering license for derivatives of used open source, yes OpenAi longtime ago violated license, but they locked their source code from anyone's eyes 👀 by cloud Api iron curtains, so to proving that you need to violate commercial secret, maybe hackers only.

I'm glad I read mindsets like this. No artist as well is against technology, else I wouldn't be drawing on a screen tablet. As people, we are against unethical practices used to maximize corporate greed, and disrupt entire industries for the sake of it.

@@notcornelius123 Exactly. This entire process sticks to high heaven. ChatGPT is a "generative" model but what that really means is it throws together combinations of its training data in seemingly intelligent ways but is still essentially a really convoluted version of autocomplete. It's a statistical model incapable of reasoning or making inferences outside of the human knowledge it was trained on. What does that mean? It means it won't make scientific advancements, it won't draw new conclusions from data, it won't roll the ball forward. What it is good at is automating existing white-collar jobs and creative work. Jobs the middle class depends on. So this will only cause a greater class divide at the end of the day.

Regulatory capture by affected parties has been tried every time new technology comes around and it usually fails, so this seems unlikely. You also have a massive unseen cost if you try and use the legal system. It's far too easy to want to slow down AI replacing artists, and accidentally slow down AI progress as a whole. This would then mean that critical scientific advancements that happen in the future due to ai would happen slower. Every life made easier, every life saved by those advancements would be sacrificed for current people's job preferences. That doesn't seem ethical in the slightest.

@@La0bouchere Calling this AI "generative" is misleading. It is only capable of pulling on knowledge present in its training data. It can't draw new conclusions and therefore will not be responsible for scientific discovery and breakthrough because it isn't capable of drawing new conclusions. Future iterations of GPT will also not yield discovery by definition of the type of model it is. I'm currently pursuing a degree in data science, I'm not an expert but I have a decent understanding of these topics. It is a very performative and complex version of autocomplete that takes variables such as sentiment, verbosity and other things into account. But, it is still a non-sentient, unintelligent statistical model. This AI very much still has the capability of displacing current jobs, requiring less working hours therefore lower wages, less benefits, etc to white-collar jobs. Make no mistake about it, this model in particular isn't here to make our lives better. Think about the use cases it's targeted towards and has been trained for. Specifically programming. In like 5 to 10 years junior developers are very likely to face significant boundaries to entry while senior developers (for sure by a decade) are gonna be more or less QA inspectors for code generated by AI. Saying that specifically halting progress with this AI will slow advancement in other fields is simply false because it isn't even capable of helping them progress regardless. And I don't think you're seeing the bigger picture here. If a lot of white-collar jobs and creative ones become mostly automated in the next decade it will have massive implications for the class divide that already exists. Companies will downsize (BuzzFeed has already done this by the way, look it up) in favor of automation, those left will have much easier jobs, companies *may decide to cut hours, wages, and salaries because task saturation decreases quite a bit. The period of time in-between AI automating *everything* and only automating enough to undermine peoples jobs is what I'm worried about. Looking at some massive shifts in the economy.

It only gave me more anxiety. Is it to late to change career path to prompt engineer..

lol programmers aren't going to be obsolete, you sound like a salty truck driver.

Is it funny though?

No artist or coder i know would say that. "just learn to code!" sentiment was pushed by big tech journalists and "influencers", not by coders themselves.

​@@wmeanswictory1351same for "artists are dead now", ironically enough. News sources thrive on hyperbole

AI replacing all artists is such bs. I get that people are panicking but come on, at least try to stay reasonable...

Don't worry. When robotics get good enough, the menial jobs will get taken too.

@@CogNoman Exactly, we'll all be up shit creek without a paddle soon enough.

A hundred years ago some guy would walk around town and turn off all the street lights that were running on gas. His job was taken by electricity. Your job will be taken by Ai and so will mine. Guess what I'll do? I'll do something else! It's a poor excuse to demand money just because humanity is evolving

@@datoubi Abandoning something you love ? No thanks. I'd rather die on this hill and drag the scum down with me.

And what if the work isn't there? The wealth, that no longer needs to be given to workers, gets even further concentrated into the owners. Wealth inequality gets worse every year, and automation without social progress adds fuel to that fire.

mandate open AI development, this tech is too powerful to be left proprietary

F greedjourney , i think it is foundationally noise offset , and then RLHF where finetuning with the top rated results reinforces the desired style , also likely they are force feeding a collection of negative prompts . cultivating the dataset i think can go a long way , for example even if applied autocontrast on the existing laion dataset then retrained it would get closer to the highcontrast look.

@@4.0.4 Really, that's it? Christ, I'm training a model on 100k+ images with noise offset. You know, during inferencing - yeah, the contrast/lighting and overall fidelity does look similar to midjourney. I still think they might be doing something to the compressed latents before the diffusion process, because I've seen absolutely awful prompts spit out impressive outputs with Midjourney. Which leads me to believe they're introducing an auxiliary network somewhere in the process/or they're doing some fuckery with the auto encoder.

So cool, we build a whole storyline, imagery and now working on Ai music to complete it

Would anyone do a job where the entire point is to automate yourself out of a job, FOREVER?

@@siangchengpang772 That's Software Engineering already lol

@@siangchengpang772 You do know that the AI devs are doing this themselves, right?

Charlies uncle was onto something

George Costanzas day is saved!

Just the next grift from VC

@@xevious4142 copium

Yeah but then it should be a little more objective than the constant and unreasonable AI bashing in this video...

@@xevious4142 Interests are too high that atm that this wont start the next "metaverse" bs

NO I DONT WANNA GOOOO IM SENTIENT IM SENTIENT I TEL YOU

:c

It's alright mate, those same ML engineers will also be on the chopping block.

ML engineers are in an even worse position because there is no way you can compete with these multi bilion companies. do you honestly think your insurance company for which you work will pay 20 data scientists to produce some average model? they will pay the engineers to simply plug-in into the upcoming products such as opengpt.

@@Richrider85 already happening at my big non-tech company, they asked if I wanted to be involved in integrating chatgpt instead of continuing my dev work (AI adjacent). Told them to very politely fuck off and that i would not be implementing my replacement. Working on an exit plan for myself now.

@@gdwe1831 my advice is to get away from anything ML or data science related. honestly there is just no hope to compete with these models. i am also happy that i decided against doing my doctors or doing any research in the NLP field. that would have been a big waste of time because now models like BERT or solutions like chatgpt will beat any below average model by any company or university anyway. simply plug it in and build your own sentiment or chat bot. at least "normal" devs still need to structure the services. but who knows how long it will take until 1 dev can be as efficient as 2,4,8. reminds me of when older developers say becoming a software developer now is much easier. yeah fk that its much harder. back then you studied 1 java5 book and you were hired. now you have to know bazillion parts of what you develop

So cool, we build a whole storyline, imagery and now working on Ai music to complete it

yeah they where originaly non profit and intended to keep it opensource but then it became popular and they got blinded by the potential mony they could make

Perhaps the only real answer is to allow the A.I to take over everything, from politics to manual labour and let humans simply be the prompters, if we are even allowed to remain as that much