MILITARY HISTORY : Medieval and Stone Age Weapons

Рет қаралды 349,407

Military History 2015

9 жыл бұрын

Uploaded by MILITARY HISTORY 2015. A look at the Military History of Medieval and Stone Ages Weapons. We searches museums and private collections for weird and unlikely weapons, then introduces them to our combat team to find out how they were used. We try out a Francisca, the throwing axe that gave the Franks their name; see how armored knights used a ball and chain; and learn the uses of the gruesome awl-pike, bizarre military fork, and the Guisarme, an extremely popular polearm. We also test strange axes like the Lochaber, Doloire, and Waggoner's Axe.
Part 2 starts at 20:54 and introduces us to Stone-Age weapons--flint or bone hand-axes, spears, bows, and slingshots--and shows us how to make them and how to fire-harden wooden spears. Paleontologists and ethnographers help us examine the weapons of primitive societies that have survived into our own time--assegais (slender hardwood spears), blowpipes, footbows, and boomerangs.
Much of what we know of ancient history is the history of militaries: their conquests, their movements, and their technological innovations. There are many reasons for this. Kingdoms and empires, the central units of control in the ancient world, could only be maintained through military force. Due to limited agricultural ability, there were relatively few areas that could support large communities, so fighting was common.
Weapons and armor, designed to be sturdy, tended to last longer than other artifacts, and thus a great deal of surviving artifacts recovered tend to fall in this category as they are more likely to survive. Weapons and armor were also mass-produced to a scale that makes them quite plentiful throughout history, and thus more likely to be found in archaeological digs.

Пікірлер: 237

@soldatmesteren 7 жыл бұрын

0:48 that guy going through the woods, it's like a Monty Python sketch.

@mihirm3632 6 жыл бұрын

lol! so funny!

@barghestblue731 7 жыл бұрын

Medieval and Stone Age weaponry. Because those are completely synonymous.

@nikitamiroshnichenko2864 2 жыл бұрын

They may be soon

@jordanthomas4379 3 жыл бұрын

it is impossible to cut through properly made riveted mail armour with a sword, if you're lucky, strong and using a very sharply pointed blade, you might be able to thrust through it, however, you must also remember that nobody would go into battle wearing just mail, underneath it they would also be wearing a thick padded tunick called a gambeson, you would also need to go through that in order to harm the persone you're fighting.

@anothervagabond 7 жыл бұрын

I love how the narrator's saying shit like "Skilled with a broadsword..." while the actor is just stumbling through the brush, randomly waving a sword at nothing.

@lukasbreznik9573 7 жыл бұрын

I love how the "Trained knight" was just flailing around and was single handing a bastard sword

@br369 4 жыл бұрын

Handgun would do the job from a close distance so his argument is invalid

@MWCharke 8 жыл бұрын

A wooden shaft made a spear "very" vulnerable. Completely laughable. This video is suffering from a lot of Holywood-itis.

@BingleFlimp 7 жыл бұрын

Literally every other thing he says is incorrect.

@georgetempest2469 7 жыл бұрын

That's the British education for you - no wonder kids are so stupid these days. Treated like mushrooms, being kept in the dark and fed shit like incorrect documentaries.

@BingleFlimp 7 жыл бұрын

George Tempest Not really. That's an American documentary for you. They think if you have a British accent that you're clever. This guy is just a stuntman they asked to present the show.

@sorenolsen9281 7 жыл бұрын

yeah

@crusaderofthelowlands3750 7 жыл бұрын

I giggled, but it does sound more like American. :)

@liamyounger2743 7 жыл бұрын

Nope It's everybody

@ReMeDy_TV 8 жыл бұрын

@ 1:06 "That is the medieval version of a tank, and he's coming towards us, so how do we defeat him?" Me: Run away and laugh as he can't catch me.

@somethingirreversib 7 жыл бұрын

We could send a cannon ball through the stomach... Cool video at first, though after learning some details, it turns out everything is inaccurate in it.

@factsabouturmum9250 7 жыл бұрын

Ok so I know there's lots of inaccuracy I could complain about over this whole video but I'm going to focus around 14:30 instead. You can not cut a spear shaft. No. It doesn't matter how strong you are or what kind of sword you have. You can not cut a hardwood pole that's being held by a person with less than like 100 hits.

@barghestblue731 7 жыл бұрын

I also love how he said a spear was useless for taking down knights, then swapped over to a more effective weapon which was........... a more pointy spear. To be honest, I knew from the title that this was going to be a massive piece of historically inaccurate shit, but it might be entertaining in small doses.

@factsabouturmum9250 7 жыл бұрын

Barghest Blue These are the same kind of people who think medieval Norse and Japanese had magical forging methods and that chivalry was about being polite to ladies.

@barghestblue731 7 жыл бұрын

Well that idea about chivalry did exist, somewhat. It was more a rule for when you were Courting a lady, not really all ladies in general, and there was the thing about how you should act and treat others (2 separate ideas). These all got rolled into one and exaggerated by Victorian romance novels and all subsequent media. As for the forging methods, yeah that's bull. lol The Vikings merely had a somewhat more advanced (compared to the rest of Europe at the time) smelting method, and I've said it before and I'll say it again: The way the Japanese made the katana is an excellent way to make a decent sword out of crappy material (and they were far from the only people to use it).

@richardseaton1570 4 жыл бұрын

Because it seems prudent. Medieval weapons and equipment were not factory set specific. They were broad categories of things, only loosely summed together under a myriad of semiformal titles. A halberd could have a spike the size of a small sword on it, or have a haft the size of a two handed axe. A polearm was just anything on a pole, and a spear was just some variant of pointy pole. It could be entirely wood, or entirely metal, depending on your preferences.

@gu3ee 7 жыл бұрын

That parry he did hurt me a little bit.

@MelMelMel 7 жыл бұрын

2:55 "YOU DIED"

@joebananas4741 7 жыл бұрын

Yeah. Don't forget your goggles, plastic helmet and orange safety vest before you use a sword.

@gandalfthegay9426 5 жыл бұрын

I saw the mid-evil billhook and I immediately thought "That's a Halberd".

@chasedoesgaming4315 8 жыл бұрын

This documentary is incorrect on so many things its cringe worthy...

@ConfusedShelf 8 жыл бұрын

+Chase Does Gaming That moment when you watch a show to learn something and realise you know more than it.

@chasedoesgaming4315 8 жыл бұрын

Adriel Pinarello There are a ton. A very obvious one is the chain maille they show. Its not rivited (As it would have been historically by the 1300s) and is clearly not a reasonable gage of steel for it to be destroyed like that (it appears to be cheap 16-18 gage budded chainmaille). Historically accurate rivited maille would not tear like it did in the video. Further more, under maille would have been worn a gambesson that would significantly have lowered the effectivness of the "weapons test" they showed. Further more, there are literally hundreds of manuals from the time period on how an unarmored fighter can fight an armored fighter using an arming sword, spear, long sword, etc. and things such as the flail shows have little historical evidence towards ever actually existing in the way they are depicted in this video. Throughout the video the cast shows an almost complete lack of understanding towards the reasons for development, modification, and context of the weapons and armor shown, and just about everything is grossly exaggerated to a massive degree.

@ewokshoterz 8 жыл бұрын

+Chase Does Gaming hey, If you have those manuals as a PDF do you think you could give me the link? I'm very interested in this subject and I couldn't find anything like that anywhere.

@7dayspking 7 жыл бұрын

He's wrong about 13 hundred but there are a variety of manuals for different weapons and forms of fighting. Look up "Gladiatoria_group" on google and click on the wiktenauer article. Scroll to the bottom and click on the "More" hyperlinks to expand the different categories, view the plates/pictures and read the English interpretations/translations of the original texts. Enjoy.

@7dayspking 7 жыл бұрын

Ok a more complete list. Not historically accurate armour (any of it in the video...) inaccurate weapons, names and a whole host of things. Examples....arming sword*** Not broadsword. Mail/Maille not Chainmail**** Falchion's historically weighed often about 800 grams to 1.1 kg, Arming swords about 900-1.3 kg. Full set of mail about 50 lbs (Full 15th Century plate harness about 40-65 lbs...so not far off.) That wasn't an Estoc...an Estoc is a very long (over 130cm.) Greatsword with a very thin blade that was *edgeless* .....Axes were not designed to cut through armour...swords can't penetrate hardened steel (in fact it's near impossible to penetrate with a Bec de Corbin spike or beak.) Crossbows did not take an entire minute to load. His statement about swords shattering was rubbish, Before the age of Blast furnaces and tempered steel Europe blades were often more soft than brittle and were more likely to bend than to chip...let alone shatter. Again inaccurate looking weapons that are largerly oversized and weighted.... The costume mail in the video appears to be *butted* and not riveted, it also appears to either be cheap steel...or more likely, aluminium. Axes were not unwieldy or inaccurate....Swords were not battlefield weapons generally. Falchion's do not cleave through mail. Later period swords actually tended to become increasingly longer (especially with superior quality steel.) Maces are again lighter than the 4-6lb figure....closer to 2-6lbs (With a lot of variation, many sitting on the lower end.) Many weigh in the 800-1.5 kg range. You don't crack armour with the hammer end of a warhammer...or any end...the spike didn't puncture plate. Slicing through a wooden shaft (lmfao.) Suggesting that Leather was a common form of armour...let alone the common soldier could afford, suggesting that mail was cheap (it was about as/more expensive than plate harness in the 15th Century....)the common soldier wore low quality plate armour. That 10 lb figure for the Bill is wrong....they were around 1.5-2.5 kg...that's about 3.5/4-7lbs.... There's just more of the same really throughout. I want you to watch the video on youtube "MIDIEVAL WEAPONS AND COMBAT - Knights Armor (MIDDLE AGES BATTLE HISTORY DOCUMENTARY)"

@insertnamehere1290 7 жыл бұрын

Skallagrim does not approve

@secutorprimus 6 жыл бұрын

We must end the video rightly.

@ianalexander7267 2 жыл бұрын

*Mike loads has entered the chat*

@carrolltruckandequipmentre8120 6 жыл бұрын

Holy water sprinkler?, it's a FLAIL, holy water sprinklers were clubs with spikes

@leleeecheese3927 7 жыл бұрын

When you get paid to do a documentary but you have no idea what your taking about

@tracysomerset938 6 жыл бұрын

Medieval armor and weapons "wears renaissance style helmet"

@Magician12345 8 жыл бұрын

i love how with the bow drill they just cut to it already lit

@MaxChencjn 8 жыл бұрын

I srsly didn't realize those armors have men inside and when they started to move it startled me a bit XD

@crusaderofthelowlands3750 7 жыл бұрын

A knight's armour would've been very expensive.

@craig1743 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for the upload 😁

@fbaez7132 8 жыл бұрын

I've seen this guy in Fringe. He was that observer guy.

@hansg6336 3 жыл бұрын

There's a big difference between a mounted knight and one on foot. On foot a knight is vulnerable mainly because the armor is heavy and restricts movement. It's also difficult to see out of a helmet with a face shield, especially peripherally. If you are armed with a pole type weapon: spear, halberd etc., it's possible to probe for gaps or weak points in the armor of a knight, and cause a wound. Even if the wound is not fatal, it can weaken this guy who's staggering around with a lot of weight on his body. Better yet, if you can manage to knock the knight off his feet, he becomes even more vulnerable. A heavy battle ax or hammer can do lots of damage, even fatally, to a grounded knight.

@jacobt6189 8 жыл бұрын

Why the hell was he using an executioners sword for fighting against that knight with the flail?

@SirWashed 8 жыл бұрын

very good, helped out alot and got alot of new ideas for swords,spears, and all around. thank you

@7dayspking 8 жыл бұрын

+DailyMonday I suggest you either look at the manuscripts or the work of those within HEMA....most of this is nonsense unfortunately.

@2serveand2protect 8 жыл бұрын

The thing he shows at 06:41 is surely not an "estoque" or "estocque" (fr.) or - "STOCCO" in Italian. A "STOCCO" doesn't have any edges and is PURELY for piercing - even the cross-section is completely different, since a "stocco"/"estoque" had often a square-section at the base, turning slowly to a round one at the tip. It was moreover used by cavalry in late-medieval period - far into the XVIIth century. Polish heavy cavalry - especially the famous "Winged Hussars" used to call it "rozno" and utilized it when they broke their lances against pikemen formations - they would take it out and use PIERCING "blows" from above against infantry in disarray (that - at the time - did not use armour anymore). Even in the late medieval period it was used, by heavy horsemen as a secondary weapon after the lance was broken and they used to get INTO infantry formations, thrusting from above, especially if the infantry was light-protected. They would take out the swords (or in case of the Poles - the SABRES) only as a last weapon, for a cavalrymen fighting with it against infantry wears the sharpened edges very quickly.

@eponymousarchon7442 8 жыл бұрын

correct me if I'm wrong but isn't the Falchion the medieval version of the ancient Falcata?

@maxzhang8321 7 жыл бұрын

The frail is used even in the East like China and Japan, and evolved into three section staff and nounchuku; the steel version should resemble the western frail, but more flexible and capable for defensive, I wonder how well it goes against the plate and maile armor knight.

@srjohndeans5508 6 жыл бұрын

Send them into the wild with a hatchet looking for weapons. I went to a steakhouse looking for a cow, and returned full.

@rohanbasu9789 5 жыл бұрын

He contradicted himself 500 times

@trespire 8 жыл бұрын

Obsidian is sharper & finer than sergical steel. It is still used today for very delicate operations as it doesn't serrate the tissue at a microscopic scale as much.

@JerryJr65 8 жыл бұрын

Seen this, been there, done that!

@bloodhound894gaming 5 жыл бұрын

This looks like a great weekend

@popepiusxv 4 жыл бұрын

you used the wrong type of chain mail, but it's still a great video

@foresthunter1865 7 ай бұрын

whats the name of the opriginal documentary

@KarldorisLambley 8 жыл бұрын

What about the battles of sempach and morgarten. And Charles the bolds death at Nancy. All won by the Swedish with huge bladed pole arms. Nothing like that here.

@petrameyer1121 8 жыл бұрын

The part about maces and clergy is totally bs and drawn from frikkin RPgames.

@connerdale4221 7 жыл бұрын

Well, it's have true and half false. Priests didn't want to (and were forbidden to) draw blood, so they used blunt weapons (namely staves), and the mace being used by the clergy was debated and not known, and DnD popularized it, though it could still be very much possible

@xtrasparx_lxix2236 8 жыл бұрын

Chain mail a mace a dagger a axe a sword and a light weight helmet

@Landibert 7 жыл бұрын

He is incorrect concerning us not having any physical advantages. We do have some which came together in one of the oldest ways of human hunting. This was especially effective in the hot climate of Africa. Our way of losing heat (>sweating) is better than that of most other mammals, means we take longer to overheat. Add this to the fact that we can run more energy efficient due to only using two legs (>means more stamina). Going on two legs also frees up our hands and that means we could use them to make and carry tools of any kind, be it to kill or simply transport stuff. I forgot the exact name of this type of hunting but it comes down to seperating the selected animal (antelope for example) away from its herd and then chevy it on and on until it collapses. They actually are faster than humans but it will stop after a while to cool down and you can catch up with it. It has to stand in the shadows to cool down. As soon as you get close it starts running again. This will repeat, but the intervalls of running away and time to cool down will diminish until they collapse from heat. It's pretty easy from there on out. Negatives? Yes, it takes very long this way but you get enough meat (+hide/horn etc.) for a lot of people and some days. Just get the guts out immdeiately.

@arddel 7 жыл бұрын

Landibert It's called persistence hunting.

@dangerdan2592 7 жыл бұрын

Landibert I was amazed when I heard about people doing that type of hunting. Can you imagine the stamina you would have to have to keep up running for that long? I'm sure you wouldn't be full-out sprinting the whole time, but still.

@JimGiant 7 жыл бұрын

Persistence hunting is extremely rare and I don't know of any evidence to suggest it was the norm in the past. It has just as much to do with planning as it does stamina. We weren't stupid so wouldn't just chase an animal at random, we'd do everything in our power to put the odds in our favor. Make sure we are well fed, hydrated and rested before hunting (while the animal isn't), use team work, go for the weakest target etc. I could certainly be wrong but my guess is that once we stood upright and had the ability to skin animals this allowed losing our fur to act as a sexual display by relieving more of our musculature. It would have also helped up cool down considerably but I suspect this was more of a happy accident than the primary driving force in losing fur. Our main strength is being good all rounders IMO. There are a few things we;re really good at but very little we absolutely suck at.

@2l84t 5 жыл бұрын

I pose a perhaps more troubling question . How do they consistently find so many ignorant people ?

@TreeGod. 4 жыл бұрын

If you put it together then you gotta do y’all an gather lots of stuff for different projects that are a lot more fun then you can be

@the_rover1 5 жыл бұрын

1:05 two guys with a rope get him on the ground, a third guy with a hammer crushes the knights neck.

@gcknives139 7 жыл бұрын

This is extremely inaccurate. A falchion is not like an axe, chain mail is basically impossible to cut through, you cant cut strait through a spear shaft, and as well as that they are using cheap, butted chain-mail and thin, poor quality Chinese made armour.

@TravisBrady-wn8fr Ай бұрын

What did they do about the giants?

@insertnamehere1290 7 жыл бұрын

Its funny that very late plate male had small plates covering the joints

@Clayton_Stewart 8 ай бұрын

I'm mostly watching this for names of weapons, less for any historical accuracy.

@unknownmf2599 8 жыл бұрын

btw its Goedendag not Gotentag xD

@Wombacher 8 жыл бұрын

Can Gerek Guten Tag!

@borntodie297 8 жыл бұрын

+Can Gerek Flemish, especially back then. Godendag could easily have been the way it was spoken/writen back then.

@borntodie297 8 жыл бұрын

+Can Gerek Flemish, especially back then. Godendag could easily have been the way it was spoken/writen back then.

@borntodie297 8 жыл бұрын

+Can Gerek Flemish, especially back then. Godendag could easily have been the way it was spoken/writen back then.

@unknownmf2599 8 жыл бұрын

I'm flemish ;)

@molonlabe4745 8 жыл бұрын

That's the guy from the patriot

@anonymousmale2243 8 жыл бұрын

+Evan Demas i was just combing the comments to find out his name lol

@molonlabe4745 8 жыл бұрын

No it's the other British solider who thanked Benjamin Martin for caring for the wounded British soliders. At the end of the movie he was like "Sound, the retreat!"

@anonymousmale2243 8 жыл бұрын

googled it, it is jason isaacs. he's the second in command to general cornwallis in the movie. love this show, i would buy it in a box set if i could find it.

@molonlabe4745 8 жыл бұрын

Dude I have the movie on dvd. I have seen it more than 1000 times. Jason isaacs was the main bad guy whose famous quote in the movie was "burn the church, captain". I have been to the sets where they filmed the movie. I know what the fuck I'm talking about, Trinidad Diaz

@anonymousmale2243 8 жыл бұрын

+Evan Demas I meant to insert peter Woodward who is in the patriot and if you have seen it multiple times you would have realized my reference to general cornwallis's second in command. I can see getting a name wrong but you really considered that it was is issacs? I'm not sure using the fact that you own a dvd qualifies you in anyway as a movie expert. It's on Netflix and blu Rays did come out, I do own the movie as well but I mean the Internet kind of puts the info out there no need to get all intense.

@SenfMeloneeeDTF 7 жыл бұрын

THIS, is the worst documentary I have ever seen in KZfaq about Weapons and of course the Armor of these Guys. WTF

@knightseer7041 6 жыл бұрын

SenfMeloneee you offer complaint but no solution.. be wuiet child

@jeremyjames2643 6 ай бұрын

Ah the medieval knights greatest enemies shrubs!

@lordalastor99 8 жыл бұрын

7:10 Odd because even with blunt weapons, the victim is still going to bleed...

@lerumlae8800 3 жыл бұрын

Well.... you could just use something similar to a molotov cocktail on the knight, his armour would become his biggest problem as he is cooked inside his own armour.

@sixthsphinx1426 5 жыл бұрын

I'm 1:06 in and have heard at least 10 things that I'm pretty sure are inaccurate.

@meowmeow9513 8 жыл бұрын

im surprised no one was hurt. that warhammer spike should have definitely gone through that guys mail and hit him

@7dayspking 7 жыл бұрын

Historical plate and mail would have resisted that strike without penetration, he might have had real mail underneath (although I doubt it.) more likely however they knew how far the spike could penetrate through their costume plate and needed only a soft strike to achieve minimum penetration...so they used the minimum amount of force required.

@Ghosthunter531 3 жыл бұрын

What was the name of this show?

@yousircantknow8987 5 жыл бұрын

Ever hear of a quarterstaff? Knock the rivet off the gorget, end of staff to the larnex.

@mooham8762 Жыл бұрын

He's like a younger more hip Mike loades lol

@TheBalder1111 7 жыл бұрын

0:49 Say hello to the knight

@Vince-tc3eq 7 жыл бұрын

hello to the knight

@tuxedolemon 4 жыл бұрын

13:10 Knight: walks towards guy with the hammer. 13:13 Hammer guy: YEET lol

@apex2000 8 жыл бұрын

could use flamables or bee hive. that wud get in armour gaps.

@eeagleeric 8 жыл бұрын

use a bolass to bind his legs...then whatever to finish him.

@cultofmalgus1310 6 жыл бұрын

Um...a plate armored knight on foot? How about....run????

@nila5482 7 жыл бұрын

Cool video I suggest it don't know if it is true or not but like the way they let you see visuals.

@secutorprimus 6 жыл бұрын

Don't suggest this video, unless you specify that it's so wrong that it's funny.

@wakenbake3316 7 жыл бұрын

holy water sprinkler this is gonna be great#BAKED

@StatiKy. 7 жыл бұрын

Is this supposed to be ironic?

@Account-vx1gf 4 жыл бұрын

13:14 KO

@jesuriah 8 жыл бұрын

The guy in the beginning has an arming sword, and they call it a broadsword...next video.

@lm3244 6 жыл бұрын

Why does he keep making that weird breathing sound. Also why do people still believe in flails, I learned nunchaku fighting and I hurt myself more than my friend. You also need loads of space and have no one but one person to attack you 😂😂

@RikkiTheRose 8 жыл бұрын

arming sword

@Enzo012 8 жыл бұрын

It's Galen! And he's killing people!

@brettjohnson536 8 ай бұрын

13:48 does anyone know what he said there? Haha

@ashsuxballs 4 жыл бұрын

that armor looks like a foam also does he know what’s he doing I think he’s doing the weapons wrong like using theme also armor is supposed to be strong

@user-bq8gd1wj6t 8 жыл бұрын

level 100 colonel

@nicole77hify 7 жыл бұрын

( watches past segment ) WHAT THE HELL HAPPENED TO THE PRIMITIVE BOW ???!!!

@MMXX_CE 7 жыл бұрын

I was thinking that myself.

@rchave 8 жыл бұрын

Embarassing, I lasted less than a minute. That's not a medieval tank, that's some clumsy waddling prat in armour that doesn't appear to fit. Who thinks his "broadsword" is a machete and dry twigs are a vietnamese jungle. Oh, and you kill him by jabbing anything heavy and spiked, like a pollaxe, at his face. But he should do the same to you first- unless he doesn't have a fucking clue, which appears to be the case.

@rchave 8 жыл бұрын

I see what you did there, that was pretty skillful wordplay.

@swissguy101 6 ай бұрын

did they have rent boys in medieval times

@cptmike4593 7 жыл бұрын

i see you

@Wargsy 7 жыл бұрын

There are so many faults with this but what makes me cringe the most even only 5 min in, is that he says a sword or axe can just cut right through mail -_- Someones been watching too many movies or used a Really shitty mail such as butted.

@oldscorp 4 жыл бұрын

I thought the falchion was invented BECAUSE it was shit against armors. Sometimes they used to ban knight killers like pointy swords and so people had to arm themselves with stuff like the falchion. As long as it couldnt kill knights/nobles they were legal. Also no way you can pierce plate with bows/crossbows/stabs , not late period plates at least. Actually nvm this guy is wrong about everything.

@youhell2328 6 жыл бұрын

cause he haves an armor, and a big fucking sword...

@SandmansHate 8 жыл бұрын

3:40 That sword is literally wobbling when he put it in the ground. How is that considered a sword, and not an ornament piece? If you brought that wobbly, weak "Sword" into battle, you would get your ass killed.

@horseman1968 7 жыл бұрын

The medieval portion was interesting but the early man section really just shows than mankind would not have survived as a species given the time frame. I guess that's why it's the "theory" of evolution.

@ihala2141 7 жыл бұрын

horseman1968 actually this video is extremely historicaly unnacurate

@WiseWarriorsPath2 7 жыл бұрын

bro... lol... that is like 20 gauge armor? Try using at least 8 gauge that has been well made and well tempered. Your sword would die. Some armors were fagaysi, but good one including chainmail was impossible unless you had some heavy duty weapons.

@Magnezone962 4 жыл бұрын

Just use fire and run away

@dominicmontecalvo2645 8 жыл бұрын

I think the 6:13 is funny though.

@myster.ejones1306 5 жыл бұрын

Er Opposable Thumbs? You could be 'Brainier' than Kurt Kohbain's garage ceiling but if you can't pick stuff up what's the point? You're just 'high I.Q. lunch' 😊 P.S. have a sub ☺

@darrenleroy 8 жыл бұрын

It's fucking Ade Edmonson.

@seapeoplesdidnothingwrong1307 7 жыл бұрын

watch real people fighting as knighs. m1 knight fighting

@menschzweiterklasse4000 7 жыл бұрын

GODEN TAG!!! this sounds so stupid to me as a german. but he pronounces Ahlspieß correct.

@gertelt 7 жыл бұрын

im flemish and its goedendag, at least he tried eh Xd

@winterdhamers1887 5 жыл бұрын

BELGIUM!!!!!

@Simon-iv5xz 6 жыл бұрын

Why would you use this? The host doesn't know shit about medieval combat, and the writers don't either, nor does the people who deal with supplies. they used butted mail in stead of actual rivited mail to see how it would endure against weapons, which is the same as using plastic foil as the windshield for a spaceshuttle. the plate "armour" they used is made of stainless steel, which is good for kitchen equipment, but simply useless for armour. I could go on, but then i'd just waste all my time typing..

@devinalexandria497 8 жыл бұрын

you don't hold the sword by the blade...

@Skullnaught 8 жыл бұрын

Look up the technique " Mordstreich" the cross guard would be used to pierce plate armour since a sword can't cut it easily

@thensho 8 жыл бұрын

well, i quess some poeple just find everything weird

@rocketbossgiovanni2325 7 жыл бұрын

Its not Gudendag its Gutentag

@edwardrh8800 5 жыл бұрын

FIND SOME GAP IN THE BREASTPLATE?!?!?!? WHAT SORT OF PLATE IS THAT!!! XD THIS SHIT IS A COMPLETE AND UTTER JOKE!! WHAT THE HECK

@mike112769 8 жыл бұрын

There is a surprising number of ancient weapons experts in this comment section. (rolls eyes)

@7dayspking 8 жыл бұрын

+mike112769 There's a surprising amount of information available, a reasonable amount of pieces, especially from the renaissance period and dozens of manuscripts/treatises. Well more than enough information that even a layman could easily correct this nonsense.