USA sanctions that other nations are bullied or cowed into agreeing with. After all, if they don't... it could be THEM subjected to USA sanctions or invasions.

Yes, neither China, India and other BRICS nations pay any heed to the 'international sanctions.'

your on u tube criticising that ? are you serious ? so the west isnt international ? what are you actually talking about ?

I would prefer, "worldwide, near universal sanctions."

International means between at least two nations, not ALL nations.

Man this is best looking toy i seen so far

Almost as big a Zelenskis nose coke shovel

flying washing machines

You are mistaken. This is a converted washing machine lol

Oh, didnt you learn from all the other propaganda projects of russia, that went nowhere. Where are the T14 Armatas? Oh yes, russia cant mass produce them.

I dunno man, looks like a Wish version of things the US has been making for years now.

@@-FAFO- Only in your degenerate under age mind.

​@@-FAFO- USA also has been producing JDAMs far before FAB with UMPK came around yet the UMPK bombs has an accuracy more than 95% on a battle proven ground yet the supposedly superior JDAMs US sent have only 35% chances of hitting caused by relentless jamming and GPS hacking, the only thing russia havent jam is the ATACMS which i admit is the biggest threat ukraine poses right now poses

​@@-FAFO- But more reliable and much cheaper, чем ваши уже закрытые проекты - джаст поверь, бро! ))

​@@g.u.t.s1467 for sure.. 😂

Yes, washing machine jokes coming from the same hypocrites who beg Russia to take and bring back their so-called astronauts to/from space... hahahah

Until the "game changer" gets destroyed in battle by a missile/tank round.

@@Glory_of_Glory_man They are not even able to shoot down ordinary KH-101 with the patriot system. Why do you think they have more luck with a real stealth plane.

@@Glory_of_Glory_man it's true, last time they tried to take down a kh-101 they took down a childrens hospital and blamed it on the russians as usual. Their money is fungible with the assets destroying schools daily after all..

@@marvin902x lamo!

Che cosa vuoi dire . Non si capisce un tubo. Perchè scrivi a coppola di minghia?

nope

Everybody knows, but nobody accept

Saw it fly along wiht the Su-57. The jet that many people claim it only for show.

Russia definitely has the upper hand in Ukraine. What a bad joke that turned out to be for USA/NATO. USA needs to stop playing "world police" because most of the world's population objects to USA sanctions and invasions of other nations.

@@Benz2533 22 are operational and delivered to the Russian army so far. Another 8 or 10 by the end of this year. Although I live in the West, I no longer listen to media fairy tales that only serve to humiliate the rest of the planet earth.

Russia also has all the metals, including rare earths: extraction, refining, and processing/forming.

Russia never used foreign engines in military aircrafts. You may be thinking of sukhoi superjet, not SU-57. SU-57 had two versions of AL-41, both local.

The opposite of U.S.A🤣 China makes American's weapons. The Republicans love cheap labor. The Democrats love new voters. Bye Bye Miss American pie

But they can't make high performance CPU chips.

hahaha without western tech modern russia wouldnt even exist.

You think there’s no corruption in the Soviet arms industry? 😆😂🤣

@@sirrathersplendid4825 arms industry in russia is state owned. explain me, how corruption works in that case?- paying politicians to approve high spending on overpriced weapons. who pays them? people, they put into charge? arms idustry in the west owns state. :D

@@flpmlks5181 - As in any state-owned enterprise, money just disappears between the cracks in the floorboards. If you don’t want to believe it happens in Russia, just look at China. Tower blocks get built from tofu dregs because the bosses ‘repurpose’ the concrete to build themselves mansions.

​​@@flpmlks5181state owned...suppliers aren't dumbass...

@@sirrathersplendid4825 its almost none, as with such a small budget Russia is capable of being ahead of US with its 750 blns

From impartial assessments, Russia has a 5- 10 year lead in electronic warfare, logistics skills, tactical skills, industrial military complex, self sufficiency in metals, rare earths, energy sources, no debt, general military staffing and skills training,

Typical brainwashed MSM human

​@@fastpistonx What is that assessment on EW based on. Given Russia makes thst claim yet never backs it with substantial evidence. Not to mention Russia is notorious for logistics. Simply looking at the ammo storage methods is obvious. They're still loading 122 mm rockets in wooden crates, each of which need to be handloaded. As opposed to NATO using preloaded modules on their M142s, M270s, and derivatives.

@@KSmithwick1989 and that is comparison that should lead us to any objective conclusion? 65 blns Russia's udget against 900 blns USA and Russia has better air defence systems, Russia has hypersonic weapons and higher production rates, much higher not only than US but the whole NATO. It is 2 years against ~mln regular army supported by NATO money, sattelites, intelligence services, mercenaries, instructors and weapons and Russia has Crimea, the whole Azov sea, 150 thousands of square km of Ukraine territory, which is 75% of Novorussia. Compare this to US and NATO, who been for 20 years in AFghan to beat taliban, who took control over country a week before NATO ran away from there. They been bombing Syria for 4 years and ISIS numbers and territory control only grew, while Russia came and finished them in 1 year. Under all the sanctions Russia became #1 economy in Europe. Now Russia is building new world order with BRICS. Yeah, i think Russia has always had the upper hand!

@@KSmithwick1989 And how exactly is that working out for NATO on the battlefield?, which is where it counts. NATO is doomed.

"that the S-70 will be a game changer on the battlefield..." Not sure about that though... It might have ended like the "game changer" Abrams and leopard tanks on the other side of the conflict...

It would be interesting if they did an "Exposé "on the US drones. (Sarcasm!)

​@@TankMasterGo 50 ročné F- 16 ?

​@@jozefmalik8443 Indeed

​@@jozefmalik8443 That's right brother 👊

LOL !!HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHA6 IF THEY ARE LUCKY IT WILL BE FLYING IN 2035 ?? AHHAAHAHAH !@ IT IS GOING TO BE A PIECES OF SHIT 💩💩 MADE BY CLOWNS🤡🤡

Экзектли, йоупта! ) 💪😎👍

cocaine powered airship

Coincidence

QAnon ?

No it's just Q we are Anon ! And just wait when Trump gets into office this war will end and there will be peace❤❤

You have to understand the truth. The against RF in Ukraine is personal. Putin is threatening their supply of girls, coke, pharmaceuticals, $$$

Quieter ISN'T important in battle, stealth is. This drone obviously has none of that, example: The engine is sticking out of the back.

@@Glory_of_Glory_mannato Propaganda

@@alexanderjason434 Agree, it seems impossible to me the US hasn't used this conflict to test out their radar penetrating capabilities with their "magic bullets". And probably found it severely lacking, together with only 29 - 60% airworthiness, and with sanctions policies disrupting supply lines, (probably making building new ones twice or thrice as expensive), deemed unsustainable to continue that strategy. If the conclusion was anything else we'd have seen a lot more chest thumping and self congratulating behavior.

​​@@denarjan US is likely worried their magic bullet equipment would be destroyed or even worse captured by Russia to be studied cause they were never tested against the tech of a near peer adversary, that would not only hurt sales and reputation of US equipment but also potentially give Russia valuable information on how to counter US.

@@denarjan U.S weapons come with an overrate price and sales pitch. Only proven somewhat effective against poor defenceless countries. Against a peer military like Russia's not so much.

silly comment

@@UserUnkown-do1ji Of course it is. Duh...

Aké čipy sú v práčkach ?

Yes, and they had spin circle microchips

You are absolutely correct, and if you think NATO doesn’t know this you’re delusional. As for swarms Russia doesn’t have enough to have a gaggle, let alone a swarm. I’d doubt it’s even that stealthy considering that it has a great big engine hanging out of its rear end.

@@Monkey-ud8bw training of AI for swarms operations starts with 2-3 working together. This is only the beginning. On another hand NATO may know this, but apparently the NAFO fanboys do not know or are not permuted to say so by the people who are controlling them - thing 3 letter organization...

@@Monkey-ud8bw and they look like shovels, it's a scam, sabotage.

@@Monkey-ud8bw "You doubt". I'm sure that upsets the Russians.

@@RickBlaine I agree, I also doubt that some random on YT giving their opinion is something that they would get upset about. Considering they are throwing men’s lives away by the thousands, my opinion is nothing.

It's a knockoff from an old American drone.

@@Glory_of_Glory_man cry more

LOL @! YOU ALL BETTER START EATING CHEERIOS CEREALS EVERY DAY.. ??@ NEVER WILL THAT HAPPEN RUSSIA IS 50 YEARS BEHIND , CHINA 25 YEAR LOL @@

I’m so scared 😂😂😂😂😂 those two “territories” couldn’t fight their way out of an outhouse. Let me know if you want to know what an outhouse is 😂😂😂😂

@@Glory_of_Glory_man Which make and model of drone is it a knockoff of?

just like what they say about the T-90 and SU 57

​@@Ghost12561 west has given ukrops several hundred billions and yet ukrops keep losing ground. Cope harder.

@@Ghost12561we never said that about those vehicles but Abrams and F-16 were called but failed.

@@Ghost12561 and T-14 Armata ...

That is not really important with Russian planes, maneuverability and speed are its virtues and they will always rely on that. Russian planes are not designed to be invasion devices that operate at remote points in the world like the American ones, but to be close to or under the umbrella of their powerful anti-air defenses.

You're wrong. Look to the Second Test prototype photos, they are available. It has the flat nozzle already. It is not crucial for a subsonic aircraft which the S-70 is, but very crucial for a supersonic aircraft (reduce of thrust by 18%-24%)...

They solved the problem on the newest iteration of the SU-57 with it's new engines. So I think they maybe already have a solution for the S70. The video here shows only the prototype, so changes in the production model are still possible.

That's been long resolved.

​@@marvin902x Really, Su-57M hasn't entered production. Not to out Su-57 has been flying with a stand-in engine for decade is pretty bad. China had the same issue with J-20. It was flying around with the WS-10. Which a horrible powerplant for a fighter, because it's a high by-pass design meant for airliners. Based on the French-American CMF56.

Lots of shovels left, the poor Russians that were holding them are now cannon fodder for the rich Russians in the Ukrainian.

Easily. You’re talking about a country with an intact industrial base not gutted like western countries I think your concerns apply far more to NATO countries 3 explosions in the last few months at weapons facilities said to be due to surging production passed what they were made to take USA and UK doctrine was always to create low yields of ultra advanced weapons the private MIC and political sell out of industry means that production is snail pace

@@off6848 Russia's industrial base wasn't intact even before they invaded Crimea. They are functionally a 3rd world resource extraction economy that also has with nukes. Their only really thriving industry is resource extraction and that was only brought online again with MASSIVE help from western firms who have now left. You call the US industrial base "gutted" because you don't understand what an industrial base IS. You think it's factories and raw materials and energy. That's obsolete thinking. What makes an industrial base work is PEOPLE. Not, brute labor mind you, SKILLED labor, TRAINED labor, ADAPTABLE labor. The KEY thing that makes the Russian economy NOT a "intact industrial base" is a profound lack of SKILLED PEOPLE. The Soviet education system for technical ans scientific training (we're talking about the equivalent of graduate engineering programs, trade schools here) collapsed for what can only be described as 'Soviet Reasons' in the mid 1980s... insofar as the Soviets replaced it with anything it was just ideological indoctrination, and it was never repaired or replaced in the 30 years since the fall of the USSR. What this means in 2024 is that if a person is all both of the following: (1) Russian, and (2) Can be described as any kind of "engineer", they are either 65 years old or older, or they are foreign trained. The 65+ cadre are aging out and retiring. The younger cadre are mostly no ideologically aligned with Putin, and HAVE OPTIONS. (At a minimum they speak a foreign language well enough to pass classes in that language, have a non-Russian and therefore internationally acceptable degree, and have contacts amongst their former class mates and professors outside Russia.) These younger Russian engineers are LEAVING RUSSIA overwhelmingly. The above failure of the Russian technical training system is further compounded by the fact that Russia is in demographic free-fall. There are more 60 year old than 50 year old, more 50 year old than 40 year old, more 30 year olds than 20 year olds... Even before they started leaving there weren't that many young Russians to begin with! This lack of skilled cadre can be seen everywhere in recent Russian military and civilian failures. Look at the drone-attacks on refineries... these refineries are going down down days, weeks, even in some cases months! These drone attacks are not THAT devastating! They should be coming back online in minutes or hours vs most of these attacks. They aren't because the people manning them are PROFOUNDLY under-trained. Why? Because all of the skilled people are being pulled into work more critical to the war effort. Nope, if Russia hadn't inherited the Soviet Nukes, we would just regime change them like any other failed state that becomes a nuisance.

On Field If you have the upper hand by Cruise missiles, artillery, Air & masses You can Test your stuff ON FIELD

Out the melted ice of New Swabia 😂

Didnt help the F115 from getting shot down?

Look to the second test prototype of the S-70, the photos are available. It has the flat nozzle already. It is not crucial for a subsonic aircraft, but very crucial for a supersonic. The flat nozzles reduce thrust by 18-24% for the same engine with circular nozzles. Tested & proven!

Too small for anti missle devices like flares you think?

Yes. It needs a large air bypass to allow cooler airflow to shroud the exhaust and reduce the exhaust temperature.

IR missiles are short range. Enemy aircraft dead before that

and that looks like german horten. it seems aerodynamics work everywhere the same :D

Different purposes

Iran drone are very low tech , low flight great for overwhelming air defence systems so they waste $1,00,000 missiles on $20,000 drones

It can also wash and dry clothes at formidable speed.

Qual'è il soggetto. Chi è che dovrebbe chiedere aiuto?

For what…how to build a better junk😂😂😂😂

China knows better because USA will sanction them.

How do you know? Are you an expert?

@@isaacomole9527 it is not stelthy to have probes poking out

​@@isaacomole9527He's done research. Have you? No such thing as 100% stealth.

@@aachoocrony5754 What research? Where? When? Evidence? Links? Nothing? Just "trust me bro" gibberish... 🤣

@@pictograph err no, obviously he knows things. You've done zero. Absolutely no impact when you read his comment which made a very good point.

You also must be amazed by all those Chinese and Korean rectangular phones. Must be stolen apple designs

Psst 🤫..... this is a russian channel pretending being neutral 😅

14000 sanctions