gotta agree, those grips on the m12 batteries make some of them a little hard to pull out of tools

Thanks for showing there new stuff

Rustbelt Mechanic Thank you for another Great Video. That's good news 👍 Again thank you

Nice! That's a nice percentage of gain in power. 😎👍🇺🇸

I want to see what cells they use on them i have a bunch of xc 6.0 gone bad, cells will not get charged properly and causing it not to work

Wonder how the 3ah cp compares to the 2.5 ho, same form factor. Thats what’s really interesting, a true apples to apples comparison

I'd like to see the difference between the HO/XC 5.0 vs. the XC 6.0. I think the XC 6.0 will still do better!

Run cooler...? I never had a problem with heat on a daily use

Hey man i know you've left the dealer and came back a couple of times how long to Chrysler certifications last time wise? Going back to the dealer and cant remember how long certs last.

You should set up an Amazon “store front” with all the different stuff you recommend. Nice convenient all in one place

when are you gonna post again? And what happened to mcbake and you guys at the dealership.

I seen they have not listened about one complaint with their ratchets,still use the paddle trigger.I hate the paddle trigger,lines and wires got in the way and this has happened to me a few times.Need to get rid of it

if they can make a 12v compete with 20V, but not make a Sick 20v that blows everything else away? Smaller sht is going to break

lol, and people cried their brains out over Flex's "rigged" comparisons. And here Milwaukee is doing much the same stuff with a bunch misleading marketing BS. A 18/20V 2.0 Ah battery has 36 Wh or ~2/3 the fuel tank of a 5.0 Ah M12 battery. 36 vs 54 Wh. Now take 64 holes divided by 2/3 (or multiply by 1.5x) and you have 96 so both batteries are normalized to their respective capacities. So Milwaukee gained all of 4 fucking holes on a mid-range Dewalt impact driver that was released 6 years ago. edit: double LMAO @ the circular saw comparison. 186 x 1.25x = 232.5, a whopping .006% increase over an XC 4.0 when you figure the # of cuts per Wh available. And on one of the most demanding tools in the entire platform. That's just a basic runtime increase, nothing to indicate any realized gains from "higher" outputs from the cells, other than the extra Ah, obviously. Milwaukee's killing it by rebranding 18650 cells they've used in the M18 XC 5.0 batteries for the past 5+ years as high output. All to sell more batteries to dumdums who treat their power tools like a lifestyle brand. They'll buy these up in droves thinking these batteries are significantly better than the XC 6.0s they already own. And not a single thought put into the fact that Milwaukee intentionally avoids the 3.0/6.0s throughout all this wanketeering because it would've undermined the entire marketing push.

Something fishy here. All their claims are in percentages, which are relative only. They don't quote ANY real numbers.