World of Warships is better.

Na bruv, World of Tanks Blitz is better.

Ok

One "performance mod" I am really interested in is the Level Of Detail (LOD) mod Distant Horizons - as well as similar mods. I don't currently use them because it's a tiny bit buggy, and I can't really use it on the server I play on, but It solves a very overlooked issue with minecraft and it's render distance. You can build up to the newer, taller build limit but you still can't see something far away unless you have an insane computer (and / or server computer). it would be cool if these mods got a bigger spotlight and potentially had more people interested in advancing that topic

Gamer Moment ™

yes

It could also double as a parity fix update for java and bedrock

@@t00nedd00d since bedrock is getting a UI redesign,hopefully java gets a similar treatment

@@darealepic this is like the 8th time bedrock got a UI redesign

@Arrow Dynamics Inc. I wish it had some of Terraria's QoL features like sorting chests and inventory, auto stacking to nearby chests, and block replacement. There's probably a ton of mods to add that, though.

Another awesome performance mod I found is called starlight. It rewrites the light engine of Minecraft, and it boosts FPS. (but it does not work with Phosphor. But it's better than Phosphor. So choose starlight over Phosphor)

Does iris work with starlight?

@@trashtrash2169 yes!

@@h-crab2082 starlight actually doesn't boost fps but has a negative effect over phosphor to them because since chunks are able to load much faster, the rendering engine chokes more (although sodium greatly reduces this issue)

@@kyonas6047 This can happen - Optifine achieves its goals by messing with the game and completely changing the way it works while doing barely any optimizations (e.g. they lower render distance but tell you all the chunks are rendered) Sodium doesn't change any noticeable mechanics at all. Also play around with the settings in sodium for a while to get the most out of it.

thinking when oxygen will be released 🤔

@@A7iler imagine the calcium mod.

@NixInTheWay lol

@@A7iler that could be a cool client or shader name

@NixInTheWay The Obamium Mod 😳😳😳

I heard that having a lot of item frames also drops your FPS. I hope there will be a mod for that too.

Instead, I would recommend Enhanced Block Entities (EBE). It optimizes entities other than chests, like ender chests, shulker boxes, bells, and signs. And it keeps the chest animations as well.

So like chests in alpha

Yeah but on other devices, its laggy still.

@Gomam0n my 3000g (over clocked) runs mc at 40 fps lol I have a 16 gb ram tho

By Notch, you're right It's been 12 years already way to make me feel old dude xD

@Gomam0n I am using i7-4770s And I can get 50 fps with shaders so.. Might be somethin else

I wish they were on forge though, 1.18 performance drops drastically with a few mods and while optifine does help, it doesn't necessarily do much. Optifines critical performance options like fast render and render regions are also incompatible with mods like mekanism and immersive engineering (which tends to cause alot of opengl errors and causes many things like wires to disappear) with those two options enabled.

I would rather people skip part of the video they don't want instead of leave. Not all that many people skipped it though lol. I only lost 5% of the total audience watching the video to that entire segment. It's funny... because that's the section where I lost the fewest amount of people.

@@AntVenom that's some crazy viewer retention. props bud, great content. keep this up, I cant afford a new graphics card so you just allowed me to use shaders in 1440p for the first time with these super neat tricks :D

Last I checked, the main reason people still use forge is for massive modpacks, which due to forge's better stability work much better there I've tried a custom fabric modpack, and things just broke randomly that shouldn't have maybe i did something wrong, maybe it's gotten better in the last year and a half, but that's the main drawback as far as I know

@@waldotheranger3987 I believe your issue with "stability" is because Forge basically includes a huge framework for stuff like energy transfer, item capabilities etc. whereas Fabric is only the mod loader itself, and optionally a set of hooks into the game. you need something like Cardinal Components API to mimic the item capabilities that come with Forge itself, and different mods could use different implementations of these. The Fabric modding scene is just relatively immature at the moment, because of "Forge's stability" as you say. The general public just believes that Forge is better for large modpacks, which makes it a self-fulfilling prophecy. IMHO, wider adoption of Fabric will eventually turn the tables, but that hasn't happened just yet.

@@LoganDark4357 Fair enough. I didn't know about things like the api you mentioned.

fabric and forge imo both have strengths and weaknesses, where fabric is easier to use on lower end pc's and can help make the game run better, forge is more stable with bigger modpacks, yes, forge is older, but it also has more experienced devs, in my honest opinion fabric is more for performance mods than full on giant mod packs, on top of such some devs HATE Fabric for splitting the modding scene, which also fulfills the self fulfilling prophecy of "Fabric Bad"

@@thatonecrazykobold1729 lmao?

Uh hi, haven't been really into MC for a few years now(1.2.5 to the one right before aquatic), I follow it kinda closely, is something not cool about forge? I remember it being the only real way to use mods for a few years, but then I stopped using mods so I don't follow stuff enough to know what happened to them?

@@JFTSwiertz Forge is still around and kicking. As of now it's still the dominant modding platform for Java, Fabric however is a "lighter" platform that is less resource demanding than Forge, which is why many people prefer it, instead.

@@JFTSwiertz Forge is still great, with mods still being released for it, but apparently Fabric is easier to code for(?) so newer mod developers prefer making their mods for that modloader. There are some really cool mods that are Fabric only, but other mod developers sometimes port Fabric mods over to Forge, or they make similar mods for Forge

I just want to know if these support connected textures and randomized mobs like optifine does

@@lifebeforedeath1788 There's separate fabric mods for that, don't know about forge though

Isnt Optifabric discontinued?

@@boredplayer7425 i think because of this very reason

@@boredplayer7425 last version I saw them pump out was 1.18.2 and its always been very picky about what other mods you have, specifically the version of fabric that you have

@@TheGreenPig321MC 1.18.2 was released a few weeks ago though? Unless you are talking about snapshots which I kinda get at why some developers don't outright support it since it's still a snapshot and won't be as predictable to code.

Compatibility with other mods isn't a strong suit of Fabric in general as it treats everything as a mixin.

Yea starlight is better

Yea, starlight is better since its just a new light engine that is better,except if you're doing light suppression, starlight is the way to go

+1 for starlight, amazing mod!

Wait so what does iris do if phosphor handles shaders? And do any of the mods have zoom functionality like optifine? Edit: also what about light items emitting light when held or dropped

@@RedstoneManiac3 Phosphor and Starlight handle a vanilla light engine overhaul, while iris handles support for different lighting profiles that can add shadows, reflections, and more. If you want light emitting items, you can use the LambDynamicLights mod.

I love that concept such a fundamental game design thing in so many other games, just not possible in minecraft cause of the way the world works, until a madman decided to vanquish it in epic coding battle

I use that mod as well. Completely changed my minecraft experience, especially with biome mods.

Best mod for big sky block worlds. You can juts see your whole base at once. Cant wait for its future updates

A must have mod for me on servers with very low render distance cap.

No, the LODs don't replace distant blocks it adds ontop of them so if you have like 12 render distance the lod's will be over it meaning you will only render more, not to mention that the LOD mod is so laggy when generating LODs.

@@UltimateSpiderMan They do replace distant blocks, from nothing render to less rendered. Aka how most games work.

Still really buggy

@@UltimateSpiderMan Not on the nightly build, the lag is much better.

Well muticonnect sounds awesome.

I'd also add OK Zoomer to the list to bring back Optifine's "press C to zoom" functionality. It lets you configure the zoom level too by scrolling while zoomed, which is amazing.

@@TheAppleFreak Ah yes Iforgot to mention that. I like that mod too.

LambDynamicLights is really only necessary if you play without shaders, as most shader's I've seen used (SUES, Continuum, BSL, Complimentary...) have dynamic hand lights already incorporated. THAT BEING SAID, playing with no shaders? Yeah DEF need Lamb.

I'd like to add miniHUD and all the other Malilib mods :)

that was the old mojang

@@randomkid8999 nope adding a small feature like smooth lighting is easy but adding all of the performance mods

Why do you have my same type of computer from the 2007?

@@kierdev4429 I had the same laptop in 2017 xd I'm poor 🥲

better minecraft is the best modpack fr

and use every mod

OptiFine """team""" It was a single developer all along

@@arseny2003 TL;DR There's no Optifine team. There's an Optifine guy.

@@GumSkyloard I appreciate that you're trying to help but it's not really TL is it

@@turboslayer7417 Yeaah, that's fair, you've got a point there.

@@GumSkyloard optifine man

Minecdaft

Also be sure to add more than the def 2 gigs of ram. 2 gigs make it absolutely unplayable at times.

@@TriflingToad but not more than 8 gigs

@@commander3494 minecraft has a minimum requirement of 10 ghz single core performance and 128 gb of ECC ram at 9600 mhz

@@commander3494 8gb is only playable when using a metric ton of mods, anyways. If you are playing mostly vanilla, use 4gb

I personally prefer MiniHUD over Light Overlay, as the overlay that MiniHUD provides is a bit chonkier and plays nicer with various shaders that LO struggles with. Also provides super useful stuff like user configurable shape renderers that use can use as guides for building various structures (boxes, spheres, cylinders, and most useful for a technical player are mob spawning spheres)

NO no no and no! Multithreading is NOT the magic solution that everyone makes it be! To quote a developer on JellySquid's discord server: "trying to multithread minecraft is like trying to use 9 women to create a baby in one month" Using multiple cores is a hard task that cannot be thrown at any problem. Currently, minecraft has the lighting engine, the world generator, the chunk builder and more ALREADY MULTITHREADED. Yes, Sodium does increase the amount of things that can be done with threads and there for sure is a way to improve it on the base game, but most of the optimisation comes from rewriting and use of modern feature, as well as just writing different faster code with clever algorithms and such, and not just throwing more threads at the problem. Please stop spreading these beliefs

sorry if I appeared rude, that was not my intent

There’s a mod called multithreaded dimensions iirc, which is completely vanilla except it breaks sand duping. This does not help with fps, but does with server performance if you need that. As first name last name said, multithreading won’t help with fps.

This is what happens when people who don't know how multithreading works try to talk about multithreading

Vanilla DOES run on multiple threads, just not all parts of it. The game would be unplayable by ANY means if it wasn’t multithreaded.

Only for server admins. If you play singleplayer Phosphor is better. Starlight has a readme explaining why but basically the game relies on light engine lag - stuttering more without it.

@PixelElectronX so it boils down to "do you need paper or fabric", aka plugins or mods

@@lystraeus- What about players on a server. Or do the mods (Phosphor/Starlight) not matter for them?

@@pandozmc In the end, the players download the pre-rendered light-data from the server, so no. In the end they get the same or a very similar result with no additional cost to the player as the server has to calculate that.

ADD ALL SHADERS AND ADD CUBIC CHUNKS

Glad to draw more attention to the detail that can never be unseen.

Moment of silence for all who play on 2 render distance.

Crazy, I HATE those things. Crazy how much people can have differing (but totally valid) opinions on things

Did you check which you minecraft is using, because it sometimes uses the integrated graphics by default

@@Batcow153 holy cow you're right! Thanks a ton!

@@cde3003 no problem

@@Batcow153 my laptop only has integrated graphics,can I get really good or atleast stable FPS in normal survival with this modpack?

@@darealepic yez

hi nova

@@moe14lord 🥭

I'm not a speedrunner so I apologize for not understanding; Why not the latest version? Wouldn't you want to try to get the fastest time while dealing with all of the new challenges and techniques that later versions bring?

@@mangoman7455 no. there are different splits for different sections of versions. in the case of any% rsg, the category i play, theres pre-1.9, 1.9-1.15, and 1.16+, with 1.9-1.13 being unofficially considered a category in its own right by some but not really recognized. while by no means objective, these categories are defined based on different routes viable due to the game features and mechanics at their respective times. the 1.16+ any% rsg split is the fastest, but the vast, vast majority of runners play on 1.16.1 because it’s the same category as newer versions as the route isn’t really fundamentally different, however in 1.16.2 ender pearl rates were nerfed and piglin brutes were added to bastions, making the category much slower on average, rng-dependent, and more painful. getting into later versions you see the removal of ocean exposed strongholds and planar fog (which allows for better visibility) in 1.17, the removal of the ability to lower render distance below 5 as well as digdowns into strongholds taking way longer, magma ravines being removed and other ways of entering the nether becoming more rare in 1.18, and the removal of the ability to raise gamma (which for accessibility purposes can legally be changed to up to 5.0 in the options.txt file) above 1 and the changing of eye of ender mechanics in 1.19, as well as probably other stuff that i forgot. all of this is slow and quite painful to run, i’ve seen plenty of people do it for stuff like challenges where you have to beat every version of minecraft, or just because that’s what was available on a server or it was the newest version, and it’s not as viable. and if you don’t find it either fast or fun, there’s not much of a point in speedrunning it not to mention playing versions before 1.16 allows for more variety as the optimal routes are different and for some people more fun. for example while i was running 1.7 at the time, in which the main unique strategy is to construct a tower to quickly refresh mob spawns with spawning/despawning radius mechanics and filter out the endermen for pearls. i got a sub-30 which isn’t a great time but it’s definitely alright, so i decided to move on for a bit, and i am currently running 1.15, which has its own optimal routes as well as a bunch of other routes that people do for fun sometimes even though they’re slower, and most of these routes are based around acquiring emeralds and trading them with villagers for pearls. hopefully that clears things up. but basically no, older versions have different strategies and viable routes, whether it’s because of different game mechanics enabling them or because of other features not existing yet. technically in 1.18+, while it’s extraordinarily rare, you can spawn in the stronghold ring and not have to either travel through the nether or long distances on foot to get to the stronghold so you know what, if you managed to reset for that and eventually get a high level 1.16+ time with it, go for it, maybe they’d make it a category :) (and even then it would probably be much less popular because newer versions after 1.16 are increasingly painful to speedrun, which with how specific some of the changes i listed are, i very much suspect is deliberate on mojang’s part)

@@mangoman7455 that being said though, to clarify, newer versions do offer unique routes and requirements that have led to splits in other categories ranging from all advancements to all logs, and while not as popular as many versions up to and including 1.16 because of some generally slow game mechanics, people do definitely run these versions somewhat competitively for these categories. for any% though, with your goal being to kill the dragon and enter the end portal hence triggering the game credits as fast as possible, your best bets are probably somewhere in the 1.7-1.16 range of versions

ill have to check this out too, i love mutlimc. and sometimes wish for a launcher which can help me update mods.

afaik polymc doesn't update mods it only adds a ui to download them

@@pectacular like does it show which ones need updating? thats all im asking for lol

@@pectacular with which i thought you can update the mods you already installed by replacing them. Correct me if i am wrong though, because I haven't played in a while.

@@CorporateColonel no, as Pectacular said above your comment, it has a UI to download mods, with which I think I've updated sodium in the past. It's just easier than going to modrinth and manually downloading it. I just check it out once in a while or look into the github repo

No lol Even Minecraft not amazing optimization The switch would still cry

bro you didn't even watch it, vid was out 2 minutes before your comment 😂

Looks like complementary reimagined.

The aurora style looks like unbound to me.@@legendisfoot

It isn't optimized fot anythinv

It's built on java and uses open gl as it's renderer, two VERY bad decisions for performance

the 1.15 was dedicated to that but the community didn't like how there wasn't many new addtions

Yeah, it really fits the style of Minecraft! With the Luna client it is a headache to see the cosmetics

Idk how I feel about there being a mod with micro transactions. I already hate the multiplayer scene in Minecraft for the same reason, the idea of it seeping into single player on modded Java makes me, well, very uncomfortable

@@Zepimo123 its just cosmetics lol

@@PRO_OF_MC that's the exact same excuse AAA companies use and look where we are now. The statement that it's "just cosmetic" takes away the fact that people who play a game still want to 1, look cool, and 2, can be bullied because of what they lack of in terms of in-game cosmetics. Micro transactions are micro transactions and they are at the core of what's wrong with the current gaming landscape. And to see them seep into community made mods to already existing games (that are not free btw) is, well disgusting and should be looked down upon. Minecraft has grown to a point where so much of the community try to nickle and dime their own sub communities. Pay to win SMP servers, paid mods, paid shaders, paid resource packs, paid maps. Adding microtransactions (micro is a loose term, no in game cosmetic should cost 20$ especially in a mod for an existing game) Not to mention it's tied to a central server, so whenever this unofficial, non sanctioned MOD is eventually pulled, people will have lost money over "cosmetics" Claiming it's "just cosmetic" is letting this greed and corruption have more a foot hold on the gaming industry. The idea of Minecraft being a game where you express your creativity by customizing the game (down to the features with mods) is being exploited here with "cosmetics" and yet, you and so many other defenders of the cosmetic store in bedrock, are perfectly fine with spending ludicrous amounts of money on valueless models. I'm going to call out AntVenom here for being endorsed by this mod, as he in the past called out Mojang for creating the exact same thing in Bedrock. You people who defend this utter trash make me sick. Every single microtransaction defender is a blind ignorant moron.

@@Zepimo123 bro not everyone has essential its just a cosmetic istg yall think way to deep who cares about that you can literally install other mods and get it for free like it doesnt matter u just find anything to shit on beacuse you go "wawawa big company make cosmetic" you probably cry about google selling data too

Well tbf at one point they wanted to basically incorporate optifine...like they did with horses in 1.6....but the optifine devs shot it down.

@@hanro50 And the devs who made the mods AREN'T optifine devs, not all devs are the same.

@@SpooktubeDeluxe fair, I wanted to add that the chances of the devs allowing Mojang to add the improvements are higher.

@@SpooktubeDeluxe what do you mean by this?

@@hanro50 is it known why they shot it down?

You should check out this modpack called Fabulously Optimized. It prob has all the mods uv listed above and a lot more.

Ads???

@@kingx1180 bedrock ads like off platform twitter stuff, ads on xbox dashboard, marketplace button thingy, ads in addon selector, in-game notifications (I've not experienced this myself but have heard about it), skineditor thing has ads, etc.

@@gabeyherr i never seen ads ingame what the hell are you talking about?

@@kingx1180 supposedly when new partnership stuff is released on marketplace, anyone who is currently playing mc bedrock at the time will get a ingame notification

pi edition lmao

It is crazy indeed, I managed to run it using a vanilla render distance of 4 and a mod render distance of 256 with no issue, and it even looked good. I also recommend it. Another mod that does the same would also be Far Plane 2.

@@sangeloo Yeah but far plane two doesn't support 1.18, and it makes distant terrain look as TRIANGLES, which distant horizons makes it look as CUBES, which is more Minecraft-ish... so I would recommend distant horizons...

@@priyanshbhardwaj8091 yeah you're right, just pointed out that it exists for anyone wanting to try out all of these.

14 gb of ram? What are your ram specs for each stick? Your ram might be getting throttled

LiNa