So to be clear: When I say extract remnant, I was slightly mixed up on the Scooper taking out endoskeletons, and yes it injecting remnant is part of Michael coming back. My point still stands that Baby is very aware of how and why she does it, to keep her “dad” alive in some way, and that the other’s realization of this is what causes them to split. Totally valid comments though.

The Silver Eyes even supports the idea of the Spring Bonnie suit protecting William. Whenever he has it on, the souls don't see him as an adult or killer, they just see Spring Bonnie. This is double-downed with what you mentioned in this video. Good stuff.

I always viewed the William going into the suit as a sort of, abused dog seeing a belt or something like that, where William being in the suit would scare the ghosts away reminding them of what happened last time they saw him in that suit, as that would not Only stop Golden Freddy but the other spirits as well But the idea of him using springbonnie the Same way as we use the Freddy Mask in fnaf 2 works too

Never thought about that connection with the FNaF 2 masks and William going for the suit to protect himself, very nice eye. The whole Michael coming back to life thing sounds solid but it's also worth noting that remnant seems to straight up have healing properties as shown in the Tales from the Pizzaplex story "Frailty". ImpulseEvan actually made a pretty good video discussing remnant and how it seems to work.

It's also interesting to me that if the bite victim was (one of the, if not) the first one to die, his fear of "being stuffed into a suit" (from seeing an employee getting help putting a springlock suit on) could have inspired the way William actually killed/hid the bodies of some of the kids later on- especially since it seems the fredbear plush could well be William talking to the crying child/bite victim etc

I still think it makes the most sense to have Evan’s death be first in the timeline, it just hits the perfect dominos that lead to the other early deaths, my personal order is that the MCI happens last of these events, mostly because of William basically losing any bit of sanity after Elizabeth’s death.

I think the reason for Golden Freddy being unable to kill you while you have the mask or tablet up, because they need you see them fully in order to kill your mind and/or drain your sanity. They're somewhat like SCP's pattern screamers

The bite victim being scared of the springlock suits makes so much sense. As a diehard fan, I just never put two and two together as to why he is not scared of anything else related to the Fazbear franchise, but is specifically scared of Fredbear for whatever reason. It’s a great plot point to have the child be in love with the anthropomorphic characters, yet be horrified at the sight of one of them with a human being stuffed inside. Tying that into the quote of his misunderstanding of the situation just brings it all home.

The ''what is seen in shadows line'' effectively confirms BV>Charlie>MCI>Elizabeth order of deaths. If Bite Victim's fears are accounted for elsewhere other than another kid's death(like with the springlock suits) then all the pieces fall into place. BV dies, William kills Charlie in retaliation(I'd assume it's because Henry built those animatronics but I think the Freddy Files contradict that?), kills 5 other kids(give gifts, give life), experiments with remnant and funtimes and then Elizabeth dies. If Charlie or Elizabeth die first then William has no proper motivation for killing Charlie and building funtimes, it's kind of dumb.

I have a question that’s been racking my brain for years! What the hell is the purple glitching Bonnie from the FNAF 3 mini games supposed to represent?!?! I swear I’ve never heard a suitable answer to that. Bonus question: Why was the ghost child in the same mini game hidden slightly out of bounds of the purple barrier & WHY IS HE A DARKER SHADE THEN EVERY GHOST CHILD WE’VE SEEN BEFORE IT?

Circus Baby: "Dont die lol"

How the hell do people think will power is what made Mike stand up?💀💀💀💀💀💀 He literally has remant inside him🗿☠️☠️☠️

Why exactly does Baby want to kill kids? I thought she wasn't happy about the fact that it happened in Sister Location or, even if that's the design quirks hinted towards at the beginning of the game: since when have animatronics wanted to kill children, isn't that specifically something William does?

That first point is slightly contested by the Scooper device injecting remnant, but it's so cool I'll let it slide. It also has interesting implications for if Henry knows the difference or not. 🤔

I never really thought that Micheal got up on his own, and he still is a badass for confronting the mess his father made and living as a corpse. Having some help from his sister doesn't take away anything

Not really a misconception but just something I feel everyone forgets. It was the puppet who put the 5 dead children into the animotronic suits, not william.

3:15 In my opinion in why William puts on the spring Bonnie suit is because he thinks by putting it on it’ll scare the spirits since he used that to lure them and then kill them

Someone else probably already mentioned it, but I don't think Afton was using the spring bonnie suit to "hide" from the spirits like with the mask in FNAF 2. We don't know if he even had to use the mask against Golden Freddy during his time as a guard, and even then, it's an entirely different context. If he wanted to hide from the ghosts, why did he stand up and laugh? It probably would have been more effective to remain slumped in the corner, hoping that the spirits would give up, but he didn't. It looks more like he wants the spirits to know he's in the suit, relying on their trauma keeping them away from the face of their death.

Oh man, I have never realized that Baby made Michael survive, that makes so much more sense and I am not at all disappointed with this knowledge! Coming back through pure willpower alone never made any sense to me, having an actual reason it happened is much better imo!

Ngl, I honestly think you're the best fnaf theorist, you should be way bigger

I don’t like the first two points. The first is pretty solid, but in FNaF 6 we see that the S.C.U.Per injects remnant, which must be why Michael survived. Baby saying ‘You won’t die.’ may just be because she knows this. The second about Golden Freddy is entirely speculation, as we don’t know who is leading the pack. William probably put the suit on because it tricked the children into going into the back room before he killed them, so why wouldn’t it work now? Btw, in one of your points you talked about remnant being extracted from by the S.C.U.Per, but that is incorrect.

Thank you for these explanations, because as someone who hasn't actually played the games I get very confused sometimes when it comes to knowing what information is clear to us directly from the games. (Especially when MatPat won't stop reading passages from Fazbear Frights like it's FNAF scriptures).

I think Cassidy attaching herself to afton isn’t like we think but rather her haunting him for the rest of his life until he dies so she can torment him

one more thing, a HUGE misconception is that the bite of 83 is because of s springlock failure, why would springlocks have anything to do with an animatronic, which, is ALREADY in animatronic mode so the springlocks cannot be used, have to do with crushing a child's head? It makes no sense.

My head canon was that William put the suit on to scare the ghosts away by confronting them with the ladt thing they probally saw in their lifes.

Why is it so hard to figure out that the reason why William puts on the suit against the kid ghosts, is because the last time he saw them, he had the upperhand by being in the suit. In his mind, he WILL have the upperhand against those same souls if he puts it on. In William Aftons mind, the suit gives him power and an advantage. Imagine if someone used your worst trauma against you in a conflict.

Reading your pinned comment, I do agree that it was the Scooper that gave him remnant so he can live, but reading through her dialogue, I don't think she mistaken Michael for William, in the beginning of Night 2, she says she doesn't recognize us and throughout the nights she treats us as a random person. Though with that said, she does tell us we won't die only one other time and it's in the fake ending "You must let us inside, isn’t this why you came here, to be with her again? You won’t die and it will only hurt for a moment.“ with a follow up of Elizabeth saying "I know it was an accident..." "Isn’t this why you came here? To be with me again?" "I don’t understand…" "Everything is okay. I’m still here.". So this leads to you are right Baby/Elizabeth thinks Michael is actually her father trying to save her, but the problem is all these lines come from the Fake ending, so would we still consider the fake ending part of the canon lore? 5:30 Yes handunit does say the closing of Freddy Pizza, but you have to read the rest what he says "it was clear that the stage was set - no pun intended - for another contender in children’s entertainment. Unlike most entertainment venues, -> our robotic entertainers are rented out for private parties

Liz catches that Mike isn’t William in 6 - saying he isn’t who she expected him to be and gloating to him about the purpose Afton gave her by the end as if he’d be unaware or opposed to it - so unless Michael has gone through a second drastic off-screen appearance change from when he was first revived to when he died in 6, it would stand to reason that Baby would either still see him as Will (which she doesn’t) or would’ve never mistook them for one another in the first place. She definitely doesn’t see him as a stranger since she knows Mike is down there to see her specifically in SL. She attempts to murder Michael in 6 and is even low enough to take advantage of his care for her by mimicking her old voice, so his resurrection is likely not due to her non-existent compassion for him.

Not gonna lie when you brought up that quote what is seen in the shadows is easily misunderstood in the mind of a child everything made sense if I was the crying child and I saw someone getting stuffed into a suit I’d think…holy f**k that bear just ate him

It's Funny Overtime Phone Guy ''Talks'' You Can Barely See Foxy In The Background

The only thing that tells me that Charlie dies first is the Fredbear plush, which is most certainly Charlie.

Micheal survives because he is possessing his own corpse which has happened in step closer

one other thing that bothers me is that it is common sense that the withered animatronics before they got withered where those one where the first missing 5 childs got stuffed in BUT at least in the end where they got remaked for the fnaf 1 events should the found inside the suits like human bones or even small human remains? or did william at somepoint come back just to clean the animatronics insides OR did some 300iq dumbass just cleaned it and where like "huh may just be some silly toys from kids that somehow got in there imma just throw them in the trash hehe"

The point of the scooper was to inject remnant, so the remnant is the reason Michael “wouldn’t die”. Baby counted on this.

I have a crazy idea but sometimes I think William planned everything he did like when you think about it each game he always ends up winning and he's a real smart guy so sometimes I think he planned for it to happen like in security breach every ending may have some of him defeated but there's always one loose thread to show he wasent fully defeated and in FNAF VR we know he obviously won by possessing Vanessa (and most likely others) and FNAF 6 like think about it he may have been in that fire but he said so himself he knew it was a trap, and think really think what did he get about it: Henry, Charlie and Michal 3 people who wanted to stop him are dead and he's still out there stronger then ever as a virus. And this leads me to FNAF 3 knowing Williams a smart man he's done enough remnant experiments to know "you die in robot you become robot" and he's had first hand exspirienc with Springlock to know how they work while also knowing those kids want him dead to move on. So what I'm saying is. What if he planned it? Get rid of this kids and get immortal life After all he's only lost once he's dead and he always comes back so he always wins Of course that's just my crazy ramblings but it's fun to believe

Though the idea of Mike coming back as a result of the sheer urge to get his lick back is funny

In the insanity ending we see blueprints for the scooper and it mentions it’s true purpose isn’t to open up the SL animatronics but to inject them with remnant. Baby seemingly knows this and that’s why she talks about you not dying in the SL endings. Before sister location came out we got a fake troll teaser saying the game was canceled due to leaks. When brightening the image we see text from (presumably) a newspaper article saying how Baby’s Pizza World was open for a day before closing down due to leaks (when in reality it closed down due to Elizabeth’s death) it’s unknown when this happens or how long it takes after Circus Baby rentals opens up but assuming midnight motorists is the Afton house hold and there’s only 3 people inside she might have died before that event.

I think it makes sense as to why Golden Freddy disappears when you put the mask on in FNAF 2. If William Afton's kid is in there (his soul, or whatever, I mean), the one from FNAF 4 who was terrified of the animatronics, he probably sees you as one, gets scared and goes away. What's even worse about this theory is that he's scared of himself as he's now the very animatronic that killed him (I mean technically it was Michael and his friends but you know what I mean). It also kind of gives happiest day a new meaning, the other souls are trying to show him that he doesn't need to be afraid of them and that he can pass on, if that wasn't the meaning already. Please let me know if this makes absolutely no sense whatsoever I made this up as I was typing it😅

6:36 In Jeremy's case, dying would've arguably been the better option. Considering what happened to Phineas Gage, and the various people who had lobotomies. Unfortunate that one of the only survivors in the series is...him.

0:06 you've literally begoned a devil with a holly fnaf bible

welp that settles it, alabama is never gonna recover from this

I don't agree with the Elizabeth's part since baby's pizzeria and baby's rentals are two different places, that could both happen at different times. handunit states that baby's rentals opened right after freddy's closed, he never mentioned baby's pizzeria, where Elizabeth died. hence, sister location happens right after the MCI, but Elizabeth's death happens in early 1983. and I do have reasons for why Elizabeth died first, and they are specifically in fnaf 4 and SL. In fnaf 4, there's a room in the house that has a pink bed, a broken mangle toy, and a pink flower picture in the wall. It's obviously Elizabeth's. However, when CC enter's it, all he sees is an empty room. Where is her? As we know, William wasn't able to recover Elizabeth's body since baby was designed to trap and crush the body of her victims inside her stomach. Therefore, sadly, her tomb is empty. In UCN, after ballora kills you she sings an interesting song: "Why do you hide inside this walls? when there's music on my halls. *All I see is and empty room, all I see is an empty tomb" * At least there's literally no other indication for when does it happen.

2:06 I think he threw it on because he heard how Jeremy got rid of the spirits by wearing a costume (well part of it)

I really don't agree with the *why* of Baby resurrecting Michael, though it's obvious she does it via remnant. I truly do not think she would still think he was william after living in his body and also his apartment for days, maybe weeks. Frankly you've got to acknowledge her personality and motivation got 180'd in a retcon and at that point in the story, she would in fact resurrect Michael- because she views him as innocent, and then, herself, go off and be Ennard. It no longer makes as much sense in current lore but it was clearly the intent at that point.

Ur exactly right.

Maybe William knew that the only way out was to possess the spring bonnie suit/his own body so he laughs being like you lose as I can now live forever but then it’s really painful so he screams when he “dies”

Here is some common misconception I see crying child is not the character who experiences in fnaf 4 nightmares it being proofed to be michael because we see michael draw nightmares Fried fredbear and the survival log book should be canon

5:24 the handunit line is about the rental service. the rental service was opened after freddys closed (most likely he is talking about teh franchise freddys and it is just after 1993 but whatever). the pizza world was open earlier. and in pizza world they had a springlock suit. which leads into your point earlier: 4:16 while springlocks werent fredbear exclusive, they were banned early on. we know this now for a fact because of pressure in the third tales book. they mention how the suits were banned shortly after their creation. so circus babys pizza world also was there early on, since they had a springsuit. this ligns up with the newspaper articel in the cancelled due to leaks teaser. the newspaper says it wasnt the right time for an operation like this. so them immediatly opening the rental service would contradict that. the newspaper implys that it takes a few years until the time has come for the cricus baby franchise. so pizzaworld was around in the early 80s, springsuits were banned around the mci, and after fnaf 1 william breaks in to get the remnant from the animatronics for the funtime animatronics, as we see in follow me, and sister location the game happens.

I personally think the fnaf 3 vhs tape calls happened in 1984 - 1986, mostly because I dont understand why they need springlock animatronics when the toys are able to interact with the guest on their own. Also, in the tapes phone guy says that the suit slightly moved meaning that it was just used, and I highly doubt that the fnaf 2 mci kids were murdered on different days(we literally see their corpses scattered around the pizzeria in the save them minigames and even if people were too blind and dumb to notice, Im pretty William isnt that stupid). Not to mention that on the last night in fnaf 2, phone guy says we shouldnt be there and that theres a search going on about william using the ol springlock suit(this could mean that the fnaf 2 mci happened before the night shift).

CBPW could of opened after fnaf 2, but sl either takes place before fnaf 1 or a little bit after fnaf 3 cause of the custom night cutscene for sl

2003? ouch... anyway the reason William put on the suit has nothing to do with golden freddy, its just that the animatronics don't recognise you in a mask

Not sure if I’m right but one thing that I think everyone overlooks is that the spirits don’t move on from the animatronics once William breaks them apart. Phone guy states that the back room was boarded up and we have no reason to suggest that it was opened and re shut between that tape and fnaf3. This means that phone guy was ALIVE after William got springlocked, and since he dies to the animatronics we know they must’ve been put back together after being broken. This logic seems airtight to me but if there’s something I’m overlooking please do tell me.

With your springbonnie idea I also believe that the other reason William put the suit on is to scare them, its the suit he used to murder them

elizabeth is so confusing... like why is she evil now and i don't think she would think michael is her dad to give him remnant IDK

Random question. Do you think the daygaurd from fnaf 2 was William? I personally think it was becuase phone guy mentions in one of the later nights (like 4 or 5 or something) that the shift became available. He seems to trail off in a way that makes it seem like something bad happened.

Tbh I always just thought William put the RUSTY AND WET SPRING LOCK SUIT. Out of fear (his face) and poor planning since he instantly started to laugh Afterall.

2:22 For a while I thought you meant spring bonnie in that was actually not spring bonnie and was instead golden freddy LOL!

Watching this brought me back to FNAF 2 night 1 phone call 📲

I would concentrate at the remnant's existence. 1.what really is that - how can be obtained? 2.how does this works? -How the possesion follows? 3. How can the fnaf characters know about the remnant? -How they know how to manipulate it? -I think we should think about this bc before we start talking about something' it's good to know what this something' is.

0:44 I don’t see how this makes any sense given any of Baby’s lines in fnaf6 though. If she thought Micheal was William, why would she attack him? Why would she say “you don’t really know who your employer is, do you?” To him? That makes zero sense lol

I think that Michael went through enough agony in his death, being scooped and robots forcing their way inside his skin, to remain after death just as the kids who were killed also stayed in the suits, in the fnaf universe agony allows one to attach ones soul to inanimate objects (a corpse is pretty inanimate), the residual soul is remnant, however you can have just agony posse sing something, such is the case with the toy animatronics after receiving pieces from the originals, but agony just makes unstable killing machines, this is probably the case with the blob, this would explain why it is still possesed even though we thought the spirits moved on

6:47 If you try to go towered the animatronics Fred plush stops CC. CC only goes towards them because of the employee coming towards him. That's because the employee is actively coming for him and because the spring lock suits where built to look like the animatronic.

Maybe the crying child wanted to get their dad to take accountability for getting him killed.

Hand unit isn’t talking about Circus Baby’s coming after Freddy’s, it’s talking about the rental service

weird bird thing turned into giygas at the end

Whoa, I just had a Mandela effect. I swear I remember the FNaF 1 phone call saying "I-It’s amazing how long the human body can live without the frontal lobe, you know?" and not "I-It’s amazing that the human body can live without the frontal lobe". That is crazy!

i also want thick cookie oreos

i thought afton put the suit on cuz it was the suit he killed the kids in so he can scare them away by triggering the fear they felt seeing a character they like kill them

Ok where did you get that Scrap Baby render from? Can't find a comment about that, and you asking that in the vid got me curious. If it isn't fanmade then what is it with it?

Am I even the only one who thinks that the crying child is the vengeful spirit?

Lore of Misconceptions YOU may have in FNaF momentum 100

I just found out the channel and have been enjoying a lot of your videos, but this one just honestly really poorly thought out. The springlock suits are the main example. The mention of William moving the Spring Bonnie suit is a reference to the MCI, thus why they seal the safe rooms with the poor excuse of "budget constraints" in the next call. William took the suit, lured the kids into that room and due the event, the room was sealed off and it's heavily implied there wouldn't be safe rooms in future locations. Going by Henry's dialogue in FFPS as well as the aforementioned fact, Spring Bonnie was never moved to the FNAF 1 building, it just stayed in that sealed room and was there in the FNAF 3 minigames since the FNAF 1 building is just that location repurposed. And as for FNAF 2, in that case, the spare suit in the back is one of the withereds (they're all there for spare parts), Golden Freddy. Phone Guy says there's ONE yellow suit in the back, and we know Golden Freddy was in that building. This also matches up with how he similarly used Fredbear for his later murders in the books. Speaking of the books, they also clear up another point in the video, being William's death. It's not because Golden Freddy disappears when you put on the mask, considering the spirit doesn't disappear here and that was likely just a result of it not identifying you like every other animatronic when you put on the mask, it's because the children are broken. They can't recognize Spring Bonnie as William. When he's wearing that suit, he's one of them, in his own words. There's other stuff here I'd have something to say about but eh not worth the trouble, and there's 177 comments, surely they've mentioned that stuff.

5:41 I know this video's old, but I just want to point out that FNaF 1 is confirmed to be in 1993 due to a piece of evidence either in SB or in AR, that basically says that the most dangerous job position in america in 1993 was night guard, plus there's also other pieces of evidence that seems to indicate FNaF 1's location was open from 1988 to 1993.

With the ennard split: why is no one talking about the ennard vent minigame? He gets roasted and damaged thanks to babys descision to go back to a place with a scooper to get a new skinsuit. Thats my take on it

About the circus baby's being after the closure of Freddy's: It's very likely that handunit is refering specifically to the rental service, meaning CB's could be anywhere in the timeline. The remnant stuff guarantees it was after the first death, but the presence of a springlock suit sits it a bit earlier, I'm guessing around the point they were being phased out. " You’re inside something that came from my old pizzeria. I don’t think it was ever used, at least not the way it was meant to be used. Too dangerous." Circus baby's pizza world probably launched alongside The original Freddy's that the withereds came from, but only lasted a day, due to...complications. Two attempts to rebrand. one with clowns and balerinas, one with Pirates and chickens. Them, after the Withered location shuts down, Afton has had just enough time to rebrand and launch the rental service, before going to the closed down withered location and dying in a suit.(Phone guy knows saferooms were sealed, phone guy dies before fnaf 1, ergo saferooms sealed before fnaf 1)

Another misconception is that the bite of 83 is a springlock failure I'll tell you know that is not true in order for a springlock failure to accur the suit has to be in suit mode not animatronic mode and we know for a fact that fredbear is in animatronic mode not suit mode also if evan/crying child's death was due to springlocks failing then 1. Why is there no one in the suit and if there is someone in the suit wouldn't they have stopped the bullies before they even got to the stage 2. How didn't the guy in the suit die from this springlock failure Its very clear that the bite was not a springlock failure

Only reason he put the suit on in my eyes is to scare the ghost kids away Also Elizabeth likely died before or after the second set of dead kids in FNAF 2

and about the 1 phone call in fnaf 1 with their server lockings turned on too long making them walking around why not just hire an on-site engineer, man! they DO perform maintenance on these things, right? And, if theyre allowed to roam free, what the f*ck do you need a night guard for? whats a thief or a murderer gonna do to them? Also why is phone guy so f*cking nonchalant about that? A-And, more importantly, how does he know thats what they would do to me? Also Also, who was the massive, 200 IQ GENIUS that thought to program the animatronics that way?! Did they not think "Hmm... Well, THAT could be dangerous to actual human beings."? even WORSE, who was the 300 IQ SUPER BRAIN that found out that the animatronics were programmed like that and went, "Huh, oh yeah, lets just leaveem like that."?!

Jeremy has a tombstone at the end of FNAF 6, so yeah, unless there are 2 Jeremy's he does die

The first fact. Why do you think, that baby revives Michael, because she thinks that he is her father. Also, she wants to kill kids too. I think she revived him, because he is her brother. And he helped her escape, so maybe she's thankful??? But I'm not sure about that.

The reason William built the SL bots the in the first place is because he noticed that his first child “C.C” possessed SpringFreddy after he was killed due to Michael. Sure there’s a bit of a jump in logic that one child haunting a bot = All children will haunt the bots, in which completely understandable but its a better explanation than William immediately building the SL bots to just kill kids under a hypothesis he made while in a crack binge

1st Point. Yeah. ~ Interesting... ~~ I don't know about the Elizabeth thing. But I would have to find an alternate interpretation. Because I don't think those animitronics exactly have to be linked as much. Only when all are created and even then it brings up questions. ~~~ Yeah I don't know why people think they saw Charlies death when they might die before Charlie.

The whole Elizabeth thing is definitely something matpat will get wrong in the fnaf tineline. Because of what you just mentioned. Hell maybe the reason she wasn't in her room in fnaf 4 was because she was with her mom at the time being

Why do you record inside of barrel? Lol

Is there any animatronics that are possessed by adults? Idk if I count springtrap as it is shown that he can change suits and stuff he probably is just using the suits and he is more like Micheal situation.

I would say you got that first part wrong, and it's much simpler than that - we know for a fact the S.C.U.P. is a remnant injector; Michael got scup'd and therefore he had remnant injected into him Also your 2003 date is inaccurate. I know where you're coming from, but that logic implies 2004 because of the paycheck's date

still waiting for someone to dig into Jeremy- so convinced "he is someone" it's not even funny anymore hahahaha alone in my theorycrafting for so long :`( hehehe

I feel like the spring lock suits are more associated with William Afton then Freddy's the company or the original establishment, as thr company wouldn't want to use something so unreliable, and if I understand sl correctly it was made by William Afton . Perhaps it's an old concept for the sl animatronics using modern materials with an old desogn. Idk why I needed to say this it really isn't important just my thoughts on why there is a spring lock suit in sl more then anything idk

The fnaf 3 tapes being recorded over a long amount of time isn’t true though, at leas the way you present it here. The incident that Phone guy alludes to in the fnaf 3 night 5 call is the original missing children incident which involved the spring Bonnie suit. We know this since phone guy identifies only the spring Bonnie suit being noticeably moved. The incident that happens in fnaf 2 wasn’t the original missing children incident since it had already happened

wait so who is balloon boy? i saw a theory saying that he is from circus baby entertainment

I am pretty sure Jeremy died as phone guy is an unreliable narrator as he has said many things Incorrect like the whole playing dead line. Plus there is no proof he is not lying like it’s the night guards first day so why say that the last guy died horribly?. Also the golden Freddy one implies that William worked at fnaf 2 or 1 to be believed as I doubt he would figure it out in his own time. Like when would afton know this?. I think you are jumping ahead I am pretty sure he got in the suit to ether scare them or to not be harmed (assuming him being in the suit protects him). Another quick thing if he knows the head would get rid of spirt why put on the full suit?

Yeee

Where the hell does 2003 come from?

6:47

5:42 1993

*Plz read* I feel like I'm the reason this video exist, lol 😆. Though I still kinda believe in Elizabeth dieing being the reason William does at least some of what he does. It makes some sense in my opinion for 4 main reasons: 1. Who else would William be talking to in the beginning of Sister Location about showing his own creation. 2. It does line up with the sister being absent in FNAF 4 and why William has an ipentire bunker made under his house where he spy's and haunts his youngest child and let's Michael torment CC so to make sure that he stays away from the Pizzeria. There's no reason that the bite of 83 and Elizabeth's "death" can't happen around the same time as each other plus Henry was the original creator of the franchise and William is just a business partner who has to have experience in the first place to even become a partner. 3. It just makes sense as a story telling stand point, Scott said himself that FNAF 4 was supposed to be the end of the franchise and he told the story he originally wanted to tell. FNAF 4 left some things up in the air that we couldn't fully understand so Sister Location exists only because Scott wanted to expand the lore and what better way to do so then to further explain what the story he's telling us while also adapting it into a new story that follows the first 4 games. And 4. Freddy Fazbear's Pizza opens as a Sister location to Fredbears Family Diner as said in the calls we get from Phone guy, implying they exist around the same time which makes sense as William would still need access to the Spring Bonnie suit he uses to kill the 5 kids and can still kill Henry's daughter as we know that she wasn't the first child William himself killed as it's confirmed that Chica was the first. Elizabeth dieing can make sense as the motivation for William killing the first group of kids and when he was gone doing it his youngest child to be forced in the Fredbear suits mouth putting him in a coma, since William at this point would be working at Fredbear's Diner so he would be there either watching on the plush cameras or actually in the Location while it's happening. Among some of the other stuff I replied to you with, this can make some sense in the longrun. It definitely doesn't fit 100% and I completelyrespectyour opinion, but nothing does fit 100% in this franchise at this point apart from that it's so confusing and frustrating to figure out at times. Scott may need to do what Sega is doing with Sonic and coming up with a definitive timeline for the franchise.

ok

fnaf 1 is 93

Yea, sorry but you're being completely wrong in this video. 1. You dont understand the remnant 2. Bite victim is Golden freddy - sorry but you cant prove vengetfull spirit with in-game lore - beacose before saying - this child is or isnt in that or this minigame - give me the way to belive this child actually exists - im sorry but there are no evidence for this - all of the 'alleged' arguments can be proven with bite victim being inside of the golden freddy too - it consists of your opinion' - not an true evidence - beacose 'golden freddy' or 'the one you should not have killed' are not the facts helping your theory be proven.

Waffle house have its mew host