Same here.

The families should be kept in our hearts and prayers as they have been through a never-ending nightmare. 🙏🙏🙏

What else?

Indeed, the same here

Same 😔

I'm a 68 y/o woman and, my dear, our government has been lying to us long before Vietnam. Even before J.P.Morgan, Rockefellers, Hearst and others ran the papers, the banks and the railroads.

Maybe but the lie was not supported by the their worst enemies at that time the Russians, whereas if there is a cover up regarding the MH370 it needs to be held up but the Chinese and the American government which does not make the beginning of a sense...

Gulf of Tonkin

And before too.

It's courageous of you to say. Most people are gullible and they prefer a comforting lie rather than having to handle the truth.

Apparently somebody recently changed the Wiki page, it will go back to complete mystery I assume as soon as someone has a chance to water it back down. I agree with Abbott, but suicide is not even in Malaysia's vocabulary, it is such a stigma. I wonder if Malaysia officials said it in quite those words. But yes I am hearing authorities there knew likely cause.

Like Abbott and most Australian politicians, Wiki’s been brain dead for many years now and under the control of the known gorilla sceptics group which is an organized group of editors who have tasked themselves with ‘correcting’ all the mistakes in their eyes. Ross’s page was edited down to ‘UFO investigator’ basically despite his decades of solid journalistic work.

He said as much in interviews also. To call it pilot suicide when the plane is still not accounted for is a bit much. The INMARSAT data wasnt even known when they called pilot suicide! They were lying to you!

@@EsromFF Oooh, those pesky, nefarious ''they'' again. Someone out there should do something about those ''they''. 😀

..which helped to send everybody on a wild goose chase. They should be looking in the South China Sea, where MH 370 went down under duress, not the Indian Ocean.

There has to be a consistency in appereance, so people know it is the show, but different episodes need to be distinguishable ofc.

Just as long as he doesn't do the youtuber thing and put his face making a shocked facial expression in the thumbnail.

Ross is the best! I click on any and everything that even mentions him!

You have a valid point!!

UFO be grifters. Ten to a penny down the years. Books, documentaries, dvds. There is not much difference between likes, clicks, and views nowadays. And still not one scrap of verifiable evidence to present to the public despite billions of HD camara phones worldwide.

You gotta check Ashton Forbes if you want a good explanation here around this case

@@zarvinny oh i have watched him.

Eh? What a nonsensical comment, why would the west not often realise the ocean is big 😂 I know for a fact everyone knows exactly how big the ocean is regardless if the live in the West or under a rock 🙄

Woulda been found so much earlier but Malaysia Government doesn’t want MH370 to be found because not only it would cost them a lot but they would then also have to compensate the families who lost their member on that plane

You may not know what happened, but I do. The evidence is overwhelming that the pilot planned out a murder suicide of immense proportions. Just because we don’t have the actual aircraft, that doesn’t matter at all. The evidence is overwhelming and indisputable.

Yes ways believe the first thing that the evening "News" tells us Then you "know"😅😅😅😅😅 Ehud Barack knew who dun 9/11 before nightfall e en though the FBI could never back his assertion. with "any hard evidence ".

The Malaysian government does NOT want to be accountable financially for the actions of this pilot working for Malaysian Airlines!

What parallel universe did you watch this in? This reporter/interviewer just ran his mouth during the whole video. Many of his sentences were super long and unnecessary.

à

ROSS is a Mockingbird

Well I do not believe at all de Changy theory, but if the US had shoot down a civil plane in mid-fly for an obscure reason, one might think that they will surely cover up the act by falsifying their assessment of the Capitain home flight simulator. An then inventing a pseudo route to the south of the ocean, after all it is documented that the flight simulator was recover by the FBI in the captain house (it is actually one of the argument of conspirationists on the MH370 case, they find it weird that the plane simulator was seized by the FBI on foreign soil and that no one had access to it since then, hence no one as the mean to check the veracity of what was said by the FBI on the simulator).

You really believe everything you're told...

The real story behind that, is that MS Flight Simulator leaves some kind of raw data temp files on the HD. They are not tagged for time and date. Amongst other data those temp files from his PC contained thousands of geographic data points. Not linked to each other, just points. From all of his sessions using the the program. So if someone sifted out certain points and linked them up in a particular order, you could try to make the case that he flew a "practice route," but in actuality in those files there is nothing to link those points.

​@@PRH123your comment is very interesting, but you haven't cited a source. With all due respect, without a source the information you give could be a work of fiction. Please provide a source.

@@bookie5667 well, I didn’t know I was writing a term paper, u tube comments don’t support footnotes, and I have better things to do than fantasize things here :( right here on u tube in videos on this incident you can find this info…

Thank you Now I don't have to waste 2hrs of my time 😂😂

absolutely --- more piles of rubbish --- Najib knows !!!

Thanks mate. You just saved me from sitting through yet another painful video about MH370. Appreciated!

You saved time for me too. Thnx.

Ross Coulthart has always been a crap journo. He's a joke. He used to do all the puff pieces about Hollywood stars on 60 Minutes Australia.

Never find it ,landed

I agree this man needs more exposure

@@Crosshatch1212 Ditched or just dove straight in.

@@watchgoose if you had seen the news broadcast that got taken down you’d be one off the few thousand that know .

Really!! Can she not explore & investigate other possibilities?? For instance what if the captain & copilot didn’t do it?? Is there any real solid proof he did ? Occams Razor favours it, but 2 plus 2 isn’t always four, what if something else did do something to the plane. How the hell do you explain all the diabolical misdirection that has occurred in the during & after the event. Microphones of the WA coast pointed mathematically to a likely crash site hundred of miles north from the arc. Locals in the Maldives tell of a low flying big jet that morning? If the flapper on is that of mh370 what happened to it mfg plate ? Why does it look like it was machined off?? How convenient it is Indiana Jones discovered it after just 15 minutes & beggars belief there was a truck load of English speaking journalists in the middle of nowhere in less than 2 hours for f### sake. Anyone who lost anyone or is even vaguely possessing some critical thinking would be insulted by what officials of the airline & governments have put forward!!!!

Agreed!

Apply this to Larry Vance’s assumptions labeled, polished, and delivered as fact.

Continue to watch internet, keeps you more entertained . Lol

Look back over the years… how many conspiracy theories have been proven to be true? In this day and age and our so called Governments around the world, I won’t rule anything out. Except unicorns. Magic however is another story…

your 100 percent correct! that’s where it landed

I’ve heard that some one very high up in IBM was able to relay a photograph back from the island Diego Garcia

These parts were all planted. This is a massive op

Yes, it would make sense if a pilot planned this. If you watched the whole video then you would have logged the three reasons the Flapperon was not genuine...And it is really the only physical evidence that the plane was ditched in the Indian Ocean. On the other hand, Florence’s book lists a good number of reasons as to why and when the poor plane was “forced down” off Vietnam.

I agree with the main naprater. I think het slawedrywer down to a 0 speel on surface of ococean. Swallowed an overdose imo, because all on. Boardwalk were already deceased.

I’m a sailor. I have seen barnacles grow in a matter of a month or so. The process starts very quickly, which is why every boat owner either pays for monthly “bottom cleaning” or does it him or herself (this is unlikely because bottom painting only costs $70 for my 32 foot Catalina 320 and even though I am a scuba diver it would be such a pain to do it myself). My point is that it was obvious the moment I saw those pieces of the plane…no appreciable growth from exposure to sea water!

@@PhilTParker You're basing that off of a portion of a hull that is permanently submerged in seawater though. These pieces are small and would turn constantly in waves with each side being exposed to the sun. It also depends on where in the world you're located, because bottom growth is also far greater in the tropics than it is in the subtropics. Also, all pieces that have been recovered have come from beaches. There's no indication as to how long they were on the beach before being discovered, or even how long they might have possibly turned in shallow water before finally washing up. Any growth that could have appeared could have easily been ground off.

Not very convincing.

If jets can just disappear flipping an off switch then why do we need stealth bombers

Military radar would have seen MH370. Question is why are they not adding information to the story of this plane’s loss.

They did, how do think they initially tracked it after transponder data was lost. Malaysian military radar

Yep, we were waiting short answer, but blaa blaa blaa again.

Mentour delves deeper into the satellite data, which is very interesting

Florence does not convince me either. I mean, she speaks to the pilot's family and childhood friends and they say he was a good person, and so she is convinced he cannot have done such an insane act. Speaking to family about character of one of their own is bad research. Nevertheless, if he was a good man why was he making lewd, creepy comments to 2 young female models online? He's a married man with kids their age? Doesn't look right to me. And why was this " hijacked" plane following the airspaces so accurately so as to avoid detection and then land in the middle of the Indian ocean? This is bizarre! And her explanation of US involvement and the Chinese govt make no sense whatsoever. The pilot's flight simulator is the smoking gun.

Impossible to realize without being caught? Humm. Ever heard of JFK??

@@SYNAPSom yup or 9/11?

The first interviewer makes the strongest case for the crash being the sole responsibility of the demented captain.

Well that certainly your opinion, fact however is in the days on & around the incident there was a lot of unusual conduct , confusing & conflicting information . Let’s no forget the modern day Indiana Jones who found the flapperon in 15 minutes & had a bus load of English speaking journalists in the middle of nowhere within 2 hours. Seriously.

Both great channels

Both of the 2 new proposed sites in the Mentour Pilot video are not the first sites that the people who are making the proposals have presented. Both proposed sites are hundreds of miles from their original proposals which they both now consider obsolete. However, Petter from Mentour Pilot did introduce an interpretation that I believe is important. We know Zaharie was doing the radio from take-off until the last transmission, and Hamid was at the controls for take-off but until when. Petter said Zaharie's last few radio messages indicated he was busy doing something else while talking. Bearing in mind the time between the last radio transmission and the aircraft deviating from its planned route was just over a minute was Zaharie at the controls or was he preparing to go into the cabin?

Mentour Pilot was better but both are good.

@@johnfinlay4864 I think he was in control and prepares his plan.

Good videos both. But still no motive and no plane.

What is the hijacking code in your company? Maybe Tango is for malaysian airline only, I don’t know

Hijack fits with the guy who tried to send a message with his iPhone. Coordinates got through I believe. Near Diego Garcia.

How so?

followingg,pls expound

Her technical sense is poor.

Agreed. It’s easy to imagine anything’s possible when you don’t have basic mechanical or scientific sympathy. On the other hand, murdering an entire plane load of people for a secret or personal issue is hard to fathom.

She is also saying (around 55/56 mins in) that there is no chance that the flaperon that was washed ashore could have been from MH370 because it would have travelled too far through the southern indian ocean, but yet does not (and presumably cannot) explain how the serial number of that parts actually matches those belonging to the plane. Oddly, Ross didn't pick up on it and ask her how she explains it. Once I heard her dismissing that she lost all credibility.

He’s never investigated the alien crash 💥 theory. Which is obviously true.

ROSS IS MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA

Hypoxia- Yes, the pilot definetly depressurized the cabin.

There were not one but two pilots…..so, two of them carried out the plots?

@@MC37138 The theory I read about has the pilot sending the co-pilot out of the cockpit for some errand, such as coffee, and then locking him out.

Yeah I watched that documentary too. Lol But thanks for the blow by blow description of what was said in another documentary recently released. Well done.

That is sad

It's even worse than that. The story we were told was that the hard drive had been erased - and it was only after forensic examination & data recovery that they found the flight path matched. If true, this is a HUGE flag.

To Diego Garcia to hit american base there, but was shot down by air defence. Rest is cover up. Doubt Usa lets anyone search there.

There is always a track history on the pilot’s computer that has a trail of searches that would indicate all the mindset he might of had but haven’t heard anything about the searches he might have performed to show a predisposition to suicidal tendencies, so blaming a pilot without those factors places suspicion on the deniers of other factors! More should be looked into, instead of finger pointing at the heat of tragedy and mourners need answers! Continual condolences to those families, and S**t to doubters until the facts are confirmed!

Yrs it seems quite clear based on the pilot's home simulator, that he was trying to pull off a concealed suicide. Almost succeeded but not quite. Not sure why he felt he needed to practice flying out to the middle of nowhere 🤔 everybody makes mistakes when trying to conceal actions . Especially with today's forensics. -->Delete is never deleted!

The suicidals know how to put on a good show

Ashton Forbes did a fantastic update with Redacted

he puts the BBC, FOX and all other linear broadcasters to shame

What.a coincidence. They won’t touch me or Targeted Justice either, and we are saying it like it is. We have absolute irrefutable evidence. It’s been extremely hard to get the truth out to the masses who think they live in LaLa Land.

It was nailed. I mean, Nailed it!

Main stream media is not about truth.

Surely you are aware he is employed by 7news msm.

No, we don't. They will never say a word at how pathetic our tracking capabilities are

There must be surveillance data on the crash but, in order to protect sources and methods, the public will never know about it. Imagine the press release " We can confirm the plane impacted the ocean but we can't tell you how we know "

I actually think he’s absolutely right about the videos. Too much evidence adds up to ignore.

@@baby_UFOdude, they can read the newspaper from outer space. They know exactly what happens on this planet every hour of the day.

For the record, I made a comment here about surveillance, came back 5 minutes later, it’s gone.

Good question

GPT 4 Answer: The ability for pilots to turn off transponders in aircraft is a feature rooted in both historical and practical reasons. Transponders are electronic devices that broadcast an aircraft's location, altitude, and identification code to air traffic control (ATC) and other nearby aircraft, significantly enhancing safety and efficiency in airspace management. However, the capability to disable these devices can seem counterintuitive at first, especially considering their critical role in aviation safety. The reasons behind this capability include: 1. **Safety and Emergency Procedures**: In the event of certain emergencies or electrical problems, pilots may need to manage the aircraft's electrical load by shutting down non-essential systems to preserve power for critical flight controls and systems. The option to turn off the transponder allows pilots to prioritize systems essential for the immediate safety of the flight. 2. **Maintenance and Testing**: Aircraft undergo regular maintenance and testing, during which transponders and other electronic systems are inspected, tested, and serviced. The ability to turn these systems off is necessary for technicians to perform maintenance safely without sending erroneous or misleading signals to air traffic control or other aircraft. 3. **Prevention of Interference**: On the ground, particularly at airports with many aircraft operating closely together, transponders can create signal interference, leading to clutter on ATC radar screens. Pilots may turn off their transponders to reduce this clutter, especially when the aircraft is parked or taxiing on the ground. ATC may also instruct pilots to turn off or adjust transponder settings to manage radar display issues. 4. **Historical Design Considerations**: When transponders were first introduced, the technological and operational environment was different. The designs included manual controls for various functions, including the ability to turn the device off. Over time, while technological advancements have been made, some operational practices and cockpit designs have retained the capability for manual override or shutdown by the crew. Despite these reasons, the capability to disable transponders has raised concerns, especially following incidents where aircraft became difficult to track or went missing. In response, there have been discussions within the aviation industry and regulatory bodies about possible technological and procedural changes to ensure that aircraft can be tracked continuously, even if a transponder is disabled or fails. This includes the development of new systems like ADS-B (Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast), which offers some improvements over traditional radar and transponder-based systems, though it also can be turned off for similar reasons.

@@Moriarte1982 Thank you for posting this information. It is the basis around which the recommendations arising from the analysis of this event must follow if we are to learn.

transponders need a ground radar sweep to activate their return data and codes, yes they can be switched off. The reasons are that no one ever thinks of making locator beacons in the tail linked to GPS fully independent of ANY action, plane goes down, locator beacon triggers (EPIRB), floats off etc, satellite (ARGOS/NOAA etc) gets the data Read about it on the net. relying on so-called black box crap technology when your Apple phone can record MORE data (including technical data) for longer than any black box, is a bit like having a 1920's 78 rpm disc player plugged into your home theatre surround sound cinema system, as the only source...

The solution is simple, but expensive. Mandatory GPS in all planes continuously transmitting to satellite. The technology is old by now, some airlines have it through paid services, such as Air France, thats why they had all kinds of info about 447, coz the airplane system was continuously sending data via satellite, much more than just position. But as usual, its money, that talks. Having it fitting in all commercial aircraft (for starters) would be timeconsuming and hence very expensive. Imo, they couldve at least made it mandatory on new aircraft, but so far, nope, nothing.

I so agree with this.

@tonygriffith2164 An FOIA request was made by Australian researcher Paul Smithson. OADR request was granted and an annotated image of possible wreckage from flight MH370 was released. No information is redacted on this image, to include the classification, official authority and analyst. This image can be viewed in the Australian Transportation Agency’s report on missing flight MH370 and also on the Quora website. There is important information on this image that has been overlooked, even by the Independent Research Group.

@@stuartlichty4250 The perps will never release what they want covered up.

you can check out muckrock, archives etc: NTSB: MH370 "- Any and all the records mentioning “mh370” or “malaysian 370” or “flight 370” relative to the period from March 6, 2014 to March 9, 2014" "The request has been rejected, with the agency stating that the information or document(s) requested are exempt from disclosure."

@@alans5799 Check the above references. The released image is there, I don’t have a link to it though, KZfaq might not allow it.

Researcher Ashton Forbes did this. refused all requests. not hiding anything at all!

China usually hides any failed attempt from public, even failed rocket launchs. So it's not far fetched for them to hide the fact that Americans caused a plane to disappear bc they tried to acquire technology

I did not understood that she would be saying the plane was shot down. However, it could have been interception operation with the controlled ditch on the ocean level with the US army recovery team nearby to collect bodies, cargo, debris. As controlled ditch theory explained it's allowing limited area of displacement for the plane's debris. There is no way US NSA/NRO satellites can identify AA rocket shot to Poland from Ukraine but not able to tell where the 777 went.

Let's look at the plane, not being shot down, but vapourised from the Cargo bay internally. Dunno how that scenario plays out in quantum physics and the maths. The Cargo Manifesto was sloppy, we know that. Any way possible with this fateful flight

My comment was removed or something. I said that Chinese government has a habit of hiding their failures like failed rocket launchs. So it's no surprise that a failed attempt at aquirring technology would be no talked about even if it means keeping shut about US involvement in the loss of civilians

Yes. She tries to explain away the strategic manually switching off the transponder, the advanced flying and sophisticated turns at the waypoints and the border skirting to evade military radar due to electrical failure and hypothermia. Her thesis is completely unreliable and not based on an aviation background but just to make a buck off of the tragedy.

it's crap. completely ignores. all witnesses, the joint military exercises, including the US, ignored the dodgy lithium battery cargo, ignored the 20 freescale employees, ignored Philip Wood's text and blank photo that gave co-ordinates of Diego Garcia. it was taken by the US. they knew where it was they have SIBRS system, fully global integrated satellite system. l think this was a very sloppy documentary and probably meant to muddy the waters rather then try to get to the bottom of it. crashed planes, even ones attempting a landing at sea break up. no debris field. that's the crunch. they found no debris till years later. and in Madagascar! 3,000 miles from where they were looking. not even conclusive and no more than 5% anyway if it was proved to be from MH370. As ever, e've been lied to and this doc doesn't even challenge the red herrings.

Sorry to say, the story from florence is complete nonsense.

Yeah..the lady seems nuts and just wanted to sell a book.

She stick to sailing. She is barking.

@@matthiasmeyer9747 i am listening to her interview for the third time thinking "whaaaaaaat?" she is making no sense. why was she even interviewed. she brings nothing to the table.

Um the Flaperon, wing flap and wing fragment were all confirmed as coming from the plane. Other parts found have no unique identifiers to the actual plane, but are the same part the plane used, with no other plane using these parts having been reported as downed / missing. They know it’s from the plane but they won’t say without being 100%. Which I think is actually high level. The other parts found as mentioned above contained unique identification numbers which were traced back by Boeing to confirm they were parts of the plane when it was made. It’s not all a conspiracy, it’s just not that easy to say definitively on some parts. Story makes no sense, mentour pilot has a great video up on it. Including messages before comms stopped. I believe the pilot asked the first officer to get something form outside the cockpit and then locked him out. Depressurised the cabin. When the oxygen run out for passengers (20 mins ish) his was good for hours. So with everyone dead in the back he was able to follow on with his plan.

@@ChrisSkene-cl2eh I've seen endless specials done on flight 370 and I've never heard anything but "most likely" said in regards to the recovered parts. Never have I ever heard serial number part matches to the plane and that is a big chunk of wing to keep hearing "most likely" over and over again. If a part is replaced even a minor one it must be traceable to the manufacturer in case of catastrophic failure. This is done even in the case of consumer products. It's sure as heck done with a major airline carrying 200+ people hurling through the sky

@@ChrisSkene-cl2eh wow.

First: What is hydrologic? I know Hydraulic, but I have never heard of hydrologic. Second: What would be the purpose of planting fake airplane parts around? Just for laughs? And all air crash investigators are either incompetent or bought off? I keep being amazed by the lack of a coherent theory by the armchair aviation experts/conspiracy nuts in this thread. Just incoherent listings of perceived inconsistencies. Just throwing everything at the wall and see what sticks. But nobody actually comes up with a consistent theory that states what actually happened, why it happened, who did what, and how they pulled it off.

What about the Passengers.? Who Were they.? There Employment has any relevance to this incident.If you follow the money where does it leed, Insurance payouts.. Technology, Patents outstanding. I Know the Answer it so obvious. The pilot is Innocent a Patsie. How Far is Guam.? does It play a Major Part in the Whole Incident. In here lies the Answer the killers the Motiv

You are absolutely right! Where has the term "outside the box" gone! Today you are in a "rabbit hole" when you really dig into something. You have a "dependency" when you are passionate or collecting something! You have ADHS when you don't stay on a topic. Why is everything problematized nowadays!!!

I'm sorry, but that man had evidence to back up his claims. Woman on the other hand was speaking out of thin air based on nothing and had nothing to show for it.

Is this the sort of thing that losers and whacko’s say to try to make their idiocies sound less idiotic?? Yeah, it’s exactly this sort of thing.

Maybe people with mental health, people who see things that we don’t see, maybe they are normal and we are not. Who knows hey! We will never know. It’s easy to make somebody look crazy. Either way no idea why you would go through so much effort to make a plane disappear. Maybe you didn’t want the suicidal aspect of it and wanted this mystery behind it all. Who knows

Exactly!!

She had some good points and info. But I dont agree with her conclusion

we have a lot of evidence that is beyond circumstantial

In the court of public opinion, this pilot is Guilty as charged! There's too much evidence to say otherwise in my opinion.

So... In the same year, with the same Airline, with the same aircraft type (777-200), both complete hull losses, with zero survivors, statistically near impossible. But yes. Without judiciary sentencing let's DECLARE THE PILOT OF MH17 A MASS MURDERER... Nah... that's wrong. And shame on you for condemning someone without 100% certainty.

Not a legal case, it is aviation safety and the only apparent answer is that a pilot took advantage of the cockpit freedom. The reinforced cockpit doors answers the who question pretty much. I wish we could say some unknown perp.

@@billtracy8774 Exactly!

What happened to the pilot after he ditched it?

And they should watch Mentour Pilot instead of this conspiracy theory. One of the pilots flew the plane into the Indian Ocean.

@@Solitude47152 He died with the rest of the plane's deceased passengers and crew!

Hardly high speculation. There are 2 options, he's entirely innocent or it's his fault. He practiced this route and a landing on his own flight SIM at home. The data was fully recovered and analysed. Why? Is it just a coincidence, considering the location and the fact it's never been found

I agree.

@karenm8239 from what I remember that route is also an emergency route that would be logical for a pilot to practice that is flying in that area consistently. Also this guy doesn't say there are 2 options, he says there is only one option, he did it. That's not a little irresponsible?

​@@karenm8239exactly.

Well we know it was a Boeing airplane....

If they find the flight data box we will know exactly what happened. (but yes, the motivation why the captain wanted to dissapear the plane will maybe never be answered)

I agree; a plane will be found but not MH370.

Even if they find the plane, they won't get the answers they need to solve the mystery, as the captain turned off the two flight recorders before that data was recorded on them.

I think it will actually be the other way around

@@SpiralCasterPlaysPedalsFlight recorders turned off means no record of what happened after that time. I don't think it will ever be found, and if it is, it still won't prove what happened, as there would be no record after ten years in salt water, even if FRs weren't turned off. Let it rest. There is nothing to be gained. Searchers will find no answers, only more questions for the conspiracy theory posters.

Vance is an old Canadian Transportation investigator. As a 5 Eyes Canadian former Government employee, of course he is Not impartial, and would toe the shameful US Military Cover-up line.

​@FMDD168 Other pilots and those experienced in this field(some not American, Canadian, etc)also agree that the plane crashed due to the pilot's actions. Any cover up was probably from Malaysian authorities.

he forgot the old utility "secure erase" a DOS utility (remember DOS??) , with several passes the data is scrubbed totally, possibly the only recovery is using an offset HDD head positioner, but that's only reserved for NSA / FBI he knew about airplanes but not hard drive data recovery in a forensic setting...one day a 3d sidescan sonar seabed survey for mapping the ocean's floor for submarine navigation (defence) will find it if its intact....

Petter mentioned that the simulator was no considered irrelevant, but didn't say more. Per this lady's stance, the alleged satellite pings would have been fabricated by the conspirators.

Has it occurred to you that we didn't find debris because we didn't search the correct area?

I don't think you need a known history of mental health issues, the captains marriage was in turmoil at the time.

Plus Ross mentioned that the Malaysian government might have been hiding some info they knew about the pilot.

@@stanner6169 He had a loaded gun at home and he had a lady friend who´s kid he supported. There´s is no motive at all. Someone wanting to kill themselves normally do not become a massmurdere of innocent women and children also

the premise in the video is that he did NOT wait until he ran out of fuel but carefully crafted where he was going to put the plane in the sea in a controlled ditch so as to not leave a myriad of tiny pieces. he wanted the plane to just sink as a whole. it seems vance's thought is one wing caught a wave causing the plane to break apart thus foiling the plot of disappearing without a trace.

Read William Langewiesche's article on The Atlantic. Look at Mentour Pilot's video: "A NEW Trace! The FULL MH370 Story." These will give you a better understanding of what happened on that flight and reveal clues that prove Captain Shah's guilt. Also, mass murder/suicides are generally committed by middle-aged men who are responding to a severe and acute stressor. Captain Shad was depressed and his wife was divorcing him. He was also likely having a mid-life crisis.

And the serial number found on the flaperon matched one from the 777 that was Flight 370.

Although this flaperon had a part number compatible with MH370, the ident plate was missing, rivets dislodged. Also how did the large bolts holding it to the airframe become undone ?

All pilots I ever met loves flying. They cant get enough of it. They like the simulator because that´s where you can do flying instead of sitting looking at the auto pilot for hours and hours. Give me one reason why a man like captain Shah would ever leave his children!?

He did it, because he was having a mid-life crisis that left him in turmoil. His wife was also leaving him. Mass murders are generally committed by middle-aged men who are responding to a severe and acute stressor.

I’m of that theory as well .

Because they are corrupt. It’s so sad

@@usdepartmentofthetreasury489 It would cost them BIG TIME!

Yes. Probably just bones now though

if it just sunk into the ocean.. then yea.. it's somewhere down there.

Yes

Seems most plausible based on scant evidence.

Oh yes for sure!😂🤣😃 Must of been!!