Evolution of the Tanks - Mitsi Studio

Рет қаралды 3,075,530

Жыл бұрын

Join our KZfaq or Patreon membership for early access videos:
/ @mitsistudio
www.patreon.com/user?u=351301...
Tanks through time. A fascinating journey of tank evolution and tank power.
In this video, we dive into the dynamic history and incredible evolution of tanks, from their humble beginnings to their modern-day roles on the battlefield.
Store - cool Evolution of the Tanks merchandise:
www.mitsistore.com/
Join our Discord - Be part of our online community:
/ discord
Follow us on our socials:
Instagram: / mitsi.studio
Website: mitsi.studio/portfolio/
Behance: www.behance.net/mitsistudio
The voiceover is done by Christian Neale:
www.fiverr.com/voiceover202
Subscribe to our channel and share our videos.
We appreciate all your support!

Пікірлер: 5 700

@mitsistudio 10 ай бұрын

Join our KZfaq or Patreon Membership for early access videos: kzfaq.info/love/uXCgyOCMXic7j0_wghXnRAjoin www.patreon.com/user?u=35130109&fan_landing=true&view_as=public

@aklapotherpotherpothikrebh603 10 ай бұрын

Can you make a video about Evolution of helicopter?

@CFox.7 10 ай бұрын

The crass language...really ? You think you're cool or trying to appeal to a 10 year old demographic ?

@valyshknee4203 10 ай бұрын

wowww the pro-ukrainian stuff at the end really set me off, you clearly know nothing about the conflict, and you seem to not know or care that atleast quarter of your subs do not share your opinion, most of the world does not support Ukraine you know? most of the world's population support Russia, majority Africa, central asia, middle east, parts of south america, parts of the carribean, most of Asia and of course Russia itself, you are really shooting yourself in the foot with this even though Ukraine is losing the war.

@unsuisseegare1291 10 ай бұрын

@@valyshknee4203 www.economist.com/media-assets/image/20220409_WOT949.png just look at the map...

@VEAFY 10 ай бұрын

T-34 Ukrainian tank or Soviet but not russian.

@ementos5358 Жыл бұрын

Im surprised how they can make something so terrifying used in quite a lot of wars look so cartoonish.

@sussyb1471 Жыл бұрын

Yea, that Mark I tank kinda cute tho😂

@adhiesive Жыл бұрын

War is a game. Yet people still play it

@banielshow6424 Жыл бұрын

Viva lé France, Napoléon

@retrogamer545 Жыл бұрын

Tanks are not terrifying they are cool

@ch-53esuperstallion76 Жыл бұрын

@@retrogamer545well the enemy will be terrified

@riane3100 Жыл бұрын

You guys can't just show up every couple of months and drop an absolute masterpiece each time.

@pitaalfereti58 Жыл бұрын

I know right!?

@wellina3457 Жыл бұрын

I totally agree with you 👍🏾

@CraffleZ Жыл бұрын

real

@Schregger 11 ай бұрын

And yet, they do! Like fucking Call of Duty!

@angryasfman9077 11 ай бұрын

real

@Romatwoknfive 10 ай бұрын

05:18 "you can barbaross all the way back to where you came from"💀💀💀

@D4v1dWasTaken 17 күн бұрын

What does Barbaross mean?

@redenzR 17 күн бұрын

@@D4v1dWasTaken It was Operation Barbarossa which the Germans had launched against the Soviet Union in WW2 ~1941

@udhdhhdhdjd9482 13 күн бұрын

@@D4v1dWasTaken The Barbarossa plan was the Germans' plan to capture the USSR in a few weeks, but the war dragged on

@meko7691 9 ай бұрын

“Yes you can leave a comment” “And no we will not read it” Lmaoo😂

@ImpendingJoker Жыл бұрын

You guys need to publish an RTS game using these models as assets. I would play the hell out of this.

@sharroYT 11 ай бұрын

Same, I love rts game especially modern military ones

@nozzatron01gaming11 11 ай бұрын

or make model kits of them, that would be amazing

@optimised120 11 ай бұрын

@@nozzatron01gaming11oooooh 3d printer time lol 😂

@somegdplayer4039 11 ай бұрын

I think in their patreon have models of things used to people who want to print them, not sure

@ranggars_ 11 ай бұрын

nice idea

@johanoskarsson8209 Жыл бұрын

A shame that the FT-17 wasn't mentioned considering how it was the first tank that looked like what we think of as a tank. All the same though, this is really awesome, and I hope to see more of this in the future.

@andyboi8399 Жыл бұрын

Yep, I agree, FT-17 set the benchmark for all modern tanks to come, and it was a superb light tank of the period too. Plus it's soo damn Cute! I just want to hug it and pet it on the turret, such a good boy.

@mrman5666 Жыл бұрын

it was the first mass produst turret tank but lil willy did have a turret.but yay why no ft17.

@viski2528 Жыл бұрын

It is a very, very watered down history of the tank.

@nitsu2947 Жыл бұрын

I mean the FT-17 was the first to have been set up like the modern tanks we know. Surely didn't look like it, however the driver front, combat center and engine back was pioneered by the FT-17

@andrefasching1332 Жыл бұрын

they also forgot about the austrian "Burstyn Motorgeschütz" from 1911/12 It was even designed for crossing trenches and had a rotatable turret. In my eyes the only true first tank

@M551_Sheridan 10 ай бұрын

5:55 sure it can bitch slap mines, but it can also become a warcrime device when your out of ammo :)

@StepdownvinnieanimateandFTF110 19 күн бұрын

The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. The bodies were mangled beyond recognition. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. THE BODIES WERE MANGLED BEYOND RECOGNITION. T H E B O D I E S W E R E M A N G L E D B E Y O N D R E C O G N I T I O N.

@catthatlooksatyoufunny7377 8 ай бұрын

I absolutely need a tank game with this kind of style, commentary and all Also im glad you pointed out the panther naming thing cuz i find it really weird, hopefully this version doesnt have any reliability issues lmao

@mr.flupsurf2860 6 ай бұрын

there was a game like this, but dont know the name anymore.

@Alphatrillon 3 ай бұрын

@@mr.flupsurf2860shield wall

@napoleonibonaparte7198 Жыл бұрын

They can make a game with this style, and I'd buy it.

@CaptainMaxwell7 Жыл бұрын

Advanced Wars on the Gameboy. Good times.

@blockmg9425 11 ай бұрын

Deep inside we like cartoonish art style even in our 20s

@planenoises5236 11 ай бұрын

Same man it looks awesome.

@whispofwords2590 11 ай бұрын

Hell yeah!

@pixilatecat7680 11 ай бұрын

Same Thought it has Potential.

@gn01816984 11 ай бұрын

Great video. But kinda sad that the Renault FT-17 wasn't mentioned here. It's the first tank to have a rotating turret. Can't imagine how modern tanks would look like without it.

@Canofasahi 11 ай бұрын

And not only that, it was also the most produced tank from the Great War, 3700 of them, that's more than the Germans and Brits combined. Another thing they missed, Czechoslovakia had a decent tank production just before the war, the Germans used quite a lot of Panzer 35(t)'s and 38(t)'s well into 1941 until their own tank production finally caught up!

@_MaitreuPanda___ 11 ай бұрын

It's the father of modern tanks, as you said it had a rotating turret but it also had a compartment specially for the engine.

@Canofasahi 11 ай бұрын

@@_MaitreuPanda___ carbon monoxide poisoning was a serious issue in the early tanks.

@Yahtzee1 11 ай бұрын

Couldn't agree more. It set the standard for most tanks put into service: A fully rotating turret; driver in the front, fighting compartment in the middle and engine compartment in the rear. Absolute unit of a little tank.

@captainobvious8530 11 ай бұрын

Not surprising, this channel is anti-french for some reason

@user-dg3yz8it2z 3 ай бұрын

Как же иронично весь этот нахрюк на бэбрамсы выглядит в свете недавних событий

@user-xx6lj2jx2o 3 ай бұрын

без нахрюка никуда, всё таки хорошо что у них есть только мультики

@lambogikka7039 3 ай бұрын

Читаешь мысли) Ток хотел про этот анимационный высер написать...

@montecarlo2684 3 ай бұрын

Не, ну про отлетающие башни, превратившиеся в доп. артиллерию реально смешно.

@lambogikka7039 3 ай бұрын

@@montecarlo2684 Смешно будет нам, когда ты гавно будешь 5ый угол искать после захода Русских в Авдеевку.

@user-hk1qn9ue2t 3 ай бұрын

Ну, вот такая у них пропаганда...

@hiraeth0811 3 ай бұрын

война на Украине показала что леопард не может воевать довольно долго на поле боя, так же как и абрамс, которого с первого выстрела уничтожил т-72б3

@Medic_spaset_tibia 2 ай бұрын

Абрамс: 😭😡 Т-72б3: 🗿🤫

@Kingfisher_2376 11 ай бұрын

Actually, the replaceability of the M4 was quite comforting to Allied tank crews as it was the American Sherman that was over engineered, particularly in service to maximizing crew survivability. Anecdotally, there was one particular crew that ended up losing 3 tanks to enemy action, only to return to base to pick up a new tank each time.

@duitk 11 ай бұрын

Only 2500 Sherman crew died in WW2. It has the best crew survival rates. The T34 was unreliable and killed it's crew. Probably the second most overrated tank ever after the Tiger. At the end of the day trained tankers are the most precious resource in armored warfare, the tank that protects that best is the best tank.

@LyonPercival 11 ай бұрын

Especially since T-34s usually don't have spall liners the whole WW2, a non-penetrating shot for a Sherman is a very deadly metal shatter to T-34 crews. Soviet crews were relatively expendable since they are easily replaced anyway.

@juryfilatov4520 11 ай бұрын

Just compare the numbers The Eastern Front had 6 million Germans and 9 million Soviet soldiers over the course of 4 years The United States had and the Allies landed 300 thousand soldiers in Normandy. At the same time, the operation was clearly planned by a member of the Kuklusklan movement

@massimookissed1023 11 ай бұрын

I've heard one British tank vet say that he was in his 5th tank when WW2 ended. He also said the British didn't get a decent tank until *_after_* the war.

@eugeneoliveros5814 11 ай бұрын

@@duitkreminder that the Soviets put the fuel tanks in the fighting compartment to either side of the driver, which is less then ideal when you get hit

@TheSYLOH 11 ай бұрын

The Sherman was one of the easiest tanks to escape from uninjured if it was destroyed, so that was of great comfort to the crews.

@cardiv5zuikaku944 11 ай бұрын

Adding the fact that is bassicaly like a limousine for the crew considering the standard of the time

@brennanleadbetter9708 11 ай бұрын

That’s one of the reasons why Soviet tankers who had Shermans preferred it over the T-34.

@gaetantreib4163 11 ай бұрын

Yep, but it use very inflamable fuel and the shell compartment where not very well protected. Not for nothing that one of the sherman nickname was bronson. Shermans was just super easy to blew up.

@Gran-knight9815 11 ай бұрын

@gaetantreib4163 early shermans were prone to becoming bonfires however 1943 onward they were just as likely to set alight as another tank.

@cardiv5zuikaku944 11 ай бұрын

@@gaetantreib4163 isnt its called "Ronson" not "Bronson" also that is only used post war. Also sherman is not that easy to blew up, study says they have similar explosion rate to other tanks of similar class or size at the time (Except the one british used as they have the brightest idea to overload the tank with ammo and still wonder why their tanks explosing everywhere) even an account from Russian that have Hero of the Soviet honor that use Sherman says he was pinned down while using his Sherman once from german attacks but his Sherman survives despite receiving multiple hits.

@ethanwalton6666 8 ай бұрын

I love how he is so educational yet still say stuff like "They can copy and paste tank name strait from ww2 like it a fucking call of duty game" GOD I love them. keep up the good work.

@Drummercommander 10 ай бұрын

I've only just discovered this channel. Love the art style! I instantly imagined collecting all those boxy tanks

@hfd_blackrose.of.darwin Жыл бұрын

Im quite disappointed that they failed to mention the Rennault tank the French were fielding during WW1. Their design basically inspired future tank designs in the following years of history. Edit: Eyyy why people fighting in my comments?

@F.O.U.N.D.E.R Жыл бұрын

The author hates French and russians

@TamanskayaDivision Жыл бұрын

The animation is gold, however the writting is really, really bad. It feels like they copy & pasted some biased british/american article, inserted some old myths and as you said above, completely forgot about the really important designs like the FT-17, T-55 and the introduction of ERAs.

@TrafficTheCone Жыл бұрын

they post like every month, if you aren't satisfied with it why are you watching em? if you want those many tanks watch a full tank documentary telling all the tanks in history, they aren't national geographic.

@curtis1552 Жыл бұрын

Yep, they even forgot to mention that the French had superior tanks during the start of WW2 but didn't know how to incorporate them in their armed forces.

@oogadyman5814 Жыл бұрын

@@TrafficTheConeyou not aloud to have a opinion ? He was not criticizing it he was just saying his opinion

@Nietabs 11 ай бұрын

I was hoping for the french tanks to be mentioned like the Renault FT that was a game changer to ww1 that after the war, many nations learned from the Renault's design as it serves the basics of tank designs

@aurelienthietard7636 11 ай бұрын

Don t expect to much of a channel that potrayed us as coward in a different video French bashing is still a thing twenty years after iraq

@cottonbear2777 11 ай бұрын

@@aurelienthietard7636 hahaha

@l.a.wright6912 11 ай бұрын

With just how much it gets wrong I'm not suprised. Like how it never touches on the long barrel revolution and it mentions the importance whilst degrading the very tanks which inspired it. Or how it quite litterally makes it look like the maus was anything more than 2 prototypes and actually saw service (neither of which is true and if we compare it to other german prototype programs it's obvious how little attention it was given). Or how it perpetuates myths about german manufacturing (which is sad because the importance of allied bombings and the supply situation almost never gets stated) Honestly I might have to do a full writeup.

@emilianoiphone 11 ай бұрын

The 2c bis and charmond too

@louisdedieu4662 11 ай бұрын

It's crazy, he completely swept the French subject...

@user-yy3zv4be9g 3 ай бұрын

Уже увидели леопард и Абрамс, горят очень даже хорошо!

@jokerkot4759 3 ай бұрын

Очень хорошо горят

@Medic_spaset_tibia 2 ай бұрын

Да

@OmarGarcia-kr4jz 2 ай бұрын

@@jokerkot4759you mean be shot by 1 round and not burn?

@user-cw6qu8rh7j 21 күн бұрын

@@OmarGarcia-kr4jz у нас хотя бы танки не гроб

@squareguy5353 Жыл бұрын

Its honestly amazing how much effort we put into destroying eachother.

@SSgtJ0hns0n Жыл бұрын

You can bet when someone invents something new, some prick will pop up next to them asking two questions; 1. How can we kill people with this? 2. How can this help to make things more comfortable for the lives of MY people who are going out to kill OTHER people?

@colelinse6196 Жыл бұрын

Its a bit more natural than you think

@WG55 11 ай бұрын

The key is to put more effort into killing your enemy than your enemy is putting into killing you.

@jurajsintaj6644 11 ай бұрын

Well, simply put, if the other guy has a sharp stick, then you need a sharp rock on a stick, because otherwise he can come over and steal your stuff. Humans can operate well in groups, but groups rarely work together if it's not against something else.

@sturmgeschutze3070 11 ай бұрын

@@WG55I’d argue the key is to put in more effort in the factory so the guys in the field put in none.

@9999AWC 11 ай бұрын

Wish you guys had mentioned the Centurion being the first MBT, and the FT-17 for basically defining what the modern tank should look like and function.

@alexeievgenievich5556 11 ай бұрын

Согласен, странно что ещё Леклерк не упомянули. Самый технологичный танк запада того времени.

@petrf-rw4pw 11 ай бұрын

Первый ОБТ - советский Т-64

@Vanadium 11 ай бұрын

@@alexeievgenievich5556 Первым основным боевым танком мог стать "Центурион" или "Пантера".

@Xyleena_Akira 10 ай бұрын

@@petrf-rw4pwcenturion was made 1946

@neoknight9180 10 ай бұрын

@@petrf-rw4pwthat’s not even the first soviet MBT bro

@TheBoringEdward 7 ай бұрын

8:16 I mean, we still call our air force "Luftwaffe".

@HoneyBatxher 9 күн бұрын

Naja es ist was es ist. Luftwaffen. halt außerdem wurde im Video der KF51 gezeigt und nicht ein "Panther" was das nazi Deutschland namen kopieren jetzt auch nicht sinnvoll macht

@wariornt 8 ай бұрын

If you guys would ever make strategy game (CoH style like of base building and such) I would buy it in 100%. The style is so fun to watch.

@federovsquared5646 10 ай бұрын

I really like the styling of these videos! After watching, I think some other tanks should have been mentioned such as: - Vezdekhod (First motorised armoured tank prototype) - Renault FT tank (First tank to have a fully rotating turret) - Char 2C (Largest operational tank)

@Kammerjagerr 4 ай бұрын

Isnt the tsar tank the biggest operational tank?

@federovsquared5646 4 ай бұрын

@@Kammerjagerr I don't even know if that even classifies as a tank 🤣

@Kammerjagerr 4 ай бұрын

@@federovsquared5646 Everyone else calls it a tank 🤷‍♂️

@federovsquared5646 4 ай бұрын

@@Kammerjagerr Probably because calling it an armoured fighting vehicle is too long of a name.

@johnsonknight1120 3 ай бұрын

The Renault FT-17 is mentioned in the World War I video.

@Mr_Metro Жыл бұрын

I’m sad you guys didn’t mention one of the best tanks from WW1 (and my personal favorite) the French FT-17 Rennault, it was one of the first tanks that looked like a modern tank (outward treads, single barrel on a turret that was either a 8mm machine gun or a 37mm cannon), and one of the first mass produced tanks, but nevertheless great video!

@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 11 ай бұрын

I think you made a mistake. The Renault was armed with either a single barrel cannon or a machine gun. We hadn’t really figured out how to put those two together at the time, and it’s not like there was enough space in the turret anyway.

@Mr_Metro 11 ай бұрын

@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 Thank you for pointing that out, I had meant to say that but I forgot to fix that line of text when I rewrote this like 5 times, I’ll fix it now

@CascouPrime 11 ай бұрын

afterwards, I think Mitsi doesn't like French, given the treatment they had in previous videos

@adddaddda7748 11 ай бұрын

@@CascouPrime In which video ? It's a real shame, if for such a reason, they didn't mention France at all in this video. I mean that country is kinda a pioneer in tank developpement.

@forters7613 8 ай бұрын

@@adddaddda7748 in the video where they prtray how different countries fight, France shows up and instead of... idk Napoleon's grand armee, or ww1 french soldiers, or hell even the french resistance in 1940, they just showed a stereotypical french dude waving a white flag at the first sign of trouble. I wasn't surprised afterwards that the FT wasn't even mentionned in this video considering the previous french bashing...

@SatiresC 9 ай бұрын

8:04 Tbh, Rocket Launchers cannot even defeat a T-90, because of modern tactical armor, modern anti-rocket system (red lights), and many many other things, and I won't want to act like a Russian Patriot or a guy who says Z at every ukraine video, i mean, that russian engineers is not that badass that drinks vodka every second because of stereotypes, as example - T-72 (Old Soviet Tank) were from 2nd Tank Century, and Abrams from 3rd Tank Century was defeated by Soviet Tank, i know, that this video created for education motives, but some people dont like the thing, some of these things were come from stereotypes.

@iachelovek-ib8rw 9 ай бұрын

I agree, they don't drink vodka there, they drink technical alcohol there 😂

@prostoigor6851 7 ай бұрын

@@iachelovek-ib8rw Nothing, just a few obscene words... Well, okay, a lot of obscene words and everything will be fine.

@Russki_improvizator 6 ай бұрын

Друг, я из России и я тебе говорю с полной ответственностью, в моей стране самые тупые инженеры и если у них каким то чудом получается сделать что то нормально, в процессе завершения они наверняка поставят туда какую-то хрень которая поломает всю концепцию, ЗАПОМНИТЕ РАЗ И НАВСЕГДА ЕСЛИ ЧТО ТЫ ДЕЛАЮТ В РОССИИ ЭТО НА 100 ПРОЦЕНТОВ ПОЛНАЯ ФИГНЯ, НЕ ВЕРЬТЕ ПРОПАГАНДЕ.

@MoskusMoskiferus1611 15 күн бұрын

That is actually Top-Attack AT Missile called FGM-143 Javelin, most Modern MBT can't handle it even with APS Launchers

@user-jk8dv6ol2b 3 ай бұрын

-3 abrams

@user-hk1qn9ue2t 3 ай бұрын

@user-sl9fy8ug2h 3 ай бұрын

@@user-hk1qn9ue2t, 6

@user-ic1ng7xl6t 2 ай бұрын

@braderickson9996 11 ай бұрын

Thanks! Once again, a great piece. Bravo, Mitsi !!!

@mitsistudio 11 ай бұрын

Awesome!!!

@darkleaf5167 11 ай бұрын

u wrong Italian tanks are the best Edit: I love it when I make stupid nonsense statements, people dumber than my comment come along to attack something so obvious. Xdddd

@ApacheBruv 11 ай бұрын

@@darkleaf5167The only thing better about Italian tanks is that the reverse is faster than forward.

@Accountlyut 11 ай бұрын

@@ApacheBruvAnd smoll look cute

@asaifaji4490 11 ай бұрын

@@mitsistudiocan you do magic? I kinda want sword and magic

@mr.tmcmeister4131 Жыл бұрын

5:44 is my favorite part. That fading of the foreground to highlight the flying tank killed me

@Senior--Pomidor 11 ай бұрын

По задумке, эти танки должны были доставляться на транспортных самолётах в тыл немецких войск и объеденившись с силами ополчения СССР - "партизанами" наносить удары по немецким линиям снабжения, держу вкурсе

@PsyckoSama 10 күн бұрын

First, Sherman had outstanding crew suitability. Second, more perpetuating the T-34 myth.

@Lechuga1815 10 ай бұрын

The Sherman was amazing engineering. Not only did it succeed in all being effective in combined arms, anti-tank, it was relatively cheap, and mass-produceable. But it had one of the best features for a US produced tank, it was compact and easy to transport. Easily the biggest hurdle to getting a lot of tanks in the war is transporting them across the sea. For a tank that was built across the ocean, it performed very well compared to the home field advantage tanks that Germany and Russia fielded.

@m4shermanfan225 8 ай бұрын

Gaming

@lancepharker 8 ай бұрын

They also had a stabilized main gun, which was so top secret, that they... didn't distribute the manuals... to their own troops... sigh.

@raketny_hvost 8 ай бұрын

Sherman had it's faults for eastern Europe landscapes. However mediums often determined battlefields

@stepanchelli4295 7 ай бұрын

ahahha, ok )))

@robertoroberto9798 6 ай бұрын

@@lancepharkerThe good news is that if a crew/armoured division knew how to use it, then the Sherman just became even more effective on top of all the other factors. If the crew didn’t know how to use the stabilizer, then the Sherman would be on par with other tanks instead of being worse.

@jbeckley6849 Жыл бұрын

With Mitsi, you are guaranteed to learn something new while cracking up laughing.

@Master10k2 11 ай бұрын

3:54 ... Definitely. XD

@blazed9346 11 ай бұрын

And enjoying US propaganda :D

@outsider9599 11 ай бұрын

Good video but it's sad that France isn't mentioned when it was the first country to develop a "modern tank" with 360° turret and tracks, the succesful Renault FT-17. We had pretty nice design during the WWII and the Cold War too (B1 bis, AMX 13,...)

@latch9781 11 ай бұрын

FT is a critical development. Oscilating turrets can go straight to hell though

@b1bis204 9 ай бұрын

it's not a bad turret configuration the question is Why did we built Oscilation turrets? Oscilating turrets have his advantages like placement saver, smaller size and could on certain tanks equipped with autoloader so on lighter tanks ist an absolute monster killer (see the ebr in WT annoying) but on heavy tanks in another hand is pointless, poor elevation degrees @@latch9781

@calhounli9656 7 ай бұрын

@@latch9781Oscillating turrets were the best design at that time, plus the French did come up with other amazing things during that time. In my opinion Amx 30 is also a superior counterpart than the German leopard 1.

@weaselwolf8425 7 ай бұрын

@@latch9781Oscillating turrets wonky asf

@xXCharli03Xx 6 ай бұрын

@@latch9781 Oscilating turrets were amazing, not by the design neither armor protection (which was not really good), but because they were the consequences of a really fast automatic reloading system.

@BlizzardVRU 3 ай бұрын

He fails to mention that the Abrams was also in Ukraine, and they are doing a hell of a lot worse than the Leopards.

@mekingtiger9095 3 ай бұрын

Eh, this video was uploaded waaaaay before the Abrams tanks were deployed in Ukraine, cut the makers some slack.

@EmpanadaDeCaca 2 ай бұрын

@@mekingtiger9095 then don't make stupid assumptions or try to predict things about the war if they want to be cut some slack

@Zloy_moskovit23 2 ай бұрын

The authors did not forget to lick the US tanks 👎, the Shermans were burning then - especially against the Tigers, and now the Abrams are burning in Ukraine.

@spudgun3982 2 ай бұрын

@@Zloy_moskovit23 abrams doing fine

@wyomingboi69 2 ай бұрын

@@spudgun3982thank you for spreading truth my friend

@FUNEZZZZ_S 4 ай бұрын

Cuanto sesgo político quieres en tu video? Mitsi Studio: si

@hanzkommandant Жыл бұрын

Tanks won't be obsolete, it'll adapt and improve over the years just like infantry and perhaps aircraft. People have said that since World War 1 yet main battle tanks are still relevant in the modern battlefield, albeit with improvements and newer technology.

@WolfeSaber9933 11 ай бұрын

It's just that Russia doesn't know how to use Soviet tanks. The KF-51 tank can smoke both tank and drone on the bbq.

@hanzkommandant 11 ай бұрын

@@WolfeSaber9933 Training is also key. Yes, your statement is somewhat correct.

@whispofwords2590 11 ай бұрын

@@WolfeSaber9933Its not only that, but people seem to think that just because tanks are being destroyed that makes them obsolete. Engines of war will be destroyed in the course of their use just by being Engines of war. Doesnt matter what it is.

@warthoggoulags1679 11 ай бұрын

@@WolfeSaber9933 now they do, they didn't in the begining of the war

@theroundtable6371 11 ай бұрын

@@whispofwords2590 B-b-but MY countries MBT that isn't in Ukraine and has never saw combat against a conventional army would do SO much better guys, it has all these better traits, trust me!

@FahrurRoziqin Жыл бұрын

8:29 I agree and like how the way you tell that Ukraine were indeed just a giant testing ground

@localhost0 Ай бұрын

He haven't said that. He says that countries are also using ruzzian invasion to test their weapons. Which is nothing new and has nothing to do with the reason the war started.

@mclukas44lol25 3 ай бұрын

M1 Abrams got blown into smitheries

@Eshladd 9 ай бұрын

Great video! You got yourself a new subscriber, it's the least I can do. Keep up the great work!! 🙌🏻

@chrspny117 8 ай бұрын

6:17 Mario shy guy sound

@Pointclearius Жыл бұрын

I'm surprised the Centurion didn't get a mention, nor the Challenger 2. Good video, love the art style. Keep it up!

@mcstaal Жыл бұрын

Or the Renault FT.

@arrowoneomega4649 Жыл бұрын

morser karl or shwerer gustav

@andybelcher1767 Жыл бұрын

Also, Little Willie never went to France and the A7V could fall over 🤣🤣🤣

@68poundercarronade Жыл бұрын

@@arrowoneomega4649those aren't tanks, they're artillery

@samwatson2373 11 ай бұрын

I thought that as well, re Centurion and Challenger series

@Stealth86651 11 ай бұрын

How long have you guys been in the animation industry? This just feels extremely professional and well done. The details, everything having personality, effort spent everywhere not just on key stuff. It's really impressive, makes me think you guys will have a really good run over time.

@PopTap 10 ай бұрын

Watch their introduction video about themselves

@AL-Shorts_YT 5 ай бұрын

3 years

@weaselwolf8425 7 ай бұрын

Awesome video and I loved the humor👌🏽 I would like to add that A) I would also like to see a game with these kind of animations and B) that there were certainly more facts you couldve mentioned, like the french and their efforts (they certainly contributed with the Renault FT 17 which I believe even the U.S. used as well)

@ajohnymous5699 8 ай бұрын

Good video but I feel France deserves recognition for the Renault FT or Britain for the Centurion being the first MBT a little before the Soviets introduced the T-54/55 (the latter being built as a tank for for the cold war and potential nuclear conditions as they were intended to keep crews safe from fallout.) Good video, but the MAUS and Ratte took up screen time that should have gone to good and influential tanks that were actually used, or even "The Panzer IV, III AND V, as iconic weapons that you had a chance to see more than once in a lifetime before the advent of the internet." Im subscribing though, this is enjoyable content.

@guillermorobustelli2652 11 ай бұрын

You forgot to mention Jan Zizka, the Bohemian leader who was the first to successfully use war wagons as battle tanks to face the entire Holy Roman Empire armies without losing a single battle during the Hussite Wars.

@kazueballesteros3665 11 ай бұрын

Bohemia would might not survive the russo ukrainian war If it still existed ofc or uh survive by improving their tanks and smart soldiers

@kristopherdecker6549 11 ай бұрын

Or that dude with the elephants.

@kingcytoxien1775 11 ай бұрын

he cant show every tank that was shown to humans, its not a documentary

@southendsunxdsep Жыл бұрын

Shame they didn't mention French tanks as the Renault FT changed the conception of tanks for the end of WW1 and WW2. For those wondering it had the 1st turret that could rotate and needed only 2 soldiers to operate. It is considered as the 1st "modern" tank Or the FCM 2C that needed 13 soldiers to operate but was a slow monster

@X13565 11 ай бұрын

They didnt even mention the french as tank makers XD, so sad...

@coolboygameing1188 Ай бұрын

1 German tank was better then 10 American tanks, but the Americans always had 11

@HarrierGuy-AV8B 16 күн бұрын

Technically it was 1 panzer = 5 Sherman’s but they had six sorry for being 🤓👆

@sersnuggles7697 9 ай бұрын

the most adorable way to picture something so destructive

@V-S7909 Жыл бұрын

3:55 The reason why Japan and Italy were not good at building tank was that they were facing different enemies. In the 1930s and before WW2, both Japan and Italy were against relatively weaker countries. In the 1930s, Japan was against Chinese who did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Japanese tanks. Italy was against Ethiopian who also did not have enough explosives or tanks to destroy Italian tanks. Because of these, both countries did not feel the necessity to build more durable and powerful tanks because their light tanks were enough to against pre-WW2 enemies. While, the UK, US, USSR, and Germany had to build more durable and powerful tanks to defeat powerful enemies who were euqal foe each other. Moreover, there were some limitations in production, and engineering. Major powerful countries of WW2 had enough production capacity and engineering. While, Japan were lack at production capacity and engineering, and Italy was lack at production capacity.

@ryanw531 Жыл бұрын

To also follow up Italy was expecting combat in mountain terrain(but ended up in the desert) and the Japanese were fighting in island jungle thus lightweight/easy to maneuver tanks made more sense than heavy armored tanks, also the Japanese was aiming for a naval victory thus Battleships Aircraft Carriers and Torpedoes were prioritized over tanks.

@aidenm9510 Жыл бұрын

Plus the Japanese tanks usually were required to be able to perform amphibious landings or at least brought on shore by a smaller landing craft, which limited their weight and therefore armor and gun caliber

@patrickwoodruff8881 Жыл бұрын

japan just had bad tank designs lol

@LanderKoenig Жыл бұрын

Makes sense, explains a lot

@civilengineer3349 11 ай бұрын

Japan was building ships so they couldnt build as much tanks

@btm9099 Жыл бұрын

3:59 damn they’re being perfectly honest about it

@bluexxx3373 7 ай бұрын

I just subscribed to this channel and I love the commentary and the animations 😎

@ImaginaShip 9 ай бұрын

This is my new favorite channel on KZfaq! I can’t believe it took this long for me to discover it.😊

@Venator-Class_Star_Destroyer 11 ай бұрын

"Wonder how the Leopards are doing" Let me give you a demonstration Landmine: Kaboom? Russians: Yes Rico, Kaboom

@orionSpacecraft 11 ай бұрын

Not to mention that Ukraine also uses Russian tanks so it’s not the tank that is performing poorly…

@dylanbilson4271 11 ай бұрын

2:20 Standing in a line of fire 32 will lead the way Coming over the trench and wire Going through endless grey 4:14 We are the Panzer Elite Born to compete Never retreat 5:00 Into the Motherland the German Army marched Comrades stand side by side to stop the Nazi charge 7:30 Death in the shape of Panzer Battallion Insect of terror, don't run Face your fate like a man

@johillholy8582 11 ай бұрын

Sabaton 😎😎😎

@canadaballplayz9999 11 ай бұрын

SABATON!

@williamdavis2960 11 ай бұрын

Ah, a man of culture.

@szaboaron8966 11 ай бұрын

Basically the entire video: Steel commanders rule the battlefield

@alexander97611 11 ай бұрын

@@szaboaron8966spearhead flanders, tankers leading the storm of panzers

@SafeSpaceGaming1 2 ай бұрын

i love this animation style so much, it takes a dark truth and turns it into something funny and sort of cute with the colors and little round soldiers lol

@GoldenInLove 8 ай бұрын

I really love the animation, great job

@lazy_bag_bones-hs3fb 11 ай бұрын

It's a shame that not a single French tank has been mentioned, not even the FT 17 which is the father of French tanks

@leprianto4930 11 ай бұрын

It's not the father of French tanks in fact there was other before it but it is the father of modern tanks with a 360° turret and an engine in the back but you are right tho there should have been at least one French tanks since they were some of the biggest designer of those

@KungFuWizardOfJesus Жыл бұрын

Best animation studio I have watched in a long while.

@KungFuWizardOfJesus Жыл бұрын

@@jzsbff4801 fully agree

@illegalisntlegal Жыл бұрын

@jzsbff4801 I love how they just slapped the swastika right in your face not giving any craps about demonitization

@serplo 3 ай бұрын

I smell the bias from the screen

@luistariba9663 9 ай бұрын

i wish i could hit the like buttom more than once!! great work guys!

@napoleonibonaparte7198 Жыл бұрын

It's disgraceful they didn't mention the most powerful tank of WW2, the Bob Semple.

@liliankeong 11 ай бұрын

Viva le France

@dylanmoore3201 11 ай бұрын

Me attempting to find the funny

@humanperson9443 11 ай бұрын

Made of the strongest armor and weapons

@johngellare3507 11 ай бұрын

It's armor looked like simple corrugated iron, but was actually made of a secret material known as New-Zealandium!

@Akin_channel 11 ай бұрын

The main gun could kill any human, and it was equipped with many of them. That's horrible😱

@javierstewbean7503 11 ай бұрын

5:56 “you had a crab Sherman used to bitch slap mines into the air” 😂😂😂😂

@williamritchie693 4 ай бұрын

Fun fact. The name tank was supposed to be only a cover for the first tanks. Many of the soldiers who saw them covered assumed they were water tanks and that’s what command stuck with. It could have been anything. Maybe it could have been called “big metal box with guns that may or may not break down or explode”.

@Alastor-1929 9 ай бұрын

I think i ive never had more fun watching history!

@coolsolder Жыл бұрын

Didn't expect that splat at 2:27 . Brutal

@otterspocket97 11 ай бұрын

I absolutely adore the animation style and the writing for this. Streamlined and adult to keep my attention

@coling3957 8 ай бұрын

Little Willy was a development vehicle to demonstrate the concept. It was never intended for service, simply to display the characteristics to be incorporated in future fighting vehicles...

11 күн бұрын

A tank game should be made with these graphics and physics. It will be the same as the War Thunder realistic battle mode but with physics.

@Chris-hz8ll 11 ай бұрын

Not every German tank was over-engineered and produced in small numbers. The StuGIII was the most produced German tank because it was very cheap and efficient. The reason why German tanks kept getting bigger was, that initially this strategy was very successful. The Tiger 1 was the first heavy tank and had no opponents. But at a certain point, size becomes a disadvantage. So this strategy didn't work anymore. If you compare numbers then you also have to consider the economic strength of the countries.

@Kingfisher_2376 11 ай бұрын

Minor Correction: Heavy tanks like the Tiger never technically stopped working, so much as they became tactically redundant decades later. The US and USSR both adopted version of their own during the Cold War. Germany's issues during WW2 largely stem from its resource poverty. It never had the fuel reserves to function as a modern mechanized army in the way that the US, UK and USSR did. So, I guess they kinda did stop working, but in a more literal sense than you seem to imply.

@TheNapster153 11 ай бұрын

@@Kingfisher_2376The key to German heavy tanks was reliable logistics and maintenance. A dedicated tank regiment with excellent radio based coordination and proper support was expected to punch through the enemy lines and wreak havoc whilst mechanised and motorised troops followed up. This is a doctrine that is still used to this day, but what Germany suffered in WW2 was the horrible state of their logistics. Not only they had sabotaged production lines and faulty supply points, their comms were also tapped in late war meaning that any and all moves they made were known to their enemies. Also, the lost of air power was one of the biggest damnings to happen to them. With the threat of getting annihilated from above, german armour was unable to play any active roles during daytime and had to move under the cover of darkness. The last bit may also be where the term 'Army of the Night' became popularised from.

@generalhorse493 11 ай бұрын

The Tiger 1 was a good heavy tank but it was too heavy and over engineered compared the sherman or t34. Plus, as early as Kursk the Soviets had devised ways to kill or disable Tigers. Anti tank trenches, anti tank mines, new Ptab anti tank bomblets dropped by Il-2s, and positioning t34s, anti tank guns and spgs into positions where they could shoot Tigers in the much thinner side or rear armor. Also, don't forget that after Kursk things like the Sherman firefly, Sherman 76, M36 jackson, Su-85, Su-100, Isu-122 and Is-2s started rolling onto the battlefield. Also also, the germans forgot to provide enough recovery vehicles in the event a tiger was disabled or broke down.

@rgelioredeker3374 11 ай бұрын

Bastante errónea tu información, es sabido que en EEUU y Europa están borrando la historia pero te aviso que el Tiger I no fue el primer tanque pesado, fuera de modelos prototipos, el primero en producirse en números decentes fueron los modelos KV rusos, los cuales para inicio de Barbarroja no tenían rival y solo un cañón antitanque de 88 o un bombardero eran capaces de neutralizarlos (La película estadounidense "Fury", esta basada en la historia real de como un solitario KV-1 fue capaz de frenar toda una división panzer por su cuenta y tras destruir todos los cañones de 88 que los alemanes poseían, fue destruido junto con su tripulación por unidades de granaderos) y el Tiger I fue la respuesta a los KV 1 y 2 soviéticos.

@taistelusammakko5088 11 ай бұрын

@@generalhorse493the tiger wasnt t 34 or m4 sherman. It had a designated role as a breakthrough tank, such as no medium tank wouldnt be enough to replace it

@AntiTankGun Жыл бұрын

8:20 lmao

@user-dx9fs3qy2v 12 күн бұрын

Everything historical you talk about you always make it historically hilarious

@agniteyt 10 ай бұрын

Mitsi Studio. They make War look like a little kid's game and I freakin lovenit

@Lukusprime 11 ай бұрын

First time viewer, long time tank fan; it’s honestly amazing how they’re able to get CG to look almost exactly like filmed claymation

@Matt_JJz 8 ай бұрын

I love how the way the tanks act like they have a mind of their own

@IBR7568 7 ай бұрын

7:06 was the funniest scene😂

@grayface19yearsago70 11 ай бұрын

With the effort of animation and content put into every single video. This channel is so much way underrated and deserves so much more

@Waaott Жыл бұрын

The Bob Semple Tank would be a interesting variant too. Great video!

@kingsmanx9700 3 ай бұрын

Очень обидно что не упомянули танк Су-152 под кличкой зверобой этот танк практически создали во время войны и он отличился как один из лучших танков 2 мировой

@user-sl9fy8ug2h 3 ай бұрын

Хочу подправить, ису

@xaythearsonist2003 Жыл бұрын

4:46 my guy was poppin' wheelies while in tank while dunkin' on Germans 😂😂😂😂

@raphael-1531 Жыл бұрын

I’m disappointed the French tanks aren’t portrayed when they was innovative and effectives the FT17 literally created the true design of tanks and ww2 French tanks where also the best of their time ( but they had problems of doctrines and high commands )

@stephen4121 Жыл бұрын

Yup not sure how France wasn't one of the main tank producing nations. They certainly produced more and more capable tanks than the Japanese or Italians that's for certain. The Chars were impressive tanks, just sadly the French army was stuck in WW1 mode.

@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 11 ай бұрын

@@stephen4121 France had a pretty big anti war sentiment during the interwar. So why would we have produced massive quantitities of tank that we wouldn’t have needed in an ideal world ? And by the time we realised we needed more tanks, it was too late anyway. One of said chars, the B1-bis had been in development since 1920. Very much stuck as a WW1 type of design. And intended to be used in a trench war scenario. It was still a nightmare for every german unlucky enough to encounter one during the short lived conflict. The only counter for the B1-bis the german had at the during the rather short war against my country was the 88mm anti air gun, whose effectiveness as an anti tank weapon was only discovered by pure accident. Probably a gun crew saw a B1 approaching, panicked, pointed the gun at the tank in desperation and fired. In terms of effectiveness, think about this: At one point, a single B1 tore apart a small german armored column. 13 tanks destroyed in a single engagement. And not a single penetrating german shot out of the dozens that hit the aforementioned B1. They were so good the germans salvaged the ones they could, and stuck a flamethrower where the 75mm was. You know, for extra nastiness. And then threw those at the soviets. To quote a comic about it, it was a « slug with enough armour to pass as a swiss safe, and with sharp teeth ». Comic is named « The butcher of Stonne », if you are interested.

@VegasFan3000 11 ай бұрын

@@manofironthathasntturnedcr9817 B1 Bis wasn't developped in 1920'. The "Char de Bataille" trials was in 1924, and the B1 was develloped from its contestants in the beginning of the 30', it wasn't made to reach trenches, but instead to assault fortifications like the Siegfried line and to be used as support for the Maginot Line guns.

@VegasFan3000 11 ай бұрын

France also producted more than 1000 infantry tank in 1940 and 500 cavalry tanks, along side many armored cars

@____admin 5 ай бұрын

0:55 1 horse power, do you get it

@Havingsights4009me 8 ай бұрын

6:43 I must make it a Lego moc for my army I failed

@hahadesu6355 11 ай бұрын

You can probably Barbarossa your way out of there 5:16 BEST LINE XD

@RemyistStudio 11 ай бұрын

Forgot to mention the FT-17, the first tank with a rotating turret

@Thekiwibirds1998 11 ай бұрын

Ikr

@DabzPlayz 9 ай бұрын

love the animation!

@4elovek536 9 ай бұрын

Забыли показать горящие леопарды

@adamcheklat7387 11 ай бұрын

6:57: That thing looks like it can wreck a giant.

@debilus7921 Жыл бұрын

Now that we had tanks, maybe the evolution of battleships ? xD With like the ships of the line at the start, then the monitors, dreadnoughts etc... And finally to finish with the Iowa and Yamato :3 It would be interesting I think ^^ And great video of course, as always ^^

@amhuman5138 11 ай бұрын

Heck, it could even cover the Iowa's conversion, and potentially some of the future concepts of a 'battleship' (I.e a bigass ship containing hundreds of VLS launchers)

@debilus7921 11 ай бұрын

@@amhuman5138 Ah yeah, didn't thought about the future of battleships (and why it has been raplaced by aircraft carrier too ^^')

@amhuman5138 11 ай бұрын

@@debilus7921Yeah, that's a good one too.

@mrpoyo7968 11 ай бұрын

@@amhuman5138either that or they gonna use railguns when they become available

@lucasjohnsen1943 9 ай бұрын

You guys should make a video game with tanks i love how you made them in the video

@Poohandler 8 ай бұрын

Woah this is about to he good i can feel it

@spirit_miku Жыл бұрын

i love these animations there so well put together i remember when How Countries Fight Their Wars popped up in my recommended 3 years ago I'm happy to see more animations being uploaded again there pure gold and the commentary tops it off

@josephpoirot5029 11 ай бұрын

You forgot to tell about french tanks who introduced a lot of new technologie before the WWII, like during the great war with the renault ft 17, it was far more eficient than other tanks, to big and slow, and the b1 bis who were facing easely german tanks at the begining of WWII, the only problem were the use of and the sabotage in production.

@haydentenno6773 11 ай бұрын

they will never do that XD this channel is part of the stupid french-bashing clan ... they just act like they're an history channel lol

@vilks887 10 ай бұрын

Indeed

@gledtrain Ай бұрын

Soviet March from red alert 3, great song choice

@AIK-arT 6 ай бұрын

아 진짜 너무 재미있게 잘봤습니다😊 역시 밀리터리의 꽃은 전차지요❤ 아기자기한게 너무 귀여운데 화력이 화끈하네요❤❤❤❤❤

@rigmo2224 Жыл бұрын

I love this Studio so much because of how quick it pumps out new content we get to love and enjoy 🙏🙏🙏

@itsamefroggie Жыл бұрын

"quick" lol (not that I have a problem with a video a month)

@magical_dioxide7948 Жыл бұрын

@@itsamefroggie yeah its not quick at all but the animation and research done for the videos aswell as how long they are is well worth the wait👍

@jaxon3999 11 ай бұрын

5:05 T-34 really just said "siuuu" 💀💀💀

@NascarF1_driver 4 ай бұрын

Now I can’t unhear it💀💀💀💀

@get2da_chappa 4 ай бұрын

i hear the loud moaning meme 😭

@-Griffin- Ай бұрын

Talking about the history of tanks without mentioning the Renault FT is incredible.....truly incredible

@user-ov4od1xt9p 8 ай бұрын

The ending was like world of tanks and that's cool and cool video!

@PaHDoMNblu_4ell Жыл бұрын

"We would see leopard 2 perform"💀 You mean graveyard for 4 Mykolas?

@tankenjoyer9175 3 ай бұрын

man its biased asf, abrams are burning in ukraine rn