Hello Zia! Firstly, thanks a lot for your attention, is being so important to myself make this decision. I am not sure at all if I will can wait for the new 2.4 version LOL Thanks! Amauri

Please be advised that with depleted battery you will rarely see numbers smaller than 9 l/100km, especially in the city cycle. That is simple physics - you can not propel a ~2 tons car for less than that, no matter what hybrid technology you are using. To get all the benefits of this best in its class car (imho), you really need to have a socket in reach.

toyotaprius79 the motors utilized in the vehicle are NOT the same as i-miev. Easiest way to tell is that i-miev is 100% electric, but this is a hybrid. The rear isnt either, considering the motor outputs a different KW than i-miev.

94eh3 I'm talking about physical size. In that regard, the motors used in Mitsubishis they're the same. These aren't engined. For electric motors they do is put out more amps through it via the inverter. But it's the physical shape of the rotor (and whether it's permanent magnet or AC syncranous) is what really defines it's characteristic. Torque, speed, efficiency, heat generation. They're all effected. In this case, the small motors, even at full throttle with engine generation still stall because of their short length. They need that 3 or 5 mph like they do in snow to really be effective.

Lionnel L it gets 74 mpg rated so just multiply that by its tank space and that's pretty much what you're guaranteed to get if you're shitty at driving hybrids. if you keep it charged in ev mode you can get regular 250 mpg (according to the vehicle). in fact, this car has a mode where if the engine doesn't run in 6 months it will turn itself on and burn out half its tank so the gas doesn't get stale.

Not for a lot of people. A full charge lasts me 2 days. 1210 Kms cost me $47 in gas and $5 in electricity. I average 100Mpg.