Also, if I was a Judge, attorneys would be writing a $50 check every time they said "axe" instead of "ask" in my courtroom.

​@@CanadaMattGood thing you're not a judge. Our judicial system is so woefully inadequate and clogged as it is, that your idiotic solution would do nothing aside from assuaging your own ego.

Black's law dictionary defines "You know what I'm saying" as the proper antecedent phrase for an awesome legal argument.

I can’t stand that or when they say “Like” or “Um”

@@mellvee There are strict rules in court. I guess you think its ok to show up wearing a bikini too, seeing as though you know so much about the inadequisies of the legal system.

😂

That's Free Masonary... not mason or masonry. He's so special he gets an extra "a" in it.

Exactly my thoughts

@@TikkaT3xexcuse me? Could you be anymore racist?

​@@Gringa_LWhat . ??

@@Gringa_L either KZfaq took it down or they deleted it.

And disbarred

For what calling out the state, there holding 2 kids in jail over a person who's filed multiple false reports, maybe look into the case before you open your mouth

@@markheckman2196the case isn’t the issue - it’s his disrespect shown to the court

You people are so weird... you have such a hard on for seeing people punished, sanctioned or admonished without knowing if they deserve it or not. It's like some sort of groupthink sociopathy or something.

@@TwistOfFate444 he didn't disrespect anyone, it's called fighting for 2 possibly innocent kid's, that the cop never had evidence that has a gun in the first place.

😹😹😹😹😹😹😹

Weak ass judges won’t do it

Yeah but the defendant and his accomplice both agree that’s what happened, and 2 is more than 1 so it’s the truth by math. Checkmate!

@@jennifergoodland561 You're not the sharpest, are ya

​@@lescook9021You're not the best with sarcasm or humor, are you?

@@mellvee At times, no

@@lescook9021the fact that you thought the person replying to you was actually serious has me rolling😂😂😂

Just means the defendants came up with a story together.

​@@jamesplymire5342Yep, it's obvious.

I was looking for this comment. Her and Jerome got their law degree from the same school. 😂

it'd be no less awful to have to prosecute someone you just KNOW is innocent.

Yeah this is one of the few times I wholly believe the defendant.

He did not say he picked it up, he said he loaded it

@@barelyasurvivor1257 you would think the prosecutor would have specified how they moved it after the defense was bringing up doubt they could have moved it in the cross. And the officer never mentioned ramps or any testimony that cleared that up.

Some lift the front, then the rear.

Typical ignorant chimpanzees.

When your client is guilty as charged you learn to come up with crap like that. Good work on her part honestly. What you don't want is a defense attorney that just admits they did it and doesn't try to come up with some BS. It's the way the game is played. Only time you do admit it is when they have you red handed like there's a video of the robbery happening but since no camera caught it and they didn't find the gun then it's one persons word against another. Of course the facts only add up one way but like they said if you can't pound the facts then pound the table. You just have to try to get an inch of reasonable doubt in there and then that means you can get better deals for your client even if they are guilty as sin.

For defendants, they may not have a quiet private place to attend the hearing other than the car. They use their phones because they don’t have laptops.

@@jescan4 They can attend Court in person. Allowing a defendant to attend a hearing via zoom is a courtesy.

@@joshuaverkerk4532 It’s a good option especially for people who don’t live near the courthouse, who can save on gas and parking, and can minimize the time away from work. That being said I agree that there should be better decorum while in zoom court.

I would also be willing to accept Wadsworth or Yvette the Maid

@@markieffmorris9263 I like yours better!! Anything with Yvette.....

Thank you! I was going to make the Clue reference but figured no one would get it.

@@TwistOfFate444 cult Classic

I kept hearing that name and all I could see in my mind was Tim Curry.

Rite 👍🎉

IMO🤔. Don't matter what the 2 Defense comes up with... Truth can kick A$$😂

I agree, but the cash app evidence is more likely to work against the defendant than help his case if they subpoena to have his phone checked. It’ll show that his phone was on airplane mode.

Yes. That was what she was saying.

@jacklow9611 In that case...we could murder someone and as long as our story is the same, we are innocent 🤣

@@cheesefriesyo No, I'm not saying that at all. You asked if the defense attorney was saying that since the co-defendants' stories matched, then they were telling the truth (please reread your original comment) and I was merely affirming to you that that was indeed what she was doing, and nothing else. I was not agreeing with her, nor was I saying that it definitely had to be that way, because, being a somewhat sensible person (despite some people's contrary opinions), I can think for myself and can think of an entirely different scenario/possibility of what might have happened. Were you making a statement that what she said was the truth? If so, why the question mark? IF it was a question, why couldn't you see and accept, that all I was doing was answering your ques question as I saw it.

@jacklow9611 Take it easy buddy.

@@cheesefriesyo Take it easy? I HAVE BEEN taking it easy, so far. When I'm (more or less) asked to explain something, and it is seemingly (or deliberately) misinterpreted, and I give a further, more complete, explanation, I do not appreciate being accused of going too far. While I admit that there are times when the right words to describe a situation are difficult to find, please be assured that the words used in my original comment to you were well thought out, where your response to them were to (seemingly intentionally) say that I'd said/meant the opposite of what I'd said, or at least something that was not what I meant. Evidently, I was totally mistaken to think that you, or others, would have been able to consider the fact that between the times of the interaction between the attempt to buy the ATV (with the theft and running away with it) and the return of it, as described, there was evidently sufficient time (if the two actually HAD produced a pistol/handgun) for them to have discarded the handgun and worked out a story to give about how the owner of the ATV had pulled the gun on them. It is a well-known trope that crime suspects are often going to lie and come up with some story where they are as innocent as newborn babies, when confronted about the crime, because that has been happening since the start of recorded history in crime annals, which anyone with even a single shred of common sense, or the ability to think rationally would/should be able to recognize and be aware of that simple fact! Until it has been hashed out in a court of law, nobody but those who were actually involved in the incident knows what occurred then and there, especially since there are conflicting stories about how everything went down, as there usually are, so until we actually hear/see the testimony of the case, it is all speculation about what really occurred by those who were only viewers of a preliminary hearing on the case, but were not actual witnesses to the events that the trial/hearing was about.

This feels like the (best) ending of the Clue movie where Tim Curry pulls out the revolver and reveals that he is Mr. Boddy.

(Assuming you are talking about the last judge) He was neither: He was patient and he stood by what he said. (Assuming you are talking about the first judge) He was also patient and didn't let the guy control anything. Chill out, not everyone is an ashhole.

Cite first guy for contempt so he can serve more jail time for cursing out the judge and being so disrespectful

I agree, he's a weak ass liberal

It’s impossible for the prosecutor to interrupt Jerome because he never should have been talking in the first place. Judge needs to find the mute button or set a contempt hearing for the goofy one

Yeah, it's utterly shameful. It's disrespectful to your own office.

I wondered if the young men have $$$ attorneys Or Court Appointed?? Hope All had A Gud long Wknd Stay Safe 😎🎉 🇺🇸🇺🇸💥💯✅

The argument was, once Brody saw the payment fail, he pulled a gun causing the kids to flee.

​@@lovesagoodpigroast3560They should have unloaded the atv. Either way, they stole it.

His client is the other kid, co-defendant, sort of.

Defense Attorney's job.

I did the same, when I was younger. A big Honda 4 stroke! Was a heavily S.O.B.!

I wonder if his "partner N Crime" Is A minor...🤔😉