Aspects of Western Philosophy by Dr. Sreekumar Nellickappilly,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences,IIT Madras.For more details on NPTEL visit nptel.ac.in
Пікірлер: 20
@godfreymwenda24724 жыл бұрын
I love the teacher in you, Sir Sreekumar Nellickappilly! Very ordinary language, yet very efficient style of communicating deeply philosophical stuff! Kudos!!
@tsewangspaldon20185 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much Sir Really very helpful lecture to us.
@reflectingplusplus2 жыл бұрын
Great Lecture, Thank you so much
@bfh891 Жыл бұрын
brilliant
@bishwashbhatta87093 жыл бұрын
I really love your class sir❤️❤️❤️
@2375nikhil5 жыл бұрын
31:44 The Being of entities itself is not an entity , seems to be confusing, Sir Can you please explain. Thanks for sharing wonderful video.
@Mtmonaghan4 жыл бұрын
Nikhil M That by which a thing is known as what it is by you,say a piece of equipment, is so, because you in your relationship to your existence,relate to it. A discarded coke bottle may seem like annoying litter to you, but if it fell to Earth from a plane above, into the dwelling of a primitive tribe, it might be considered a sacred gift from the gods. Same thing, different manifestation of being, related to different ways of being.
@brahmaraz3 жыл бұрын
Check out the first reply www.reddit.com/r/askphilosophy/comments/4eor92/what_does_heidegger_mean_by_comportment/
@siddharthb26335 жыл бұрын
Today I am being happy because I have realised that Being is different from being. That being said, Heideggar's notion of Being is phenomenal! But without Phenomenology's transcendental subjectivity, knowning Being would have been very difficult.But I am no philosopher, thus, knowing what Heideggar's conception of Being means won't influence my life much. I am going to my daily work now, where everything is at hand. screw it, let it be.
@Mtmonaghan4 жыл бұрын
siddharth b You going to work, was never chosen by you. You simply do it because that is what one dose. You actually find your self feeling that this is very much the correct thing to do. Thus your way of being, say feeling and understanding are purely contingent on the way of being of Someone like you at this time in your culture. If you were borne with a different gender, into a different culture, at a different time, you would not recognise yourself. This is because you are inauthentic and you do believe in the existence of a enduring subjective self. But if you were authentic you would understand the same Being at work in the for mentioned example. Hiedegger dose not want to give you more truths to believe in, he wants you to experience a truth, related to truth in a different way.
@SignsMr4 жыл бұрын
@@Mtmonaghan 1) When you say: "you are inauthentic and you do believe in the existence of a enduring subjective self", is this living inauthentically because one is taking their Dasein not as (Being there) but rather as some ontic-present-at-hand entity? 2) Is it in Haidegger's language or jargon to talk about "enduring-subjective-self" or is this Buddhist / Vedantic language / jargon? (Not that I disagree with Buddhist / Vedantic expressions, I just would like to know where this is coming from). 3) Can you explain what it means to be "authentic"? You said, if we were authentic we wold understand the same Being at work in ....? Are you saying that we would understand the same Being at work regardless of any false-ontic-self that we regard as present at hand situation or circumstance?
@user-qf4rn3sl8e4 жыл бұрын
Thank you 😊
@JoeSophist497 жыл бұрын
Sir, can we say that Heidegger fell into the ditches of Metaphysics eventually?
@sssssarthak6 жыл бұрын
Being a true philosopher, you cannot regard a viewpoint as a 'Ditch' or something abhored. He might have revisited the notion of an absolute entity, but calling his life's work a 'fly in the bottle approach' is not a correct justification. It's his viewpoint, you may either subscribe to it or not.
@adaptercrash Жыл бұрын
Ya the ontological study of the meaning of the other through Cartesian dualism is a metaphysical ontology that disregards the life of being and falls short of a proper investigation of being
@vishaljayani83623 жыл бұрын
So can I say the essential meaning of dasein is concoiusness?