Oh how kind that a woman can go to a male judge for “reconciliation”, whilst a man can beat his wife and divorce her by saying “Talaq” 3 times. This religion makes perfect sense. 😀

Just when you think Mohammed Hijab couldn't be any more loathsome, he sinks to new lows.

I love Hijab. He discredits Islam far more than David Wood or Apostate Prophet or Samir ever could...

When a man loves a woman ... he could never hurt her physically for just suspecting her of something . Never

Doesn't surprise me. He sent some disgusting sexually violent texts against wives of other you tubers.

Then whyyy there is no verse about striking husband??????? Somebody ask that broomface man... 😕

Yes because mothers kill their children... really?! If a father sees his wife harm their children take them away and get the mother some mental health help. You don’t need a scholar or a Quran you need common sense and a grasp on humanities right from wrong.

I think these modern apologists living in Liberal countries and defending these teaching are very dangerous because they are affecting youth I had a chat online with someone and these were the points presented by him to defend this type of teachings

🤔🤔🤔🤔 if a father beat his naughty son the wife should also beat the father. 😳😳😳😳Hijab has really nice logic only a lunatic can have

He's taking the meaning of pathetic to another level as well as his cult!

07:35 Just look at his expression. He knows full well he is lying and deceiving (like allah) his audience. Absolutely disgusting. 🤢🤮

Modern marriage psychology: communication is key Quran: beat them all.

You’re fighting noble and worthy cause. It takes a brave person to challenge the absurdities of Islamic scripture especially as an apostate. 👏🏼👏🏼

I'm starting to respect Muhammad Hijab and Ali Dawah. At least they're now being honest that they have bigoted views and follow a bigoted dogma

Was there ever any doubt?

I can't believe that my country, England allows this creature to live in our civilised society

The very idea that a man has the right to physically discipline his wife explicitly defines the man as the dominant party in the marriage and sets up a dynamic of male dominance. After all the wife is not allowed to physically discipline the husband

Raisin-head Hijab at it again...

Too disgusting to see him wetting his lips every 10 seconds, interrupting his every sentence which is already unclear due to his extensive made up arabic accent

so if men and women are equal, is that also in intelligence and religion? Are both required to hide behind a veil? Are both required to take care of the children and housework? Are boys and girls able to gain an equal share of inheritance money?

That's an IQ-dropping video if i ever saw one, of Hijab's incredible mental gymnastics to try to defend that verse. I am just so baffled by his ludicrous arguments, wow, just wow. He should watch Zakir Naik to learn how to be unapologetic and defend the verse straight up.

Abdullah, you should play, one after the other, "interpretation" of such matters by Hijab and Zakir Naik ! So that people can compare a more honest interpretation by Zakir Naik to the deceptive, dishonest interpretation of Mohammed Hijab !

Thanks for taking the time to make this video. :-)

People like Mohammed Hijab are essential to keep INTELLIGENT people away from RELIGIONS and live MEANINGFUL and HAPPY lives in SANITY.

Well done Abdullah, this is golden, a real gem. This Is one of those classic one's that will make the hall of fame! 👌💯🏆

He threatened to rap e and ki ll other youtubers ! This is what his profit Mohabbatein taught 🐗😂

The epilepsy and hallucination is off the charts with this Mo. Like with the other Mo.

Ever since he attacked the wives ive haven't watched him. Im over him. He has mommy issues and its painfully apparent when you look at his videos.

A woman rebels because in Islam she is portrayed as a subordinate and the man a ruler, otherwise she is not rebelling but acting according to her freewill as a human being.

Biblical? 'Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, Ephesians 5:25 ESV

How lovely that they always skip over the word "If you FEAR". How on earth is that rational? Acting on mere fear? The examples Hijab gives have nothing to do with feared scenarios, but with actually occurring situations. And why is 'nushuz' translated as 'rebellion' when it applies to women, but not when it refers to men (4:128)? Could it be that there's just a bit of bias there?

Unless your significant other is about to murder/hurt you there is literally no reason for you to put your hands on another person. NO EXCUSE! Especially not “rebellion” or arrogance. It’s actually quite concerning to see people with a platform try to apologize and normalize abuse...makes you wonder what they do behind closed doors.

Can you be a muslim and a sincere person at the same time?

Just subscribed, love the content of your video's and the way you react.

Hijab looks like a sixth former explaining to headmaster why he has permission from his dad to bully and groom girls

Your work is keenly needed to expose this kind of repulsive behavior, thanks for your time and effort

First it doesn’t say in the verse if a woman abuses her children you can beat her. It says a man is in charge of a woman and if she rebels he can beat her. So it’s about a woman that is not submissive to her husband. Secondly why this punishment is only mentioned about women in Quran, why there isn’t anything about in which circumstances a woman can beat her husband. If a woman feels that she’s neglected she has to reconcile it with her husband. The verse is about men being allowed to beat their wives and nothing this man and his ridiculous arguments can do to change that. Unless he doesn’t want to change it but just using taquiya to protect Islam!

For reasons I do not know, I am happy with such matters and those who tell the truth. You deserve to have a lot of subscribers. I am happy to subscribe to your channel. Keep up the good work. God bless you.😊❤

What if you say Talaq three times together ?

No it DOES NOT mean separate. The word ضربوهن (pronounced darabuhuna) literally translates to beat them, and is derived from the word ضرباً (darbaan) which means to hit or to beat. The verse is clearly telling men they can beat their wives if they fear rebellion. This is so clear to anyone who speaks Arabic. It is literally as unambiguous as if it had been written “and beat them” in English.

This is a new low for Hijab. 🤦‍♂️

Special pleading eh Hijab

I think that criticizing is one of the most important things to change the world better but, this is a passive violent effort. I also think we need to establish new things to guiding new people and their open minded, and I think this is an active violent effort. We need both passiveness and activity. I’m working on it now.

It's nice to see a muslim explain...(whatever do u wanna call it?) In swahili we say 'anakula meno'.. eating teeth..how does he feel?

MOHAMMED was the first feminist brodaaaa 🤣🤣🤣🤣

What are the instructions to the wife for if/when her husband disrespects her? It would be against most peoples' natures to assault anyone let alone the person they love

Wow...the last statement was stunning "Quran does not show you the best to treat your wives its just the words of Muhammad"

Another brilliant video many thanks for the the hard work.

Well said sir! Notably Mr Hijab still hasn't found the courage to respond to my post from over a year ago, which included: 1. We are told that the Quran is the perfect, unalterable and eternal word of Allah (God). Therefore the context of time and/or place is irrelevant! Your fallacy of presentism is completely spurious and irrelevant. 2. Sura 4:34 lets break this down for you as you seem incapable of doing so or fearful of doing so. A) If you fear rebellion (disobedience in other translations) =How insecure would a person have to be to consider imposing sanctions/beating a person because they fear (suspect in other translations) rebellion? B) Secondly, the rebellion/disobedience immediately implies that the man is the authority. Rebellion means to resist a leader/authority and disobedience is to refuse to obey rules of your master/someone in authority.

Brilliant analysis ! Keep it up dear brother .

How did he get an interview in the first place ?

0:50 That is not presentism... en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(literary_and_historical_analysis) "(...) presentism is the anachronistic introduction of present-day ideas and perspectives into depictions or interpretations of the past (...)" en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historian%27s_fallacy "(...) presentism, a mode of historical analysis in which present-day ideas (such as moral standards) are projected into the past (...)" Presentism is interpreting old ideas using anachronically present ideas. It's not a way of disproving old ideas using modern ideas.

Hi Mr Sameer, just found your site, found this video very informative, nice bite sized piece of information, keep up the good work, and I will keep watching. Just one observation, I thought you over played the accidental harm point Mr Hijab made, my husband suffers night tremors, and has been known to kick out, and punch, during these nightmares, and yes I have been woken by a punch to the back of the head, or the odd sharp kick. I think the saying is,"to give a sucker an even brake".

Sorry but i hv never seen The Deen Show before. But i think the guy fell asleep after he asked the question, n woke up soon after Hijab finished bullshiting.

That’s Hijab speciality, defending the Allah’s donkey revelations. Why couldn’t Allah say, “spouse” instead of husband. Did Hijab watch Yasir Qadir’s fatwa on step 3 of this verse?

Taqiyya is hijab's middle name.

The culture of Is l am is based on pagan polytheist honor culture. This can be see in Koran 30, verses 38 to 40, and in other verses, where the listener is assumed to be embedded in the pagan polytheist culture

So, basically Hijab was trying to argue in favor of some sort of moral relativism? He doesn't think there's any good reason, beyond cultural happenstance, that we think wife beating is wrong? The suffering that the beating would cause the woman, the psychological damage from the clear power imbalance in the relationship, the fact that it creates an atmosphere of violence in the household-- finding any of that wrong is unreasonable in Hijab's view? I really hope that these kinds of moral anti-realism go extinct.

so,the conclusion is..u can beat a woman.

Hijab is absolutely insane 😄😄😄 What an example !😄😄😄😄😄

Hijab uses contradicting arguments.

Abdullah Sameer please do a video on Imran Khan writing to Facebook to ban Islamophobia (criticism of Mohammed)

The more I see and hear M H, the more I dislike him. He is obnoxious. Look how he treated Alex O'connor a few months ago and how arrogant he is when he's at Speakers Corner in London. Self righteous and insulting. I'm sure there must be Muslims who are embarrassed by him.

The narrative has holes

I hate that thing all these muslim apologists seem to do, its obviously taught to them in some way, where they do that thing where they are explaining something, then at a point they do that thing that teachers do when they try to get you to complete their sentence. That sort of raining of the tone of the word, a pause............. then say something like its a fact. They all seem to do it.

But I remember seeing you refute this long ago

Is he actually bringing NSPCC into this?

1-Islam asks both male and female to restrict themselves only to their spouses. 2-Islam, in the strongest manner possible, condemns every extra-marital relation. 3-The permission to (lightly) beat women is not unconditional, nor it is in every situation. Lets see the context of the that; Quran says: "....therefore the righteous women are devotedly obedient, and guard in (the husband's) absence What ALLAH would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, Admonish them (first), Next, refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them (lightly); But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, means (of annoyance): For ALLAH is Most High, Great (above you all)." (Quran 4:34) This makes it absolutely clear that this permission is only when women become disloyal--And again reading from start makes it clear that disloyalty here means something below dignity of a modest and chaste woman. 4-When a woman indulges into such an act then of a surety she would not be to her husband as she ought to be. This can even possibly make her husband slip away form the right path and he may get involved somewhere else. If such a stage arrives then this would be havoc not only for the couple and their relations but for the society as a whole. And this permission is deterrence and a necessity against evil. It's allowed in extreme cases only: 1-Even in that case, to beat is the last option. First is to admonish, if this does not work then next step is to part from their beds, and if this also fails then is light beating. 2-And even if such a stage arrives then also their are restraints, "But if they turn to obedience, Seek not against them, Means of annoyance" 3-If at all a woman feels that she cannot live with her husband anymore, for any reason, she must get divorce and part, but as long as she is inside the marriage she must remain loyal to her husband even in his absence. For the mutual relation of the couple is the very basis of the society. An Important Instruction: When interpreting a verse we have to take in consideration the Hadith of Holy Prophet (peace be upon him). He said; "Fear Allah concerning women! Verily you have taken them on the security of Allah, and intercourse with them has been made lawful unto you by words of Allah. You too have right over them, and that they should not allow anyone to sit on your bed whom you do not like. But if they do that, (in that case) chastise them in a way that leaves no mark (i.e. not severe). Their rights upon you are that you should provide them with food and clothing in a fitting manner." (Sahih Muslim, Hadith 2137) This shows it is more of a psychological thing then a physical one and the purpose is only to maintain the chastity and mutual love and affection of the spouses. If a wrong conduct of the woman is not checked then surely the relation will be adversely effected. Why there is no legislation for wife doing the same to her husband: Remember man can have legitimate second wife but woman can't have two legitimate husbands at a time for obvious reasons. Considering this and the more obvious psychological, physical differences and considering real life facts there is no legislation regarding wife admonishing her husband this way. She may take up the issue with the elders of both families to correct her husband. An unauthentic narration: Some people try to mislead by quoting a narration which goes as: Narrated Umar ibn al-Khattab: The Prophet (pbuh) said: A man will not be asked as to why he beat his wife. (Sunan Abu Dawud Hadith 2147. Albani classified it as Da’if i.e. unauthentic). Besides Albani, Ahmad Shakir and Shu’aib ‘Arna’ut also graded it Da’if in their respective classification of Musnad Ahmad. Ibn Kathir also criticized its chain in Musnad Al-Farooq 1/182.

abdula sameer is clever than muhamad hijab.

He managed to make a clear verse very convoluted. Going against quranic claim that it is a book made clear to understand. Hijab has disproved quran

Hijab talking not by evidence from quran, just try to cover by his words.

I love your voice! It's so cute🥰

Women’s rights...why not? Hijab is against it.

3:23 Were you impersonating Mufti Abu Layth? :P

ask Hijab to take his wife's opinion on this. But he won't agree.

When the Glasses are off you know things are serious

These momins are great, they can confidently twist any verse to their advantage. they think all others are stupid

An a muslim, I don’t take teaching from just any one trying his hard to explain, i refuse what Hijab explained and I have done my search to find a much much better explanation for this verse than what hijab is saying.

It was like watching a bad Saturday nightlive episode on acid

Sends threats of violence, veiled rape threats, messages about guys pissing on each other, supports wife beating. Can't imagine why he's single. What a catch. Good grief...

A man defending himself from a woman???? Hijab..really

@Abdullah Sameer, Thanks for putting this together. The man who hit Hatun Tash in the face last weekend approached her while she was SPEAKING. Hopefully Mohammed Hijab is not impressed.

Who knows what is happening in Hijabs house? I'm really worried about how vicious and big maybe Mrs. Hijab is. Seems that she implikated a genaral fear of wemen inside him. And after his, over the past month, mentioned sexualy favors, I (shame on me) saw a 200 Kg woman sitting on his chest and he, wurling like a snake try to get her off. Oh my goodness!! I'll never get this out of my brain again!!

can the women beat her husband if hes hurting their child? I bet not. the guy from the deen show doesnt seem conviced by what Hipus is saying

His last name is hijab lool what do u expect

Taqiya in best light sich a liyer and deceiver only peak and choose whats fit in his agenda. Thank you dear Abdullah for your work 🙏

This guy should be ashamed of himself! Infact all those who follow this book should be ashamed!

Mimi compared muslims vigilante to black people in his interview with AP.

What a pathetic argument. Any person should be able to defend him. Or her self Why is that verse not for reverse roles. Why does it talk about men beating women and not women defending herself against men. This is clear Taqiyya

If Is l am ic Fate was true, why is Allah allowing marital violence and divorce? Marital violence and divorce shows Is l am ic Fate is nonsensical and incoherent, so Is l am is false.

He's so pathetic!

Your good !! Now l understand what a straw man argument is !

brother.. i wanna talk to you

This is why so many Muslim stays Muslims. Because they interpret the quran or hadith in their own meaning and understanding. Jesus is God

Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "The believers who show the most perfect faith are those who have the best behaviour, and the best of you are those who are the best to their wives". وعن أبي هريرة رضي الله عنه قال ‏:‏ قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم ‏ "‏أكمل المؤمنين إيمانا أحسنهم خُلقا، وخياركم خياركم لنسائهم‏"‏ ‏(‏‏(‏رواه الترمذي وقال ‏:‏ حديث حسن صحيح‏)‏‏)‏‏.

the man defending himself lmao

Why would a man be bothered if his wife buys new shoes😥😥 I'll never understand Islam

Firstly , an emotionally intelligent man will know that it is never ok to strike a woman or threaten divorce . Secondly, I have listened to Ani Zonneveld , of the progressive Muslim movement in a scholarly debate defend this verse in breaking down the Arabic word for ‘strike ‘ like all Arabic words has various meanings and that it doesn’t literally mean to physically harm . Alhamdulliah 🌸

There’s another verse, hijab, saying: a man should not be asked why he is beating his wife.

9:42 that's ridiculous. Lol 😂 i can't believe how some people believe in those people and listening to them seriously while I'm listening just to laugh.