My wish is to be with scientists and give you new theories and I have some theories plz 🙏🙏 help me to give my theories to world love from Pakistan.

Türkçe diline nasıl çevireceğiz.

@@TURNON111write a Article and send to a good journal for publication..

@@murugan5280 already done it but no one even published worldwide

Dear Eugene! Wowww! That's beautiful and perfect job! Congratulations

Not to mention 'On The Beautiful Blue Danube', which always transports me to a Pan-Am space shuttle docking with the space station...

+Eugene Khutoryansky You're the best, hands down best youtube subscription. Don't stop making videos!

you shold put the link to the patreon in the description of the videos. awesome video!

+Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky I m watching your video 9th class and now I m 1st year(11th class) and still watching................. Your physics videos, animations and explanation are the best...............

You and Salman Khan ( from KhanAcademy) rule when its about illustrative and clear e-learning.

Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky You're one of the best teachers I've had in physics, but somethings been boggling my mind for a while and this video is a perfect opportunity to ask. Could you please explain how the smaller object when colliding with the bigger one(2.25) does not stop. I know in real life it would bounce off but according to Newton's laws of motion it shouldn't. According to Newton's third law, there should be an equal and opposite reactionary force on the smaller ball when it applies a force on the bigger ball and since force is equal to the change of momentum, when the bigger ball applies the equal and opposite force, the smaller ball should stop as the force it exerts is equal to it's momentum. This doesn't happen in real life. Something that may help you that I've thought of, is from a different example. Consider the smaller ball now stationary, and the bigger ball is moving toward it at a constant velocity. Same situation but the roles switched. When the bigger ball hits the smaller ball, I used to think the bigger ball should stop as the smaller ball produces an equal and opposite force to stop it. But then I realised that the bigger ball does not have to exert its full momentum onto the smaller ball, but only enough so that the move at a similar speed. So the momentum of the larger ball only decreases by a smaller amount as it takes less force to get the smaller ball moving at the same speed. That's my reasoning, unfortunately it does not explain what I mentioned earlier. My reasoning lead me to think that the smaller ball has to exert a larger force than its momentum can give to the larger ball, but it then gets cancelled out when the larger ball exerting the same amount of extra force to the smaller ball making it move in the opposite direction. However the reasoning mentioned in the last paragraph alludes to there being a conservation of velocity which definitely sounds untrue. I hope you read and understand my long winded messy post and give some kind of solution based on what you can understand of what I am saying, I hope I'm not wasting your time, sorry :)

Your video is older than the Bugatti Chiron. Wow

Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.

Karan Agarwal absolutely

It’s his name.

@@cssstylescommand4 "Physics Videos by [Name]" could be shortened to just this name

@@ThomasBomb45I think a bit longer but self-explanatory channel name would be "[Name]'s Physics".

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation. More videos are on their way.

Glad you liked it. More videos are on their way.

+Virusnzz He's an Electrical Engineer!

@Aaron Morris Not necessarily true. I've earned a degree in Physics but getting a Doctorates in Electrical engineering. In other words, there is a physics background even if it's scope is just courses in physics. Electrical engineers are required to take physics as part of their program.

That is so untrue lol.

@@Spacetime_ghost richard feynman started as a biologist

@@elijahjflowers so that proves that most people who don't do physics can explain it better?

+Vineet Dubey, Glad I was able to help.

Thanks for the compliment about my video. I hope your students like it.

+Eduardo Nogueira, thanks for the compliment, and I am glad to have you as a fan.

Glad to hear that. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you like my videos.

Thanks. I am glad to hear that.

Glad you liked my video. Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment about my explanation.

Thank for the compliments about my video. I have many other videos on my channel in which I explain other subjects in this manner. Thanks.

Thanks!

+saksham chauhan, thanks. Glad you liked it.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like my videos.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment.

+Abduzayir Abdukadir, thanks. I am glad that you like my videos.

You'll notice the bottom and top get wider as height decreases. So, area field is still constant, and angular momentum is conserved.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks for the compliment. I make my 3D animations with "Poser."

Thanks. I am glad you liked my video.

Thanks. Glad to hear that.

This is just the way we chose to define the term "angular momentum." This definition happens to be useful for calculations. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment.

To change the ball's distance from the center, a force is applied, thereby adding or removing energy from the system. The energy is being transferred to or away the source of the force.

+John Lux, thanks for the compliment. In reply to your question, when the Sun exerts a gravitational attraction on the Earth, the Earth exerts a gravitational attraction on the Sun. I show an animation of this in my "Laws of Motion" video. Thanks.

Thanks. Glad you liked my video.

+Igal ***, you are welcome and thanks.

+Ibrahim Chahrour, this is a consequence of Newton's Laws of motion. Since for every force, there is an equal and opposite force, and F = mA, the net consequence is that momentum and angular momentum must be conserved. We also know this through experiment, in that we have always found momentum and angular momentum to be conserved for every experiment we conducted.

+Shirshak Bajgain, thanks for that really great compliment, and I am glad that you liked that I used a parallelogram to explain cross product. I also have a parallelogram to explain cross product in my video on Maxwell's Laws, to explain the strength of the force create by a magnetic field on a moving charged particle. Thanks.

Thanks. I am glad you liked my explanation.

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you like them.

+Premed1981, thanks.

+MultiMrHP, thanks for the compliment.

Thanks for the compliment.

Thanks.

Thanks for the compliment. I am glad you liked my explanation.

+isb pk, the units for angular momentum is "kg*m^2/s". This is different than the units for momentum in that we have meters^2 in the equation, due to the fact that we are also multiplying by the distance between the point and the object. You can calculate the angular momentum by calculating the area of the parallelogram I showed in the video. This can be done by taking the cross product of the two vectors that made up this rectangle. This can also be done by multiplying the length of the two arrows by each other, and then multiplying this number by the sine of the angle between them.

+konda babu, thanks.

Thanks for the compliment. I make my 3D animations with "Poser", and I do some of the simulations with an add-on purchased separately called "Poser Physics", in addition to the built in simulator called "Bullet Physics." Poser is expensive, but there are also free 3D animation programs available, such as "Blender" and "Daz Studio."

@@EugeneKhutoryansky Thank you so much for taking the trouble to answer me your videos are really INCREDIBLE!!!

Thanks for the compliment.

@@EugeneKhutoryansky thank you, actually. Please make videos more on physics with great animations and everything. Especially about electricity, mechanics and thermodynamics. I know you will deliver the best.

Glad you liked my explanation. Thanks.

+Rodrigo Appendino, yes. I plan to make more videos on linear algebra, in addition to the one that I already have on that topic. Thanks.

+Eugene Khutoryansky YES PLEASE!!! Linear Algebra! :))))

Acceleration is not a cause. Acceleration is a mathematical description of motion. Acceleration is the effect, when a mass is subject to a net force.

I will add the Dzhanibekov effect to my list of topics for future videos. Thanks.

It was always rotating, just at different speeds. Therefore, the angular momentum was never zero.

I make my 3D animations with "Poser."

We need to take into account the momentum and angular momentum of all the subatomic particles in the material providing the friction, and then we see that the momentum and angular momentum is still conserved.

Meeharbi N the reaction is the one object stopping. the force brings the object to zero so there still is a equal and opposite force but it's just the perfect amount to stop it and not have the ball move in another direction

Meeharbi N it depends also on how elastic the collision is and if energy is lost in the collision. it does happen all the time so you saying it doesn't is simply wrong

You are understanding is incorrect. Please to refer to F=ma . let m1 be the smaller ball and m2 be the bigger ball and also let's assume m1= 1kg and m2= 10kg . then after collision between the balls it is abvious the smaller ball will bounce back with greater acceleration that the bigger ball. In this case, by the equation f=ma , we can safely say that it's acceleration (lets assume m1 acceleration be a1 and m2 acceleration be a2) wil be in the ratio 10:1 so as to show f=m1.a1 = m2.a2.

+PT Yamin, thanks. Glad you liked it.

+XxKINGatLIFExX, thanks for the compliment.

Physics Videos by Eugene Khutoryansky Np, keep up the good work. Have you got any vids on Quantum Mechanics and Space? Thanks.

+XxKINGatLIFExX, yes I have many videos on those topics. Just check out my KZfaq home page.

Will do thanks!

You are welcome and thanks.

I make my 3D animations with "Poser."

+Max Webster, it is any point that we pick in space. No, this point does not exert a force on the particle. It is just that for any point we pick in space, the angular momentum around that point, as described here, will remain constant.