😜

Happy Birthday Armando!!🎂

Deeana Johnson thank you!

Happy birthday Armando 😊😊 Btw love ur honest review 👍👍

Unsubscribe!!! Haffy birthday ahahha

Wow, what a contrast. But then again, it's the people using those tools and it makes a huge difference. You guys are such an awesome pairing, maybe even better than Peter and Matti because you guys are both really funny.

@@joshzaring Appreciate that man!

@@joshzaring Peter and Matti are Canadian's , they just want to be Americans

Did you use any custom profile on the M50?

@@chrisprophet9699 Yup they paid me so much money I don't know what to do with it anymore ha!

Nice videos Max!

In fact, I think I need to make another "what I hate about Sony cameras" video. They've fixed a few things I complained about before, so maybe that will help.

Please do some test on still images, not video, when shooting sports and moving subjects. See which autofocus is better/faster.

Looks like to have a Canon Eos R and Sony A7III next to eachother would solve the problem since they both fill eachothers shortcomings more or less.

@@MaksimYuryev how does this video compare with the one you did recently comparing the video quality from several mirrorless cameras? Based on your video, canon performed poorly. I'd like to know your thoughts on this?

Potato Jet you mean WAAAZZZZUUUUUPPPP!!!???!!? 😂❤️

why not compare slow mo.... ??

What's UP!!!!

man that pimple really sticks out in this video

Hi

Manny De Los Santos Productions I've got really good at grading Sony S-Log footage to match Canon mainly because my main camera is a C200. But yeah, once you get the colors down it's hard to tell them apart.

@@mondobytes Nice. I appreciate all the testing. Thanks!😊

@@mondobytes Why did you go for the Sony A7III if you are a Canon C200 shooter in the first place?

Lutte Kikker because the EOS R wasn't available at the time. Sony A7III has been out for a while now where EOS R was just released a few weeks ago.

@@mondobytesI think he means why using a a73 if u have a c200.. My quess would be for typical projects, its smaller and usable on the smaller gimbals.

This is 1 video of many more to come on both our channels. The stuff you mentioned will be covered in upcoming episodes.

Exactly. And for $300 less.

Why TF are you shooting in 120p?

Cinema Heist Same can be said about Sony has crappy bit rate and only offering 8 420 100mbps, If you’re shooting a professional job that requires color grading then there’s only one option. And if I’m trying to get smooth shots I’m definitely not using IBIS i’m using my ronin s with either camera. Video is just not about the resolution it’s about the bitrate. The only thing that canon really messed up was the 120fps, they should just crop 1.25 to match the Sony 24mp. 4k crop is understandable because it’s a 1.25 more pixels at a high bitrate. Both cameras made compromises in the video department just different ways and I find it baffling that nobody sees it especially Sony fanboys. I can easily prove it watch a movie at 1080p 2k bitrate and 1080p 10k bitrate if you can’t tell the difference, I recommend you sell your gear and use your smartphone

the same reason i am using sony right now for shooting wedding videos. But i have the 5D mark IV as a second camera just because of the color you get straight of the camera. 1080p at 120p with auto focus was a deal breaker for me. For gimbal works sony is way to go.

Thanks for stopping by and enjoy the R! Solid camera, should be getting mine today!

@@mondobytes Most under-rated camera.....on youtube. I made a video stating that a camera does not make you a professional, you make the camera professional. Too many people relying on gear to be a professional in video and photography. Have fun playing with the camera today!

@@JaredHoyman Well spoken, I shot with Fujica and Nikon in my early film photography years without a problem. Then I went medium format with Rolleiflex (also pretty fine camera). I switched over to Canon DSLR's after the Nikon D100 because of the 1080p film option (which Nikon refused for years to implement). Nowadays with Sony they seem to have a slight advantage with video, but then again....if you can't pull it off with Nikon or Canon or any other brand you won't pull it off with the Sony A7 III either probably.

@@luttekikker completely agree!

and btw even though the settings were the same, the A7 III videos always looked a bit brighter, which is probably one of the reasons why the highlights were blown out. It would be interesting to see the cameras side by side matched to the same brightness and not the same settings.

@@RedHatMedia We only did that because people would then complain that the tests were unfair. But we do plan to do more videos and will address this.

@@mondobytes Thanks for your reply. I know it's not possible to compare these to cameras without upsetting someone. But I'm glad to hear that your trying to address these points ;)

Tojikiston Today Yeah, same. I tought the A7 M3 was much better but now I got my opinion changed with this video.

@@slbandre its really close camera the a7iii have color close to reality, sharpness, better af in good condition and low light u dont see too many diferencr, eos r have better af in low light, better colors in low light and noise its about the same

@@iurip.a.7104 what??? obviously you have no idea about Sony's low-light video performance... There is way too much more noise in images taken with Canon.

@@rubydiseno9406 i have no idea? I have the 2 câmeras the Sony about 1 year and canon 2mounth

@@rubydiseno9406 I love Sony but I'm not blind

i was thinking the same exact thing

PS SLOG2 is flat enough to compare to CLOG. SLOG3 needs to be recorded on a recorder. Both are flat profiles but the SLOG3 is flatter and for best results - you must use it only in very ccontrasty scenes. 1. SLOG needs ~2 stops of overexposure by specs. So you were perfectly fine to shoot the Canon at its native ISO for CLOG. 2. You are totally ignoring the customization of the Sony profiles. It is something that can turn the tables. You can make a simple profile - Cine4 with Sgamut3 and boost the saturation a little. This will give you Canon colors and much easier to grade footage. You can tweak the Knee settings and get the smooth highlight roll off... Sony is giving you the settings to do whatever you want. 3. HLG - you have to try it... 4. 480mbits ALL-I is just as effective as 120mbits longgop codec. Yes there is a difference if you are shooting fast moving subjects of anything that requires more changes in the scene but you also get much smaller files with the longgop. My point here is that you both on your channels explain that the Canon codec is many times better and I suppose that you know the truth... they are pretty close. When you grade SLOG3 which is MUCH more flatter than the CLOG it is normal thing to have more problems with the compression. But with some simple tweaks the SLOG can be improved without losing any quality. The only reason to keep it stock is if you are matching it to other cameras like FS... And one more thing :) I have already seen other testers showing footage from those cameras and it looks like you and PotatoJet are trying with post processing to make the EOS R look better. I am pretty sure about that when I saw the videos from PotatoJet but you @Armando Ferreira... I thought that you are more fair and unbiased.

What a BS, ofc the a35mm suck A LOT!!! AND the bigger problem is, why the you did NOT use correct exposures, who shoots underexposed scenes anyway? No one, ever. Correct the exposure as you go up the ISO. That a disappointment, use the camera the RIGHT way!

@@billjohnson1816 l think you missed the part @3:51 we did test both FF and Super 35mm and the results were pretty much the same. The Sony as I said in my video "destroyed" the ESO R and there's really no competition there.

@@mondobytes @3:51 is still says the Sony is in Super 35. Maybe it's a mistake.

Damn, I have a T5i...

Haha thanks fam, I lost count but we need to do another one. 💪🏼

how is it performing?

Co ask

@@digitalavatar5699 very good actually, I bought 2 Canon Eos r and it's quite a fantastic

@@Deepinodissi thanks. I sold my old camera waiting to get a used Canon EOS R 😀

Likewise, thank you for watching!

Hallow ferriera

Haw many price Sony A73 please

wow, 3 camera brands and 3 different sensors....how does that work out in productions if I may ask (mount and colour wise)?

Thanks man!

Exactly

kapil busawah You're missing one point though. He had the Canon images to 'match'. If you don't own both cameras you can't do that, so you're just guessing at colours.

highlight roll off is extremely adjustable on sony a7 iii, just go to the picture profile and knee settings, you can practically do a tone curve adjustement there.... helpguide.sony.net/di/pp/v1/en/contents/TP0000909110.html people who have sony should really check those manuals, they are not even 3 pages but makes you understand every setting

@@cooloox exactly.

don't need another camera to match. X-Rite Color Checker. That's all you need. Davinci will even automatically grade for you. Will improve canon's video also! :)

Haw many price Sony A73

Brendan Miranda wait what!? It’s your birthday!?!

Laertes the barber yes... these guys know what they are doing.

Laertes the barber if you leave EIS ON which is the electronic stabilization it crops in to the image and really degrades the quality.

There’s a lot of Sony sales associates on you tube posing as video experts it’s pretty common knowledge that canon has been on top of the dual purpose photo /video camera game for a decade are more know since the 70d anyways , if you were on a movie set and needed a quick 3rd angle shot no one pulls out a Sony’s a series camera where as a 1dx2.... yeah not to mention glass and mount and a smooth AF Sony has gotten better but they aren’t on canons level yet no matter what any youtube pro tells you.

Its all a matter of settings in the end.

yep, this video is very bias and intentionally favouring Canon.

Jeff Luo I think Potato Jet said it best in his video, image colors are like art. Just because someone likes a specific art piece doesn't mean it's good or bad. I think both cameras give you great results and in the end you have to pick what works best for you.

I agree. Canon is too yellow

I watched Sean's video but you can't really apply it to shooting video. He is editing raw images, good luck grading 8 bit video like that. So the straight out of camera colours are kind of important for this test. If you prefer Sony that's great but the majority of people seems to prefer canon in this test.

Yeh!

When you shoot professionally, you don't shoot crazy high ISO 3200, 6400 too. Also, you don't shoot high dynamic scene, it's all lit artificially. Both are excellent and the overall bigger system have the edge as per requirement.

You do if you are a profesional run and gun videographer. I can use ISO 3200 in weddings for example, but i'll never use the standar profile, maybe for an interview? and then you can do some quick color grading to make it much better

@@hav6301 But These aren't meant for run and gun videography. That's why pro camcorders exist. These are more like film making tools than run and gun things.

Nanogalaxy film making camera...??? The a73 and eosR are dual purpose photo /video cameras not at all are they designed for film making they can be used for that but there are a lot better options in the price range of these cameras for actually filming a movie are even indie short but whatever you have can work that’s for sure

@@joewayne9951 They're indeed dual purpose But they're not supposed to be used in the auto mode or standard picture profile. We're supposed find the perfect manual settings which varies with each camera. So that's why I said it's pointless to compare both cameras with their standard picture profile. Maybe the Canon is better at auto mode, but how can that mean it's better it all ways?!

EritreanMusiq 120 FPS can be slowed down for smooth footage. If you have 60 FPS slowing that down won’t look as smooth. So to answer your question it’s in camera.

Thank you so much for stopping by, working on that video as we speak!

Set high iso noise reduction to standard

Best Deal Window Tint glad you enjoyed it and thanks for watching!

Andrian Sogoci

Damn I feel you bro. I'm stuck in your same exact condition. Been using the Canon 80D for two years but it just doesn't perform good in low light.

in low light sony is better. IBIS 5-steps(so, you can shot for example at 1/50 for stills). non-crop 4k. 1080p/120fps with sound. better eye-focus, faster low-light focus.

BearHuggedTrees you should watch my EOS R Review 😉

@@mondobytes I watched a few times sir ;). While I dont shoot 4k right now, my biggest worry was that I was gonna want to in the future. Your Baby C200 video made me feel a lot better about the purchase. It may not be the perfect camera but its the perfect camera for ME. Thanks for all your content. I've learned a lot. It's people like you that make any of these skills obtainable to people like me.

💪

Zack8133 no!!! I told you to come here and unsub remember!?

Hey hey 🎈

🙏🏼

Didn't know he was my neighbor so yes, there will be more!

Did you bought it? Didn’t you regret? I’m today at the same situation you was 🤷🏾‍♂️

No, I haven’t Kenneth. I’m holding out for the R5 now. 😎 Have you seen the specs on that?! 🤯

Mike Banks No I haven’t When is gonna be released

If you watched the video you it would have saved you the 5 minutes it took to write this. First off i'm not "complaining" I said in my video both do a great job in AF. I gave the slight edge to Canon because it's smoother, these are facts I've messed with Sony's AF settings and can never get it to rack focus as smooth as Canon. It's just not possible, it's either too aggressive or too slow.

Damn ! Thanks for the heart😉

Hope you enjoyed the video 🙏

What’s your personal favorite?