Thanks bro!

Can I just keep it for a bit longer? I have a few more of these videos to make!

@@automaticgainsay Mark ok here is the deal: she said “yes he can keep it longer... however next time when you bring the milk and cookies, leave the milk at home and just bring the booze” also she said something about “the depends had a leak dont flip the cushion”... what ever that means😳

Wait why are they not doing synth sounds of anymore?

@@user-iz3fn3mc9w I don't know and I could be wrong. But I feel like I haven't seen a William Kurk video in a while.

There's a book coming with several examples of Bode on his instruments...

@@briankehew579 What book? That sounds cool

@@KirbyCurbwhy Tom Rhea's Electronic Perspectives, dozens of examples of very rare instruments.

Good. I'd like to be able to see again. It's been a great loan, though!

@@automaticgainsay Lol.

The Electronic Sackbut purported employed "voltage control," but the important point is HOW that voltage control was employed. And I don't actually know. It may be in some very relevant fashion. But when talking about events in the development of synthesizers and Electronic Music history, the MOST relevant points are those that deal with influence. There are connections between LeCaine's history and historical elements that led sequentially to other developments, but the Sackbut was not really one. On top of that, Harald Bode's Warbo had what could be called "voltage control" in ways, too... and that was 1937.

@@automaticgainsay I watched a talk recently on the Sackbuts restoration, The Sackbut (apparently had what we would recognise as standard VCF, VCA, VCO topologies. Gustav Ciamaga apparently had experience with LeCaine's VCFs and introduced the Idea to Moog (which is certainly worth exploring). Of course as I mention Bode had as I understand implemented voltage control topologies with tubes, I am certain many other examples could be found both in musical instrument design & more significantly in analogue computing and process control earlier than in musical instrument design.

The Hammond Novachord did not employ the control voltage paradigm. However, it did feature early versions of just about everything that defined a polysynth. And, it was the first top-octave-divide instrument.

The Trautonium was an incredibly important instrument for a variety of reasons... primarily that it used a neon-based oscillator that generated a sawtooth... that in combination with its dormant filtering meant it was one of the first synths to demonstrate a “subtractive” paradigm. However, it did not employ voltage control in the manner that it is relevant to later synthesis devices.

ha ha ha...I mean who invented that hair...is that voltage controlled????

It is the very same! And yep, good ol' #2 keeps the detuning alive!

Through those beautiful locks that is

Press X to Doubt

Hey, Cameron. Hugh's work was fascinating and important. But Harald's work preceded it. What can be done about that?

Exactly, Hugh is well known to have communicated with Moog and others at the time and to have written in the popular journals of the time. His designs date back to ‘45 and through a connection with Gustav Ciamaga influenced Moog’s early filter designs. Le Caine is often disregarded when the history of synths are discussed so it comes as no surprise here 🙃 do a video on Hugh, his life as a musician, motorcycle rider, and trick photographer, coupled with his quiet demeanour and untimely death may make for a surprising video. 😻 and I love the hair! Don’t cut it! 😻

@@jdanielcramer The Ciamaga connection is absolutely fascinating, and I know for a fact that Bob knew of Hugh's work through the trip to Toronto he took when he and Herb smuggled an early Moog modular into Canada! I only wish that Hugh's work had had more of a impact as products.

Yeah, because everyone knows he's gonna say it's Don Buchla.

@@automaticgainsay As he always does. Probably why they only have a clip of Doody in the beginning and end, reading from a script. lol

@@automaticgainsay Don't you work for Buchla, too ?

@@DBCisco Except he didn't say that, did he, DB. No, in fact he said it was Harald Bode. Also, he wrote the piece. So, what was your point?

@@automaticgainsay You realize that the commentator was NOT Mark, right ? Mark is white. You prove you are little more than a troll all the time.

I think you've nailed it, Tim.

Bo-duh.. apologies on the pronunciation fluctuations

Something between Bo-duh and Bo-day would be closest to the German pronunciation. Accent on the “Bo”.

It was, but Robert wanted to pronounce it mogue.

@@HenritheHorse Thanks, I didn't know that was Robert's choice 👍

@RTOD - Bob told me his "...ancestors had long pronounced it with long o's".

Mohog

ikr?

I'm super flattered that you think I'm a hipster. Thank you!

Richard Wright in some pictures too!

It was windy

Hey, Brian! Certainly, the layout and intended function is not quite as formalized as what both Bob and Don would come to do, but isn’t that the nature of technological development? As for voltage control: While, as you’ve pointed out in the past, there is no oscillator in this device, and that certainly puts it in a different realm than what Bob and Don would come to do (also, it is not transistorized, which makes a difference, too), the way that the envelope-following Modulator creates voltages from audio, and then the way that those voltages can be applied to other functions certainly constitutes “voltage control,” even if it is a primitive example. And, again, while a different paradigm than an oscillator-based system, what is applied to the tape can be used in the same way various control voltages could be used. While the method is different, it is still the implementation of control voltage to achieve an audio outcome. As for Buchla’s instrument, I’ve been fighting the prevailing inaccuracy of “1963” for over a decade!

@@automaticgainsay Hello! But many studios already had racks of equipment with patch bays - just like the Bode- and decades before. It's not even innovation other than he made the panels look the same and saw it as "a system." No sound generators at all, and significantly - no voltage control at all. In the video above it is said that the Bode system had voltage-control: it did not. CV brings a factor of complexity and power that is 100s of times more powerful than anything to that moment. Almost anyone would conceive of a "synthesizer system" as being generators and processors interacting, specifically with voltage control - otherwise it's just a fancy pedalboard (not a synthesizer). The Bode system is indeed a racked set of processors with a patchbay to reorder them.

Come on... no self-respecting 23 year old would look like that.

Really. Please, take that road kill off your head and look us straight in the eye. LOL