If my interpretations are accurate, Disney Channel's 2017 Tangled spinoff series turned out to be so popular, that there is a new Princess and the Frog spinoff series on the way for 2019 and 2020. The characters certainly deserve more appearances, especially Louis the Alligator, who had so few appearances in the original film. And no, Frozen does not need a spinoff series, because a new theatrical sequel is already in the works.

Also about "Bambi II", it was the last piece of Disney media released on VHS.

very nice vid. I can tell you why there are so many direct to dvd sequals. Many of the movies as you know are not created by disney but adaptions of existing works (cinderella, snow white, winnie the pooh, etc...). Disney makes a contract with the original creator or the existing estate holders for a set number of years for the use of the story. In order to keep the contract from expiring, the stories must be used and numerous "sequals" are made.

There was an animation studio that made two sequels to Disney films despite not being Disney, Filmation. They made a Snow White sequel called Happily Ever After, and a Pinocchio sequel called Pinocchio and the Emperor's Night. This explains why Disney hasn't made sequels to either movies. Could you take a look at both films? But I must warn you though that both of them suffer from low budget animation, bad writing, and unnecessary celebrity casting.

For some reason, I vaguely remember liking Lady and the Tramp 2 when I was really young. I don't remember much about it, though.

THAT SAID

I respect your opinion, but by far for me and what many critics have called the best of the direct to video sequel is 101 dalmatians 2 patchs London advebture. I would say that you should consider it, because they spent more time and care on this one, and even if it isnt as good as the original, as insane as it sounds one critic would chose this over Oliver and company. Plus this was what inspired bolt, just compare it and you'll see big simalarities at certain moments.

Lilo & Stitch 2: It was I that recomended it and I still found it to be an relativly solid movie. Bambi 2: I loved the first bambi becose it was so natural but bambi 2 fielt like they try to make the animals into people so all the magic is gonne. Cinderella 3: I did not like the first one and Cinderella 3 was pretty damn stupid to.

What about Brother Bear 2?

I disagree, Cinderella III: A Twist In Time is a sequel that shouldn't be

@Kitsuneranger If you've seen Happily N'Ever After it's pretty much a knockoff of that.

They probably should have kept the original title 'Bambi and the Great Prince' though. 'Bambi 2' is ramming the blatant 'sequel cash in' ploy down your throat.

One thing I like about Return to Neverland is that it respects content from JM Barry that wasnt touched in the 1953 classic. Not only centering on Wendy's daughter Jane being taken to Neverland, but with Tinker Bell dying from the denial of fairies.

Can someone beat me with a stick to FORGET that the Third Cinderella movie even exsists, please?

Do you want to know how many times you sade "with that sade" during this video? 5!

101 Dalmatians II was decent!

Return to Neverland is not worth watching for me. I don't like Return to Neverland. It's awful.