Wait for china 1$

Free will win in the beginning.. but as soon as we have movie quality.. $ paid will be the way to go. I’m not paying for subpar quality right now

This AI will is taking the creativity out of being creative. Ther is no reason to get excited about this when literally everyone can make movies from a prompt. The value of a thing comes from its scarcity. Whats the purpose of making a movie when the oversaturation due to the lack of need of talent makes this worthless?

@zatronbuck8633 I understand your point, but progress always brings about change on every level. As long as humans have the power and will to invent new ways of doing things, it can't be stopped, nor should it. Do you know how many people were put out of jobs in the carriage making business when Henry Ford's first Model T car rolled off of the assembly line in Detroit in 1910... it changed the world forever and made America the literal "King of the World!" I was a young kid in the corporate world in the mid-80s when the Apple computers "invaded" the corporate world. I saw I had only two choices, I can sink or swim -- I chose to swim. As an artist and designer, I understood that Steve Jobs understood how designers worked and he tailored his computers to help us transition. But, some of the older designers, used to the old ways of producing graphic designs, refused to budge and learn the new tool and eventually were laid off or forced into early retirement. The secret to living with new technology is to embrace it and see how you fit in and what you can do to enhance what you do as an artist with it. Here is a little secret I have discovered about AI, it still requires an artistic eye and mind behind it. It is not going to just spit out a superior piece or film to those who don't understand art, design, filmmaking or screen writing-- but it is going to make it a helluva lot easier for those of us who are.

@@zatronbuck8633 This democratizes movie making and creative expression. This means that now anyone can bring their ideas to life without Hollywood agendas being shoved down people's throats. More creation just means more chance for genius to be unveiled.

@@jacobe8834 No. If you didn't have the knowledge before this your not a creative genius. All the creators have already been creating. If you need AI to do the work for you and all the heavy lifting then you never had creative ability

@@jacobe8834 "Democratizes?" You mean lower the talent barrier? Saturation leads to devaluation. How impressive will your movie be once everyone feels they can do the exact same thing? It's disturbing how you can't foresee this. It's hard to sell food to a chef. It'll be hard to sell movies to people that can just type a movie into existence.

Thanks for taking the time to leave this comment mate, I really appreciate this type of feedback. I love your ideas on expanding viewer experience based on taste

@@aisamsonreal I agree: the new background is great. Awesome video BTW. I think this is a true game changer because non-professionals can create full story boards from text with a true cinematographic look.

Things are getting tasty!

Glad you liked it!

I appreciate that!

It devalues it economically and I guess socially because you can't impress your friends with your skills if the AI is doing most of the work but we can still intrinsically enjoy the process of bringing an idea to life. Most people would never derive any value from production and vfx traditionally because they don't have the means to do it and now they do. For people in the filmmaking industry it's a problem but that isn't most of humanity.

Absolutely! It's time for the democratization of film

This AI will is taking the creativity out of being creative. Ther is no reason to get excited about this when literally everyone can make movies from a prompt. The value of a thing comes from its scarcity. Whats the purpose of making a movie when the oversaturation due to the lack of need of talent makes this worthless?

lol

Great suggestion! Have you got any reference links of ones you’ve seen?

wow, exactly what I need. yes please 🙏

samsonvowles@gmail.com

Email already sent :)

Nope. Once you had it over to AI, you lose copyright.

@@badpuppy3 I doubt That .That's why all the Studios will switch over to it

Sadly - I am currently in the jungle and it is fairly noisy with frogs, birds, snakes and tigers. Anyone else have an issue with this?

No problem!

Thank you! Cheers!

Thanks! Yes. I hope Midjourney is paying attention

what sora is not telling you is that for 1 minute video, conditions apply.

Thanks for the tip!

Glad you liked it!

That’s all illegal.

Nah, what we will see are AI content farms churning out billions of AI generated crap, and everyone will be so overwhelmed they will completely ignore it all, in favor of legacy media which will own the search algorithms to sort through it all.

Less than 5 years I'd guess. Looking 5 years into the past we had basically nothing compared to this. If it keeps improving at that pace, it's going to be revolutionary fairly soon. It might happen earlier.

We'll see. People have to actually LIKE AI generated movies. I think a lot of people will be creeped out by them, and there will be so many AI Content Farms churning out nothing but poor quality sludge, that people will start to dismiss AI generated movies altogether. They'll live in the depths of KZfaq, barely getting any clicks.

The value of a thing comes from it's utility - that is it's usefulness - if it isn't useful it generally has no value regardless of scarcity. I guess you could say the Mona Lisa is not useful but is valuable because it is scarce and you would be correct but these sorts of examples are exceptions. I think in the future the most immerse captivating emotional inspiring moving story will win. The cost of video production will fall immensely and make production accessible to people who otherwise could not afford it. Interesting times

I don’t believe the value of things comes from scarcity. If scarcity was the measure of our value then we can never live in a genuinely good world. And if AI can do things better, then why shouldn’t someone else who sees time and capital as scarce just say “screw it I’ll use the AI instead?”

@@Gazzapa57 What if the government made nice areas and suburbs affordable to people who otherwise couldn't afford it because of lack of discipline and work ethic? Then you'd see people who never really had what it took to create real value in this world moving in next door. Then your neighborhood which at one time wasn't accessible to everyone now is. "There goes the neighborhood ". That's exactly what this is. You have to be able to understand the implications of things.

@@zatronbuck8633 That rant makes no sense at all - how did this turn into a conversation about neighbourhoods ?

@@Gazzapa57 it was an analogy. Certain neighborhoods remain valuable as long as every type of person can't stay there. Why can't you understand this comparison? Art is the neighborhood. If anyone even those without creative ability have the ability to create then it's less valuable. Just as a neighborhood than no longer has a certain criteria will soon fall in value. The criteria for the Art "neighborhood " is talent. How do you not read the analogy? Seems simple enough to me