MOST Advanced Warships in the World

Рет қаралды 353,345

Күн бұрын

When it comes to military technology, some of the most important advancements in recent years have not occurred on land or in the air but at sea. After all, be it submarines with unlimited range or battleships that shoot lasers, there are some new navy vessels out there that are absolutely insane. So today, ready your sea legs and prepare to set sail as we count down the Top 15 Most Advanced Warships!
#warships #top15
Several segments are licensed under creative commons
creativecommons.org/licenses/...
For more video information, please visit our website.
The Top Fives show brings you informational and entertaining top five videos! Join us and subscribe for more.
Follow Josh on Instagram! Founder and producer of the Top Fives show. Stay up to date with the channel and everything KZfaq and business related! / joshuajosephbaker
Follow us on Facebook!
/ topfivesyoutube
Contact us via the email form here: kzfaq.infoabout
Note: The videos featured on the Top Fives channel are for educational and informational purposes. If you have a good idea for a video, leave us a comment! We try to read each and every comment made.

Пікірлер: 316

@ZERO-CHEATS-GAMING Жыл бұрын

Great to watch 👍 Looking forward to the next 1

@Fred-vy1hm Жыл бұрын

Let's include the DDGX that may never come to fruition but omit the type 26 frigate that's already being built with ultimately 32 examples being fielded by three different NATO partners.

@bartmason3395 Жыл бұрын

Cuz the NATO forces are so cheap they can't even pay us and need to buy cheaper destroyers from China they can afford an American Destroyer

@choibayona3816 Жыл бұрын

What ever

@clivesaunders456 Жыл бұрын

NR navy new aircraft carriers, the new type 26 frigate, the type 23 is top notch and let's not forgetting the new nuclear submarines.

@donhiggins629 Жыл бұрын

England navy is 2 small .weak is my opinion

@markredgrave6282 Жыл бұрын

In the Arleigh Burke segment, a Ticonderoga class missle cruiser The Lake Champlain is briefly pictured.

@donaldcarey114 Жыл бұрын

AB's are actually light cruisers. They are no more Destroyers than the Japanese Hyuga (officially Destroyers), are.

@roberth1148 Жыл бұрын

Wow look at all those expensive targets!

@michaelcolley7660 Жыл бұрын

I didn't see any ships from the British Royal Navy. Queen Elizabeth Carriers, type 45 destroyers, latest nuclear powered submarines (apparently the most quiet and deadly on the planet) plus the new frigates that are currently under construction etc. etc.

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

The creator of this video is HIGHLY ignorant. He should have consulted some naval historians before producing such a whale of misinformation. Guy's a putz!

@rogerusa9696 Жыл бұрын

It's the quietness of the UK Astute class that makes them so deadly. More so than more heavily armed subs since they can remain undetected and strike first, which is a deciding factor in war.

@donhiggins629 3 ай бұрын

Because England is weak very weak country England should never be mentioned ever

@MH5XXXX Жыл бұрын

What about the TYPHOON sub. I know there is only a few still operational but it was a VERY MEAN sub in its time.

@Coxman Жыл бұрын

Russia no longer has those subs in service.

@interestingworldai Жыл бұрын

I love the videos you make, Wishing you lots of luck!

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

Well the Chinese Aircraft carrier will not be ready for 5 years. And in that time the Queen Elizabeth class carriers will have 40 F-35 on each carrier. Plus the Astute-class Nuclear attack submarines which their will be seven of. Moving on to the Nuclear Dreadnough class.

@jamesbugbee9026 Жыл бұрын

Zhu Hai Yun looks like it attacks w/ martinis

@leejones3852 Жыл бұрын

So the British type 45 destroyer does not make this? Or Elizabeth class carrier?

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

of course not , the UK only has one operation type 45 due to constant mechanical problems, not fit for purpose and obsolete

@leejones3852 Жыл бұрын

@@georgebarnes8163 think you will find there are 6 type 45s not 1.

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

@@leejones3852 You will find that there is only one that actually functions

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

Or the Astute-class Nuclear attack submarines. Which are the best of the best.

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

@@georgebarnes8163 There's six Astute-class Nuclear attack submarines. With another getting built by 2026. The magnificent 7.

@BrooksWachtel Жыл бұрын

Who ever wrote the narration is exceedingly confused about the term "battleship" of which there are none active in any navy.

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

Yup! Very ignorant and uneducated use of the word.

@davewhyte1977 Жыл бұрын

Ridiculous. What the Queen elizabeth class daring class and astute subs?

@madmann5040 Жыл бұрын

And yet they put that Chinese aircraft on the list what an insult.🇨🇦

@apqodgs Жыл бұрын

Guess this page is controlled by Chinese. Kept promoting Chinese's shit but we all know they sucks. I.e. I am from Hong Kong

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

The QE class are very very limited in what they can actually do and have major reliability problems and besides the RN has no aircraft to put on them.

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

The Chinese Aircraft carrier will not be ready until 2026. The Queen Elizabeth class carriers will have 40 F-35 jet's onboard by then. Plus there's two Carrier's. With the Astute-class Nuclear attack submarines which are the very best in the world.

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

@@ENGBriseB China already has 3 carriers

@jamesagnew-hh2qy 7 ай бұрын

Kool and insightful 😂

@atharvdwivedi3843 Жыл бұрын

Content from varied countries would be appreciated... Too much US tech

@edwardoalvarez3705 Жыл бұрын

GREAT SHIP A TRUE FREEDOM FIGHTER

@lockehaney3013 Жыл бұрын

amazing how many of the destroyers look alike

@Big-O43 Жыл бұрын

Thats because China can only copy others

@matthewschuchardt684 Жыл бұрын

From everything I have read on the Zumwalt they’re actually more of a disappointment than a advanced tech worship. To this day the Swedish Navy’s Corvettes are actually far stealthy. And because of major cuts during the construction process, it’s capability of actually using its radar for interception duties is negligible at best.

@saulneinstein1110 Жыл бұрын

The Zumwalt program was cancelled and the ships built were decommissioned..

@matthewschuchardt684 Жыл бұрын

@@saulneinstein1110 no, they completed the three first ships. In fact, the third one is scheduled to launch sometime this year. What is important to remember is that three ships out of a proposed 25 if not more. On top of that, they were originally intended to be built as artillery support destroyers, rather than multi rule combatants.

@markredgrave6282 Жыл бұрын

Whatever happened to designing reliable destroyers that had real world capable proven weapons systems like the Charles Adams class we had from 59,60 till they retired them like what, 35 years later? My late dad was a retired career navy Capt. skippered the Henry B. Wilson out of San Diego right when I was around 2 and his flagship as Comdesron 25 after he was c.o. of the Naval Destroyer School in Newport, R.I. was the Cochrane. Funny when I visited Pearl again in 99 and we went on onboard the Missouri, there the two were birthed side by side after they retired them just a mile or two away over anchored. Brought a tear to my eye I must say.

@jemme8468 Жыл бұрын

Talks about the Burke Class, but shows film of a Ticonderoga.

@josephgeekie Жыл бұрын

I am actually very happy they are not mentioning the Royal Navy's Equipment. we have some of the best on the planet but we don't have to Advertise it. Just let the enemy find out the hard way! But mind you there is plenty of info out there already lol

@1963Austria Жыл бұрын

Yes, but the UK like to keep their power kin of quite....not having to boast....then unlike many others, the UK is not out eniciatinging conflict.

@Mr.Robert1 Жыл бұрын

Like in the Falklands

@davidlangton3778 Жыл бұрын

@@Mr.Robert1 we never started it. A dictatorship did remember. But sadly many people died as the dictatorship needed an excuse to stay in power.

@donhiggins629 Жыл бұрын

England idk you do make good ships you just dont make enough of them .is that because you depend on USA way to much.thats my opinion.or there is way to much corruption going on like in usa

@rogerusa9696 Жыл бұрын

Without inclusion of the UK Type-45 destroyer, type 26 frigate, the Astute class submarine, which is so quiet that it can shadow America's best, and QE aircraft carrier, this is not much of a comparison video. In fact it is very American biased. Some of the vessels listed are not advanced at all. But a revealing video.

@batmansummer9236 Жыл бұрын

British saltiness and arrogance all the time

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

The Royal Navy has 4 active Astute class SSN's. The US has 3 Seawolf class SSN's that are far quieter than the Astute class. Oh, you're talking about the Los Angeles class SSN's that entered service in the 70's being noisy.

@mmmoroi Жыл бұрын

JMSDF Atago is a spitting image of her predecessor IJN Atago launched 90+ years ago.

@ioanbota9397 3 ай бұрын

Realy I like this powerful warships

@rajtilaksengupta Жыл бұрын

Why is the Indian and uk navy not in this ?

@bartmason3395 Жыл бұрын

Chinese propaganda buddy

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

It's what you call fake news.

@bigman23DOTS Жыл бұрын

I’m kinda not convinced powerful radars hmmm I’m certain cea-far and some uk radars are more than likely quite a bit better and a ship is only as good as it’s radar my thoughts anyways

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

Dutch radars are where it's at. The UK use Dutch radars as well, like the S1850M, which is derived from SMART-L and was made in collaboration by Thales Netherlands and BAE.

@Au60schild Жыл бұрын

The Zumwalt class was designed for white water and even for that provved of questionable abilities. Last I heard the prototypes were."swept under the.rug" somewhere.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

The USS Zumwalt DDG-1000, USS Michael Monsoor DDG-1001 are in active service homeported out of NAVSTA San Diego and the PRECOM Lyndon B. Johnson DDG-1002 is undergoing sea trials.

@scottcarlon6318 Жыл бұрын

Those sail drons should be armed with a small nuclear device, so when it is captured by a hostile state, that state would get a big bang for their trouble.

@williampaz2092 Жыл бұрын

I disagree with listing any ship not yet built. The DDG-X may not be built at all, why include a hypothetical ship? And while I’m at it, where is the Royal Navy’s Type 45 DDG?!

@davedbaveda Жыл бұрын

Why would a sea hunter need to detect land mines?

@philholbrook7174 Жыл бұрын

Nothing from the Royal Navy? 🙄

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

the UK does have small fleet of ships but nothing outstanding enough to make the list, their type 45 destroyers are pretty useless due to major mechanical problems and currently only have one type 45 seaworthy, their carriers are very limited being able to launch only one aircraft type which they RN do not have even when they are not flooding or being in dock for major repairs when they break down which is often.

@ENGBriseB Жыл бұрын

The Type 45s will be one of best Destroyers in the world once the refitted ships have been upgraded with engine and lots of new weapon upgrades. And are new Frigates will also be highly regarded among our allies. The Royal Navy's Nuclear powered Astute-class attack submarines are new and are the very best in the world. Also are two Queen Elizabeth class Aircraft carrier's. And buy 2026 they will have 35 F-35s on each carrier.

@lightfootpathfinder8218 Жыл бұрын

@@georgebarnes8163 the astute class submarines are amongst the most advanced attack subs on the planet at least on a par with US subs and Superior to any sub the Russians or Chinese have.

@keepyournoseout1569 Жыл бұрын

@@georgebarnes8163 glown you have no idea what your talking about im guessing your American??

@georgebarnes8163 Жыл бұрын

@@keepyournoseout1569 I am guessing English is not your first language?

@johndeluna692 Жыл бұрын

The list should have been narrowed down to only proven and existing systems.

@user-mn5tv4gb8s Жыл бұрын

with Jack Nicholson in Hotel in the Berge

@Leopez02 Жыл бұрын

Warships are amazing but dangerous too. Bismarck is best warship. Ps I remember when United States uss Kearsage warship was here in Finland in Summer. 😮

@bartmason3395 Жыл бұрын

For a pocket battleship but it fell real quick to aircraft did it

@arnulfomanuel6340 Жыл бұрын

Not the best if it was sunked

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

@@bartmason3395 Was NOT a pocket battleship. Graf Spee, Scharnhorst, and Gneisenau were pocket battleships. Bismarck and Tirpiz were full size. The ignorance displayed in comment like this one is appalling, showing that education has gone to Hell.

@flash-dk1cc Жыл бұрын

Bismarck best battleship ? You serious ? Sunk on its maiden voyage . It’s brother the tirpitz hid in a Norwegian fjord for most of the war , before being sunk by the RAF

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

@@ronrowan4828 Scharnhorst and Gneisenau were battleships, not pocket battleships. They did have 11" guns but that was only due to treaties and were scheduled to have them removed and armed with the same 15" guns as the Bismarck class.

@michaelwong4303 Жыл бұрын

Excuse me, you said the Zumwalt class destroyer is a jack of all trade but not specialised enough, then the same will apply to the other destroyers you have mentioned!! Whatever individual weapon system the Zumwalt carries it is more advanced than that of 🇨🇳, 🇯🇵, 🇷🇺, 🇰🇷🇬🇧 , so how can you say it isnot specialised enough?

@bartmason3395 Жыл бұрын

It's all Chinese propaganda

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

This video is way full of holes. Sounds to me like he pulled "facts" out of his ass!

@markredgrave6282 Жыл бұрын

The much vaunted rail gun system the Arleigh Burke's were designed to be fitted with that was touted as the game changing weapons system that would be absolutely unspoofable by enemy aircraft or anti- ship missiles ended up looking good in the lab but undeployble in a real combat environment as the sheer velocities needed to launch the inert tungsten bolts tore apart their own launchers very quickly and therefore became useless in combat as they were unable to reload and keep them in the game. Ridiculous they designed this ship and wasted all those billions on a ship class not to mention the billions sunk into the r&d of the weapons system itself. Did the engineers who designed this high tech piece of garbage not know this before the company snookered the hell out of the Navy pitching it to them? How could they not have? And shame on the Navy for being stupid and naive enough to buy their bullshit before it was proven. Someone needs to be fired, court martialed or otherwise held accountable for this debacle.

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

Zumwalt's AN/SPY-3 radar has a range of 320 km. Zeven provinciën's SMART-L ER surveillance radar has a range of 2.000 km. Pretty obvious which one is the superior, by a factor of 6 in fact. Even most other countries have better search/surveillance radars, generally with a range of 400 km. Zumwalt sucks, the only thing it has going for it is stealth, and even that only goes so far.

@rodneyharris9439 Жыл бұрын

Great video well worth watching

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

Sure, if you like videos produced by ignoramuses.

@raevj 9 ай бұрын

These must not be in order, just a list…

@TTeamFan Жыл бұрын

Where are the Royal Navy's new aircraft carriers - a generation ahead of the Nimitz and Gerald Ford class a/c's?

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

A generation ahead? Surely you jest!

@thegrinch8161 Жыл бұрын

What really makes me shake my head in bewilderment is all the negativity being heaped upon the fujian ACC, most people are writing the Chinese dragon off as a useless piece of kack but I’d say that what the prc is doing is a mahoosive maskirovka. Let’s not forget that one of the typical useless items not working on the ford class was the bomb lifts and let’s not also forget the electronic Cato bar systems were only given a fifty out of 100 expectation of a cat or trap actually working and the busted flush ie the grf still has serious issues even after having to delay launching the 2nd Ford class because of of all the pieces of kit stolen to try and get the grf to work and so in closing I’ll say that give the PRC a chance because they may surprise us all

@stephennewton2777 Жыл бұрын

Left out the tug towing Russia’s little carrier. It has to know where and when the carrier will break down (not difficult admittedly), work out the best route back to harbour trying to avoid the world’s press (international navy’s having long since stopped bothering to track the ship by the amazing amount of smoke it puts out on those odd occasions when it operates for more than a few days), and help the Russian leadership explain why it’s constantly in dry dock when their yachts seem 5o cruise the world without a problem.

@Bok2022st Жыл бұрын

If you want your channel to succeed you maybe should include the British also the Australians

@Bok2022st Жыл бұрын

@@PartyhatRS well that just goes to show how uninformed you truly are if you think the USA is under prepared they are Australia and England best mates,and Australia is now brisling with the latest technology so you can think what you like but I know different try it and your country will see it's discussion capisce Aussie Aussie, ALL the way think again you . Australia is that prepared with the UK and USA help that we can see every single thing on the planet and also destroy it at will you can take that to the bank Sunshine. Your stupidity or your arrogance will be your country's downfall we are not blind and we are not underprepared not at all party hat rubbish slinger

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

Successful to idiots that don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. The misinformation this guy puts out is measured in metric tons!

@user-gn2xv8ur1k Жыл бұрын

Красивые корабли.

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

Cool picture, how long do you keep your hair? I find it very attractive, please describe it?

@erikempire318 Жыл бұрын

All the Chinese ships here are not advanced for more the show of it. They are parade ships… one of the most advanced is the Swedish Visby class corvettes, it’s a very small boat but workingly advanced.

@davidsaunders1125 Жыл бұрын

This article loses all credibility by mot mentioning ONE UK Vessel . So advanced are UK radars that on some UK USA joint exercises the UK ships have been asked by the US to turn off some of its radars to give them a chance !

@rayjames6096 Жыл бұрын

Bullsh*t

@davidsaunders1125 Жыл бұрын

@@rayjames6096 EVIDENCE PLEASE. I expect that you don't believe that during the Cold War in an exercise against the US nuclear defence system the UK sent a few Vulcan Bombers to attack New York, Washington etc and despite the whole of the US defence systems, successfully destroyed ALL of its targets, with NO loses. A second exercise was held with just the UK as attackers. The whole of the US defence system was warned in advance. All targets were destroyed with the loss of ONE UK aircraft ! The US blocked any publicity for decades !!! I expect you think the US split the atom first and that the US invented the jet engine and RADAR ! THEY DIDN'T. The UK did. We also along wirh the Commonwealth were the major force in the D Day landings and totally thrashed the Americans in 1812 , causing the US president to flee while we burnt the White House down. Challenge me with PROOF, if you dare !!

@rayjames6096 Жыл бұрын

@@davidsaunders1125 For one thing the Vulcan didn't have the range to reach the US and used Canada as a launching point and this was over 50 years ago when US defense systems were a new technology. The US supplying the UK in 1940 is the ONLY reason the UK didn't surrender. All the fuel, heavy equipment and transport aircraft and most of the war material were provided to the UK during WWII by the US...just like during the Falklands War. The US won the revolutionary War. You brits make shit up. No one believes your nonsense.

@rayjames6096 Жыл бұрын

@@davidsaunders1125 The US Mahatten project developed the A-bomb and I never heard of a single British scientist involved. The UK didn't invent radar, it was under development in numerous western countries at the same time and also in axis powers Japan and Germany. The jet engine the UK developed is a forgotten variant, Germany invented the type in use today. The brits live in the past.

@rayjames6096 Жыл бұрын

@@davidsaunders1125 The term RADAR was coined by the US.

@Nemesis32201 Жыл бұрын

5:12 DDG X is still on modern warship

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

Neat picture, happen to be a lady with very long hair? I find it very attractive, please describe it?

@Nemesis32201 Жыл бұрын

@@danielobrien1571 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i9iCmJZnr97Lpnk.html

@danielobrien1571 Жыл бұрын

OK, so that link is for a video you have on your homepage but how about you describe yourself and your hair? I find it fascinating when ladies grow their hair long like Rapunzel's so tell me all about yours since I do find it beautiful just like I said.

@langtam5959 Жыл бұрын

I disagree with your ranking. How can a CCP aircraft carrier that’s not completed be rated above the Ford carrier

@Ericsstyle-vx9wg Жыл бұрын

i am soooo confused

@LeonardojavierMellaretamal 4 ай бұрын

Leonardo Javier Chile ❤❤❤❤

@bartmason3395 Жыл бұрын

This is such a Chinese propaganda the Chinese have no idea about a blue water Navy tell me about their Blue Water Navy history over the last 200 years especially carrier operations

@markredgrave6282 Жыл бұрын

All this sky is gonna fall bullshit the press has been pitching about the goddamn vaunted Chinese navy and their threatened invasion across the South China seas is laughable. The Chinese would be looking at the same problem Germans were looking at in their proposed Operation Sealion in a cross channel amphibious invasion of England. Without the massive domination of air superiority like we had at Normandy and a big gunned Navy like the Brits had ready to send the German transports to the bottom of the Channel, they didn't stand one chance in hell of succeeding in anything but drowning their entire invading force. The U.S. Pacific fleet and it's far superior carrier battlegroups with their far superior nuclear attack subs sweeping the Chinese navy away surface and subsurface probably not more than a few miles off of their homeports, not to mention our far superior air force and navy fighters having another Marrianass turkey shoot with the People's Army air force, it would be all over but the crying very quickly for the Chinese military.

@colinbarnard6512 Жыл бұрын

THREE Ford Class carriers in operation? Beside the USS Ford, which others? USS Kennedy is still under construction. The USS Enterprise is still under construction. The USS Doris Miller is in the early stages of construction. And #4 slips my mind. Bottom Line? Only one, the USS Ford is at sea. Getting this right should have been easy.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

#4 is the PRECOM Doris Miller. #5 hasn't been named yet.

@johnnymars9782 Жыл бұрын

There are lots of less than amateur videos in youtube and this is one of those. The Zumwalt program is already cancelled and the destroyers decommissioned. It was a disaster. Not only its usability is questionable, it was plagued with problems since sea trial. It is not the future of US navy as the author said.

@frankkoslowski6917 Жыл бұрын

New Warships for the future! Because we all love seeing our global tax dollars spent meaningfully. 😆

@rayjames6096 Жыл бұрын

Yep, there are definitely no Russia's out there in that little candy cane and rainbow world the virtue signaling left lives in.

@ap6878 Жыл бұрын

Just a warning

@bradthackston5217 Жыл бұрын

Lost me when you said land mines….

@MH5XXXX Жыл бұрын

The Fujian is a ODD BALL on the visible aspect. your video showed TWO different carriers. one with a SLOPPED flight deck to launch air craft and another one with a FLAT flight deck. who is who?

@williamhutchinson7 Жыл бұрын

flat deck is the newbie. other is chinas 2nd carrier built by china and is a copy of the 1st they purchased from Russia , tho I don't know why he put it in 2nd spot because nothing about it has has been proven, but it does look nice

@markredgrave6282 Жыл бұрын

Yea their new one with the flat deck is being fitted with steam catapults from the british designed ones the Brazilians let them copy from the French carrier they bought and operated for awhile and saw action launching the Skyhawks with the Exocets they gave Brits such a tough time in The Falkland Islands war. The Brits surface to air missiles and their radars on their frigates could not lock on to the sea skimming Exocets after the Skyhawks launched them and dove away.

@dspates51 Жыл бұрын

280,000 horse power for only 28mph!? 🤔 Hull design of the Virginia class must be pretty crappy.

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

The numbskulls producing this crap win the prize for ignorance and lack of research.

@dspates51 Жыл бұрын

@@ronrowan4828 I know that information isn't correct. I'm a retired US Navy submarine veteran and I know it isn't right. The internet is full of erroneous information especially when it comes to military hardware.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

Maybe the reactor is capable of putting out 280,000 hp if you were able to use every bit of heat it makes, but reactors don't work that way and maybe you can use 1/3 of the energy they produce. Also, 260,000 hp is what a Nimitz class CVN has for power, not a Virginia class SSN. (The Kitty Hawk class CV's had 280,000 hp).

@bampie1 Жыл бұрын

It lost me when they argue that the Chinese/Russian aircraft carrier was a match to the Gerald Ford class

@wiltonnguyen Жыл бұрын

The uss Ohio can destroy 24 city at the same time and at Mach 24

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

Nope, not anymore. the USS Ohio is no longer a SSBN, but was converted into a SSGN and carries 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles. The first 4 submarines of the class were converted into SSGNs.

@jpmtlhead39 Жыл бұрын

Oh yes,that radar must be from alien technology to the ship navegate without the fear of hitting land mines. Uauuu. Where did they built that ship,area 51 perhaps,no. PS: i wonder where did you get all this missiles and weapons designations on the Chinese ships when by your own words they are involved in absolute secrecy. Do you have a mole on the Chinese department of defense...??!!! Or an very good imagination.

@frozenbuckeye6700 Жыл бұрын

For the Chinese Aircraft carrier to be that high is crazy being that it is unproven. The first aircraft carrier China had was a casino. The second one was a copy of that casino with Russia helping to install systems. The third "The Fujian" is a brand new design from the ground up with the technology they learned from the first 2 carriers. There isn't a lot "groundbreaking tech" on it. Even China will say it is still an "experimental" ship. I would fear the 5th or 6th carrier they build. But the Fujian shouldn't be any higher then any other carrier out there. We just haven't seen what it can do.

@garyhughes2446 Жыл бұрын

The sharp end of the stick for any carrier is its aircraft and so far I haven't been overly impressed at all with what China has put to sea with any of their carriers. Quite possibly they are waiting on the next generation of the U.S. fighter and attack planes so they can copy them.

@jerrykahn6894 Жыл бұрын

Fujian type 003 already has major cracks in it's flight deck!

@XkMeng Жыл бұрын

@@jerrykahn6894 Yes, the "cracks" in those photos are at least 2-3 meters wide in proportion, and the Fujian crew has a 2-meter-wide long crack that won't break even after overtime. This is alien technology

@Mirraluka Жыл бұрын

This may sound like going backwards BUT, the USA should build a couple of new Battleships with an array of 15" Guns that would be awesome.

@batangfirst5993 Жыл бұрын

Arleigh Burke should be on top five

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

Which Arleigh Burke class ship? They entered commission in the early 90's so those ships are worn out (the Flight I's) and the newest ones are still under construction and will be for many years and trying to compare the technology on them is ridiculous.

@paulcorcoran7295 Жыл бұрын

A very poorly thought out video.

@keepyournoseout1569 Жыл бұрын

Lol no UK aircraft carriers arguably the best in the world nevermind the astute class nuclear subs definatly the best in the world our new frigates being built and not lastly our destroyers the Americans asked us to turn off the radars because there too powerfull can target 1000 targets at once just my opinion but im glad because whoever trys to mess will have a huge shock lol

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

Hahaha, the Arleigh Burke. Lol. That's anything but the most advanced. Just its mast alone is primitive and ancient, super bulky and will cause it to stand out like a massive beacon on radar. Compare that to the frigates/destroyers of many Western European NATO countries and you can inmediately see how ancient Arleigh Burkes are. The Zeven provinciën class is literally a decade or more ahead of the Arleigh Burke and still easily 5 years or more ahead of most others, especially thanks to it's unrivalled sensor suite. It's equipped with the new update of SMART-L only the Dutch have, giving it a 2.000 km detection range while all the other ships have a detection range of 400-500 km.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

How to say you know nothing about the various world's Navy's and radar technology without saying you know nothing about it!

@daweinie5157 Жыл бұрын

This chap is boasting about the Chinese capabilities despite the fact that Chinese carriers are still using steam turbines. Besides the aircrafts they carry are Russian made. He is exaggerating the Chinese capabilities

@Element905 Жыл бұрын

This relies heavily on Chicom lies

@angeldomingojr.7538 Жыл бұрын

Whoever made this is....ahhh nevermind!!!

@user-ow3tv4jv6j 4 ай бұрын

I stopped watching because of your ignorant use of the term battleship. That is a very specific class of giant surface combatants. Not a generic term for warship.

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

Stop calling then "battleships"! Call them "warships". A battleship is a specific type of warship which no navy in the world uses anymore. Such ignorance!

@kultingen Жыл бұрын

Was hoping for the swedish Visby clas. Sad swedish tax payer noices.

@Mr.Robert1 Жыл бұрын

Does anyone here remember how well the British ships did during the Falklands War ? If not do a search to see how many got destroyed or hit badly.

@davidlangton3778 Жыл бұрын

It was because of the aluminium (alumina) super structure that is no longer used in ship design and the wrong anti flash equipment then they were made with nylon incorporated but this type is no longer used. The USA also fazed out these issues after the falklands war

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

@@davidlangton3778 And the fact they didn't have any CIWS installed on their ships. Signaal Nederland offered Goalkeepers (which came out 3 years before the Falklands) to the Brits, but rather painfully looking back the Brits ignored the offer. Untill after the war of course, then they jumped on the opportunity and bought a bunch of them, but obviously a bit too late.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

@@davidlangton3778 Well, 17Ticonderoga class CG's are still in commission with their aluminum superstructures. You're right though that the Arleigh Burke class DDG's don't include aluminum in theirs.

@mirandela777 11 ай бұрын

Tons of BS and non-sense : "lasers able to destroy any incoming missiles" ?? Dude, right now are NO lasers able to destroy a superonic missile, and I not even talk about HYPERsonic missiles ! Stop inventing BS, you make a fool from yourself ! Lasers are decent FOR SMALL DRONES, and USELESS against fast missiles ! Learn some fraking physics ! And secondly, a warship is ONLY a sea based platform, we are long pass the days when the ship was relevant, as in ww2 ! Now what made a ship dangerous is the quality of the weapon systems installed, especially the missiles. So, next time focus in the MISSILES deployed on these platforms and not in the ships. Nowadays, even a container ship can pop in an instant a dozen of these destroyers if that container ship is armed with enough good AS missiles !

@capmultser Жыл бұрын

They do love to blow their trumpets these yanks. UK LEADS WHILE OTHERS FOLLOW. except we don't like to brag.

@dundonrl Жыл бұрын

Leads with what exactly? 1 active carrier, 6 destroyers and 4 attack submarines?

@capmultser Жыл бұрын

@@dundonrl Get a life master critic. dreadnought subs are being built now, type 31 and 32s. challenger 3s are being built, Tempest is well on the way.

@kwamepalavin8405 Жыл бұрын

China’ type 55 is the best. Much better than A Burke class, Japan or Korea.

@kwamepalavin8405 Жыл бұрын

@@cj64343 did I hear a ‘ correct ‘, maybe that should be kept in mind while USA, Japan, South Korea keep threatening China and pretending China is 3rd world weak militarily!

@ronrowan4828 Жыл бұрын

@@cj64343 China until now has never had an navy, and has no history of naval warfare.

@johnsilver9338 Жыл бұрын

In terms of the number of VLS, it's 2nd to Sehjong class destroyers. In terms of radar, its Type 346B is comparable to European SMART-L radar. Both are better than SPY-1, but not SPY-6. But in terms of offensive weapons is where it shines the most outclassing any other destroyer IF it carries YJ-21. Otherwise Burke will take its spot while also being the best in terms of defense.

@pieterveenders9793 Жыл бұрын

@@johnsilver9338 Dutch SMART-L is the best on the planet by a decade or more. It's been exported to a whole range of countries, like South Korea, Denmark, Germany, and to the UK, France and Italy as its derivative S1850M, but all of them received the base version. However Thales Netherlands developed a new upgrade, turning SMART-L into it's ER variant and giving it a 5x increase in detection range, from 400 km to 2.000 km. SPY-6 doesn't come anywhere close to that, no one does.

@johnsilver9338 Жыл бұрын

@@pieterveenders9793 THAAD's TYP-2 radar has a max range around 4700km. SPY-6 is also from the same company Raytheon. SPY-6 with 24 RMAs on Burke Fligh IIA has a comparable max range around 4600km. SPY-6 with 37 RMAs on Fight III will even be more powerful.

@jamespratt7691 Жыл бұрын

Jon Stewart for President

@dwyanehall2120 Жыл бұрын

Funky China

@jaziejay1 Жыл бұрын

WOW BIAS much no facts behind it at all just wow

@chloejenkins1152 Жыл бұрын

well this was BS

@aberry2521 Жыл бұрын

It's a pity this channel can't tell the difference between a Destroyer (Arleigh Burke) and a Cruiser (Ticonderoga), while they both use more or less the same hull shape, everything from there on up is, totally different and doesn't even look the same.

@matthewhayes3142 Жыл бұрын

under the heading of pesky details... as the earth is round, or spherical shaped, it doesn't have straight edges, instead, it's a series of curves. by definition, anything round cannot have corners. so when you say, as you have twice so far, every corner of the globe, you are stating a place of impossibility, or non-existence. sure, it's part of the lexicon, but it's in fact, inaccurate, wrong, impossible, not definable. even if you argue that the intersection of a longitudinal line with a latitude is what people mean, that only references a single point, and not a corner. a corner is defined by 2 hard edges meeting at 90 degrees or other variant degree, but no corner of the globe exists. far reaches of the globe, absolutely. same holds true to the term edge of the earth. unless you're a flat earther, no one will be chasing anyone to the edge of the earth or end of the world, nor will anyone be visiting the four corners of the the world, 2 of the cardinal points are possible though.

@rogerusa9696 Жыл бұрын

True, but a widely used expression. More importantly, this video is inaccurate inasmuch as it includes an unlaunched design, old inventory and omits many more advanced existing vessels.