Now, as my mind caught hold upon this thought, I cried within my heart: O Jesus, thou Son of God, have mercy on me, who am in the gall of bitterness, and am encircled about by the everlasting chains of death. 19 And now, behold, when I thought this, I could remember my pains no more; yea, I was harrowed up by the memory of my sins no more.

Great lecture Mr Hadsall. Thank you.

Amen, thank you for such an interesting and informative video. Its answered a lot of my questions. God bless xxx

This helps strengthen my faith. Thank You brother.

Speaking on rapid fossilization, I don't remember all the details, but I'm sure it can be found on Google. There was a deep underground mine that had gotten flooded, I believe, a few decades ago. It was a pretty major tragedy, because quite a few miners had lost their laves in the sudden floods. After just a couple of weeks, when the waters had finally either receded or had gotten pumped out, the mines were being searched to recover the bodies of those lost in the mines. It was discovered that all of the wooden supports beams in the lower parts of the mines were completely fossilized. It absolutely baffled those who had discovered it. It only took roughly two weeks to turn the wooden beams into solid petrified, or permineralized beams

My wife would likely love a fossilized flower, since her ADHD keeps many of our plants from being alive.

Romans 1:20

You can also mention the little grand canyon here in Ga. and how quickly it formed.

Very interessting! Thank you!

Thank you for your contribution in God's kingdom.

I stumbled into this video. Praise God. I can understand this.❤

Praise the LORD! God's word is truth! Hallelujah! Proverbs 23:15-16 My son, if your heart is wise, then my heart will be glad indeed;16my inmost being will rejoice when your lips speak what is right. Jesus is coming soon.

God bless you AIG !!! Stick with the authority of the word of God

In Christianity, the Bible is considered the "Word of God," and there is much to find about this topic in scripture. The Bible is called the Word of God, meaning it can be considered a direct line of communication from the Lord, divinely inspired by the authors of the respective books. If the Bible is truly God’s Word, then we should cherish it, study it, obey it, and fully trust it. If the Bible is truly the Word of God, then it is the final authority for all matters of faith, practice, and morality. If the Bible is the Word of God, then to dismiss it is to dismiss God Himself.

to connect more with July 4 ...just watched a movie about GW ...attaching the Hessian ...crossing the Delaware with his rag tag army...half of which had enlistments ending in a couple of weeks

Thankful for the work this ministry is doing

Unless you understand the fall, you cannot understand Redemption.

God bless all of you at Answers in Genesis, I'll be sharing this presentation to my catechumen when we begin our Christian Apologetics unit which verifies the truth of God's Word delivered to us through His appointed prophets, disciples, and apostles.

I came to the idea of a rapid disruption of Pangea when looking at underwater contours. Atlantic looks ripped apart quickly then slowed down for the mid-Atlantic Ridge to form. Pacific looks like a crumple zone on a car after impact. So maybe Pangea (one super continent, low hills at most)... The Ark (animals able to walk to Noah)... Earth ripped apart (tsunami flood) Tectonic mountain creation and mid Atlantic Ridge formation... Tectonic motion is rapid then slowed over time(migration of animals to "origin continents")... Look to the underwater contours and see if things don't match.

Amen 🙏🏿💗✝️

Excellent, thorough, faith-supporting presentation delivered with strength and grace.

@Kevin Hadsall: Would you please share the name of the book mentioned at the end of your message that helped you in having dialogues with humanists? Thank you.

50:24 You havent had any debates, you are talking about comment sections. I doubt you have ever debated anyone in a debate setting.

Amen AIG 🙏

It all sounds like fantasy, but I know it is not...

This is fantastic. Nice work, easy to understand and well put together presentation. Thank you and God bless you, as this does fill some gaps for me. Awesome.

Beautiful how GOD closed the door of the Ark, and JESUS says HE stands at the door knocking and whoever lets HIM in…..

Awesome Kevin! Your church family is excited to see how God is using you for His kingdom.

00:48 there is unknown amount of water on earth, there are under ground river basins that have never been explored. The Bible even mentions water springing up.

Thank you for clear explanation of scientific issues. My one question - would there also be human fossils?

Another consideration is if millions of years was spent making fossils all over the earth, there should be millions of years of humanity within the same remains. We have found a few, but some of the people didn't survive the flood and human population only expanded in the last century. The Earth is most likely younger than most people think.

Mr. Hadsall asking the question "where is the erosion?" is so key to understanding this. This is an extremely important question. Geologists are always talking about the deposition while dismissing the natural processes of erosion on this vast swaths of layering. This is so important!

Exactly what we needed in 2024! Great video guys and thank you!

God bless you AIG 😊🙏✝️🕊️ thank you for all you do. You are a blessing to us

When the water bursted forth from the ground it’s talking about the springs all around the worlds started shooting water up out of them over flowing.

Angels speak by the power of the Holy Ghost; wherefore, they speak the words of Christ. Wherefore, I said unto you, FEAST UPON THE WORDS OF CHRIST; for behold, the words of Christ will tell you all things what ye should do.

There is no evidence of plant life and erosion within the layers, proving that it was all deposited in a very short period of time.

Atheists have become much more vocal and militant in the last 20 years or so, I think it has to do with pride, they went to college, paid their dues got their degrees and in these last days their pride in these things has really increased. We are promoting the Biblical record and this record comes into direct conflict with their authority as educated degreed scientists, how dare we question them as they are authorities in these fields, this is really what this boils down to, their authority and education is being brough into question. Before we can even get to molecules to man evolution, we need to start with cosmic evolution, the big bang and then the solar nebula theory, in a big bang cosmology, the big bang is said to have only made three elements, Hydrogen, Helium, and a little bit of Lithium, for everything else you need stars to make the rest of the elements. Stars fuse Hydrogen producing Helium, and Helium into Carbon, an so on until Iron, once a star begins to make iron it is that stars death nell, all the rest of the elements after iron are said to be made in super nova explosions. In a big bang paradigm, stars are fundamental for life, as they created the elements needed for life, thus in a big bang paradigm explaining star formation is very important as we need stars to make the elements of life, even the noted scientist Dr. Carl Sagan said "we are star stuff" Fair Use Star Formation Neil DeGrasse Tyson said, "We Know the cloud wants to Collapse under its own weight to make one or more stars. but rotation as well as turbulent motion within the cloud work against that fate, so too does the ordinary gas pressure you learned about in High-school chemistry class, Galactic magnetic fields also fight collapse they penetrate the cloud and latch onto any free-roaming charged particles contained therein restricting the ways in which the cloud will respond to its self-gravity The scary part is that if none of us knew in advance that stars exist, front line research would offer plenty of convincing reasons for why stars could never form." [Neil DeGrasse Tyson, 2007, pg 107] Death by black hole and other cosmic quandaries. New York: w.w. Norton and co. Eva Novotny said, “The process by which an interstellar cloud is concentrated until it is held together gravitationally to become a protostar is not known.” [Eva Novotny. Introduction to Stellar Atmospheres and Interiors, p. 279.] Martin Harwit said, “Literally hundreds of ideas on how stars are formed have been advanced in past decades. However, we are still far from any real solution.” [Martin Harwit, Astronomical Concepts, Second Edition. p.405.] Martin Harwit said, “The universe we see when we look out to its furthest horizons contains a hundred billion galaxies. Each of these galaxies contains another hundred billion stars. That’s 1022 stars all told. The silent embarrassment of modern astrophysics is that we do not know how even a single one of these stars managed to form. There’s no lack of ideas, of course. We just can’t substantiate them.” [Martin Harwit, Book Review in Science, 7 Match 1996, p. 1201-2] Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu said, “The origin of stars represents one of the most fundamental unsolved problems of contemporary astrophysics.” [Charles J. Lada and Frank H. Shu. The Formation of Sunllke Stars. Science, 4 May 1990, p. 564.] Ward D Thompson said, “The formation of stars is one of the most fundamental problems in astrophysics... No current model can reproduce all of the observations.” [Ward D Thompson, Isolated Star Formation: From Cloud Formation to Core Collapse, Science 4 January 2002: " Vol. 295. no. 5552, pp. 76 - 81.] V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, “The formation of galaxies and large-scale structure remains TMIUPIMA. . . "the most important unsolved problem in modern astrophysics.” [V. Trimble and M. Aschwanden, Astrophysics in 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 113:1025-1114, 2001 September] Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell said, “Nobody really understands how star formation proceeds. It’s really remarkable.” [Roger A. Windhotst, as quoted by Corey S. Powell, "A Matter of Timing" Scientif‌ic American, Vol. 267, October 1992, p.30] Having planets for life to form on is also paramount, so explaining their formation is also up there in importance. Fair Use Formation of Planets Martin Harwit said, “Once these planetesimals have been formed, further growth of planets "may" occur through their gravitational accretion into large bodies. Just how that takes place is not understood.” [Martin Harwit. Astrophysical Concepts. p. 553] J. Blum and G. Wurm said, “The formation of planetesimals, the kilometer-sized planetary precursors, is still a puzzling process.” [J. Blum and G. Wurm, The Growth Mechanisms of Macroscopic Bodies in Protoplanetary Disks, Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2008. 46:21-56] Jeff Cuzzi said, “How the first stage of this process, primary accretion, works is a fundamental unsolved problem of planetary science.” [Jeff Cuzzi, “Planets: the first movement," Nature 448, 1003 30 August 2007] John Chambers said, "Objects must have grown very rapidly from sub-metre-sized pebbles into 100-km-sized bodies, possibly in a single leap.” [John Chambers, “Planetary science: Archaeology of the asteroid belt," Nature 460. 963-964 20 August 2009] Anders Johansen said, “How this process continues from metre-sized boulders to kilometre-scale planetesimals is a major unsolved problem: boulders are expected to stick together poorly, and to spiral into the protostar in a few hundred orbits owing to a 'headwind' from the slower rotating gas.” [Anders Johansen et at, "Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks," Nature Volume 448 1022-1025 30 August 2007] We cannot even get to molecules to man evolution because we have no stars nor planets for evolution to start, no stars no elements for life, no planets no place for life to start. However, the creation model works just fine.

Back in the 90's milford lake in Kansas had to do an emergency water release to prevent a catastrophic dam over toping . A few days later 168' of hard bedrock was eroded exposing several dinosaur skeletons. Now conciter the Grand Canyon. Soft sandy fresh sediments getting hit with much more water

Can someone answer this for me please? If we find so many fossils of creatures, then why don’t we find millions of human fossils ( the population of humans on earth that were killed in the flood)?

The flood was a natural and supernatural event. Humanity would not have been able to survive if God had not intervened. The Flood of Noah’s day (2348 BC) was a year-long global catastrophe that destroyed the pre-Flood world, reshaped the continents, buried billions of creatures, and laid down the rock layers. It was God’s judgment on man’s wickedness and only eight righteous people, and representatives of every kind of land animal, were spared aboard the Ark.

There is more water IN the earth than ON it .

There is a part in the bible that says the earth was covered with like a mist or humid layer in Noahs days and this is what God rained down on earth. When God made the rainbow as his covenant that is what made it so special because mankind had never seen this before the flood. Just my op.

I get so weary of Christian apologists who do NOT hold to young earth creationism. There are too many otherwise well-educated Christian scholars who feel they MUST adhere to the “science” that the creation is millions/billions of years old. Thank you for THIS clear presentation. My prayer is that Christians who mock YEC will reconsider and repent. Continued blessings to you and your ministry.

Brilliant! Awesome can’t wait to hear you in person!

I know that the huge T Rex skull on display in Corpus Christi museum was plastic and after it was discovered, they removed it and replaced it with pirate shipwreck artifacts.

So not everyone perished apparently aborigines say they have been on earth for 65000 years so how does that work

The biblical Old Testament, using the Hebrew lunar calendar of 28 day months (13 months/year + 4-5 days tossed away), the biblical Flood happened (with restored timeline, Abraham's life, and Moses and the true date of the Exodus 1207/1206 BCE), in ~1987 BCE.

Your theory about plate tectonics isn't exactly 100% accurate according to Genesis 1. If you can imagine a solid sphere of land under the water and God called forth after the opening of Genesis said that darkness was upon the face of the deep and the spirit of God moved across the waters. When he calls forth the land breaks underneath and rises. This is why it looks like it should have went together like a puzzle. There are a few other items in Genesis 1 that reinforce my faith such as the fact that light exists here on Earth because of our atmosphere. If you had a ship and were to travel between the Earth and sun and viewed with the naked eye in between the two bodies you would see darkness. You would think you'd see light but unless you're looking at that big ball of flaming gases directly you don't see light. The rays travel through space and once they hit our atmosphere or more precisely the water molecules in our atmosphere that refract that light then we have sunlight here on Earth. If you saw Felix Baumgartner's jump from the edge of space here on youtube in that Redbull challenge he did, you'd notice as he's rotating that it's dark then light then dark then light but it's not light when he's facing space unless he looks directly at the sun. Instead all of space is dark and when he's turned back toward the Earth then it's light. Genesis 1:6-8 is the 2nd day of creation and God creates atmosphere. Remember too that it didn't rain then. It wouldn't rain until the flood in 1656 so what was the purpose of dividing the waters? It's talking about atmosphere and the water molecules that were in the air or as Genesis 1 calls it heaven. Also it describes Eve's creation and that God put Adam to sleep and opened him up and took a rib then closed him up. Sounds like surgery to me. Lastly, Genesis 1 gives us DNA record as God uses a rib to make Eve which sounds almost like cloning but God had already done the hard part making Adam with his X and Y chromosome. With Eve He only needed to isolate and duplicate the X Chromosome to make the female counterpart void of a Y Chromosome. Had he made Eve first then believe it or not making Adam would have required new material as she did not have the full DNA to create on her own man genetically speaking. With God all things are possible but from a genetics standpoint it was easier to make Adam first and use his DNA to make a help meat. Lastly, I'll leave you with this: We all have a mother and father. They had a mother and father and so on. If you were to trace it all back there is a common ancestor we now know through DNA mapping that we all share. Every human on the planet is related. Now science thought they'd be cute and call these people Y-Chromosome Adam and Mitochondrial Eve. They believe that the two though didn't exist in the same time period and they're sort of right. You see the Bible says that Noah and his three sons along with Noah's wife and his three son's wives were the only souls who survived the flood. Depending on how closely related the three daughters-in-law were to each other and to Noah himself would depend on how far back toward Eve pre-flood you have to go to find the closest common ancestor while Noah and his three sons sharing the same DNA would have been the male line not Adam. The female side may actually go back closer to Eve. Oh back to everyone has a father and mother. So there was a 1st man and woman then we know this because of DNA. Where'd they come from? No matter if they were homosapien or some other homoerectus and we can have a discussion about the Tower of Babel then as God changed folks and scattered them across all the earth, ever wonder why there are bears on nearly every continent? Why they look different and don't match up with DNA? How about that Ark too that couldn't hold all the species we have today of animals. No unicorn but the Bible mentioned it. So if there were less species did God change them too and scatter everything during the Tower of Babel? Again this is speculative because the Bible doesn't say outright. I caution anyone who recounts my crazy theories to remember their place and Revelation 22:18-19. Don't add to or take away from that book. Tell them some nutjob named James who's son named his youtube account some other name said so. :) There has to be a God because there had to be something that didn't have a beginning that made the first man and woman otherwise you have a paradox. If Adam and Eve weren't the first then there would still have had to be a first and that would have had to have come from somewhere. Science wants you to believe there were as many evolutions that happened to similar subjects dozens or more times for each ethnicity that exists/existed on the earth and that from those "evolutions" came man from the cradle of civilization either North Africa or Mesopotamia which the Bible says as much about the location and that they walked depending on their now ethnicity to different corners of the earth, some crossing an ice bridge they still argue for in some circles. The Bible says God did it and he did it at the same time. Considering that common ancestor seems God's got this one a lot more believable than some magic evolution and trek theory. Also, in some Bibles there's a pilcrow between Genesis 1:2 and Genesis 1:3. For those who don't know a pilcrow is also called a paragraph mark or marker. It shows in this case a text transcribed by King James' scribes in Old English that there is a new paragraph starting at verse 3 but why? The purpose of a paragraph ending and a new one beginning instead of running on is because of a change in the subject, place, idea or time. The subject is still creation. The place of that creation is heaven and earth with special emphasis on the earth itself. So why is there a new paragraph? Well, this one is gonna be a bit hard for some folks to understand and many are going to disagree without fully giving this idea a chance and I want to say before I continue that this is speculative but given the evidence seems to be not only plausible but most likely. You see the Jewish day doesn't begin at midnight or even in the morning like ours does but instead at sundown of the previous evening. Why? Because God said let there be light and there was light and God divided the light from the darkness and the evening and the morning were the first day. The darkness came first so this isn't poetic license when it says the evening and the morning were the first day. So God created that first day "The heavens and the earth"....let me say again the heavens and the earth. We're talking about everything with exception of life on this planet. He created everything in the first ???24hour period? Really? Then it took him as long to create man or animals? You're saying he created in the same amount of time the universe and frogs. It took God as long to make a dog as it did Pluto. Here's an idea, when did time begin? Did it start being counted before or after God made the clockwork that is our solar system with the sun in the center. So when again did he make light? Verse 3 says He said Let There Be Light. He'd already created the heavens and the earth before he created light. So did God create the heavens and the earth on the first day or before? ;) It's a crazy world, I'm just living in it. Thanks for reading and God Bless.

This is really good but has a major flaw. I am speaking as a Geologist Geophysicist, Physicist and a Retired Missionary. Everything you posted is true but there is a flaw in it. Also, the bible deals specifically with this flaw as most over look it or do not even think it applies. I point this out as I became a born again believer after reading this in the bible. You see the earth is like 4.5 billion years old. That is fact and not fiction. If any creationist tries to say the earth is just 10 to 12 thousand years old, you will get busted big time and there is absolute proof that the earth is older than that. Secondly and more importantly, there was more than 1 global flood in earth's past. Yes, there was a flood roughly 6000 years ago. But there was two earlier ones as well. This is truth that can not be denied. Lastly, Fossil record. This is a more subjective area and the weakest of all the arguments for Evolution. However, just like the flood there are multiple periods of different life forms that are separated by each flood event. This is problematic for Creationists who is not knowledgeable to counter it. What is the real timeline of earth needs to be addressed so that creationist can stand solid and not contradict known provable science and adhere to what scripture actually says? In this case, I do not have to get into much of the evolutionary arguments if you understand the true timeline of events given in the bible. Hint, the earth is 4.5 billion years old. Scripture does not contradict this! It is a matter of careful reading of the scriptures and understanding exactly what you are reading and how it applies and falls. The scriptures have places which add information here and there that expand upon the Genesis account. You pointed out one from Psalms. There is another in the Book of Job. However, most creationists are severely and shockingly ignorant of the one in Jeremiah. In Jeremiah 4:23-28, is a visionary verse. It is specifically talking about Genesis 1:2! What is interesting about it is this? Jeremiah sees the earth without form and void. Notes how fruitful places are a wilderness and so forth. Then Jeremiah makes a comment that Man and Birds are not seen alive or dead! Kind of an important factoid. However, Jeremiah sees destroyed cities. What does this mean? So, in Genesis 1:2 the reason why the perfectly created earth in verse 1:1 is suddenly without form and void according to Jeremiah is God destroyed it out of his fierce anger. Modern man and birds are recently noted in the fossil record and not found anywhere else. So, if their was humanoid creatures in the in the past, God destroyed them. This answers the fossil record of these 500k year old bones of humanoids that Creationist really have not been able to address out of ignorance. It also addresses the fossil record specifically that of Ordovician period fossils which is the go to evolutionist fossil record proof against creationist. Jeremiah crushes the evolutionist here. In fact, Jeremiah's vision absolutely destroyed anything the evolutionist bring forward today and anything in the future. The problem this bring to the evolutionist is the bible points out to multiple creation and destruction events of earth! These destruction extinction events are in the fossil record. If the bible accounts for it, then the evolutionist no longer have anything useful to bring to the table. They immediately become a debunked branch of science! If you have more question just ask.

Love this. Thanks for your work! From Virginia.

Life cant come from none life

48:07 The unnamed unknown debate with a humanist, someone you wont name or mention when or where? I am guessing you are lying

@5:27 '...and that pulls the rug right out from underneath the millions of years concept...' Not really. First notice he says the flood explains 'most' of the layers of rock we see....so not all. What he needs to explain are not the deep flat layers of sediment but rather inconformities where rock layers formed...ie sediment was laid down then hardened into sedimentary rock...a process that takes many years, THEN due to movement of the earth's crust, those layers were upended AS SOLID ROCK and then worn off and new sediment was laid down on top of those worn off upended layers of rock and THAT new sediment itself turned to sedimentary rock (many more years) and then IT wore down until we see BOTH rock strata...the more recent rock that is still horizontal AND the rock strata that was upended. THAT cannot have happened in a 1-yr flood, nor even in the few hundreds of years between creation and the flood. The only explanation would be that that is how God created the world, originally. That would mean God intentionally created the rock layers to appear ancient and he would have known full well that is who they would be interpreted.

You realise 😈, this is going to affect the B🤑ttom line?

Psalm 100 Worship the LORD with gladness; come before him with joyful songs. Know that the LORD is God. It is he who made us, and we are his ; we are his people, the sheep of his pasture. Enter his gates with thanksgiving and his courts with praise; give thanks to him and praise his name.

I'd love it if my husband gave me a fossilized flower.

We have found the remains of towns on the India continent with the foundations at about 35 degrees. We have found all kinds of evidence of towns and literally large cities down to about the 400 ft level under the worlds ocens. The change of the earth was so extreme that the explorers have found town remains down 6100 ft deep off the coast of the Peru and remains of a sea port in the same area above 1200 feet!

Citation needed for 44:46 - 45:01

The Fossil Record - powerful evidence of a world wide flood.

Calculate the flood not by lineage but by the death of Methusala. The name Methusala means "whos death will bring destruction " This name is the reason behind Methusala having a long life. He was protected and cared for very well throughout his lifetime. Upon Methusalas death the flood began.

We only have 1% of species today, of all species lived in the past. So ur telling me that in 6000 years, we had all theese animals living here on earth. This is absolutely insane to believe this. Its allmost as insane, that people believe that the earth is flat.

The engineers told Ham his boat would never float so rather than floating it on the ohio river giving rides, its a building mock up. If ham really thought it would float, float it somewhere, a sinking ark though doesn't make Ham money

The flood is the best explanation by far. That's when God ripped apart the continents.

0:12 - I find it quite ironic that the Word Of God only has so much "authority" as man-made governments permits and allows it to have.

Dear Kevin. How does the global flood explain both the geology of the Grand Canyon and the geology of the South East corner of England. In particular, I'm thinking of the White Cliffs of Dover, 300 feet of chalk, and the Seven Sisters, over 600 feet of chalk. You may need to think about this for a bit. I'll wait...

I know.....thanks to AIG!

He seems to think that rock cant bend, yet most average americans have seen a blacksmith bend steel with a hammer and anvil. Not hard to understand. Heat and pressure can indeed bend rock, and this has long been understood in science.

at the 12th minute it appears that the area of ​​Arabia and Turkey was formed after the flood and I don't think so because there are megalithic constructions that show damage from the flood

I'm a believer, I believe in the flood of Noah, I enjoy your presentation. Just one question, how did any sea animals survive such a flood?

I love how scientists state the temperature of the Earth 120,000 years ago, when there were no temperature measuring devices 120,000 years ago. ;)

Creation is fact, Evolution is myth

Now, talking about this video and all other videos from AiG, they are too much longer than they could be... C'MON GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We are not all Bill Gates' sons who have no need to work for money and study or anything else...

Dear , Answers in Genesis here is your next step there are to many people who have been gone astray . 😢 They do not know who Jesus is and what he looks like. And do not know what the angels and the animals in the Bible look like .

It all makes sense when you start with God's word. It all gets ridiculous when you start with darwin's presumptions.

Where is all of this technical information in the Bible? I assume it's hidden there somewhere since no one was alive to observe the drift.

Less gravity pressure on the surfaces of the earth makes more sense to me

Some 60 years ago after being taught basic geology, biology, chemistry and physics in Jr High and the first years of High School, and having finished reading the Bible for the 3rd time, I became an agnostic. For some 50 years there after, I investigated the religions of the world, both past and present, as well as a number of what are generally referred to by most Christians as "mystic cults" - if they are feeling charitable. I also continued my studies in science, resulting in college degrees in Biology, Chemistry and Electronics, and a profession. Now, after all those years of study, I have determined to MY satisfaction that the foundations of ALL religions are attempts by primitive humans to explain what they did NOT understand about the world around them, particularly death, and that there are NO supernatural beings, either God, gods, angels, devils, demons, or any other beings, capable of changing the laws of reality, that there is NO soul, which means that there is NO life after death, resurrection, reincarnation, or karma. To put it bluntly, the Universe is completely random, there is no "meaning" to life other than what YOU as a person put into it, and share with the other living beings around you. As an objective morality: “A particular action or choice js moral or right if it somehow promotes happiness, wellbeing, or health, or if it somehow minimizes unnecessary harm or suffering or both. A particular action or choice is morally wrong if it diminishes happiness, wellbeing or health, or if it causes unnecessary harm or suffering or both.” Scott Clifton’s statement of objective morality as stated by AronRa on KZfaq

Let us consider that for a moment, if it really was this deep time with slow evolutionary development, then would we not expect to find billions of dead things in different layers of different types? And that is exactly what we find in the fossil record.

These videos make me a little sad. People would rather be ignorant then abandon their archaic beliefs. Peddling lies and making a living doing it. Using no science at all, rejecting all modern scientific research, and dating the food using strictly biblical text is insane.

There is water up there, look 👀 up, it’s blue!

We have even found pyramids complexes down to about 450 ft off the southeast coast fo Cuba. The nearest rock of the same make up is found in centeral Alabama. Also found was the remains of tree stumps off this same coast down to the 400 ft level.

No. Reality is the flood.

Stop the misinformation. Darwin did not just think up his theories from finches. He understood the fossil evidence and proposed a theory that gave a good explanation for why fossil sites contain the remains of extinct life forms. Darwin didn't destroy creationism. Dinosaurs did, simply by existing.

51:32 The fossil record records many things you deny in favor of cult nonsense from ken ham that you have to repeat word for word under contract per the statement of faith you signed.

Also when radio carbon dating was done on mt st helens ... the results came back as millions of years.. fission track dating results came back as 60-80 years... why don't scientists use fission track dating? because nothing and I mean nothing will come back as more than 6000-7000 years. Helium dating is also much more accurate

About the genealogy of the bible. Is that observational science, or historical science? Are the six days of creation observational science, or historical science? When evidence of a homicide is gathered, and someone is sent to prison for life, or sentenced to death for the crime, is that observational science, or historical science? You make a grand distinction between the two, but you don't follow it yourself. You are willing to accept the historical science of the bible, but not the historical science of radiometric dating, for instance. Sorry, but you can't have it both ways. If historical science is unreliable, then the bible is unreliable.

The heat problem the evolution believers always bring up is so easy to explain. When they tested air bubbles in amber it shows the atmosphere had double the pressure. When air expanes it causes cooling like spraying an arousal canister. This expansion of the atmosphere would absorb this heat. Also they calculate the heat by using a 40 day rain cycle that covered mount everest when the Bible clearly says the flood came from the fountains of the deep bursting forth and that the mountains formed during the end of the flood from the waters being ejected from under the earth causing voids which would collapse in on themselves causing an up lift in some places..walt browns hydroplate theory explains this very well and he is a reliable source having a phd and working for the military and if you disagree with him then you hate our military 😊

0:14 it always cracks me up how Apologists talks about how scientists can’t be correct because they weren’t there to witness the events 66 Million years ago, and they subsequently begin talking about a book whose events ALSO weren’t witnessed by anyone alive today, and who’s authors aren’t even entirely known at that

For size context, the ichthyosaur was slightly larger than the blue whale. The flood waters and sediment must have been inconceivably powerful to freeze frame a live birth! 😮 reference: Ars Technica

I know you don't want to hear this but regardless of whether or not evolution is the best explanation for the diversity of life on this planet your magical assertions have never been, nor will they ever be compelling enough for me to believe them.

The KJV Bible is mathematically encoded.

Also,.. that the ark was sealed inside and out with pitch made it unaffected by whatever did take place during the flood,.. it is logical to think that great rafts of flotsam were floating during the flood, thus some life may have potentially been able to ride out the flood ,thus not die, except that I think that when the flooding was taking place it so completely destroyed the old earth that even the atmosphere for a time was void of oxygen which might be why the bible explicitly pointed out all air breathing animals, and never spoke of fish,.. thus why the ark was sealed with pitch inside and out,.... and to seal the door,... God shut it,...

, THEY WILL CRUCIFY HIM; and after he is laid in a sepulchre for the space of three days HE SHALL RISE from the dead, WITH HEALING IN HIS WINGS; and ALL those WHO shall BELIEVE on his name SHALL BE SAVED in the kingdom of God. Wherefore, my soul delighteth to prophesy concerning him, for I have seen his day, and my heart doth MAGNIFY HIS HOLY NAME. #BelieveinChrist #Jesuslives! #Jesusloves!

But if it was a global flood, wouldnt there just be one rock layer? All rock layers would be mixed.

Radiometric dating shows that the earth is a few billion years old. By making the claim that it is a few thousand years old, you already discredit yourself. Why can anyone believe the rest that you're saying?

48:17 "95% of the fossil record is of marine creatures, and they are found throughout most of the strata." Except anomalocaris, trilobites, etc., who all lived and died out before the dinosaurs. Those marine creatures aren't mixed with the dinosaurs, nor are they found in layers dated at the same time or after the Mesozoic (the dinosaur era). And where are the human fossils? Those don't show up until long *after* the dinosaurs? You're trying to say every human who lived during the flood somehow managed to avoid getting fossilized until after the last dinosaur got buried? Same situation with whales and dolphins- they don't appear in the fossil record until long after dinosaurs stopped appearing. Edit to add: and that's just marine creatures. Sabertooth cats, mammoths, rhinos, etc. don't appear until after, either.

What was said at the beginning about what evolutionist believe vs the word of God makes the most sense and is more logical that if we believe that the bible could be wrong because it was written by men who are fallible then evolution which is purely by man would be totally wrong because of our fallibility and that the bible being inspired by God who actually created us would be logically more correct.

In Genesis, there are three types of "days". Why are the other two ignored?

Are there mass human fossil graves too? More importantly are they mixed with creatures that they shouldnt be mixed with according to evolutionist theory?