MOST Memorable Women of Star Trek: The Next Generation

No video

MOST Memorable Women of Star Trek: The Next Generation

Рет қаралды 496

Күн бұрын

These 5 women practically raised me through Star Trek: The Next Generation episodes!
⭐️ Get your sci-fi bingo card here ➡️ thescifisavage...
🎙️Subscribe to The TNG Podcast - A Star Trek Show! @TheTNGPodcast
Time Stamps
00:07 Tasha Yar
03:54 Dr. Katherine Pulaski
05:36 Ro Laron
08:42 Guinan
10:12 Deanna Troi
12:54 Dr. Beverly Crusher
About:
This channel is dedicated to people who love science fiction and are looking for other people to geek out with. My expertise is in Star Trek: The Next Generation and Star Trek: Voyager -- so I love it when people educate me on aaaaaalllll the other shows out there from TOS and DS9 to DISCO and SNW. All trekkies/trekkers welcome! 🖖

Пікірлер: 11

@ps2chiper112 Ай бұрын

Thank you, the video was a lot of fun!

@TheSciFiSavage Ай бұрын

I'm so glad you enjoyed it!

@scimbrelo Ай бұрын

I thought Vash was memorable too. She really knew how to get stuff done her own way

@TheSciFiSavage Ай бұрын

OMG yes! Vash was such a fun and interesting character! The only reason she's not on this list is because I focused on people who worked on the ship. Otherwise the list could get much, much longer lol.

@meiketorkelson4437 Ай бұрын

Forgot about Bevs relationship with John Doe. She does have a type, secretly an energy being. 😅 I know we all like to slam Sub Rosa. But really in a way, it's a genre Trek should do more of. Don't we all secretly love paranormal romance? ❤

@TheSciFiSavage Ай бұрын

I guess she does have a type 😆. My main problem with Sub Rosa is that she's hooking up with the same man/ghost/alien that her grandmother hooked up with. AND all the women of her family hooked up with fire centuries. Hard pass on that for me 🤣

@BOdelaRUT Ай бұрын

Hey, that's good breakdowns of women characters. OK... maybe not deep enough on Pullasky, otherwise - great! With Pullasky, you should realize it's about the dinamics of original series... TOS had this Spock/Bones dinamics which they were trying to recreate with Data/Pullasky, but it was neither needed, nor kept up, so Pullasky is off :) And about Beverly... yeah, creator's point of view (Rodenberry): officers should not engage in romantic relationships.

@TheSciFiSavage Ай бұрын

That's a fair point for Pulaski! I figured they were trying to recreate TOS dynamics, but it didn't make sense in TNG, at least not in season 2 when characters are already established. Guess it was worth a try though? As for Beverly and Picard, after 7 sessions of disappointment, I had zero emotional reaction to how their story ended in season 3 of Picard. I would still want to see them hook up even if for only 1 episode. Maybe that's just me lol

@BOdelaRUT Ай бұрын

@@TheSciFiSavage Well, that doesn't make sense in hindsight... at the time it was the end of season 1 and it wasn't a big hit, so the producers were thinking how to make it better, more to people's liking... what should we change from season 1 to season 2 so the show would become more liked... and Spock/Bones dinamics seemd to be what they decided upon - but that was not what the show needed (as it was proven later).

@jefff3886 Ай бұрын

Come on, what about Lwaxana Troi? If she's not a memorable character, nobody is. And in the later episodes, they filled out a little of her backstory, so she wasn't just a ditzy caricature.

@TheSciFiSavage Ай бұрын

I completely agree! I decided to focus on women who actually worked on the ship. Otherwise, Lawaxana (and Vash) would have totally made the list!