Most Tested Bar Exam Rules: Evidence

No video

Most Tested Bar Exam Rules: Evidence

Рет қаралды 48,580

Күн бұрын

FREE Top 120 Most-Tested Rule List: studicata.com/...
📚 LAW SCHOOL & BAR EXAM PREP
Law school prep: studicata.com/...
Bar exam prep: studicata.com/...
🤝 CONNECT WITH YOUR INSTRUCTOR
Michael's Instagram: / studicataguy
❤️ COMMUNITY & REVIEWS
Community: studicata.com/...
Testimonials: studicata.com/...
Submit a review: shoutout.studi...
📱 TECH
iOS app: studicata.com/ios
Android app: studicata.com/...
📣 ABOUT
Studicata provides a fresher, more relatable way to prep for law school finals and the bar exam. With top-rated video lectures, exam walkthrough videos, outlines, study guides, strategy guides, essay practice exams, multiple-choice assessments, performance tracking, and more-Studicata has you covered with everything you need to ace your finals and pass the bar exam with confidence.
Email: info@studicata.com
Learn more: studicata.com
🎬 VIDEO INFO
Most Tested Bar Exam Rules (MEE): Evidence
(1) Relevance
(2) Character Evidence
(3) Hearsay
Learn more: studicata.com

Пікірлер: 35

@constanzaortiz92 5 жыл бұрын

Hi! This summary has been so fantastic! I've watched all your other evidence videos and they've been so helpful!! Totally cleared up my understanding. I wanted to follow-up and ask whether you've had a chance to make the flowchart for character evidence?

@jsamanipour7540 4 жыл бұрын

Im willing to be an attorney in California as a foreign lawyer. The general principles of law is all same . Like jurisdictions, evidence rules , torts .... only the type of regulations are different. Im following your videos its very helpful to give me a vision on CA state Law

@legallycurvy 5 жыл бұрын

Nothing more attractive than a man who knows his evidence law. This explanation was brilliant. Very well done❤️❤️❤️

@christianthames2302 Жыл бұрын

You have one of the best legal channels on the net man. You should pay someone to advertise you a little bit, you make it right back in advertising revenue and grow your channel

@studicata Жыл бұрын

Thank you for your support!

@johnshumate8112 2 жыл бұрын

If I asked a witness on cross how they knew it was blue ink for the contract and they said, “because it was raining that day”, I would just say no further questions and sit down.

@VK-el3of 5 жыл бұрын

Omg. Taking February 2020 bar and love your videos. Seriously considering enrolling

@jaidevkalra3569 4 жыл бұрын

VK were the results a shock? ;/

@cleotoo1 5 жыл бұрын

thanks for the great video! could you include the flowchart you refer to?

@akiyahb4276 5 жыл бұрын

I was just thinking the same!

@victoriakroger5506 4 жыл бұрын

This is great! I do not see the link to an evidence tree chart as stated in the video. Did you ever make it?

@reycfd7753 2 жыл бұрын

Amazing! Thanks!

@saradavies1582 2 жыл бұрын

God bless the day i found studicata!!!!

@hyojinlee 3 жыл бұрын

Love all your videos, thank you so much!

@tiggerish 5 жыл бұрын

This is a great video and very clear.

@studicata 5 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@timothystarks5053 4 жыл бұрын

Great explanation of this rule I've heard thus far...great....it can get complicated but great job...

@NamasteCC 5 жыл бұрын

thank you

@poppy5267 4 жыл бұрын

Very helpful thank you!

@dagobello 4 жыл бұрын

Awesome explanations.

@studicata 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@cass4420 3 жыл бұрын

To clarify, you said for your mnemonic device “MIMIC” (sorry, I butchered the spelling of it, love the device nonetheless) - “preponderance of the evidence” to get some evidence in under FRE 404(b) Character Evidence; however, isn’t 404(b) for criminal cases only, therefore the standard of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt instead of preponderance? Why is it preponderance of the evidence for the weight of that evidence to get it admitted?

@ivancarlson953 4 жыл бұрын

In the Casey Antony trial, an expert witness, Dr. Rodriguez, failed to enter into his report that he couldn't make an opinion on where was the placement of the duct tape, despite the lawyer, Mr. Baez, previously had been given a court order to tell witnesses to enter all opinions into their reports. Rodriquez claimed he wasn't aware of that court order, and he wasn't conformable making the opinion since he had none. I guess this goes to show that evidence, even documentation that there is no opinion and the basis for that opinion, needs to be entered. The old adage, "if you didn't document it, you didn't do/consider it."