Super sexy

not more than ferraris f40 and 50!

the best lambo ever

@@zoka3593 need for speed

ugly

Soul

They come from people more interested in cars than becoming the next internet celebrity.

and still over 200 grand ! :)

even more awesome than a bunch of modern cars today!!

+Lucas Arthurs purple with black mags

Looks are arguably a personal thing. I love it in every color it came out

Sharp Blade yeah, this car was sexy in just about every color it was offered.

Metallic Midnight Blue

I love the yellow sv. Those were some beautiful cars

Say no more. It is one of the best looking cars ever made. However today, other cars can beat that 0 to 60 time. No matter: it doesn't make them better. Other cars could beat my 85 M/c SS, But it didn't make them better. All cars of the future hail the Diablo.

+LoveMyZJ Love the early Diablo like this one, classic 90's supercar =)

I want the 2001 6.0 diablo. Last year before audio started making lamborghini

+TheKJProductionz Audi started with lamborghini in '99, The "real" "true" last Lamborghini Diablo was in '98 before December when Audi took over. So when you see flip up headlights on a Diablo, thats the real deal.

+aintnunbutapenut learn something new everyday

Audi brought stability. However his point is that all the parts etc were still made in Italy at Lamborghini or somewhere in Bologna until then. GM and the privateers before were mostly just the check books. I'll admit I still consider the 6.0 a "real" Lambo.

me too.

Countach wasn't supposed to be good looking. It was supposed to outrageous....which it accomplished quite nicely. But absolutely... The Diablo is definitely gorgeous. Not quite "outrageous" but still very exotic.

Countach is like "lol, look at this silly looking car with its horn, so dumb......I MUST HAVE IT!!!"

I think both look good

loved that game.

That "jump" on the alpine track...

I remember watching the car cinematics over and over

It was literally the poster car of the '90s NFS (when they used to imitate The Cannonball Run movies before of Fast & Furious) In this game alongside with the Diablo SV from HP from 1998.

The first racing game I played!

+di foo!! You may be right, but this was a legit issue for the early diablos. Had he complained about the later ones, then that would be too much!

I can't recall if it was a Supra or Porsche review where he said something to the effect of being pleasantly surprised at its practical and functional layout. I was also pleasantly surprised... that he actually complimented a dashboard layout for once. 😆

I think you would have to go back to early '80's reviews because certain gauges got eliminated over time--starting in the '80's.

He complimented Chrysler Caravan from the '80s (mini-van, whatever it's called)

Indeed

+incyphe And now you can buy a $25k car that's just as capable and way more practical. Progress!

+incyphe well put..

+Kevin G Uhh.. you're not serious. wtf..

+Tom Jones IKR? It's so stupid, every new car these days is ridden with computerized bullshit and are so complicated. Sure 90's cars had computerized shit but it wasn't like what vehicles are today, they were a lot simpler, and at least on 90's vehicles you can work on them yourself. That's why I stick to 90's vehicles. I drive a 99' Chevy Tahoe LT and I love it. Next vehicle on the list is going to be a 1990 or 91' Plymouth Acclaim LE or LX. Still keeping my tahoe though.

Andrew Piatek Compared to a modern Lamborghini, I can see why.

I remember that it seemed relatively restrained compared to the Countach - it didn't look as extreme. And there was more competition. But the looks have aged well.

I think I can agree with that. I always loved the Countach as a kid, but once i saw them in person I didn't like them. The Diablo and Murcielago have some of the best looks though I think.

Ryder you sherm head

Agreed

Everyone agrees, only that some people won't admit it

i know right, i think the 3000gt vr4 and the 300z were sub 5 for the era

Should have been 4.4 seconds

13.3 slow too

My Mercedes does 4.2 with an automatic transmission lol that pilot sucks

+Toyota4Life I liked the looks of the Countach better.

Not really saying much going by Italian standards.

I think the original Aventador has something to say about that...

@@tyler9703 Not too big an improvement, tho....

So true. So true.

Sesto Elemento. 👀

+Mista Butterworth If anyone wants to see what the Diablo was going to look like before Chrysler, google "Cizeta Moroder V16". Essentially that car with very few changes was to be the Diablo.

V12 That is true, the Moroder is pretty close to what Gandini was going for with the Diablo. Although the V16T's more angular appearance and 80's detailing dated it rather quickly.

Mista Butterworth I didnt know that. Thanks for adding that info. I always loved the Chrysler concept from the movie "Wraith". It makes you wonder what they could release without restrictions from the higher ups.

add in the killer nissan 300zx head lights and you got a winner!

Mr. Butterworth looks pretty cool, maybe a bit Testarossa-like with those slots on the side

A worn clutch is a worn clutch. It brings up a good point though: most magazine numbers require launches that will destroy your car, especially if it's all wheel drive (or has a tall 1st gear in the case of the Diablo), so at the end of the day they rarely mean much in the real world.

Not to mention it was also at high altitude

@@dmar813 LOL. Pocono sits at ~1800 feet. That's not high. Higher that sea level, yeah, but I'm at over a mile high. NA cars really suck up here.

i can still see the last COUNTACH at the SANT AGATA plant number 1997 going in for retirement and wondering who his replacement will be if there is 1. on going in sees the DIABLO, number 1 coming out and says WHAT THE F^%CK!!!!!

That's the version I owned.

Lol

I would masterbait to the picture of this car on my wall

sorry i'm not a pro at it yet

Jorge Lopez youll get there!

I had the Alpine stereo one. It would be cool to find again

I had a 10ft long poster!!! until I graduate high school in 94

and the 6.0 did it in 3.4 with an 11.8 quarter. Amazing piece of machinery

That's much better. I frowned when he said 0-60 in 5.4 seconds bc my girlfriend's 4cyl Mustang can do that now.

@@Kee-Von The early diablos did over 5 seconds 0-60

You mean trailer!

You can pick one up for under 150k these days...

@@PatrickRob82 250-300k and up unless something is seriously wrong with the car.

it was broken. 0-60 should be 4.4 seconds. but yes, many "normal" cars can match that now.

+doctorlobsteroctopus They are hard to use at first if you insist on looking down while shifting and/or not putting your full arm into the shift. It is nothing like shifting a BMW, Honda, or pony car. The first Ferrari I drove I didn't do all that well with the shifter. It took a few drives with gates to get good.....I found the Diablo VT shifter to be really good. I've never owned any of these shift gate exotics but can imagine over time you'll be really good at shifting them and it will be a joy. Once you're good at shifting it, it is indeed a real pleasure.

they do. Called the lexus rcf

Nothing wrong with the wheels or tyres...17x335 on the rear?? lovely! Those 21 inch rims look too huge these days