I too have access to both and think it differs person to person. For example, I've used both a heavy amount and never gotten inspiration from Omni, while always finding something I like in AL. For someone like me, Omnisphere is not even close. But thats what makes us all human or whatever haha

I have both. Each vst offers something different!!! If you play keys to have all those synths in Analog labs v would cost alot money!!! If you just talking about making some beats omnisphere is cool but you can recreate actual music from 45 years ago and duplicate the sound exactly with V. You can duplicate a time period!!!

Plz don't say that .u gonna make me Wana go all the way out to crack omnisphere and get inspired wayyyyy up to hollywood

So Arturia is not inspiring? Just their Analog Lab Play alone(a totally free VST)..is VERY inspiring and it's the very reason why I bought Analog Lab Pro, Pigments & the CS-80 synth. The analog modelling synths in Analog Lab are flawless recreations of many of the most iconic classic monster synths of the 70's and 80's, which is my vibe. With Arturia, I am not forced to spend $500 right off the bat and with Arturia's periodic sales, I save a staggering amount of money. There's no dongle, no e-licenser bullsh*t and adding installation via the software manager app, is so seamless. Speaking of seamless functionality, the overall layout of the GUI is amazingly intuitive, the FX are dope and the fluidity of layering sounds allows you to create without toiling over any steep learning curves. You can do ANY genre of music...from video game tunes, to film scoring with an orchestra of bread & butter instruments(which you c-a-n-n-o-t do in Omnisphere. Arturia is very CPU efficient and they will NEVER make you pay for each & ever time you re-install their software on a new PC or whatever. Also... there's plenty of new sounds libraries to choose from & they are very reasonably priced. You could spend thousands of dollars on Omnisphere and you STILL won't have everything you need to cover multiple genres of music production(whereas you can spend just $600 and have everything you need, more or less. Arturia is a different flavor from Omnisphere, but that doesn't mean Analog Lab is any less inspiring. So you favor Omnisphere and that's cool, but it's not fair to say that Arturia doesn't have it's own brand of inspiration.

Arturia Pigments is pretty awesome. I think that should be compared more to Omnisphere than Analog Lab.

Totally agree!

Which version is he using for the video? is it the stripped down version or V collection? I would really like to buy it as it is from the presets he's shown. I'm sold man

So@@edavidmartinez Analog Lab V is essentially two things: first, it's a frontend that allows you to access all of the presets in the V Collection. It allows you to do some basic sound editing. But, to get into deep programming of each synth, that is where the V Collection comes in. You open the individual synths and can deep edit each! So, for example, you could open the Matrix 12 and have access to all of the actual parameters of the Matrix 12 including lag proccesors, ramps, and Multi creation within the Matrix 12. Perhaps you want to do some resynthesis? Open up the Synclavier V in Analog V and you have full access to the Synclavier itself. Also, the designers of the 250,000 dollar Synclavier worked with Arturia on the Synclavier V. If you just want access to tons of presets with the ability to edit just the common parameters such as Cutoff, Resonance, and some filter editing, then Analog Lab V is excellent. If you want to get into truly deep editing, you need the V Collection. One caution however: Omnisphere has one interface for the entire instrument whereas the V Collection gives you the interface of each synth, so, learning Matrix 12 is quite different from programming the Jupiter V or Prophet VS for example.

@@edavidmartinez he's using the "stripped down version". Actually it's the full Analog Lab V version, but it consists of synth presets. Many presets, which can also be altered to a certain degree. You can add the V Collection that gives you access to all the knobs and sliders you's have on the original synthesizers that are emulated. But even without the V Collection, you'll have tons of content. You're just a bit limited in creating your own sounds or simulating the exact sounds used by the likes of Vangelis (unless the sound is already there as an included preset). Having said that: many Arturia midi-keyboards come with a full version of Analog Lab V. I bought a Keylab Essential for €150 that came with Analog Lab V, which is a great deal. Currently V Collection can be bought for €199, which is also a great deal.

Yes it's free but almost all of these sounds need adjustments like voices, depth and other things and basically if you want to really modify them you have to buy each synths that make each sound.

@@wallendiazGood point. Omni is more editable than analog lab v. Also, I’ve never had omni crash, not once, and I’ve used it since it was atmosphere. 🎹♥️

I agree. I spend a little too much time searching for sounds in omni and sometimes wind up going back to old favorites. So I spent a bit more time finding new sounds to favorite. I use Omni on almost every song. That said, pigments is calling me. 🎹♥️

Definitely one of my favorites 😄

Well-put. 🎹♥️

Totally agree, personally. And I’ll have to check out pigments!

Es muy pesado, para diseño de sonido seria mejor el Serum

I can try and get my hands on Falcon 2 and do something like that! 😄

Falcon is not even close to the same level as Omnisphere. The sound libs for it are terrible and overhyped. The only lib I ever used in Falcon was the Beatbox Anthology 2. The rest sound like free common midi sounds.

Aquí hay una cosa y es que los sintetizadores virtuales que hay en el analog, no solo son software sino que también existen en hardware y Omnisphere es solo software

Very nice!

I've had it for 6 months and not one crash 😅

All very valid points. I’ve had to pay multiple times to get Omni and keyscape on different devices, so I definitely feel that 😅

Weird

Toooootally agree 👍

Thank you for sharing!

In what way ?

@@JDiamondMusic Well, the range of sounds is just staggering but also I find that editing and creating sounds with omnisphere is way better for me as you can create a much wider range of textures. 🙂

@@lancegfoin9117 been considering pigments 4 have u tried that

Please send mep

Really appreciate your level headed opinion. A lot of people just say that one is trash and anyone who thinks otherwise is stupid 😅 so thank you 🙏

I wonder whats his processor, memory and HD capacity is. I played Omni using a absolute dinosaur many years ago and It rarely crashed.

I’m using using the lite version in which you can’t do that. I mentioned I’m using the lite version a couple times

lol thank you 🙏

Both are delicious 😋

Very true. Omni has a lot of great FX and texture sounds! So if that's your game, than that's for sure the better option