Thanks for the nice comparison. For BLADE diffusion, the SNR might be higher if longer TR is used, e.g., 3500
@Nguyen_MRI5 ай бұрын
Thanks for your input ☺️👍
@andesastro7 ай бұрын
Thanks Bac, as usual very informative 🙌🏼
@anniesshenanigans38157 ай бұрын
the frustration I have is that my facility does not want any alterations to the sequences. Knowing that my Siemens has so many great options is fruitless when you cannot manipulate it.
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
yeah thats sad.
@abrabr67207 ай бұрын
Can you do another video to the one that you have in more detail like step by step on how uploading protocols, making changes to protocols and add positioning pictures to protocols. I would really appreciate it. Thanks again for your help. I'm big fan of yours.
@9cobil2997 ай бұрын
You should just try, send the new sequence alongside the old one. Done this alot, and it works. They dont know what they're missing until they see it.
@dvalled187 ай бұрын
We usually use Resolve for routine inner ear scans and Haste diffusion for cholesteatoma. Unfortunately, we do not have blade diffusion available but it looks great!
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
Same here. But will look further into the blade dwi and see its potential.
@_Guga7 ай бұрын
A question: Do you always wear the device on the patient's finger? (Brazil-SP)
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
What device?
@_Guga7 ай бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI I noticed that you put the pulse monitoring on the patient's finger, I would like to know if it is necessary to use it?
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
@@_Guga oh you mean the respiratory? It's monitor only because the table have it in build. For this exam no needed
@_Guga7 ай бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI Thank you so much for answering, I have been working with MRI for 19 years and I have never used respiratory monitoring for this sequence, I follow all your videos on KZfaq and Linkdim
@mihaimoldo7 ай бұрын
@@_Gugait's not used for this sequence. Bac has the respiratory trigger built in the table itself so automatically you see it for every pacient .
@user-wx4xc4zv4y6 ай бұрын
Haste DWI or non-EPI DWI, Siemens harmony 1,5T.
@djfhdjfjfh6597 ай бұрын
This is focous dwi thanks
@user-eg7vc8tn9n7 ай бұрын
Sir, what do you think about Sequence 3D Watsc? Some articles said it's superior, but some said not? I'm really confused. and which fat supp technique do you think is better for knee MR?
@mihaimoldo7 ай бұрын
Water excitation is the fastest in MSK. But normal fat sat works just as well. Dixon is king if you have trouble with fat sat.
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
good question, but i dont have experience with that sequence. so i cant say much. are your radiologists happy?
@selimakko98117 ай бұрын
👍🏻
@RADKIT7 ай бұрын
may i ask what would the most used protocol you currently use for inner ear imaging? i mean for none cholesteatoma cases, e.g. pre implant
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
mrimaster.com/protocol-and-planning-of-iams/
@23232Bing7 ай бұрын
Do you prefer Multi-shot or TSE in DWI?
@Nguyen_MRI7 ай бұрын
good question. for inner ear non epi haste dwi is good. but sometimes an optimized resolve is also very good. the new blade dwi is something im currently working on now, looks promising so far. what about you?
@23232Bing7 ай бұрын
In my opinion, in a Philips scanner- DWI-TSE sucks ass, we only use it because theoretically said by literature that choleastoma is better seen in those sequences. I couldn't see shit there@@Nguyen_MRI
@dailyarttamil17854 ай бұрын
Haste dwi and non epi is same?
@Nguyen_MRI4 ай бұрын
Yes
@dailyarttamil17854 ай бұрын
@@Nguyen_MRI thank you so much
@fishyKRIMINAL6 ай бұрын
What are people doing to minimize that artifact on GE?
@b3rlinop6936 ай бұрын
Bro do have any suggestions for Mri Simulation for practice free