MRI - DWI - INNER EAR IMAGING

No video

MRI - DWI - INNER EAR IMAGING

Рет қаралды 4,595

Bac Nguyen

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 62

@sniperzk 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for the nice comparison. For BLADE diffusion, the SNR might be higher if longer TR is used, e.g., 3500

@Nguyen_MRI 5 ай бұрын

Thanks for your input ☺️👍

@andesastro 7 ай бұрын

Thanks Bac, as usual very informative 🙌🏼

@anniesshenanigans3815 7 ай бұрын

the frustration I have is that my facility does not want any alterations to the sequences. Knowing that my Siemens has so many great options is fruitless when you cannot manipulate it.

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

yeah thats sad.

@abrabr6720 7 ай бұрын

Can you do another video to the one that you have in more detail like step by step on how uploading protocols, making changes to protocols and add positioning pictures to protocols. I would really appreciate it. Thanks again for your help. I'm big fan of yours.

@9cobil299 7 ай бұрын

You should just try, send the new sequence alongside the old one. Done this alot, and it works. They dont know what they're missing until they see it.

@dvalled18 7 ай бұрын

We usually use Resolve for routine inner ear scans and Haste diffusion for cholesteatoma. Unfortunately, we do not have blade diffusion available but it looks great!

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

Same here. But will look further into the blade dwi and see its potential.

@_Guga 7 ай бұрын

A question: Do you always wear the device on the patient's finger? (Brazil-SP)

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

What device?

@_Guga 7 ай бұрын

@@Nguyen_MRI I noticed that you put the pulse monitoring on the patient's finger, I would like to know if it is necessary to use it?

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

@@_Guga ⁠oh you mean the respiratory? It's monitor only because the table have it in build. For this exam no needed

@_Guga 7 ай бұрын

@@Nguyen_MRI Thank you so much for answering, I have been working with MRI for 19 years and I have never used respiratory monitoring for this sequence, I follow all your videos on KZfaq and Linkdim

@mihaimoldo 7 ай бұрын

@@_Gugait's not used for this sequence. Bac has the respiratory trigger built in the table itself so automatically you see it for every pacient .

@user-wx4xc4zv4y 6 ай бұрын

Haste DWI or non-EPI DWI, Siemens harmony 1,5T.

@djfhdjfjfh659 7 ай бұрын

This is focous dwi thanks

@user-eg7vc8tn9n 7 ай бұрын

Sir, what do you think about Sequence 3D Watsc? Some articles said it's superior, but some said not? I'm really confused. and which fat supp technique do you think is better for knee MR?

@mihaimoldo 7 ай бұрын

Water excitation is the fastest in MSK. But normal fat sat works just as well. Dixon is king if you have trouble with fat sat.

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

good question, but i dont have experience with that sequence. so i cant say much. are your radiologists happy?

@selimakko9811 7 ай бұрын

👍🏻

@RADKIT 7 ай бұрын

may i ask what would the most used protocol you currently use for inner ear imaging? i mean for none cholesteatoma cases, e.g. pre implant

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

mrimaster.com/protocol-and-planning-of-iams/

@23232Bing 7 ай бұрын

Do you prefer Multi-shot or TSE in DWI?

@Nguyen_MRI 7 ай бұрын

good question. for inner ear non epi haste dwi is good. but sometimes an optimized resolve is also very good. the new blade dwi is something im currently working on now, looks promising so far. what about you?

@23232Bing 7 ай бұрын

In my opinion, in a Philips scanner- DWI-TSE sucks ass, we only use it because theoretically said by literature that choleastoma is better seen in those sequences. I couldn't see shit there@@Nguyen_MRI