In sha Allah shaykh ❤ Beautiful Byan and beautiful Jubba❤❤❤

Shia Maslaq a Heretic sect within islam was formed and created by Byzantinian Church establishment ....please the following 1) Muhammad bin `Ali bin Babwayh al-Qummi, known as al-Shaykh al-Saduq (d. 280/901 A.D.), has recorded four polemical discussions between the highest spiritual leader of Christians and Shi`ah scholars of eminence and Mutakallimun in his works. It is probable that dialogue of Cathilicos with Imam `Ali (`a) took place during 657 A.D.1 But the culminating point of these controversies has been during the early 10th century A.D.,2 i.e., in the 2nd century Hijrah, during the periods of Imam al-Sadiq (`a) and Imam al-Rida (`a),3 the 6th and 8th Imams of the Shi`ah. 2) Another point that is indicative of the close cultural relations between the Shi`ah and Christianity is recording of the sayings, character and biographical accounts of Christ in the books of the Shi`ah, which surpasses all such accounts of Christ in the works of all other sects of Islam. It is noteworthy that the name of `Isa has occurred in the Qur'an 25 times and the name of Masih (`a) recurs 36 times in the Qur'an. And the circumstances of his birth and his way of preaching and his ascension are repeatedly narrated in the Qur'an. But despite this emphasis the books of non-Shi`i authors do not contain detailed accounts of Christ's sayings and character. For instance, in Sihah al-Sittah, i.e., six authentic compendia of hadith of Ahl al-Sunnah we do not come across even a single utterance of Christ. On the other hand in the books of the Shi`ah, even some of the oldest, utterances of him are found in abundance. Imam `Ali (`a), the first Imam of the Shi`ah, has narrated the ascetic style of the life of Christ in one of his sermons, given under No. 160, in Nahj al-Balaghah. After him, in the 2nd century A.H., Imam al-Sadiq has quoted the preaching of Christ, as found exactly in the Bible of Mathew, while delivering his advice to `Abdullah bin Jandab in New Testament, book of Mathew, chapter 6, sentences 2,3,6,7,16 and 18. During the period from the 2nd to the 4th century A.H., al-Jahiz, in al-Bayan wa al-Tab'in, nine short sayings and one detailed speech of Christ were recorded. During the middle of the 4th century an eminent Shi`i author, Abu Muhammad Hasan bin `Ali bin al-Husayn bin Shu`bah al-Harani (d. 38 A.H. = 1001 A.D.) in his book, Tuhf al-`Uqul `an Al al-Rasul, had devoted about 16 pages to record the sayings of Christ. These utterances consist of two parts: the first, which is briefer, second, which is comparatively detailed, quote parts of Christ's sermons. According to the researches done in this regard, same words are accessible to us at present, in some of anajil (i.e., Book of New Testaments). For example one may refer to the following: Book of Mathew, sentences 1-7, 14-17 and 44-45 in chapter 5, sentences 12-19, 24, 30 in chapter 6, sentence 16 in the chapter 7, and 29-36 in chapter 22; Book of Luke, sentences 17-49 in chapter 6; 44-45 in chapter 6, 4-17 in chapter 8 and 37-53 in chapter 11; Book of Mark, sentence 30 in chapter 12. Ibn Shu`bah was a resident of Harran and since Harran was a center of learning for the Christians, he had access to a majority of the Christian primary source. Of course, most of the sentences that Ibn Shu`bah has quoted are specifically from the books of Mathew, Luke and Mark. It remains unknown why he has not quoted from all the books of New Testament. However, it is a distinct feature of the Shi`i works that they have been forerunners in the matter of referring to and quoting profusely from the sayings and sermons of Christ as compared to all other Muslim sects.

Do a stream on Shirkia activities in mazaars & dargahs

@@Atharva1973 that doesn't require any stream, just refer to our ulama. What you see at the mazaraat like tawaf of grave, sajda e tazeemi, etc has already been prohibited by our ulama. You can only stand against the jahalah of the public. Be a man. Talk with books. Now I know you are gonna run away again. Accept the truth brother. Not everyone is gifted with this characteristic

Be careful, don`t call Muhktar ibn saqafi(Ra) for missguided, okay?

no arab will name his son Abu Bakr. Abu bakr is kunya and not a name. Ali never had a son called abu bakr.

Learn Arabic and then talk

@@FikrNaqdi some shias also claim that his name was abdullah, the same name as abu bakr's, though there is ikhtelaf in it. so he directly had the same kunya as abu bakr as siddique radiyallahu anhu

Literally no hadith ever to state that imam ali a.s named his son after the first 3 but sunnis seemed to be over the moon. Maybe google sermon of Shaqshaqiya and see what imam ali a.s. felt about the first three.

I like this guy but the problem with him is he thinks whatever he reads from these books are absolute facts!!! is just so laughable to hear Mola Ali named his son after a person who he disputed all his life and on the other hand if a Shea cleric was to decide to debate him he will be destroyed completely. All together at least he has a decency to accept the family of Prophet (pboh)

Really? Is some video available?

@@amatullah313 he mentioned it himself in his interview with dilly on 5pillars youtube channel

Haqqani was a deviant

Following the yahoud is ok but following ahl al bait is misguidance You fast on a day. The Yahoud never fast on , so you are fasting on mis guidance You take your religion from yahoud

⁠​⁠​⁠@@biggms13g the Prophet ﷺ fasted on the 10th of Muharram and enjoined his companions to do the same because Muslims have more of a right to Musa AS than the Jews. Now you know, so delete your comment or be ready to face the Prophet ﷺ for accusing him of taking religion from the yahud

@nihalhakim5148 I'm not accusing him of taking his religion from the Yahood. I'm accusing you sunnies of doing this. The Yahoud do not have a fast for the exsodos Whoever made up this hadith didn't know how to lie very well

Respectfully the point he made wasn't that you should fast that day in memory of Husain RA. He was refuting the idea that fasting Ashura was a later instrument of Umayyid propaganda to overshadow the massacre. He properly attributed it as an established practice of the prophet (SAW) and further remarked that not only does it take nothing away from the terrible crimes committed later it can even enhance the emotions one might feel if it crossed their mind due to the heightened spiritual state of fasting.

but will it not be permissible if someone fasts on the day of ashura and remembers both of these?

there is nothing wrong with either of that........commemorating the tragedy of karbala isnt equal to mourning. it is better instead to keep the memories of the sacrifices fresh and spread love and devotion for ahlul bayt radiyallahu taala anhum........other than that it is also good to expend in the name of ahlul bayt there is no denying that no problem with that. we should do both. and yeah remember brother.........it is an usool that daef hadith can be accepted and practiced upon in case of fazail. the pseudosalafis just try to misguide ppl on this saying hadiths daef, for example the night of 15th shabaan

Very true

Why ist Imam Hysein Not mentioned in that list from Shaykh?

​@rexrex6578. its the first name on the list

In Turkey Adhan indicates call to prayer. Imsak is still 3:51. Bear in mind Turkey has a Hanafi majority population, which is a madhab that is better to pray fajr when the sky is lit rather than complete darkness.

Are you an idiot? He's comemorating the martyrdom of Imam Hussein

I think he is fake

Show us evidence that Fatima was pleased with Abu Bakr. Basically if you show us this then Aisha is a liar. The term he used was not delirious, it was mad or more specifically 'not in his senses'. You Sunnis try your level best to defend the indefensible

@@Warlock786watch the video again- its both in sunni and rafidi sources. Dont be a blind conformist to your rabbis theres alot cover ups that your ayotollahs like to do. “When Fatima became ill, Abu Bakr came to her and asked for permission to enter. So Ali said, ‘O Fatima, this is Abu Bakr asking for permission to enter.’ She answerd, ‘Do you want me to give him permission?’ He said, ‘Yes.’ So she allowed him (to enter), and he came in seeking her pleasure, so he told her: ‘By Allah, I only left my home and property and my family seeking the pleasure of Allah and His Messenger and you, O Ahlel Bayt.’ *So he talked to her until she was pleased with him* *MUSLIM SOURCES* (Sunan Al-Bayhaqi, vol 6, page 301) Al-Bayhaqi, Ibn Kathir, and Ibn Hajar all authenticate this hadith & Ibn Kathir states it as *SAHIH* in his Al Bidayah and Ibn Hajar in his Fath Al Bari. *RAFIDI RESOURCES* Nahj-ul-Balaga, Vol.5, P. 107,109, Ibn-i-Mitham al-Buhrani, Hujjaajus Saalikeen.

@@mughal_r9374 You are right this happend !!! 100%. So we both agree Aisha is a liar and a mushrik yes ? After all she is giving a fasle testimony in this Mushrik Hadith from Bukhari. The amount of hadith you mushriks and nasibis has changed is amazing. Narrated `Aisha: Fatima the daughter of the Prophet (ﷺ) sent someone to Abu Bakr (when he was a caliph), asking for her inheritance of what Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) had left of the property bestowed on him by Allah from the Fai (i.e. booty gained without fighting) in Medina, and Fadak, and what remained of the Khumus of the Khaibar booty. On that, Abu Bakr said, "Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "Our property is not inherited. Whatever we leave, is Sadaqa, but the family of (the Prophet) Muhammad can eat of this property.' By Allah, I will not make any change in the state of the Sadaqa of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) and will leave it as it was during the lifetime of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ), and will dispose of it as Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) used to do." So Abu Bakr refused to give anything of that to Fatima. So she became angry with Abu Bakr and kept away from him, and did not task to him till she died. She remained alive for six months after the death of the Prophet. When she died, her husband `Ali, buried her at night without informing Abu Bakr and he said the funeral prayer by himself. Mushrik Sources: Sahih al-Bukhari 4240, 4241 In-book reference : Book 64, Hadith 278. Also nothing as you mentioned exists in Nahj at all. Another Sunni/Mushriq fabrication like your Caliphs. Pathetic.

@@Warlock786 neithe,r the clear sahih traditions are in sunan of imam bayhaqi volume 5 pages 380 onwards. And other works. Whatever you accuse the khulafa of same blame goes upon Ali as he acted no different. Faraziyat bi dhalik Is also used in Shia hadith works that she became pleased with him. Last part jahil simpletons shouldn't discuss religion the words " she became angry or did not speak to him " on this matter are the words of shihabuddin zuhri and not Aisha. So you don't know how hadith science works and you wish to discuss hadith, stick to playing x box and this ain't your league kid.

@@Warlock786 the only mushriks is you, Sayyidah Aishas, Iman and character is attested to buy revelation she is ahlul bayt by Nasss!!! Clear textual evidence not rafidhi interpretation gymnastics , your religion of ibn Saba is the shirk factory and go prove the iman of nargis the one used by a whole cavalry of Romans was sold wearing a silk dress spent three nights alone with bishr then supposedly allegedly became the mother of your 12th. Ref the book of occultation by majlisee volume 51 of biharul Anwar translated by Allahyari, and kamauluddin by shaikh Saduq. The ones who drink horse urine and whose women seek tabaruk of horse rentals. The ones who turn the lights of and have disco nights , the ones who ascribe wilayat e takweeniya and tashreeya to imams the ones who did shirk almost every second by calling the imams the hands eyes and sides of Allah- ref majlisee hayat ul qulub volume three chapters with each title..shouldn't call anyone a mushrk that's like a pim-p claiming decency. Jog along rafidhi . Bring one of your priests.

Who saying those were shia?

Those were Kufans...not necessarily Shia..don't be an idiot suggesting ALL kufans were Shia as many Shia existed outside of the Kufans as well

​@Warlock786 the family of zuraryah al aya. was from al kufan and guess what he was cursed by the imams yet you use the taqqyah clause card to save him however you cannot use this with the sermon to ahlul kufans. Your finished

​@@Farzadsafarwandi it's because these shia carry out those bad rituals during ashurah just like how syedna zainab said they won't be able to wash their dirt of their clothes

@bk-qr5nx I'm finished ? Lmao. Brother if saying that makes you feel better by all means. The sermon was to Yazid and his court not just the Kufans. Amazing how you Sunnis always try to protect the enemies of the Prophet. I have always thought Sunnis are closet Nasibis and conversations like this always prove I'm right.

Read Surat Al-Najm “In Huwa Ila wahyun yuha alamahu shadidul Quwa” The prophet does not say anything without a deep wisdom and inspiration from Allah SWT. He did not compare Ali AS to Harun AS because it’s a poetic simile.

You are misguiding people by imposing your beliefs onto the hadith. The prophet s.a.w. mentioned this to Sayyidunah Ali A.S after the incident of him being made to stay behind for a battle. When he questioned the prophet s.a.w. as to why he was made to stay behind, the prophet s.a.w mentioned this quote. Just as Harun A.S remained behind to look after the ummah when Musa A.S went to meet with Allah at mount Tur. To use this story to claim that Ali A.S had a superior status to the other sahabah is misguidance.

The context which you have quoted does not matter - everything he says is Wahi and has a deep wisdom which extends beyond the immediate situation in which it was said.

@@saahirkhan7994 Quran: “And give to me an aider from my family: Harun, my brother, strengthen my back by him, and associate him (with me) in my affair.51 Musa said to his brother Harun: Take my place among my people, and act well and do not follow the way of the mischief-makers Refer back to the Hadith in Tirmidhi to which you are referring and you will see that He SAW also used the word “brother”.”

@@saahirkhan7994 of course his status was superior to even the most pious of companions. He is from the 5 Ahlul Kisa who were under the cloak of the prophet SAW upon whom we send Salawat (not just Salam) 5 times a day every day. We do not include anybody else in the Salawat within our Salah. Some versions say “Kama salayta ala Ibrahim wa ali Ibrahim” but nobody else is included. Imam Ali is among those

Wrong,Abubakar was not amongst it

But why would Ali name his sons as Abubakar, umar,Usman in a series way...why ?He had many options

@@user-zq1co8ef2i I cannot help you if you refuse to open your eyes and see.

@@user-zq1co8ef2i Umar Ibn Abi Salama the foster son of the prophet saw from Um Salama fought on Imam Ali’s side in the battle of the camel. Many others had the name Umar.

I gave you a very similar example to the prevalence of the name Umar at that time - the name Judas (Jude) in Christianity and the name Mohammad Ridha in Iran. Both bad and good characters in those contexts shared the names as it was common - simple.

Your kinda coward never have guts to debate , keyboard warrior ..come to debate

First of all dumb shi'i it was not Ibn Abbas but Abbas. Second of all you only cite half. In the same hadith Ali & Abbas ra) also call each other with those same words. So Umar (ra) said to them those words you say to each other are incorrect as you were incorrect about Abu Bakr (ra)

@@user-ms9wd4ws4z So, you read well the hadith! Whatever... The hadith clearly narrates that Imam Ali AS had disputes with abubakkar al zindeeq & umar al kazzab. Then, why you ahlul bakri people are trying to make others believe that there was nothing wrong between them.

If the properties of the Holy Prophet SAWA cannot be inherited by His heirs, will He inform it to Abubakkar al zindeeq, Ummul munafiqeen ayisha, Hadith merchant abuhurayra instead of His holy house hold, kins? Abubakkar al zindeeq fabricated it with the support of ayisha, abuhurayra inorder to cut off the legacy of Holy Prophet SAWA from Ahlul Bayt AS. These are the rights that Ahlul Bayt AS deprived of by Abubakkar al zindeeq - Umar al faseeq: 1. Spritual Leadership 2. Political Leadership 3. Inheritance of Properties 4. Possession of a gift - The land of Fadak 5. One fifth - the khums

@@user-ms9wd4ws4z it is a shame that you claim to be a follower of the beloved Sunnah of Muhammad SAW and you do not exemplify his Adab in speech.

@@zainab0889Truth adab? After he's calling our beloved people kazzab and zindiq and twists ahadith? You must be crazy

What came first, the prescription to fast or maqtal of Hussein? So deluded lmao thinking the deen is because of the Ahl al Bayt man come back to the deen of Muhammad SAW

@@dontwatchmee There is no "deen of Muhammad" unless you go through Imam Ali (as)! And that is according to our Prophet (saawa) himself... "Ana madinatul ilm wa Aliyyun baabuha". Labbeyk ya Hussein! Ya Ali madad!

@@arash313 🤣🤣 are you feeling okay? There is only the deen of Mustafa SAW. We can disagree with everyone else except him. Your beliefs are not in the Quran buddy 😂 get a grip

@@dontwatchmee feeling amazing alhamdullah. Every word I wrote is true. If you feel different, tell me specifically with what. May you be raised with your Imam and I with mine.

@@arash313 my imam is Muhammad ibn Abdullah SAW. The one who Allah SWT chose. I would be honoured if Allah SWT rose me up with him. He is the one who Allah SWT said is a mercy to the worlds. Who is your imam? Is there any leader for the Muslims beside the one Allah SWT chose for us? Fear Allah

Meet him at SBC masjid Birmingham, or let ahbash leaders state a formal debate challenge

@239muhammadfaizaanakram4 Ahbash been gave a formal debate challenge to his crew that they weasled out of so at this point it is known who is dishonest here and who is genuine.

@@hymnisphear try again, probably the intellect of your crew wasn't adequate for a debate at that time.

@239muhammadfaizaanakram4 saying that our intellect was not ready for a debate when your guys was ducking the debate in their own masjid in 5k is beyond delusional, but if that's how you square it I won't argue with such foolish equations.

it is not

Any decent nutritionist can tell you they are a slow poison and highly addictive. Avoid avoid avoid

@shalmaahad6915 U don't need him to tell u about those things as they fall outside the deen & is a matter of personal choice. Use some common sense & reason!!

@farzanak8107 Why don't u use your common sense to realise this question was asked so can be shared with young people to make them realise? Next time think before acting like a smart a***

@@shalmaahad6915 Energy drinks are dangerously addictive and act as a slow poison, causing severe long-term damage to your health.

@farzanak8107 I asked sheikh so that his response can be shared with young people...but because of smart Alec like yourself, sheikh may not respond now..

Imam is said for Ali and Jafar as Sadiq and not Abu Bakr or Omar because the former two are imams while the latter two are not.

The fact that Sunnis hold this family in high regards blows my mind. Put all hadeeths aside. Lets use our brains and go with with Historical Facts that come from from NON MUSLIM HISTORIANS. Abu Sufiyan was a Dog fought against the Prophet (saw) for years, Mawiyas mum was worse than a Wh000ree she ate the Liver of Hamza. Mawiya was a Dog fought against the Rightly guided Caliph 2 times and Instigated Jamal. Yazeed was a Dog Killed the Entire family of the Prophet (saw). Can you not see the trend....... Wake up.................

Lol what a logic

​@sweetyx1180 perfect logic

Akhi zamakshari is a great scholar, but unfortunately is deviant in his creed because he is mutazalite. So it is expected of him to have a different view. Concerning the returning of isa aleyhisselaam this is derived from several ayaahs from the quran plus mutawatir hadith. In every creed book including imam tahawi , imam nasafi books you will find that is agreed upon unanimously and it is wajib to beleive in this, in fact the arguments are so strong that it is considered stronger than mahdi s coming because of several ayahs. Moreover, it is agreed upon that is kufr to disbeleive in the returning of isa aleyhisselaam. It is very well known and even other people who are considered deviant also believe this. That should indicate how strongly this case is founded.

When an "akhi' like you replies, I know it's normally a total waste of time BS.

@@mraltay10 I’m not interested in your opinion of Imam Zamakhshari. As you listen to more of this video by Sheikh Asrar, it’s clear he has deviated from any common sense. The term ‘ahle as Sunnah’ was first used by the companion Ibn abbas [rduh], to distinguish the main group of Muslims as from the breakaway sect the ‘khawarij’. The Khawarij were obbsesed with making takfir on rulers who did not agree with their ideas of theology. Nowadays the term ‘ahle Sunnah’ is being misused to make takfir or insult Muslims of different theological beliefs. Back to the topic of Issa[pbuh], I point out the Hadith narrated by Umar Ibn Khattab does not mention the second coming of Issa[pbuh]. Also Imam Malik lived in Madina, I believe his book ‘muwwatta’ does not contain any ahadith about the return of Issa[pbuh].

@@sparephone8228 im also not interested in your opinion which clearly is deviant but you chose to reply and try to argue with sheikh asrar but you are probably not even close to be able to debate him. Your arguments and opinion is also weak and i think therefore you are biased and our discussion will not bear fruit. Just to give you a hint, If you would have even basic knowledge about muwatta you would have not said what you would have said, and i am not even talking about the rest of kutub at tissa.

@@sparephone8228I hope you are not a Ahmadi

this scholar is from bangladesh and he says he is sunni but seems liek wahabi... he believes in aby bakr aisha and umar who did bayt on shiatan and eveil people, how this evil uy can sleep spreading msjinformation. he hides saqifa. ghadeer and etc

@@flag_bearertruth6257 you think asrar rashid is like a wahhabi? have you looked him up at all?

​@@flag_bearertruth6257well said Brother

The biggest Shia guru goes by the name of MoDeen. I don't think he stands a chance against the scholars of Islam.

So you are saying the shii hadith books are wrong? They say Ali as names His sons the same as Sahaba ra……I don’t think you’ve read your own books rather the Zakir’s have fed you lies

@@H4Hidayah I don’t think you are familiar with our scholars, I haven’t heard of Moden but I can name hundreds of Shea scholars who have studied the subject throughly…

@@jakblack1744 personally I don’t care about the names or even the books! what really matters is to submit to Almighty and ask for guidance and He will show you the Truth, after years of submission I know that Ali is the Vali and the only way to know this is by giving your heart to Almighty and he will show you His Vali! Reading books which are originally hundreds of years old is not the way to find out what is or isn’t , at the end of the day why is it even important to know the name?

@@Leftfield8 you sound like a right xtian who thinks the spirit has entered him lol…..how did you come to the conclusion or better still how did Allah swt show you His vali after praying for years ….Ive been praying for years yet no vali signals come to me?!? Be realistic fella you may be being mislead by shaitaan until you can prove Allah swt has lead you…..