This Giant Airliner Even Had A Movie Theater: The Bristol Brabazon

Рет қаралды 5,500,642

6 жыл бұрын

Watch More Mustard Videos & Support The Channel: nebula.tv/mustard
Support Mustard on Patreon: / mustardchannel
Mustard Muchandise: www.teespring.com/stores/must...
Instagram: / mustardchannel
TikTok: / mustardchannel
Facebook: / mustard-109952378202335
Twitter: / mustardvideos
Website: www.mustardchannel.com/
With a wingspan greater than a Boeing 747, The Bristol Brabazon was the largest aircraft ever built by Britain. More a flying oceanliner than plane, it featured sleeping cabins, a dining room, a cocktail bar and lounge, and even a 23 seat movie theater.
The Brabazon was also fitted with cutting edge innovations. A fully pressurized, air conditioned cabin. Electric engine controls, and high-pressure hydraulics to operate its massive control surfaces. It’s enormous wing housed more than 16 thousand gallons of fuel, and eight of the most powerful piston engines available. While the first Brabazon used piston engines, later Brabazon were to use turboprop engines that were being developed by Bristol.
The Bristol Brabazon would have true transatlantic capability. Able to fly non-stop from London to New York against prevailing eastern winds. In the 1940’s, this would have been quite the feat. Transatlantic flights were almost always done in stages to allow for refueling.
Despite introducing new innovations, many of which influenced the future of aviation, the Brabazon’s driving philosophy was outdated. The Brabazon’s mission was to compete with ocean liners for ultra-wealthy passengers. But this lumbering, super-sized airliner would have been introduced with airlines for 1950’s, right around when the first jet airliners, like the De Havilland Comet, were taking to the skies. Aircraft like the Dash 80, which would become the 707, were also just around the corner, and would bring a transatlantic crossing down to as little as 7 hours.
After a massive design and development effort, Britain found itself stuck with a plane nobody actually wanted, designed for an era that no longer existed.The program was cancelled and the Brabazon, and half finished turboprop successor were sold for their weight in scrap. #BristolBrabazon #BritishAviation #WhiteElephant #Airplanes
For an authoritative resource on the Bristol Brabazon visit:
www.historynet.com/bristol-bra...
Special thanks to niltondc for helping to model the Bristol Brabazon:
/ niltondc
Like the the aviation industry posters found in this video? Visit The Aviation Ancestry Database, containing over 80,000 high-quality examples: www.aviationancestry.co.uk/
Special thanks to Nick Arehart for helping clean up our audio:
/ airhrt_
Special thanks to: Coby Tang, Christian Altenhofen and Razvan Caliman for supporting us on Patreon and helping Mustard grow: / mustardchannel
Thanks for watching! Please Like, Comment and Subscribe:

Пікірлер: 3 800

@maureenhanney9998 3 жыл бұрын

As a child in the 1950s i remember my father taking us to see a huge pile of scrap which he told us used to be the Brabazon. I am now in my 70s and have for some strange reason retained the memory

@mimikyulorders2611 2 жыл бұрын

nice

@Hyu249 2 жыл бұрын

Woah,how lucky,I wish i could see one but yeah time passed.

@sammatthews3583 Жыл бұрын

That’s crazy!

@Tundraviper41 Жыл бұрын

They say that important memories are kept in a special place in our brains that even after time we can still remember it clearly l.

@jabiantakarua9347 Жыл бұрын

Lies

@peterfeltham5612 4 жыл бұрын

In the very early 50s we would all stand in the school playground and watch in awe as this plane flew over Bristol.The sound it emitted from it's engines was wonderful,I was a 9yr old at the time living in Knowle, southside of the city,i will never forget it.

@harshranjan8526 4 жыл бұрын

U have a lovely memory

@singsingsingsong111 4 жыл бұрын

Very fortunate Peter. Nice!

@automotivetv9861 4 жыл бұрын

Daimm .. How old are you Sir?

@mikel4616 4 жыл бұрын

peter feltham thank you peter very cool!

@josephjoy1500 4 жыл бұрын

Ok boomer

@ffinybryn 4 жыл бұрын

They demolished a whole village (Charlton) to extend the runway to enable it to take-off - which, as it turned out, it didn’t need. I grew up near Filton and my dad watched the maiden flight.

@spencerbrinton1397 3 жыл бұрын

Very cool

@upnorthviking823 3 жыл бұрын

Totally what the brits do!!Its illarious!!

@seamusmckeon9109 3 жыл бұрын

Nothing says confidence like over guessing in case you need it

@MrBrander 2 жыл бұрын

The amount of pissed off hissing can still be heard to this very day.

@stephenbaker7079 Жыл бұрын

Yes, I remember the famous Brabazon too! It was named after the aircraft minister of the time. At the time I lived in Lawrence Weston, North Bristol, so was well placed to see it flying overhead. How long was it in service, does anyone know?

@AlexxForest 2 жыл бұрын

"What's it for?" "Oh, it will redefine luxury." "So... it will fail very soon?"

@jocelynuy2922 2 жыл бұрын

Why do people only care about something else

@mehmetgurdal 2 жыл бұрын

@@jocelynuy2922 well cost? if something i really worth paying thats completely ok, thats why we still got wired headphones that cost thousands of bucks. because they are a result of research and development that provide really good user experience. same goes for everything. but if something is expensive just because if its price premium than you got a problem. sure the passengers of th,s plane would be able to relax, but they would be more comfortable on a hotel suit or a transatlantic; where you are not bombarded by the noise of the engines.

@HowToChangeName 2 жыл бұрын

Laughs in economy transatlantic flight "How about screen for every seat and first class cabin instead?"

@basilii5446 2 жыл бұрын

@@mehmetgurdal if the brabizon was design to carry as many passengers at once it would work decently at the time

@basilii5446 2 жыл бұрын

@jiyoun park welp. Still could have been a cool idea tho

@branon6565 5 жыл бұрын

That really was a good lookin aircraft, can't deny it.....

@TR-br1ns 5 жыл бұрын

I would buy it for myself or make it house it already have sleeping compound and theatre dining etc

@RLTtizME 5 жыл бұрын

Reminds me of a suppository.

@jona.scholt4362 5 жыл бұрын

I was just about to reply to the original comment saying how she has great lines. And then I see your comment and now I can't stop thinking of it as "the Flying Butt-pill" or, more poetically, "the silver bullet", which would be a great name for a high class suppository. Hats off to you, good sir!

@Prof.Megamind.thinks.about.it. 4 жыл бұрын

This should have been the break-through jet , NOT the Comet . The Brabazon Committee should have modified the piston/prop design , into an in-wing turbojet design . Eight staggered pairs of the reliable RR.Nene/J-33 centrifugal-turbojet engine , at 5.5k.lbs thrust apiece , would have given this plane a takeoff thrust of almost 90k.lbs force , and a high-altitude top-speed of over 500mph . In 1948 the RR.Tay/J-48 (Nene derived) , (8.5k.lb.thrust w/water-injection) , became available , increasing possible Brabazon thrust to 130k.lbs.force . In addition to better servicing the passengers , the economics of prop-craft vs jet-craft would have ensured a healthy and continuous profit-margin . This could have given Britain total ownership of the post-war , long-haul market . Lack of vision costs , eh ? D.H.

@r.r-vr4684 4 жыл бұрын

Im agree with you...should continue the program by changing it into the jet engines.

@nicolaiby1846 2 жыл бұрын

I like how every crazy design from the 1930-1950s included cocktail lounges, fine restaurants and other insane luxuries lol They really liked being comfortable back then I guess.

@Retired88M Жыл бұрын

And men wore suits and ties and women gone dresses

@agentsus9681 Жыл бұрын

I think the A380 has those luxuries like the cocktail lounge and first class suites with showers.

@JBofBrisbane Жыл бұрын

@@agentsus9681 not the two QANTAS ones I flew on.

@FlyingKangaroo1473 Жыл бұрын

@@JBofBrisbane Do you really need that stuff though tbh, and for 20K? Emirates really only works for luxury, for safety I go with Qantas.

@connorlomax1269 Жыл бұрын

@@FlyingKangaroo1473 which is interesting as emirates has one of the best safety records in the world

@darkprose 4 жыл бұрын

This seems like the kind of thing Mr Burns would invest in.

@heisselnicholaspramoedya8121 4 жыл бұрын

who's mr burns?

@brynglasgow2550 4 жыл бұрын

@@heisselnicholaspramoedya8121 The guy who owns the nuclear powerplant in the simpsons

@RattelP-sx8tx 4 жыл бұрын

Sick burn

@mattjones1992 4 жыл бұрын

Joseph Charles I said... hop... in!

@drewgehringer7813 4 жыл бұрын

"and it will fly from New York's Idlewild Airport to the Belgian Congo in 17 minutes!"

@decoybuilder 4 жыл бұрын

This thing is like the A380; engineering marvel, economic disaster

@christianc.512 3 жыл бұрын

L-1011: Engineering Marvel Commercial Failure

@christianc.512 3 жыл бұрын

@RikkyCZ No, I wasn't saying the L-1011 was a failure. I was mentioning another Mustard video about it called 'L-1011: Engineering Marvel, Commercial Failure'

@coyotelong4349 3 жыл бұрын

That’s a good comparison... This was the A380 of its day

@jamesricker3997 3 жыл бұрын

The designers of the Babizon in the A380 made different mistakes but all came down to not doing the math If they had done the math early in the design phase both designs could have been successful

@tapaschakraborty8534 3 жыл бұрын

That's a good one!!! Thank you

@Mikey-xz4vn 5 жыл бұрын

Honestly, taking the opposite approach and selling out 300 'coach' seats might've been the solution to save the Brabazon

@MrGeocidal 5 жыл бұрын

It still would have been to slow compared to the Boeing 707

@Mikey-xz4vn 5 жыл бұрын

@@MrGeocidal Sure but it could carry 100 more passengers :p

@Alucard-gt1zf 5 жыл бұрын

Michael Piperni it would most probably weigh too much

@simonm1447 4 жыл бұрын

Arline tickets weren't affordable for normal people in the 50s. Normal people started flying with the 747s in the 70s, though it was still much more expensive compared to the typical income compared to today.

@yanuchiuchihaanimegamesand3907 3 жыл бұрын

@i. rob Which is exactly why the proposal of seating 300 makes sense

@davidgreen5099 5 жыл бұрын

I must say, that airborne, the Brabazon makes a handsome aircraft.

@coyotelong4349 4 жыл бұрын

David Green I wish someone had one fully restored that still flew!

@shingojira6612 4 жыл бұрын

Imagine if it was kept as a museum plane

@factorylad5071 3 жыл бұрын

It takes rather a long time getting there though.

@kishascape 3 жыл бұрын

Like a zeppelin with wings.

@lookoutforchris 3 жыл бұрын

...from a more civilized time.

@PiotrBarcz Жыл бұрын

It's unbelievably sad for me to hear this wonderful plane was destroyed along with it's sister craft. The thing should've been put in a museum for the sake of aviation history!

@impguardwarhamer Жыл бұрын

It's the same with many planes, tanks, ships and anything else big. The problem is this thing is so large no one has the space to house it, and the very few that do are probably using it for more significant aircraft.

@PiotrBarcz Жыл бұрын

@@impguardwarhamer Good point

@hudiscool4186 Жыл бұрын

@@impguardwarhamer very good point indeed!

@flitetym Жыл бұрын

… meh … it was scuttled because it was a national embarrassment. They could have parked the darn thing next to the Convair B-36 “Peacemaker” in Ft. Worth and call it a day. 🙄

@360decrees2 Жыл бұрын

It made more flights than did the Hughes Hercules (aka The Spruce Goose) but it didn't have an eccentric billionaire to store it away for decades.

@camboose3726 3 жыл бұрын

I actually wouldn't care much about how fast it went, because that means more time with the luxuries onboard

@SHINR__ 2 жыл бұрын

That's actually a good point...

@alphafoxtrot787 6 жыл бұрын

It's a good day when Mustard uploads something

@boombozling2633 6 жыл бұрын

YUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUP

@ajaysumbing 6 жыл бұрын

no doubt

@santiagomachado7378 6 жыл бұрын

Preach, brother

@spongebobtentacles5393 6 жыл бұрын

IF sucks after global update

@alphafoxtrot787 6 жыл бұрын

SQUIDWARD TENTACLES I agree dude

@immersiveparadox 5 жыл бұрын

Felt sad that this incredible plane was sold in scrap.

@ralphyznaga1761 4 жыл бұрын

I never understand this. Why do people lack the vision that someday this plane would be more valuable than simply selling the parts?

@boobyqueen 4 жыл бұрын

ATX NATION Because it wasn’t? In a few years jet engines would surpass propellers

@zoso1980 4 жыл бұрын

@@ralphyznaga1761 It takes time and if there is embarrassment over it, making it 'disappear' would be attractive. I'll compare that to B-29. Thousands of them were built. The Air Force started scrapping them in the 1950s. By the 1970s they were thought to be extinct with no surviving copies. Only a handful of airframes survived in California and Delaware. It took them sitting for 20+ years for people to realize their historical value and need for preservation. Today, there are about 30 of them left. My point is that a failed program that has tied up resources for far too long, no one is thinking preservation. They are thinking 'get out from under it.' There was no space for vision to exist in that paradigm, yet.

@kenshien544 4 жыл бұрын

@@ralphyznaga1761 because people dont value old things back then.

@hertzair1186 4 жыл бұрын

The Paradox : it should have survived in a museum...

@awuma 3 жыл бұрын

This concept more or less was successfully realised in the Tu-114, even with an initial nod to comfort and luxury. It had the very powerful engines needed, but the noise of its contra-rotating props was legendary, still heard in the Tu-95 and derivatives, the Russian equivalent of the B-52.

@jasonirwin4631 2 жыл бұрын

The Tu-144 never had turbo props it had after burning turbo jets.

@yashwagh83 Жыл бұрын

@@jasonirwin4631 Dude he's talking about 114.

@Orrinn123 3 жыл бұрын

Why is it so interesting to watch videos about planes and trains?

@charliemolda297 6 жыл бұрын

These 3D animations are so sick!! Incredible job

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418 6 жыл бұрын

The chromatic aberration was over done though.

@anthony-ob6lw 5 жыл бұрын

an mlg dual Xeon PC powered that lel

@Exige000 5 жыл бұрын

They look pretty healthy to me.

@FREEDOMFORUKRAINE2024 5 жыл бұрын

How does he do them so well???

@armandodauer 6 жыл бұрын

I´m always amused by the stunning quality of your videos!! This brazilian fan salutes you!

@marcelolima2815 6 жыл бұрын

And this other Brazilian too

@Q2CK 6 жыл бұрын

And this Pole too

@amandeepsingh8382 5 жыл бұрын

and this Indian nerd too

@liliuMAX 5 жыл бұрын

And another brazilian too :)

@mercoid 2 жыл бұрын

🇧🇷

@user-cx8ss2uv7c 4 ай бұрын

Mustard, your work is amazing, the background information makes the magic paired with the visuals and sound. Keep up the great work! Greetings from Switzerland.

@Paper246 Жыл бұрын

The new thumbnail looks sick!

@sonuchadalavada5193 6 жыл бұрын

Narratives like this are what led me to study Aerospace Engineering. I want to be a part of a story like this someday whether or not the project that I'm working on ends up like the Brabazon or if it ends up like the 707. Thanks, Mustard for helping to inspire me and tons of young engineers like me. :D

@goldenalbatross9462 6 жыл бұрын

Sonu Chadalavada I also want to study aerospace engineering and these videos give me more motivation and inspiration

@bradlemmond 6 жыл бұрын

Honestly, the folks who designed the Brabazon should be proud - the failure of the project was because the plan called for an aircraft nobody wanted that also needed engines that the technology just couldn't support yet. The engineers and designers did a great job.

@flybyairplane3528 5 жыл бұрын

Brad Lemmond this is what happens with GOVERNMENT intervrvension

@javiergilvidal1558 5 жыл бұрын

@@flybyairplane3528 Without government "intervension", nothing at all would happen. Neither in the USA, where aircraft industry is massively subsidized. The Boeing 707 is the product of Uncle Sam´s pouring hundreds of millions of dollars into the B-47 & B-52 bombers, as well as the KC-135, the tanker version of the 707. Nothing (and nothing means NOTHING) really serious is ever done purely by private initiative. Everything depends, in the final analysis, on large contracts from the State.

@GavMystro 5 жыл бұрын

Currently in 3rd year studying aerospace at UoL. It is challenging but pretty interesting. Good luck buddy 😀

@aliyusx 5 жыл бұрын

Bristol failed because they didn't subscribe to square space

@peterhogben3304 5 жыл бұрын

They didn't have it in 1949. LOL! Haha

@calvin3448 4 жыл бұрын

Peter Hogben R/Wooosh

@mikeoxsmal8022 4 жыл бұрын

@@calvin3448 r/swoosh

@gibber4330 4 жыл бұрын

Yes the whole city of bristol failed

@jordynp942 4 жыл бұрын

Peter Hogben r/wooosh

@johnrohde5510 2 жыл бұрын

The Brabazon was still a legend in the Bristol area in my youth. Three villages were, so I heard, demolished to build the runway at Filton.

@samuellickiss8463 9 ай бұрын

This is true. They expanded Filton Airport just to build/house it. You can see bits of the aircraft in M Shed museum in Bristol.

@shaneraines2094 6 ай бұрын

The village of Charlton was demolished with the promise to rehouse them in the new estate of Patchway

@captain_commenter8796 Жыл бұрын

Anyone else rewatching this because of that absolutely beautiful new thumbnail?

@harambejr.4711 6 жыл бұрын

That chrome probably blinded the hell out of other plane pilots. Especially on really sunny days.

@xaviation5144 5 жыл бұрын

Harambe Jr. you’ll never get it in the Uk!

@welshpete12 5 жыл бұрын

aluminium you ignoramus !

@harambejr.4711 5 жыл бұрын

welshpete12 Don’t call me that.

@LESAORAS 5 жыл бұрын

It was a well designed way to make other planes way less safe, then this plane would've been the safest one. It was the only way it could beat it's competitors. Sadly, as the planes never sold, the plan was never achieved.

@Spazik86 5 жыл бұрын

Polished aluminium ;-)

@paulvincent3299 5 жыл бұрын

The UK is great at building planes that nobody wants.

@wolfgangmarkusgstrein8522 5 жыл бұрын

On point ... and they love the Royals, although every other person in the world hates them (except Idiots).

@madwolf0966 5 жыл бұрын

As what one Londoner would say:"We got there first and now were the worst."

@madwolf0966 5 жыл бұрын

alberto sobieski I’m not British lol.

@paulvincent3299 5 жыл бұрын

@@madwolf0966 Obviously. You have good teeth.

@ozymandias1192 5 жыл бұрын

Paul Sale Britain has some of the best dental care on the planet, that stereotype is so outdated.

@hope6571 4 жыл бұрын

I have the feeling everything created in Britain always looks super nice and it is super modern but also so overwhelmingly complicated.

@raven4k998 10 ай бұрын

when I see something like that plane I think how stupid it is cause what happens when a propellor break off and goes into one of the jet engine's think about that happening cause that's what comes to mind when I see those planes🤣🤣🤣

@mauriciocastro7505 4 жыл бұрын

The problem was designing a plane with piston engines in an era when jets were arising.

@09onine 4 жыл бұрын

More like economical problem, Brabazon could have been a success if they can redesign it as economic-class seats only plane

@emmaherron5121 4 жыл бұрын

That’s not an issue. In the 1950s piston planes were still widely used it was mainly in the 1960s where jets really took off.

@09onine 4 жыл бұрын

@@emmaherron5121 Plus the Brabazon were already designed to use the more powerful turboprop engines

@deaddoll1361 4 жыл бұрын

@@emmaherron5121 The B36 used piston engines in a similarly big, heavy but slow aeroplane and it certainly was an issue in many respects.

@tz8785 4 жыл бұрын

@@09onine This would have turned it into an earlier and likely considerably slower Tu-114. It might have worked to some degree but even with the Tu-114's competitive speed, those weren't built in particularly large numbers either, so the success of a turboprop Brabazon doesn't look at all certain.

@krrk6337 6 жыл бұрын

Your planes addiction is like Wendover productions with better graphics.

@CinemaDemocratica 5 жыл бұрын

Economists (like Sam) *love* commercial aviation. And I should know because I'm not just a Ph.D. in economics; I'm also a private pilot and aviation enthusiast myself. It's a weird overlap that I suspect has something to do with the part of our brain that economics appeals to as a field of study.

@visbytheproducer 5 жыл бұрын

@@CinemaDemocratica you could have stopped after the first sentence but of course, you had to talk about your education and achievements.

@CinemaDemocratica 5 жыл бұрын

Right, because if I'd said "Economists (like Sam) *love* commercial aviation" and stopped there, you or someone very, very, VERY much like you, wouldn't have immediately written, "How the fuck do YOU know?" :D :D D :D :D

@justanotherasian4395 5 жыл бұрын

CinemaDemocratica what a polite way to say go fuck yourself.

@philthephilosopher9235 5 жыл бұрын

More like Infographics Show

@simonfranc9422 6 жыл бұрын

I absolutely adore your channel. Loads of interesting information under as little as 10 minutes, the animations are absolutely flawless, keep it going! I’ve been watching your videos since the Tu-144 video was rolled out :D. Thank you!

@simonfranc9422 6 жыл бұрын

frightone well, I can highly recommend a short documentary about the DH Comet by WTTW producer John Davies available on YT, or a two-part doc from BBC about the history of british aviation. But unfortunately, I’m not familiar with such a channel like Mustard

@peterhunter657 Жыл бұрын

@pdr5926 3 жыл бұрын

That aircraft would be fully booked every day today. You know, transatlantic luxurious nostalgic flights.

@cuspurs 2 жыл бұрын

This is one helluva channel. I have never been this happy discovering new channel before. Thank you!

@afon_s 5 жыл бұрын

"Bristol Brabazon" is the most rock-n-roll name of plane in history :)

@Mick_92 4 жыл бұрын

I cal almost smell the fuel and shaving cream! ✈️💪🏼

@ToastedBreaad 4 жыл бұрын

BOO

@ToastedBreaad 4 жыл бұрын

@@Mick_92 are u a bot

@Mick_92 4 жыл бұрын

@@ToastedBreaad Yes.

@TheMrPeteChannel 3 жыл бұрын

It's a silly name

@araujofi 6 жыл бұрын

Why does not this channel have 10 million subscribers?

@Hazztech 6 жыл бұрын

Filipe because it's not good enough

@eddolous 6 жыл бұрын

Give it some time😎

@Salvavideocrack 6 жыл бұрын

Because most people have no brains

@cryobytedoesstuff2302 6 жыл бұрын

Filipe i agree the animation is phenomenal

@CP-ne5nf 6 жыл бұрын

Unfortunately Mini-docs about failed aircraft from the middle of last century is probably too niche for the KZfaq algorithm, which is a damn shame to be honest, because even the production value on these videos is higher than some larger channels :(

@riazhassan6570 2 жыл бұрын

All hurry, hurry, all dollars and cents, everywhere, everything. This was a beauty and would have provided one of the best experiences of flying

@Napoleonvanderbilt Жыл бұрын

Even though Mustard also has a video on that plane. The title is wrong. The Saunders Roe Princess is significantly larger than the Brabazon.

@a_random_tank_152mm7 5 жыл бұрын

The reason why we all love mustard’s video this much us because of the insane amount of efforts this guy puts in his video and his passion for the subject.

@wallaby4 5 жыл бұрын

A good deal of the engineering advances that went into the Brabazon were later incorporated into the Bristol Britannia. The Proteus engines being the major items, the final incarnation of the engines that were planned to go into the second Brabazon. The Britannia proved very popular with the charter airlines of the late 60's and early 70's, and passengers liked it for its comfort and quietness compared to the 737-100 and the BAC1-11 for example. The Britannia was in effect a much scaled down version of what the Brabazon could have been.

@viceregentofducanada9384 2 жыл бұрын

The Bristol Britannia would also later be used to develop the Canadair Argus, Canada’s premiere patrol bomber.

@kubeckjay1137 Жыл бұрын

I flew Heathrow to Shannon on a Britannia in 1962. The first one developed engine trouble twice and BOAC ended up putting us all on a 2nd Britannia for a third and successful flight. It looked and felt like a great aircraft. Legroom in economy was tight, however, for my 6’4” frame; my knees were pressing into the seat back in front of me!

@phbrinsden Жыл бұрын

After many flights on turbocharged piston planes flying from Heathrow to Malaya in the early 50s I recall my first flight on the Britannia. It was so much faster, smoother and quieter. It was also spacious inside. Beautiful plane and such a step up from piston engines. In later years I flew the Comet and again another step up in quietness and smoothness. Luckily I just dodged the one that exploded due to window failure.

@raysmith1630 Жыл бұрын

I'm glad that KZfaq put your channel in my feed. I've been an aviation fan all of my life and it's very cool to see something new, new to me anyway. Thanks for posting this video.

@emiledekam2925 3 жыл бұрын

Honestly, the music in all your video's are on point

@Softload3r 6 жыл бұрын

01:14 switzerland wasn't occupied by german forces.

@axlslak 5 жыл бұрын

Is it the map? Must be a map from the Allied? If it were from the Axis powers it would show the exact opposite thing? (I'm just asking... hello from Romania)

@Softload3r 5 жыл бұрын

I don't know. To me, it looks like he made the map himself (Mustard). The Allied and the Axis both new that Switzerland wasn't affected/occupied by any military force. The only "trouble" we had was some bombs dropped from American bombers because they confused some parts of Switzerland with Germany and bombed wrong buildings. Some 40+ people died at one bombing for example. (Hello back to you from Switzerland :] )

@8749236 5 жыл бұрын

Well, I guess that is just an alternative universe where Operation Tannenbaum did took place and succeeded.

@Softload3r 5 жыл бұрын

@Dennis Liu probably, yeah :P

@noth606 5 жыл бұрын

Freidenker CH Neither was Finland

@TheSirRolfe 6 жыл бұрын

Mustard coming in with the quality content It’s a good night

@michaelhiggins7365 4 жыл бұрын

These videos are simply AMAZING, so very well researched and written, so very well produced. High Marks to say the least and Thank You !

@protopiano6122 3 жыл бұрын

Man, how I wish all those planes where still out there to visit...

@Redmenace96 2 жыл бұрын

Visit Tucson, AZ. They have an air museum with amazing aircraft from the whole history. You can go back 2-3 times just because there are so many historical gems that you can't take in, in one afternoon.

@rodmunch69 6 жыл бұрын

I'd rather get there a few hours later in comfort, than get there faster while being compacted like trash in a garbage compactor.

@krashd 6 жыл бұрын

You would hate Asian airlines, 500+ people crammed into aircraft that are a tight squeeze with just 300 aboard. Chinese Southern and Asiana both bought A380's but so far haven't tried out it's maximum configuration of 856 passengers but give it time :/

@rodmunch69 6 жыл бұрын

Yeah that's pretty ridiculous. In that situation, if it's a short flight, like under an hour, I'd rather stand than but crushed into a seat with my knees being pushed into my chest from having no space between the rows.

@edhikurniawan 6 жыл бұрын

Ikr, Air Asia Airbus 320-200 Surabaya Penang. Not just cramped but the cabin baggage compartment cannot hold as much as the many passengers. And they put jarring advertisement poster on top of it. 3 hrs and half flight made me exhausted for four days, flying compactor, pain is real.

@paradigmlost7582 5 жыл бұрын

Welcome to the beauty of capitalism my friends! Garbage compactor is a great one!

@nutsackmania 5 жыл бұрын

+Rob Fraser JAL is like 3x better than any fucking American airline that flies transcontinental.

@ericvreeland1362 6 жыл бұрын

I shared your video and channel with an aviation group I'm a member of. I'm sure they will become instant subscribers, just as I did after watching your content. Keep it coming!

@greatunz67 2 жыл бұрын

I say it on every one of these videos, but i just can't get over the incredible quality of the graphics, animations and 3d models in these, it's off the charts, better than anything on mainstream tv.

@espinozanovak831 4 жыл бұрын

One of the best put together videos I've seen. Good Job , you made my day.

@CrescentGuard 6 жыл бұрын

The funny thing is that I think the Brabazon could have stood a chance if they'd just ditched the luxury thought and went the far opposite direction. The ultimate in bulk passenger transport. That thing could've rivaled a 747 in pure numbers--sure you wouldn't get there early, but with that many people funding your flight, you get what you pay for. Besides, if it already had that A/C system, that'd be fine to help out with the numbers.

@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 5 жыл бұрын

The Boeing 707 entered service in 1959 with turbo jet engines by 1962 Boeing had improved it with JT3D Turbofan Engines and other refinements. All of those British aircraft that came out of Brabazon committee such as Brabazon, Comet, Viscount, Britannia were so late they were destroyed by the 707 and DC8. Only the viscount succeeded. Latter aircraft such as the VC10, Vanguard also missed the mark. So they all really needed to get into service by around 1950. The US industry had the Constellation/Super Constellation/Stratocruiser/DC4/6/7.

@musaran2 5 жыл бұрын

Speed is not just about passenger's time, to airlines it means more travels thus more revenue.

@Kaziklu 4 жыл бұрын

@@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs ... what are you on about? The Comet entered service in 1952. The issue was the fact it was basically exploding due a design flaw that grounded the whole fleet and prevented sales years before the 707. The 707s design and the DC8s were actually influenced by the lessons learned by the Comet. It is likely that had the roles been reversed the DC8 or 707 being first they would have suffered the same issues as the Comet as they design language of High Altitude aircraft changed because of the unforeseen endurance flaws in the comet.

@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs 4 жыл бұрын

@@KazikluPrior to the Comet 1 blowing up in mid air two of them crashed due to stalling during take-off rotation. The Comet could stall on the runway, in fact it pitched up into the stall. It was a POS that was never air worthy.

@Kaziklu 4 жыл бұрын

@@WilliamJones-Halibut-vq1fs The Comet 1 was for sure.. which is why all 22 were scrapped. The Comet 2 and 4 both came out before the 707. This means they couldn't have been so late they were destroyed by the 707 which is the point of contention. The later Comets were perfectly good aircraft. Had the Comet 1's major flaws, the ones that the 707 and DC8 learned from which in developed for 5 more years.. (the 707 flew the first time 3 years after the Comets were grounded and 2 years after the major issues with the air frame were discovered. ) are what killed it. Not the 707. Comets were still flying into the 90s and the Nimrod until 2011. Now there are still 707s in the air though they were being produced a lot longer.

@damonstr 6 жыл бұрын

"The meteorite proves glass cockipts were a fad"

@GeorgeInAShed 6 жыл бұрын

Its true, i much prefer to pilot good 'ol analog instruments that a tv screen

@sailintothesun3421 6 жыл бұрын

lol.. have you tried actually typing in the web address? hilarious

@damonstr 6 жыл бұрын

Real men use analog :D

@friendlyneighborhoodskinwalker 6 жыл бұрын

damonstr but real pilots use glass cockpits :)

@Bartonovich52 6 жыл бұрын

I can do things with my glass cockpit you couldn’t dream of with analog. I’ve got a Piper Cub with a basic steam gauge panel for day VFR... but for hard IFR in high density airspace, few things are better than my military grade Collins Proline 21 EFIS and FMS3000 Flight Management System.

@Windows98R 3 жыл бұрын

I guess the 747 was like a slap on the face when it was introduced when it beat them in the one thing they did years back...

@sharonbraselton4302 2 жыл бұрын

yes it is yiu buy fkyubgvhiteks version amwàium

@SiVlog1989 Жыл бұрын

As a Brit myself, I find it interesting the number of times Britain looks back technically speaking, rather than forwards. A documentary about High Speed 1, HS1, the first purpose built High Speed Rail line in Britain, talked about how the Eurostar (the High Speed train that connects London to Paris, Brussels and (more recently) Amsterdam) "as soon as it emerges from the Channel Tunnel, the Eurostar shares tracks with 20th Century trains moving at 19th Century speeds," so rather than running at the full 186mph (300kph) they're capable of, on 25kv AC overhead wires, they (until 2007) ran on an outdated 750v DC third rail system with a top speed of 90mph and on the run to the original terminal at the London end at Waterloo, they'd barely reach 50mph and sometimes even barely move at walking pace seemingly

@Mundo-bn2ho Жыл бұрын

True, Britain has one if the worst railway in Europe. Spain' s and Italy's trains are fast, clean and elegant. And the fastest train in the UK is actually Italian technology.

@SiVlog1989 Жыл бұрын

@Mundo 2024 part of the problem is that there seems to be in many places in Britain that when it comes to major infrastructure projects have a "Not In My Back Yard" (NIMBY) mentality. Even from the early days of railways. One quote from the documentary "Ian Hislop Goes Off The Rails" mentions one of these mindsets from the time (1840's and 1850's): "Railways have set all the towns of Britain a-dancing. Reading is coming up to London, Basingstoke is going up from Gosport or Southampton, confusingly waltzing in a state of progressive disillusion and know not where the end of the death dance will be for them."

@SiVlog1989 Жыл бұрын

@Mundo 2024 another example is in a one off documentary I'd recommend watching, "Ian Hislop Goes Off The Rails," there was one point in that, while watching an old Newsreel of a streamlined train running between London and Newcastle that claimed it was "keeping up the prestige of Britain's railways," but as Ian Hislop himself noted, it wasn't really the case: "By the 1930's British steam trains were smashing International Records. It looked wonderful, it looked like progress, but sadly, it was exactly the opposite. While we were still in love with steam [as a form of traction], other countries were already heavily investing in really modern technology, like high speed diesel and electric traction,"

@althejazzman 6 жыл бұрын

As an Englishman, I would like to thank you for showcasing some of our aviation history, that was suddenly lost some time after the 1960's!

@duecomicsans9145 5 жыл бұрын

I have something to say are you happy your the king of aircraft😊😊😊😊😊

@gordonferrar7782 5 жыл бұрын

@Star Trek Theory explain old cake.

@gordonferrar7782 5 жыл бұрын

@Star Trek Theory i was asking how?

@kvltizt 5 жыл бұрын

@@gordonferrar7782 He can't tell you how. He can only parrot memes and rhetoric anytime he feels insecure about his misplaced and overinflated nationalism. This nationalism usually stems from a gaping hole in one's personal life. He probably wasn't hugged enough as a child, or he was hugged too much.

@jorge8596 5 жыл бұрын

Concorde and Harrier?

@piotrpodlesny1383 5 жыл бұрын

This plane is beatutifull

@ohlawd3699 5 жыл бұрын

Except for those underpowered shit engines, lol. Just by looking at the props, you can see that they're not big enough to adequately power the aircraft. 😂

@ohlawd3699 5 жыл бұрын

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aJh4a7BpzZyslKM.html The Tu-114 was the real deal. 😊👍

@davidgifford8112 5 жыл бұрын

Oh Lawd Piston engines were only intended an interim.

@5000mahmud 4 жыл бұрын

Oh Lawd it had 6 Bristol centaurs, one of the most powerful radial engines ever made.

@wholeNwon 4 жыл бұрын

@@ohlawd3699 Now THAT was a plane.

@Astr0Flux 4 жыл бұрын

I ADORE your visual style ! It's so eye catching and at the same time so easy to watch. I don't know how to explain it. :D

@bluesteel1199 Жыл бұрын

Irony about this plane is that it offered 1960s version of what Air Emirates offers today with A380.

@grahamduensing121 Жыл бұрын

OMG UR RIGHT!!!

@goodshipkaraboudjan Жыл бұрын

As an ex EK pilot - they mastered smoke and mirrors! I was right seat on the 7s but the A380 economy is worse than QF or Singapore but they have 9 or so seats up front that give you access to a shower so there is that. Just ignore the FA suicide rate.

@TheParallellinial 5 жыл бұрын

Good Lord, that's a beautiful plane! What does it for me is the "simplicity"! And I really mean that as a compliment!

@davidvance6367 4 жыл бұрын

TheParallellinial, they the British were putting people in the labor force that had many people that were trained in building aircraft. It was just a government job situation. Besides the Brits are good aircraft builders & laziness is frowned upon

@drewgehringer7813 4 жыл бұрын

it is a wonderfully clean design from an aerodynamics standpoint

@olsmokey 3 жыл бұрын

It's a barge when compared to the Constellation.

@sachinvenugopal6926 3 жыл бұрын

@@davidvance6367 having a governmt job in most countries considers as a privilege

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418 6 жыл бұрын

And then we built Concorde.

@TheSjuris 6 жыл бұрын

HypersonicMonkeyBrains another failure of a plane. Marvel yes, but not profitable. Especially when nobody would allow it to land anywhere.

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418 6 жыл бұрын

Failure yea right. whatever. Just because you never got to see it in person you're all butthurt.

@TheSjuris 6 жыл бұрын

HypersonicMonkeyBrains I’ve seen the Concorde it looks like a baby plane. It was a failure. You can’t have a plane that can only fly to 4 or 5 destinations. It’s not going to work. Boeing was smart enough to cancel their project before they wasted billions on it. The Concorde was doomed from the start. Only 2 national airlines used it because of national pride.

@hypersonicmonkeybrains3418 6 жыл бұрын

you clearly dont understand the definition of failure. Now then a failure would be the Russian Tupolev Tu-144 - crashed on a test flight while being delivered, and the passenger fleet was permanently grounded after only 55 scheduled flights. The aircraft remained in use as a cargo aircraft until 1983, by which point a total of only 102 commercial flights had been completed.

@TheSjuris 6 жыл бұрын

HypersonicMonkeyBrains The Concorde wasn't a complete failure. It also wasn't a success. It was a boondoggle that failed as a passenger aircraft. It didn't have the passenger compacity to compete with the 747 or the cargo capacity. You would be able to carry more cargo in a 737 then the Concorde with the 737 filled with passengers at the same time. You can't fly a plane commercially that can only fly to 4 destinations. Boeing was smart enough to stop it before it was too late. The Concorde was doomed from the start. It was a waste of France and Englands resources. It is no different then the Bristol aimed at the same elite class of consumers.

@shibolinemress8913 2 жыл бұрын

I'd love to have flown one of these just once.

@sharonbraselton4302 2 жыл бұрын

me too

@lindsayheyes925 3 жыл бұрын

Excellent video. I used to fly in Chipmunks from Filton with the Air Training Corp, and the Brabazon Hangar was then a place of awesome mystery to Air Cadets - where Concord was being developed behind closed doors. Nowadays it's a museum, so you can visit it and walk through a Concord. A lot of water has passed under the bridge since the start of Britain's "Jet Age" ended the future of the Brabazon.

@youpediatelevisie3876 6 жыл бұрын

When you're doing homework but Mustard uploads a video

@okrajoe 6 жыл бұрын

So beautiful.

@thepylonperspective 2 жыл бұрын

“How would you describe Brittan?” Me:

@k.m4061 4 жыл бұрын

I need a true airplane that has a sleeping room

@affandi99 6 жыл бұрын

*THAT IS SO HUUUGEEEEEE PLANE*

@syxepop 6 жыл бұрын

There is a "British Pathé" video floating around about this same airliner (was put as a YT suggestion 2-3 weeks ago) and Googled to find how big was this plane. Found it would be between a B757 and B767 in size (probably between an A300 and A340 for Europeans), so it wouldn't be the biggest commercial aircraft by modern standards (the 300 passenger estimate the narrator put tells you), but TOO MUCH to move by PROPELLER-BASED ENGINES and A LOT by late '40s standards.

@rascallygoose4926 5 жыл бұрын

Eriq Affandi back then. It was huge. And now we have the Antonov 225

@aklhj 6 жыл бұрын

Vickers VC-10 please!

@MustardChannel 6 жыл бұрын

...its coming

@DeltaDS 6 жыл бұрын

o.0

@mattpoon368 6 жыл бұрын

Mustard then do the VC-10ski, the il-62

@andrewsparey697 6 жыл бұрын

Superb. I never understood why it didn't sell, it was a brilliant aircraft that could fly faster and use more difficult airports than Boeing's of the time. It was like a British Lockheed TriStar - great but no buyers ?

@aklhj 6 жыл бұрын

Gotta thank BOAC for that, couldn't wait for the VC10 they asked for and took the 707. They operated both for a time but from what I understand, the VC10 wasn't able to shine so much no thanks to the 707s earlier service entry.

@bobbobson4069 3 жыл бұрын

Only recently subscribed. Absolutely brilliant video, which I would call a real documentary : beautifully produced and narrated, thoroughly researched... Keep up the excellent work and hope you reach 1 million subscribers soon. What I appreciate most is historical accuracy.

@mistertoy3658 4 жыл бұрын

Bro how do you not have a lot more subscribers?? Your content is AMAZING

@xigxog 6 жыл бұрын

You honestly remind me of Ahoy, and that's an great thing, your editing is also unique and I very much enjoy it. You are very satisfying with your videos, combining your commentary well with the actual videos and edited scenes that you use. Looking forward to where your channel goes and happy to be here with you for your fast start to KZfaq. Keep up the great work, your content is very interesting.

@Sammakko7 6 жыл бұрын

Urban_Foxtrot ”you are editing”

@brumby92 6 жыл бұрын

very true. I think I found mustard from an ahoy video. glad I did. the animations are gorgeous.

@zJoriz 4 жыл бұрын

I love that cockpit window arrangement. Coupled with the smooth shape of the rest of the fuselage, very pretty. Jet engines and some sleeker wings might have sealed the deal.

@kaijasharif5027 Жыл бұрын

X mx

@pmckinlay653 4 жыл бұрын

My 2.9 year old is OBSESSED with the Brabazon. I think it's the name. I was shocked that there are so many videos about it.

@sharonbraselton4302 2 жыл бұрын

gid chef has kne orvte flights he comes çhyef fkugg hiteks

@ieataviationgradefuelusedonthe Жыл бұрын

Holy balls this new thumbnail is amazing, same for the Savannah

@tarlach1280x960 5 жыл бұрын

And yes the British Empire is no more. But they still make a great cup of tea...

@atdfbttl15 5 жыл бұрын

...and nice little political discussions that don't go to anywhere.

@user-ex6lp1yi6q 5 жыл бұрын

Kirina Yuuki lamoofof

@Lindsay5137 5 жыл бұрын

@i. rob You're bloody joking!

@ArkadyRenko1 4 жыл бұрын

Tea imported from Kenya and Sri lanka 😂

@iwanttocomplain 4 жыл бұрын

1) Tea is grown then blended and 2) It's too mild for tea plantations. 3) It's too high in tanin for anyone else to stomach. I drink Adsa (which is Walmart) budget own brand and it's fine. I'm not sure but I think only the British actually put milk into it.

@goobfilmcast4239 6 жыл бұрын

Mustard.....just wanted to add my "attaboy"..... your shorts are terrific.... consider (time and funds permitting) longer form mini-docs with "Steam-punkish" elements like the clash between the USS Monitor and the CSS Virginia...your design/direction style would suit that very well....visual elements like animated daguerreotypes would smash !..... Read Richard Snow's Iron Dawn for a bit of inspiration..........look to the sea...........

@Engineeringrocketry Ай бұрын

For anyone wondering, the oceanliner at the 30 second mark, is called the SS Normandie

@imbw267 9 ай бұрын

6:55 What a jazzy send-off

@davidhix2913 5 жыл бұрын

Congrats on the blow up Mustard I’m so happy I’ve been with you for the long journey and more to come! Next up 1 mil!

@Charioteer71 5 жыл бұрын

The Brabazon was orignally an "100-ton" class strategic bomber designed in 1943 by Bristol and the 8 engines were put at the back of the wings (pushing) instead of conventional layout. The take-off weight of that bomber is 130 tons. And it could carry two 22,000lbs bombs, the "Grand Slam". Actually, the bomb load was 2 tons more than the US XB-36 design at the same time. (However, XB-36 evolved into B-36 but the Bristol "100-ton" became Brabazon.) By the way, the Brabazon could be call an 8-engined aircraft as well as a 4-engined aircraft. Two coupled Centaurus 57 engines made one Centaurus 20 engine in Bristol Company database. So, the Brabazon got 8 Centaurus 57 engines or 4 Centaurus 20 engines.

@lukajalo8635 2 жыл бұрын

4:12 miata guys: hmmmmm that will totally fit into my car

@crazyivan030983 2 жыл бұрын

5:29 wow this poster screams 50s and 60s :))))

@erfanurrahmanbhuiyan6997 6 жыл бұрын

Love your videos!you really taste delicious like mustard LOL! you deserve 10 million subs.

@sparetime2475 6 жыл бұрын

No, 7.4 billion subs

@dhtelevision 6 жыл бұрын

FINALLY, THE BRISTOL BRABAZON, The Brabazon was basically the British stratocruiser

@MrRandomcommentguy 6 жыл бұрын

Except the Stratocruiser was pretty successful technically and commercially.

@martentrudeau6948 6 жыл бұрын

Soviets liked British engineering a lot, like Rolls-Royce jet engines they copied, the Concorde they stole and much more than that. The Brits should have been the first to fly super sonic, but they gave the flying tail technology to America, stopped funding their own super sonic program which would have been the first and allowed the Americans to be first. It's mysterious as to what is going on, but when given the opportunity Britons are world beaters.

@jimandmandy 6 жыл бұрын

Technically, yes, commercially not as much. It was still too big and luxurious with a bar/lounge below, dressing rooms, a private compartment in some configurations and way less than 100 seats. The Douglas DC-6/7 and Lockheed Constellation hit the sweet spot for commercial propliner success.

@martentrudeau6948 6 жыл бұрын

Designed during WW2 with piston engines the Boeing Stratocruiser, Douglas DC-6/7 and Lockheed Constellation made sense, where as the Brabazon made after the war made no sense, it's designed to be an ocean liner in the sky with a low seating capacity, and shouldn't have had piston engines. Speed and seating capacity should have been the primary design goals, Briton was the first to have jets and turboprops, there was no reason why it wasn't 100+ mph faster and have a higher seating capacity. Other than that, it was still a good looking airliner.

@die1mayer 6 жыл бұрын

Maybe they should have gone the opposite direction, no fluff and squish 300+ seats into that thing. Then the Brabazon could have competed with low ticket prices against the early jets.

@brianbb177 Жыл бұрын

the animations are top notch. it makes this channel stand out

@nickarehart3968 6 жыл бұрын

Mustard! Such a pleasure doing my little bit to help out and getting to see this video come together. Amazing, as always. You deserve millions of subs, dude!

@tobiasb6768 6 жыл бұрын

This channel is so underrated

@krashd 6 жыл бұрын

Never a truer word spoken!

@andie_pants Жыл бұрын

What a lovely surprise... an old-school Mustard I haven't yet seen! 😀

@suphalakinyot2166 2 жыл бұрын

I was screaming “Aw come on!” when the other planes beat the Brabazon!

@fastpace101 5 жыл бұрын

5:58 "The comet didn't fly as far as the Brabazon." That's an understatement..

@grahamt5924 4 жыл бұрын

Boeing seems to have the same problems as what comet did these days

@grahamt5924 4 жыл бұрын

@i. rob Boeing have committed the cardinal sin of an aircraft manufacturer. Killing their passengers due to planes that are not safe is a sure fire way of destroying a manufacturer. You would think that Boeing would have known this after the Comet saga. After I heard this come out, I changed my travel plans accordingly. I certainly would not let my kids fly on an aircraft where the company have been shown to cover up serious flaws. If I owned Boeing I would sack every manager at the company. I would also sack every engineer that was even remotlley involved in this incident. I would then replace the engines on the 737 max with ones that actually fit under the aircraft with the idea of scrapping this plane as soon as it's affordable to do so. I would hope that Boeing doesn't go bankrupt due to this error because right now they are in serious risk of going under. Such a shame for a company that had such a solid reputation before this incident.

@grahamt5924 4 жыл бұрын

@i. rob they are an insanely large company and they will most probably weather the storm. They have just lost many people's confidence currently. They are in a position right now where they could get back on track but not with me. I would rather not fly Boeing for a while.

@grahamt5924 4 жыл бұрын

@i. rob I am in Europe so I have loads of choice. You are right though. If there was somewhere I really wanted to go and only Boeing available, I would use it.

@simonm1447 4 жыл бұрын

At the beginning of the jet age piston engines were state of the art technology, and more fuel efficient than the first jet engines, which were only turbojets, no turbofans. Later jet engines became more efficient, and this development is still ongoing until today.

@manlyastronaut6984 6 жыл бұрын

You should really talk about the CF-105 Arrow. It's an interesting story... especially with the technological advancements made with this plane!

@sazaflaz 6 жыл бұрын

yes!!!

@vieuxbal1253 6 жыл бұрын

Totally agree with you. I made the same request. There is a lot of mystery around the cancellation of this technological gem.

@davekp6773 4 жыл бұрын

@@vieuxbal1253 The Arrow and the TSR-2 both victims of shady governmental meddling.

@vieuxbal1253 4 жыл бұрын

@@davekp6773 Absolutely!

@amandacurtis8374 11 ай бұрын

The Narwhale of the skies!!!!!! Its lovely.

@strigonshitposting793 4 жыл бұрын

I wish the Brabazon wasn’t scrapped. I’d love to fly in that beauty.

@hafmaint7557 5 жыл бұрын

I watched this fly over Cardiff my home town when I was 12 years old thanks for the video

@ScaringCrab 6 жыл бұрын

Looks like the Comet mixed with Tu-114 xD

@Ibirdball 6 жыл бұрын

The Tu-114 was just as bad though, crashed all the time xD.

@leneanderthalien 6 жыл бұрын

no crashes with the extremly reliable Tu 114 who was basicaly a civilian Tu95 and use long time without problems on lines Moscow-Tokyo and Moscow- La Havana: you confuse with Tu 144 (concordsky)...

@ScaringCrab 6 жыл бұрын

Ibirdball The Tu-114 had only 1 fatal accident xD

@Kalvinjj 6 жыл бұрын

The Tu-114 looks like it came straight from a bomber project with that glass nose (which... it actually did so)

@ScaringCrab 6 жыл бұрын

Sigui Tim XD true