Fantastic video! I LOVE LOVE LOVE filmconvert! Easily one of my favorite plugins! LOVE that AI scene! So trippy!
@RedFrameTech9 ай бұрын
Curious how it compares to Dehancer. Seems to look just as good though. Great to see you having a sponsor!
@RhettThompsonFilm9 ай бұрын
Would certainly be interesting to put them up against each other… that’s definitely on the list of videos to make! Both have their strengths of course though.
@filipmichalsaffray4419 ай бұрын
Great combo with ciné match à Must if you shoot multicam Multi Brand…will Upgrade for sure! IMHO we got closer to Dehancer for 1/2mof the price😊😊😊😊
@RhettThompsonFilm9 ай бұрын
I plan on diving into Cinematch soon! But yea Dehancer had a few tricks up it’s sleeve but for the price it’s hard to beat Filmconvert, especially now!
@filipmichalsaffray4419 ай бұрын
@@RhettThompsonFilm Thx for your answer I Somewhere read that they will add New film stock as well soon...do you know when?
@RhettThompsonFilm9 ай бұрын
@@filipmichalsaffray441 I couldn’t say but I’ve heard similar rumors!
@BackusCreativeImaging8 ай бұрын
I use Dehancer Pro. Their film grain requires several GB of VRAM on a 4K timeline. It looks great. I apply film emulation in a subtle way, I don't over do it. It's just part of the entire post process :)
@RhettThompsonFilm8 ай бұрын
I’m planning on doing a video comparing them! For me my computer is just so old Dehancer feels a little sluggish but when I need all the fancy tools I’ll bust it out!
@tonnib12 күн бұрын
The previous version of the film converter (before the Nitro sign) was better for me in terms of image exposure. Somehow it was more organic and natural in the program. Now the exposure change is quite digital, almost on the basis of darkening and dimming. Maybe I'm wrong, but does anyone have the same experience?
@RhettThompsonFilm12 күн бұрын
I do find the images are initially quite over exposed, but I haven’t really noticed any difference in the quality of the exposure inside the when changed. I’ll have to look into this more…
@dapunkof19756 ай бұрын
You shot all this? Either way damn that’s some really good cinematography.
@RhettThompsonFilm6 ай бұрын
All mine! I’m pretty happy with most of it but a lot of room to improve still!
@DennisSchmitz9 ай бұрын
Can't really use it for my own workflow since there's no ACES or RCM support. It's limited to SDR output in general.
@RhettThompsonFilm9 ай бұрын
Oh so you need an HDR output for your work? Maybe I should ask about that!
@RhettThompsonFilm8 ай бұрын
As far as I gather they are aware people would love a HDR output and we make see it eventually! Thanks again for commenting.
@nightdonutstudio8 ай бұрын
I have top line PC (13900k with 4090). Dehancer pro is barely useble in PR, I have to set playback quality at 1/2 to being editable and if I add other effect it will be a pain. It is probablly optimized for Mac and resolve. Quite disappointed. I might try filmconvert one day.
@RhettThompsonFilm8 ай бұрын
filmconvert really does run like butter compared to Dehancer for me. I think both have their place for sure though!
@TheTomashch8 ай бұрын
v-log vs v-log dr boost. You always record in dr boost?
@RhettThompsonFilm8 ай бұрын
As often as I can!
@kristopherclark48354 ай бұрын
Do you denoise prior to filmconvert? I figure garbage in garbage out so I denoise first, but I'm curious what your workflow is.
@RhettThompsonFilm4 ай бұрын
I suppose it depends on the noise level. If I am shooting at a low or base iso there doesn’t seem to be much of a reason because it’s going to get mostly covered up. It also drastically increase is render times on mine not so great laptop. For more noisy shots or things shot in log or raw I can definitely see noise reduction been a lot more necessary. So long story short, it depends quite a bit on the project and situation!
@Lowridersdoggs8 ай бұрын
Doesn’t even support Nikon Z8
@RhettThompsonFilm8 ай бұрын
Beats me! Sometimes it takes awhile for them to get the newest cameras but if that happens I just use the next closest profile till they update it since the Z9 and the Z8 for example are probably close enough.