I agree I unfortunately didn’t play during that time but picked the deck up in 2019 and fell in love with the shaddoll deck and the invoked portion as well but at the current moment as mentioned in the video I don’t think the invoked engine is the way but his time will return just depends on the formats but right now mathematician is the way 💯and as for me playtesting I love shaddolls and like all the decks I love I never let them die if I can do anything about it! I always try and find new ways to innovate them and keep them competitive as possible

That’s kinda spicy using Ken an gen

@@TeamDDD everytime I summoned Gen opponents looked at me like I was a serial killer LMAO

@daniellocklear5908 😂😂😂praying you don’t have talents 😂😂

Thank you happy you enjoy them!

You don’t typically use so every game she’s mainly there if we can’t otk turn 3 and to banish opponents follow up or resources in gy for their follow up while at the same time providing us with the ability to dodge our opponents targeting effects or at worst banishing herself or any of our monsters with one of theirs on their turn like a key link piece or synchro piece they may need basically denying them board presence of their key piece if timed properly

@@TeamDDD Ah okay gotcha. I definitely felt that when I couldn't kill then turn 3 it gets really close when they start setting up. Def because I didn't make use of SP on those situations. I'll be sure to try that out. Thank you again for the advice

Ygo omega

The deck can get to her pretty consistently we don’t need it also fusion locks you which can be a issue sometimes which I personally don’t like

I tested melodious but to run melodious I’d have to trim my utility slots and potentially go over 41, also the extra deck is super tight and hard to fit the combo pieces needed for that version not to mention I didn’t wanna lose to droll if I didn’t need too but I’d rather play a more low to the ground version in the form of having more extra deck utility than just having the ability to make a apple for 3-4 negates with a absolute, not to mention that’s only truly solid when you go first and I feel like we have enough interruption going first… as for the Dogmatika names you don’t more than what we have because Maximus is terrible and ecclesia doesn’t start our plays Deff not running Maximus, nadir is the true starter because it can search them plus get apk in the gy to search whatever we need while triggering the dolls in hand by pitching them plus nadir can add back from gy too

No the only “brick” is if you open to many names and no way to fuse or just golden lord but we run 9 ways to fuse with 11 names in a 41 card list plus the 2 high spirits to search 2 of the ways to fuse while triggering our names in theory we have 11 ways to fuse with 11 names which is a solid ratio but if you wanna factor in the other starters like 3 nadir and 3 mathematician and 1 foolish we have plenty of starters this is a mid range version that utilizes the control aspect of the dolls idk why so many people feel the doll names are bricky makes no sense to me Deff when you commit as hard as I do to just fusing guess it’s just people who aren’t used to actual shaddolls instead running 3-4 names with a big Dogmatika package just to get schism which isnt shaddolls at all…. But hopefully this cleared it up on my choices and understanding the deck isn’t bricky

Depends on your shaddoll count if you are running 10+ names in the main I’d say so

@@TeamDDD ok i see thanks mate.