Indeed; sadly, not the case for an Xbox controller.

@@GamingMagic13 Yes. And on a SNES controller, the ideal jump button is the B button for most games.

@@GamingMagic13 x for jump in a switch controller is the real deal

@@GamingMagic13 Dude, I Absolutely 100% Agree With You On How Bad The Plot Twist To The Ending Of V3 Is, I Mean I’m No Danganronpa Fan But Still, Prepare To Be Surprised When I Say I’m More Pissed Off At “The Person Who Caused It” And Why Is It That You Never Talked About Said Person?

@@GamingMagic13 thanks for explaining the joke man

Yup; that sounds about on par with the typical quality of an Among Us game.

@@GamingMagic13 I have a little question what channel do you like watching?

Very similar story I've got for you: a friend and I were playing Among Us one night, and a group we got into immediately went after me and those people got so mad at me (for no reason) and kept trying to eject me or kill me in game that I just didn't feel like playing anymore.

@@GamingMagic13 Why do people even like Among Us anyways? I guess the 2D spritework, while there are much better-done examples like the Disney Renaissance and Don Bluth films of the 1980s (but AU feels more reminiscent to Titan AE. Not horrible to look at, but still forgettably cheap.), can catch eyes. But outside of that, though, I think this is one of those games that exist for the sake of being popular (and boy is it winning) rather than actually having anything to make it stand out. Like, it could have given us lots to do, for example! But it has no story, no variety of gameplay other than the genre that is “social deduction”, no real music, JUST NOTHING!!!!! Yet for as many haters as this game may have, it also has fans even though it feels like something that should have landed on more lists of worst video games for being barren. Oh yeah, that reminds me! While Superman 64, my personal most hated game (alongside most of the games on the list with the exception of Super Mario 64… except for the 3D All-Stars version because SM3DAS in general is the worst Super Mario game(s) since these New Super Mario Bros. sequels which has fans that would argue with dislikers of these games about which original stuff the games have to offer to treat them more like underrated gems than they actually are.), was put on many lists of worst video games, where was it on your list? Could it at least be a dishonourable mention? Because it really is unfinished and boring to the greatest extents.

@@SolEmeralds18 I had something like that happen to me once. I was in this one lobby with this person who somehow convinced everyone to vote me out immediately after the game started and the reason they gave me afterward was that I was "annoying" (even though I literally did nothing that could've possibly annoyed them) so not only did they do it for no reason, they decided to make up a reason that made absolutely no sense. I've had some genuinely good rounds in that game but, more often than not, I'm stuck with people who either have zero critical thinking skills or are just obsessed with the idea of seeing people get ejected. There were times where I genuinely wished I could HELP the imposters win because my crewmates were just that worthless.

early player here too (back when the only map was skeld) i agree, players were way more smarter i still play it occasionally though, and i still think it's good, but it was way better in the earlier days

Among us is only fun if you are playing it with everyone in person.

Among Us is overrated anyhow after it become as popular as Fortnite and fall guys

I think the DS version of Mario 64 is way better than the original. There's more variety in the levels and characters, and the camera works better (though in Big Boo's Haunt, it is fixed and you stupidly can't move it).

The controls are significantly worse in SM64DS due to the movement being locked in eight directions. Not that any of them are bad games, but I don't think this guy would want to play the DS game if he finds the original N64 game to be difficult to control.

@@fatterplatter3029 I think I’m just used to the DS controls in general so that probably made it easier for me. But if you’re not used to the DS, it could be difficult to control.

@@russellhunter9951 The DS game was actually my first exposure to Super Mario 64, and I liked it a lot! Then I played the N64 game, and wow did it feel a hell of a lot smoother with 360° movement

@@fatterplatter3029 I thought it was the exact opposite. The 360 degree movement was too slippery in my opinion, so I preferred the DS's more "rigid" movement.

i think the placements are largely based on how much he hates them personally (aswell as how bad they are objectively obviously) so a game he hates that gets constant praise for being the best thing ever created would rank higher than a game basically everyone knows is bad

@@fortnitesexman He said that the more he hates something people like in comparison, the lower it can go as seen with the movie analog of the video where a lot of the movies people unanimously agreed was awful was higher because of similar reasons while ones he hated specifically that was the inverse was lower since his critisisms were from the minority.

Speaking of "paint thinner," I'm really looking forward to when he updates his Top 20 Best Games list to include Epic Mickey!

Don't insult my sweet secret rings 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡😡

It’s about him hating the game, not objective rating. He literally said that at the start

I've always thought Among Us is missing some game clues as to who the impostor is, and by clues I mean unbiased clues given by the game. I see how it can be difficult to implement but else, I agree with you.

How could not 1, not 2, not even 3, but at the very least 4 people come to that assumption? I genuinely want to know how they pieced that together. Was it a poor choice of words on your part or was it completely idiot-icy? I just gotta know how the whole scene played out.

I have to say that thinking Among Us as a game is at fault for the stupidity of the young or stupid player base is just a weak argument. I do agree that the developers should try to implement something to counter-act these issues but that can be very hard to perfectly add. I really feel like you HAVE to play this game with friends with rules set in place in order to have fun and if you're gonna complain about playing on open lobbies with strangers then you can't blame the game, you have to play the players themselves.

@@boomboom6410 play the players 🤔

@@Sir_Isaac_Newton_ lol sorry I was tired as hell when I wrote this. Meant to say blame.

Don’t. He doesn’t respect your’s.

My exact thoughts

@@wishbushwashbosh6443 how so?

@@StickMan10Blue He actively gets mad and attacks people for liking that Sonic Adventure 2 or Toy Story 4. He’s a complete manchild.

@@wishbushwashbosh6443 got proof? This isnt ment to sound mean, im just curious.

Super Nario!?

Yes, it could be a great game if 70% of the game was improved.

I like some aspects but was more so dated, but it is not so bad to be the worst mario game.

Yeah I don't know why Nintendo didn't optimize it for 3D All Stars.

​@aletanook Remember Super Mario All-Stars for the SNES/Wii? That collection had effort put into it by updating not just the art style of the side-scrollers, but the *physics* of them too! But with *3D All-Stars they only update the UI, the controls, and the resolution for Sunshine. The collection may be $60, but in my opinion that's NOT because they are each worth $20! For me THESE prices are what they're worth: Super Mario Galaxy = $40 Super Mario Sunshine = $19.50 Super Mario 64 = the remaining 50 cents

Tad late but I wanna say that I agree with you that playing with voice chat with people you know is the only way to really play this. The issue being that not only is this a game of logic... but a game of deception. Which is nearly impossible to tell with strangers. Is he an imposter that threw his ally under the bus? You can't tell. Is what he says true or a lie? And it isn't like you can deduce that by it being wrong or correct. Hell even his example of "being killed right after accusing the player of being an imposter". Since 1 group of impostors might just do that. Another? Won't. Hell this simple base scenario contains so many what ifs that it is hard to tell what actually happened. And this is not even touching the experiences the players had that make them hesistate to trust you.

Um actually the Danganronpa games are good despite it's multiple issues by story department wise

hear hear. I have heard some of his issues with the game being echoed. Others? Makes me wonder what on earth was going on when he was playing the game.

​@@TheDJman248I think the just refuse to learn and adapt to something new.

I'm looking forward to the day he updates his list by removing Super Mario 64 and putting Mario Party 1 in its place.

but they couldn't have made 3D ANIMATED CUTSCENES!!!

Exactly, I really don’t get why most people don’t know this

Also the movie game wasn't a cash grab unlike rehydrated which is solely a cash grab that looks worse than the original to boot Rehydrated should be on this list it's litterally a carbon copy except worse at least the movie game is a different experience unlike rehydrated which is the same experience with worse visuals

@@This-is-a-commentt I mean tbf I think they had a strict time limit to make the game to coincide with the movie

@@CinnamonGhost_Crunch if that was true, I would be less harsh but… that’s not confirmed.

It’s so weird he could have just been like “I just don’t like Mario 64 I don’t see what you guys see in it” instead of the “you guys are wrong and stupid I am right” approach

I feel like the latter of those reasons is the reason people make ROM Hacks. You got it right about why there are speedrunners, too! However I kind of feel like they do Rom Hacks of THAT game because it's just the easiest of 3D Mario Games to do that with. I personally have played ROM Hacks of SM64 that I loved. But in terms of the Vanilla game, I definitely would say it's the weakest of the 3D Mario games. Luckily, some ROM Hacks have gone so far as to IMPROVE the control mechanics! Look to "Peach's Fury" for a prime example.

To my shame the way he's treating Mario 64 is the way I used to treat Loz ocarina of time. As someone with no nostalgia for the game I regarded it as sluggish boring test of patience that's aged horribly, not getting why anyone could still unironically like it. And the remake couldn't improve something so flawed at its core. But nostalgia is a powerful thing. When a game resonates with you that much then it's easier to look past it's issues. I do it. Everyone does for at least one thing. I can't find enjoyment in Oot but I don't think I should be faulting people who do. And who knows. I might give it another try someday.

@@Superluigi881 The old games aren't for everybody, but some people can and will find great enjoyment in them despite their roughness. Glad you understand that you shouldn't fault the people that do like them.

Not to mention he compared it to Halo: Combat Evolved of all things, a game that isn't even in the same genre as 64. 💀

The concept of this game was right there. Free-roam with new characters, keep the story revolving around the time limit, a new threat, it could have been great. Instead it was the halo 5 of fnaf. Well, it has a single up on 5 bc the style of everytjing is decent (but yeaj fhe quality is questionable af best, awful at worst graphicswize)

The funny thing is, though I could very well be wrong, the “I always come back” thing has been a running meme in the community for a while now. I think it started with all the “glitchtrap is William afton” theories going around. Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong because I’m genuinely not entirely sure about that.

TV tropes call it "Hijacked by Ganon" because a lot of Zelda games have a main villain that inexplicably ties back to Ganon, so Ganon is the actual final villain.

​@@wastelandlegocheemat least sigma has an interesting idea.

@@mangle6850 but with the ruin DLC and tales from the pizzaplex,glitchtrap is not William Afton but he's...T H E M I M I C!

wow rude

@@rayganthetheremind1216 With the way that "GamingMagic13" talks, he kinda opens himself up for rude responses

@@Crigencerude doesn’t mean intelligent

My guy, no one has played every single game out there. He’s probably played hundreds considering he’s played on the first Xbox and still is to this day

Lol 💀

IKR

And that’s why I love it

What's a zoomer?

It doesn’t need to have bubsy 3d superman 64 ,or any old games like that but omg man. Like im just going to say it. If *Black Opps 3* is in your top 20 worst, you shouldn’t make a video like this. Like its not even the worst cod game by very large margin, Infact it’s considered by many people to be the last good one. Not to mention he has a tech demo (that i got as a damn FREE BONUS! From buying the original Bendy and the Ink Machine) as number 20. Also i was born in 2004 and even i am Furious at him not only putting mario 64 on the list but at number 10 BELLOW! Sonic and the secret rings, one of the worst sonic games, a franchise that DEFINITELY could have made it on this list more than once if he didn’t have the one per franchise rule (he isn’t scared to criticize franchises he likes afterall.). Like come on. Cause it aged poorly? It didn’t even age that bad. Yeah some stuff if the game was made today would be different but it would buy and large be the exact same game.

But the ruin DLC makes security breach scarier

@@Mr.Feather130 Don't care. Ruin was their best attempt at fixing everything they broke with the main game, and it wasn't great.

@@silverscorpio24 is it because of...T H E M I M I C!

@@Mr.Feather130 Yes. A retconned villain that's basically Afton in pure robot form pulled directly from the non-canon books that shoves aside both Glitchtrap and Vanny.

@@silverscorpio24 but Tales from the pizzaplex are canon to security breach and the ruin DLC actually

nah he forgot to mention minecraft for that to be the case

Plus Ninja and Dr. DISrespect

@@fortnitesexmannope, Minecraft players are already adults. Also he already disrespected them as fortnite is there

He’s played a lot of games. I know you haven’t played every single game out there

I think he means something besides just using another ability, something that actually requires some semblance of skill.

‘Genji is op because he can deflect any projectile’ Also the counter is picking a different character, not your skill with your main

Except he hates great games like Mario 64 cause he got no skill… and no b*tches

But if you are putting down the worst games of all time, than it should be easily guessable as you already know from experience what games are the worst, the fun part is listening to their take on why it's bad and listening to them rant on about stuff.

For the games, you can guess from a mile away, would Mario Tennis: Ultra Smash be one of them?

the list is based on what's personal to him he states this at the start of the video

@@fortnitesexman Of course it is. I just really disagree

@@mr.funnyman9765 oh, it didn't come off that way honestly and like you disagree with the list itself? or that it should've been titled differently?

@@fortnitesexman Both, but I can understand him saying "worst" to get more views

@@mr.funnyman9765 honestly, from the games on the list that i knew about i completely agree with (aside from the portal bridge game which i'm sort of split on) and the rest are solid as far as i can tell

I disagree on the speed department, I think Sunshine can be just as fast and it has fun tech like the spin jump and water sliding. But yeah 64 isn't a bad game, this guy is nuts

​@cryguy0000 Super Mario 64 is better for Speedrunning, though. I'm pretty sure you can't skip a single location in Super Mario Sunshine before the final boss, and you have to get these shines in a specific order thanks to them being in episodes.

Sonic is faster and more fun than Mario 64.

What made SM 64 so great was it was the first 3d game to really get a lot of gameplay things right. You kinda had to be into gaming already and played what came before to understand this, so the new kiddies just don't get it. I personally loved getting the flying powerup and shooting myself far in the air with a cannon to just play around with it. It had little to do with the actual gameplay, but it was incredibly fun, and that was enough to overlook the other flaws of the game, which would become more obvious later, as many other games copied the basic open world 3d ideas and improved them. Everyone has that one game that they are far from the mainstream in their like or hate category. My outlier game would have to be Athena on the NES. Widely regarded online as the #1 worst game of the NES, I actually quite liked it, for the same reason I liked Mario 64, as it was the first game to get a flying power up right in a game, which completely changed the level dynamic when you got it, and was very fun to use. I am CERTAIN that super mario 3 copied the flying powerup from Athena, which is one of the best parts of that game, and a version of which would eventually appear in all future mario games. Athena also had a fairly deep armor and weapon power up system for a game of this era, and also a female protagonist, before that became a thing in every other game. Strangely, it also featured nudity, both in game, and on the box art (!!) The gameplay was incredibly hard, and even though you had a life bar, you could easily be stunlocked and killed if any enemy got close to you, and the ranged powerups were completely useless, so it was always a hand to hand fight. Only in the internet era, with a proper walkthrough was I ever able to beat it, but it was very satisfying to finally complete this game, but it was quite fun to play, especially with the flying power up, and that was enough for me to love it. Also, for the record, the worst game on the NES was Top Gun, both because it was unplayably bad and all but unbeatable, but also because of the potential it wasted, being such a high profile licensed game. Also, it was incredibly unfun to play, which is the one thing I cannot overlook.

​@@sprinkle61 I only read like three sentences of your response, but I can tell you right now, Mario 64 is just good. Straight up. I first played it when I was 16. It was the year 2016. I had already been well experienced in games with infinitely better controls, and I still loved 64 (and to exacerbate how good it is, I emulated it on a phone, using a touchscreen gamepad, still loved every second).

I was not able to get into Mario 64 at all. I wouldn’t call it insultingly bad but it feels so empty. I don’t get what people see in this game since the lack of enemies makes this game too easy and the dated controls, graphics, and level design are a huge turn off for me.

Define "nitpicking". Because I was once told hating the stupid attempt at meta commentary trying to pass as a plot for FFR remake was just "nitpicking".

​@@RevolverRez dude, i've never played fall guys, but even i know that at least half of the things he complained about the game are gameplay choices made on purpose because it's the game's purpose and inspiration for things like that in real life. He might not like the game, but he mostly didn't because he didn't understand it.

@@MsElViktor agreed^^^ the game literally resembles real life in a lot of ways lol

@@MsElViktor Just because you make something bad on PURPOSE doesn't make it good lol.

*most

funnest isn't a word

Facts

Yeah I'm pretty sure the clunky controls were the entire point

The “funnest” proves his point exactly

This... Isn't a tier list, though.

Rankings and tierlists are almost the same, but technically yes.

well he is the most reddit-like reviewer ever (joke)

@@redrox3312 Don't really have to joke. He yelled at his friend just for enjoying Toy Story 4 and freaked out over it on stream.

@@CDRW24the “let’s watch” with his friend was really dumb, like yeah it was her idea but I genuinely feel like she actually liked the movie just to get “LOOK AT THAT TRASH.” every other minute 💀

could you mention some games that are worse? personally i'd volunteer minecraft survival mode

@@fortnitesexman Devil may cry 2, you won't possibly believe what you just experienced after playing it

He doesn't seem to have played anything older than the n64, but unfortunately I have played things back to the birth of console gaming, so there is so much more dreck I honestly can't even remember it all. I should have made a list as I was playing the games, but I never even realized that an online community would pop up that would value such ancient history 30 years into the future. The one that most comes to mind is the Top Gun game for the original Nintendo. Yes, it was hard, like all games of this era, but for all the wrong reasons. Braindead enemies flew in front of you in predictable formation for no reason, you had to shoot heat seeking missiles out of the sky with your infinite shot cannon, your own missile choice didn't matter, except that the tiny missiles gave you more missiles, but by far the worst thing about the game was that refueling and landing were insanely hard, even when you knew the parameters to pull them off. Missing a refueling attempt meant that you would for 100 % certainty run out of fuel later and die, and you only got one shot at it. By far the worst element of the game was carrier landing. This was so monumentally hard its hard to imagine the US having any planes left on its carriers, because they all would have died trying to land. Pulling off a landing was like a 100 to 1 lucky shot, and you would likely never again get it in that playthrough. This is one of the few games I never beat, even with a cheating device, because it was just so brokenly hard. It was also not fun to play, it had no redeeming qualities, besides an 8 bit rendition of the movie theme. I received it as a gift, and hated it as long as I possessed it, and felt I paid way too much for it, in that I might have received any other gift and it would have been better, and I have received some truly crappy gifts, but this was the worst one...

@@sprinkle61 it's not that he hasn't played games older than the n64, it's that the list isn't solely based off of objective quality, he brings this up at the start of the video

@@fortnitesexman Yes, he says he isn't just going to go after low budget games, but the video does not refer to an arbitrary time cut off, only games he has actually played, and to be honest, there really isn't any reason for a millennial to play old 8 bit games, if you are not nostalgic for them, so I totally understand, but there are plenty of bad and good games before his system cut off date, even though they are all 'bad' from a technical limitation standard, but its OK for us to mention them as well.

Or maybe insted of putting actual awfull games like superman 64, ride to hell, drake and the 99 dragons or sonic 06 he just put the popular ones to make him look like a cool kid

@@motor4X4kombat he only talked about games that HE played not about every game out there.

@@motor4X4kombatyes whenever he finds the teeniest tiniest thing that’s wrong he makes a 12 hour rant about it because he just wants people to agree with him

@widedolph3 No, he doesn't! Six hours at most. Plus, a myriad of people do the same to Cars 2 just to spit in the face of people who like it.

@@motor4X4kombator maybe, he actually put games that he HATES. Also do you really want to watch another copy paste video on the worst games?

If you want to see TGX Game Reviews’ review of every Star Fox game that is not 1 & 2 or 64 or Assault, watch at your own risk, because I find it funny how he accuses great games like Mega Man 9 & 10 alongside every Crash Bandicoot game after Mind Over Mutant (unless he’s actually grateful for Crash Bandicoot 4: It’s About Time feeling more like Warped and Crash of the Titans in terms of quality than how he portrayed the N-Sane trilogy as “the ‘meh’ heard around the world) of nostalgia pandering (or as he would like to call it, “The Twinsanity Effect”) while defending SFZ to the point of comparing the haters (of the controls and game in general which is a real meh heard around the world or at least by StarFox followers) to bratty little children. I love (or at least like) that guy for what he does right (especially the ending of his channel with Infamous 2, one of my favourite games he gave the light of day it deserved), but sometimes even TGX could be laughable because of his StarFox bias as if it were this underrated, badass franchise. m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/obWpqtB1v93Ln6M.html

But the ruin dlc and help wanted 2 concluded the security breach saga of the series since glitchtrap and the Mimic are finally no more

I really didn’t enjoy it. I tried playing it once and it was so boring that I couldn’t get past the first 2 levels.

He isn't insulting them, he just objected to the opinion that it's "one of the greatest games ever made." And honestly, I don't see how it can be regarded as that if Super Mario Odyssey can't for some reason.

And I am scared if he thinks 3D land and 3D world are better than 64

@@Mr.Feather130 I think I played 3D Land ONCE on my friend's 3DS, and I wouldn't care to play it again. Excuse me, but, I actually enjoy 3D World a LOT more than 64, whether I am alone or have company. Are you scared for ME, too? As for Gamingmagic13, don't worry, he hates 3D World just because of... get this: its linear level design! Which I guess is his reason for why he loves Captain Toad Treasure Tracker in spite of that.

@@KopsiDayzee22 Trevor hates 3D world? how rude!

@@Mr.Feather130Well, actually, I didn't mean to say he "hates it," but he said it wasn't a good game. He said it during his Super Mario Odyssey playthrough after meeting Captain Toad in the lake kingdom: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z7KglpuC08rTp2g.htmlsi=BYawYg165Zm5z2-Q But yeah, someone asked him why in the comments, and that was his reason. I'm sorry for exaggerating.

Online gameplay in Splatoon 2 and 3 isn't rage enducing, though. Well, as long as people like Putz12 have nothing to do with you.

@@KopsiDayzee22 Yeah, splatoon is pretty much the exception

@aceash5.065 Also, are you aware of that Online Lounge thing that's existed since Splatoon 2's release date? Well, I've never used it, but according to Nathaniel Bandy, you can only use it to communicate *in between* battles. Even if that's true, do I think Nintendo should feel ashamed for making it that way? No! I think they should feel quite the opposite, actually. It's a game rated E for everyone, so that was a nice way to make it *safe* for everyone. You know, so that things like THIS won't happen. 47:30

@@KopsiDayzee22online gameplay in COD, Apex legends, overwatch 2 etc are rage inducing tho and players are responsible but they take advantage of what was made

The RDR franchise as well

@@phoenixc7245and the GTA franchise

@@user-to4zl8wf2n very true

Fall Guys and Mario Party: Breakers of friendship and sanity.

@@supersmilyface1 I have no clue what you guys mean, I bond with my friends over Fall Guys 😃 I guess some people get too pissed at losing in a game

when were we supposed to take mario party seriously again?

just because we aren't meant to take it seriously doesn't mean it's not shit

He takes everything too seriously

Which game or games on the list make you say that?

@@KopsiDayzee22 -SpongeBob movie game being on the list -Mario 64 being on the list (and below Secret Rings) -Secret Rings is stupidly low on the list -A lot of multiplayer games that he put on because he wasn't very good at them -Fortnite because a lot of the issues he had are incorrect or outdated -Apollo Justice being on the list -Danganronpa V3 being on the list, and somehow not Despair Girls or Decadence -Overwatch is stupidly low on the list -The Witness only being here because of Joseph Anderson -Hates a Bridge Constructor game for being a game where you construct bridges Fnaf Security Breach would be fine if his main reason for placing it there wasn't the story (Cause let's be honest anyone who plays FNAF for the story is a lost cause)

@willberto6969 Well, some of the multiplayer games he put on there aren't because he sucks at them. Rather, they're on there for the poor design choices.

@@KopsiDayzee22such as?

@willberto6969 Call Of Duty, Fall Guys, Overwatch, and Among Us. Still, I think Overwatch is too low on the list, and Rainbow Six Siege is too high. He's right about the map ban system being a bad feature, but at least the matches in Rainbow Six Siege actually happen! Compared to Overwatch, which has so much of a boring wait time to it that it gives Splatoon 2 a run for its money. And Among Us is so bad that I can guarantee you'll have a better experience just playing a Roblox Murder Mystery game.

Saying it's intentionally designed that way doesn't make it any more fun.

@@GamingMagic13 it’s an insane party game, if it’s not for you that doesn’t mean it’s bad

@@shady9044 it's like the earlier Mario party games in its insanity. It's all down to taste; team game platforming puzzles, or FFA fight for the mcguffin via mapping and mini games? That's basically the differences between the two's insanity nature

@@shady9044 Still, just because it was ment to be bad doesn't make it any more good. There are a bunch of better insane party games that are better than Fall Guys...

@@Player-jh4ko That's fair. I sorta bailed on the game too but I can see why people would say the clunkiness of the controls actually adds to the madness.

Honesty it dose tbh

That's kind of to be expected in a video titled "My Top 20 WORST Games of All Time."

@@kek-senpai243 But not the response to criticism in the comments

Way too bitter reply and you are bitter to criticism too. He isn’t, he argues the points made instead of insulting people

@@user-to4zl8wf2n Wym bitter to criticism? Where?

Super Mario Bros doesn't have wierd camera angles or graphics that aged like milk.

@@markofthewolvessucks8930 camera, yeah. Graphics…it was the N64, it was an old console.

@@KopsiDayzee22 I meant 9 and 10

@thatrandomredengine9430 I was going to say 1 or 5 might deserve a placement more, but I'm humble enough to admit that for Mario Party 5 I only felt that way because its boards aren't so fun, and there's little room for strategy with them.

@@KopsiDayzee22 Bro, Mario Party 1 -5 are peak fiction 😂

Never played Revenge of the Flying Dutchman, so I can't comment on it.

@@GamingMagic13 It's basically the predecessor to Battle for Bikini Bottom, which is what many consider the best SB game and was the basis for the Movie Game's engine. If you could consider trying it, please, for the love of god, play the GameCube version, or, play the PS2 version on a Slim PS2 model, you can look up why though

He literally shows video evidence of it just being a skill issue lmao

What is the name of the game?

@@Pinkyorangegirl No idea, sorry.

@@supersmilyface1 It's fine :-)

@@Pinkyorangegirl you probably already know but I think it’s enchanted journey

ME: Lists 20 whole games I hate against the hundreds that I’ve played in total. YOU: Oh my god will _anything_ make you happy? Also, I made an entire video going over the top 20 best games I’ve ever played - something I mentioned in _this_ video - so I think the answer to your question is pretty self-evident.

Idk I just think it’s odd having a lot of these multiplayer/online games because playing them with friends will guarantee make your experience, like I’m watching this fall guys section rn and it’s kinda making me think you’re much more the type of dude to get mad over the slightest things like i don’t like fall guys much either but I don’t think the little dumb platforming battle royale would make me mad, it’s just something I can just ignore. And don’t get me started on SM64 as well man, I honestly think it’s strange to have that down here while Over the Hedges at the top 20 but overall I love this channel. Please keep making more content, it’s pretty entertaining!

Yes there is

@@WanupDeShroomif you need friends to play multiplayer/online games then that means they aren’t fun

Well considering the fact he put Mario Kart Wii on his best games list, maybe he really is!😎

So do you

@@user-to4zl8wf2n thank you

I'm tellin' you, check out the PC port. Mario 64 is an amazing game when given the chance and having tighter controls really helps. I love Mario 64, but even I get pissed when playing on original hardware. The controls just kinda suck a little.

@@hajilee4539 That's probably what would fix the game for me. I don't have a gaming PC, or even a good PC period, but I'll have to give it a try.

its an easy game

@@grandmastermario3695 It's easy yes, but it has some technical problems that can make it frustrating.

@@hajilee4539 ive never beat it 100% i just do 70 stars and then beat the final bowser.

Yeah v3 is more like a soft reboot/stand alone sequel to dr1,2,and the dr3 anime

The campaign was, and still is, universally adored. And the gameplay of the multiplayer absolutely has been universally adored. It's just a pitiful lack of content that 343 is taking an inordinate amount of time to address due to a mountain of technical debt - among other behind the scenes reasons.

@@GamingMagic13 I don't know about that campaign part. It was okay really. Out of the Halo campaigns by 343, it's definitely the best, but still has nothing against Bungie's Halo. I still really like the game though, despite its issues which I hope get fixed

Every single fall guy player is like that bruh

You do realize that just because something was made bad on purpose, doesn't mean make it a good right? Also IQ or not, Among Us should take account for how people can pathetically lie to win, it's basically determined by luck lol. Lasty You probably haven't heard of SM64 fans lol, they act like that Mario game is the only one to exist in the franchise...

@@Player-jh4ko they really don't act like that. They just like the game. This is just ignorance

@@Luna-pk7gz Umm they kinda do lmao...

@@Luna-pk7gz As someone who's been in and out on several Mario communities, I can verify that 64 players literally act like 64 is the only 3D Mario game in existence because I remember seeing some blokes get attacked because they happened to like 3D World

He’s valid for IQ points in MULTIPLAYER GAMES. The whole point is to play with and against other people. Solo queuing is basically giving you the most brain dead teammates imaginable

So, the same with this comment?

@@user-to4zl8wf2n ?

Would you mind sharing the story? You don't have to of course, but I'm interested.

“Taking it too seriously” should be the motto of this channel if we’re being honest

​@@sportingvoodoo3126As well as the motto of ALL of Nikocado's channels. Unless it's referring to his health. He doesn't take THAT seriously.

Yes, and also with the best Zombies mode in the CoD series. Sure the campaign is shit, but the rest made it up for me at least...

Can't believe he think that one call of duty that's considered as good by the fans is garbage

@@inactivehorse9753he only talked about multiplayer tbf

@@Mr.Feather130bro the fans eat garbage cods every year. They defended the devs after they got mad over a joke

Yeah no, it’s literally just a cross over spamming shitshow, a glorified billboard, people who take it’s “story” seriously are idiots.

It's a story that sadly is not even as memorable as, "Buy the battle pass, you stupid fuck!"

It’s funny because during the craze, 80% of the player base was adults who are mostly over 20 🤣🤣 The whole game is based on serious deduction to find the imposter(s) or kill the crew members without being caught. People manipulated that by having big groups to single out players. Public matches weren’t fun, that’s why people loved watching private matches

It clearly isn’t

Man, it'd be extremely awkward if I actually made substantive criticisms against the game itself that are entirely irrelevant to the people playing it. Doubly so if those criticisms were also directly intertwined with what I said about people playing it, especially because this game is entirely dependent on the people playing it being smart.

@@GamingMagic13 Bro, I'm not denying that game is frustrating to play. I'm just saying when you claim it to be one of the worst games of all time primarily because of the community and elements outside the games control it just feels like an unfair claim. Like for instance, if we're playing Mafia in real life and someone is very obviously the mafia but the sheriff decides against catching them even though it makes total sense to do so, are you gonna call the game a shit show? NO! People are always gonna be dumb when playing games and you have to learn to work around the idiocy or suck it up. I also felt your claims about the limited chat choices was flawed when you can easily make an account that allows you to type to your hearts content. I understand that making an account might seem unnecessary but it's done for safety purposes and it's easy to set up. You could also argue that every portion of a game should be accessible to everyone but that's just a narrow way of looking at things. Lets say a player is colorblind and so the original version of a game is hard for them to play effectively but there is an option to add colorblind features. If that player decides to just ignore the features and call the original game bad because of it even when there is an obvious solution to your issue, it just feels unfair. Same goes for your stance on the chat. You can't claim that chatting is bad when there is an option to not use the quick chat. I know being color blind and not having free chat aren't one in the same but my point still stands. I'm not trashing your opinion, I think you're valid in your take always from your experience. I just feel like you're being too harsh about aspects of the game that are out of the developers controls and claiming it to be one of the worst games of all time is just untrue. I just see it as harsh, that's all.

@@boomboom6410 ----------------------------------- " I'm just saying when you claim it to be one of the worst games of all time primarily because of the community and elements outside the games control it just feels like an unfair claim." You literally ignored everything I just told you. ----------------------------------- "People are always gonna be dumb when playing games and you have to learn to work around the idiocy or suck it up." Except not every game is dependent on people not being stupid. Something I went over quite explicitly in my last comment - which, as we established, you entirely ignored. ----------------------------------- " I also felt your claims about the limited chat choices was flawed when you can easily make an account that allows you to type to your hearts content." What the fuck are you talking about? Literally nothing you just said makes any sense at all. ----------------------------------- "You could also argue that every portion of a game should be accessible to everyone but that's just a narrow way of looking at things." Is this the 'make shit up I never said' discussion? ----------------------------------- "You can't claim that chatting is bad when there is an option to not use the quick chat." Nope; quick chat is the primary means through which they want you to communicate, and if you're playing on console your optimal option is to use the quick chat, and it's utterly garbage. Sorry ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ----------------------------------- "I just feel like you're being too harsh about aspects of the game that are out of the developers controls and claiming it to be one of the worst games of all time is just untrue." Once again, you keep ignoring that a substantive part of my criticisms revolve around in-game mechanics irrelevant to the players. Then again, I suppose it's easier to argue your position if you ignore that. So, yes it absolutely is one of the worst games of all time; sorry ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

​@@GamingMagic13 Bruh, are you seriously claiming that I warped and ignored the context of your arguments while simultaneously doing the exact same thing to my words? Perhaps I didn't make my arguments clear enough so I will rephrase what I said before in rebuttal to your responses. 1."You literally ignored everything I just told you." "Except not every game is dependent on people not being stupid. Something I went over quite explicitly in my last comment - which, as we established, you entirely ignored." I didn't ignore anything you said. You basically said that making a review without considering the social aspects of the games would be dumb and a game such as Among Us that requires players to be smart should be judged by including the intelligence of the other players. I understand what you're saying for the most part, but I very much disagree. Many other multiplayer games where you have to work as a team and develop effective strategies fall apart if your players are dumb. For instance, if your party in CSGO doesn't know how to shoot or isn't stealthy and just charges into battle then you are screwed due to your teams stupidity. Now there is a way to still win but it is greatly reduced. However, I don't see many people going around claiming that game to be diarrhea boogers (great choice of words, I know). I'd also like to point out that I said you PRIMARILY highlighted the social aspects of the game, meaning you tended to make that your main argument in the video as you focused on it ALOT! 2. "What the fuck are you talking about? Literally nothing you just said makes any sense at all." Lmao, looking back I probably didn't phrase that well. What I meant to say was that if you want to use the free chat function on PC you need to create an account. I'm not sure if it's the same on console but I just assumed it was. 3. "Is this the 'make shit up I never said' discussion?" I never claimed that you actually said "every portion of a game should be accessible to everyone". I proposed it as a 'What If' scenario, that's why I said "you COULD". I was creating a potential argument against my argument which you yourself have done many times to further prove a point in your videos. 4. "Nope; quick chat is the primary means through which they want you to communicate, and if you're playing on console your optimal option is to use the quick chat, and it's utterly garbage. Sorry" I'll admit that quick chat is flawed but it isn't really the primary way to communicate. I mean quick chat wasn't added until like a year ago and was marketed as a way to learn simple phrases and info you should know when playing, at least from what I remember. I'll be honest I haven't played the game in a few months but most of the criticisms you made were about things I recalled. Also, a point I made in my previous comment which you seemingly ignored was, you can't say that quick chat is more optimal when all the problems you've presented could be easily solved by free chat. I understand that typing on console can be difficult but that just means you have pick your words carefully which could add another layer of strategy. 5. "Once again, you keep ignoring that a substantive part of my criticisms revolve around in-game mechanics irrelevant to the players. Then again, I suppose it's easier to argue your position if you ignore that. You say a substantive part of your criticisms came from in game mechanics when in the video you ranted about the community for a good 6 mins out of the 11 mins that the Among Us segment took up. Which speaking of your other critics I'd like to quickly argue against those now. The maps are functional and while certain maps may give one side more of a benefit it is still possible to win in every map, the closing chambers in Pollus could be a great way to break away from an imposter chase or a great way for an imposter to kill. I will agree though that the airship is aggravating to play but not every map will be perfect and if you don't wanna play it then you can choose not to. In terms of tasks, yeah some of them are confusing or crap I will admit. In conclusion, I understand where you are coming from and I won't deny that your experience with the game could give way to a negative look at the game but while the game is flawed, I feel claiming it as a dumpster fire is just over the top. I do enjoy your content and agreed with many of your other picks and opinions but I just didn't agree with this choice. I myself have ran into many of the same issues you've discussed in the video and I was able to not get angry at the devs because I understood it was the players and not the game. That is all, good day sir.

​@@boomboom6410 --------------------------- "I didn't ignore anything you said. You basically said that making a review without considering the social aspects of the games would be dumb and a game such as Among Us that requires players to be smart should be judged by including the intelligence of the other players." Imagine being so smug about how you definitely didn't ignore my comment and then, in your attempts to prove so, you only end up proving how laughably you failed to understand a single thing I said. Fucking pathetic. Okay, I'll make this really simple for you because this is clearly hard: *I addressed things beyond just the issues that occur with Among Us players.* I specifically call out map and game design problems. Pay attention to what I'm talking about for fuck's sake. --------------------------- "Many other multiplayer games where you have to work as a team and develop effective strategies fall apart if your players are dumb." First of all, that it not true of all multiplayer games. Second of all, even if it was, that would be nothing but 'whataboutism' which is an invalid defense. --------------------------- "Lmao, looking back I probably didn't phrase that well." No shit; at least you have _some_ level of self-awareness. Next. --------------------------- "What I meant to say was that if you want to use the free chat function on PC you need to create an account. I'm not sure if it's the same on console but I just assumed it was. ' Which is entirely irrelevant because if you paid any attention to this video at all you'd see that I clearly had the text box available to use _and I even used it._ --------------------------- "I never claimed that you actually said "every portion of a game should be accessible to everyone" Oh good, so you wasted my time with something I never said; lovely. Next. --------------------------- "I'll admit that quick chat is flawed but it isn't really the primary way to communicate. I mean quick chat wasn't added until like a year ago and was marketed as a way to learn simple phrases and info you should know when playing, at least from what I remember." You've already admitted that it's flawed, so my work here is done anyway, but it absolutely is the primary way to communicate especially if you're playing on console. --------------------------- "I understand that typing on console can be difficult but that just means you have pick your words carefully which could add another layer of strategy. Oh fuck off, you cannot possibly be serious. Typing on a console is actually painful; you do not have enough time to type _anything_ meaningful given the amount of time that meetings last. And again, given how quickly Among Us players leap into action before anything is discussed, everyone will have already voted or started an accusation train you can't stop in the time it takes you to type a simple message. --------------------------- "You say a substantive part of your criticisms came from in game mechanics when in the video you ranted about the community for a good 6 mins out of the 11 mins that the Among Us segment took up." So putting aside the fact that you hilariously fail to realize that's almost a perfect 50-50 ratio, it takes much more time to break down the problems with Among Us players because it takes much more time to summarize the events that took place before I can comment about them, especially if I also am playing video clips from the games in question. Whether you somehow missed that crucial detail or are deliberately ignoring it to strengthen you argument, I don't really care. --------------------------- "The maps are functional and while certain maps may give one side more of a benefit it is still possible to win in every map," Yeah that ain't a counter; saying "they are functional" is a worthless statement, as is saying 'it's possible to win on ever map.' Yeah, no fucking shit, one team is guaranteed to win because that's how games work. What a useless thing to say. It's _possible_ to beat Security Breach. Doesn't make doing so any less painful. --------------------------- " the closing chambers in Pollus could be a great way to break away from an imposter chase or a great way for an imposter to kill." Nope; all it does is artificially clutter up the map making navigating places absurdly inconvenient and far too heavily tipping the scales in one direction. --------------------------- "I will agree though that the airship is aggravating to play" " In terms of tasks, yeah some of them are confusing or crap I will admit. " Oh I'm sorry, have you considered that it's possible to win on every map? Have you considered that it's possible to complete every task? Oops. That fell apart real fast. ---------------------------

He hates it because he’s got skill issue

Hopefully no one. But it's on the Switch for $4.99. If I may ask, what is the price for the PC version?

@@KopsiDayzee22 It was for free on Epic. But I think the standard price is 4,99 too

Yes, I was frustrated that I lost a game due to reasons completely beyond my control because the game is terribly designed; thanks for paying attention. Also, slippery controls, linear level design, padded content, etc. are not nitpicks; they're extremely substantive criticisms of the game.

@@GamingMagic13 like the criticisms for your toy story 4 videos when it was just standard nitpicks that are worse than cinemasins. Also how is among us terrible gameplay design when the players are at fault for blaming others with no evidence. Also the complaints you had for the movie game seem to be the same as battle for bikini bottom or they aren't all that bad.

@@SuperSonicHeros Among Us is a game that is entirely driven by players not being stupid. That's literally the foundation of the game. The obvious problem with that is that the people who play it clearly cannot think critically to save their lives, making it an absolutely miserable experience. And no, the complaints I had absolutely do not apply to Battle for Bikini Bottom; I drew explicit comparisons between the two games to demonstrate how much better BfBB is.

@@GamingMagic13 People literally voted me out for no reason and evidence. but guess what? I never blamed the game or call it bad because of that reason. again that is the problem of the players. not the problems with the game. for criticizing games you have to come up with the flaws that the game actually have instead of blaming for the players mistake. thats literally dspgaming levels of annoying. also explicit comparison? my dude you were out here shitting on this game and nitpicking it for the level design, and other aspects of the game. I prefer BFBB also but your criticism isnt well written. it is just angry ranting.

@@SuperSonicHeros 1. Congratulations; you miserably failed to pay attention to the point I made about how Among Us's gameplay entirely revolves around its players. 2. I _did_ criticize the flaws of the game's mechanics and map design. I guess you missed those in the video. 3. Yes, I made explicit comparisons. They happened in the video. It's not my fault if you missed them.

Fortnite is ass since you need to have only 1 skill: building. The AI doesn’t matter when someone comes from another part of the map

Also the community is alright. Yes the fan made stuff is good but they mostly care about jingling keys and not improving the game (unlike some of the streamers)

@@user-to4zl8wf2n No-build mode exists

@@user-to4zl8wf2n Zero-build mode exists.

I have not heard of that, no.

@@GamingMagic13 it feels wrong to suggest that you play it but may I highly recommend if you're ever looking for a bad game try Drake of the 99 dragons

A lot of the gameplay made it seem like he's just bad at the game. Same goes for Fall Guys.

@@NintendoLover2005 Yeah...I haven't even mentioned other things I disagree with yet.

@@NintendoLover2005nope, a lot of the games has bad gameplay and game design. No one is perfect

@@user-to4zl8wf2n Never said the games were perfect, just that a lot of what he was complaining about felt moreso because he was incapable of playing properly

@@NintendoLover2005after playing Super Mario 64, I think it’s bland. I stopped after the second level. I just wasn’t having any fun.

I have given the other part of the game a chance. I directly addressed private lobbies in this video. Any experience I’ve had in private lobbies mirrors the same type of reactions found in the videos I referenced.

You can’t just say “it’s revolutionary so it’s good” because this logic means the first game ever, Tennis For Two, is a masterpiece of a game. Super Mario 64 hasn’t aged well and I’m tired of pretending it has.

That would mean he thinks sonic 06 is better

⁠@@Spider-Guy62 Jesus Christ. Honestly surprised Sonic Adventure 2 isn’t on here, he hated playing that game. Not that the game itself was poorly designed, but because he’s very bad at it! XD

@@thatrandomredengine9430 yeah

@@Spider-Guy62 Yeah. Either that, or he couldn't put it on the list due to Sonic and the Secret Rings.

@@KopsiDayzee22 That too, though I do agree, it’s a horrible Sonic game. For me, it’s either Forces or Secret rings, at least Sonic 06 is fun in how broken it is. The other two are just boring and bad.

I would for fortnite

What is the point, to FALL?🤭(This is me assuming you're setting up a joke.) Really sorry if I'm misinterpreting you're comment. If you're speaking more seriously, and I'M missing what the entire point of Fall Guys is too, just let me know.

@@KopsiDayzee22 🤓

@Iggin Is that a "Yes you're right," or a "No you're wrong"?

This video has a lot of "I don't get this game" hot-takes, honestly.

My man’s don’t even know what fall guys is 💀💀💀