That's somewhere in the Nanalyze product roadmap but requires a lot more resources than we have at the moment. As we get more subscribers and build our brand, we'll be in a better place for a successful ETF launch. Spreading the word about our content will help build our brand which will bring us closer to an ETF. Our dividend growth investing strategy - Quantigence - is perhaps best suited to an ETF, and that's an investment strategy that's really flying under the radar - which is why Nanalyze Premium subscribers are signing up left and right. Thank you for the great suggestion!

Always interesting to hear from actual users of these platforms. Thank you for taking the time to comment.

You're welcome. Watching them overtake Protolabs was like an MBA case study on the relative merits of two competing business models (one we got wrong). Also agree that the earnings drop seemed like an overreaction. In this volatile market, nothing really shocks us anymore when it comes to how low some boats can go as the QQQ tide continues to fall.

NNDM needs to put all that cash to work.

@@Nanalyze Yes, but no deal like the Twitter one.

@@daniuskac1527 It's not over until the large-and-in-charge female bellows forth a tune.

@@Nanalyze 🙆‍♀

Insider selling always needs to be put into context. Who is selling? How much are they selling relative to their overall position? We don't dig into this much because these signals are often lots of extra noise. It's expected that employees - especially those who were around for a while before the company became publicly traded - would want to diversify their wealth. We're more concerned with the viability of the overall distributed manufacturing business model which - according to revenue growth - seems to be viable. If this indeed saves firms' money, then it should enjoy sustained growth in a bear market.

@@Nanalyze The sales are quite overwhelming as outlined below and include CEO, CFO, COO and a number of Directors. Certainly explains the Q4 plunge, and to me signals they're anticipating a very bad 2023... INSIDER TRADE: 3 MONTHS, 12 MONTHS Number of Shares Bought: 0, 218,605 Number of Shares Sold: 165,237, 4,011,908 Total Shares Traded: 165,237, 4,230,513 Net Activity: (165,237), (3,793,303)

Thank you very much for the added info! Perhaps they're trying to time the market then if expecting a bad 2023? Our understanding is that companies are extremely aware about what insider selling telegraphs to Wall Street. For example, there will be BOD-level policies in place about who can sell during what windows - and they'll usually require approval beforehand. What we'll do is look to write a research piece on insider selling using any academic studies we can come across. We'll try to find simple metrics that can be used to analyze the degree of concern one might assign to any particular situation. That said, these are not signals we would ever include in our own methodology as they're just too noisy and add unwanted complexity for your average retail investor. Good comment, thank you.

@@Nanalyze Now we know why the C suite was selling! Definitely worth an autopsy when you guys can fit it into the schedule.

@@jamesgrasso1980 We're sending an alert to paying subscribers shortly, but it all comes down to this. When a management team misses guidance for the first time ever following a scathing short report, then fails to even mention said short report, it's insulting to investors and exhibits total arrogance.