Thanks to LIQUID IV for Sponsoring! Visit www.liquidiv.com & use Promo Code: *REJECTS* Leave A *LIKE* & *SUBSCRIBE* kzfaq.info - Support The Channel By Snagging Some *RR Apparel* ! www.rejectnationshop.com/ - *Full Reaction* Watch Along & MORE For *SS* Rejects www.patreon.com/thereelrejects
@user-ks8jt8xw1k7 ай бұрын
Hope Tara feels better
@RealTurbidHere7 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: The director said only 40% of the movie is accurate.
@matthewcharles58675 ай бұрын
Your review was great , unlike this shit movie.
@unkillable16935 ай бұрын
@@RealTurbidHereI’d say less
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
The frustrating thing for me, as someone who has read about Napoleon, his life, and the people around him, there is great material for a really nuanced take on the legacy he left behind. On one hand, he certainly was a man of the enlightenment era. He introduced some very impressive reforms to French society and law. Elements of his Napoleonic Code are still in place in the legal system in France today. Our modern understanding of Egyptian culture comes from his campaign in Egypt (and no, he did not blow up the Pyramids. They were over five miles away from them during The Battle of the Pyramids.) He brought scholars, scientists, anthropologists to study the culture. At the same time, he was a man who seized power through military force. He was egotistic, which proved in many cases to be his undoing. He invaded Spain due to his own arrogance. He wasn't above forcing countries to his will. He also legalized slavery in the empire after it had been abolished in the French Revolution. There is plenty to dislike about him. There is so much more to Napoleon than just what Ridley Scott presents here. He was a brilliant military leader and politician. His troops worshipped the ground he walked upon as if he were blessed by divine providence. They carried his eagle standards into battle like religious relics, simply because they were touched by his own hand. At the same time he was brutal, arrogant, and to put it simply human. He is one of the most fascinating characters in history, and with everything he did both positive and negative, his story, as well as the story of those who surrounded, such as Josephine, Maria Louise, Marshal Davout, Marshal Murat, Marshal Ney, Marshal Lannes, and so many others, deserves to be heard. I think for me, what really left a sour taste in my mouth before the movie even hit theaters, was how Ridley Scott reacted to historical criticism. Any period piece is going to have inaccuracies. You have to to form a proper narrative. But when historians criticize gross historical inaccuracies, and even lies, and your response is either "Get a life" or "Where you there? No? Then shut the #%@ up!) I don't have the best opinion on your work. As someone who has had to deal with deconstructing the misconceptions of history to the public, it rubbed me the wrong way. TLDR - Not a fan 😕
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
Honestly, you should just watch 1970 Waterloo to get a good cinematic depiction that shows Napoleon in a nuanced light.
@TheAOTSdude7 ай бұрын
History nerd
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
@@TheAOTSdude Indeed I am😁
@TheAOTSdude7 ай бұрын
also its comedy @@tinmanbrigade7304
@china_is_asshole6 ай бұрын
@@TheAOTSdude the attack of the show?
@criminalcontent7 ай бұрын
Kubrick's dream was to do a Napoloeon film - can you imagine how epic that would've been?
@PeterSimone7 ай бұрын
would pay through the nose to have seen that
@kdizzle9017 ай бұрын
We ended up getting Barry Lyndon instead
@Joggi987 ай бұрын
Steven Spielberg is working on an HBO mini series based on Kubrick's Napoleon script
@MoleyRusselsWart_7 ай бұрын
Interesting that he released Barry Lyndon instead and everyone hated it - now of course it’s hailed as a masterpiece proving once again that critics haven’t a clue
@RealTurbidHere7 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: The director said only 40% of the movie is accurate.
@Josh86_9257 ай бұрын
Crazy that a lot of people don't know about Napoleon, and he's 1 of the greatest battle commanders in human history... probably the greatest ever. Between him and guys like Alexander the Great, and Julius Ceaser.
@randyrocket45467 ай бұрын
yes Napoleon is my favorite battle commander and i also like alexander, Cesar and Genghis khan i was so hyped and ready to go see this movie back at thanksgiving until i started hearing mixed reviews that made me back off and lower my expectations i just think its a shame with so many great battles they could have shown his rise through the ranks that's my favorite part is seeing someone come from humble beginnings and end up on top
@parsman99147 ай бұрын
Welcome to America.
@johnord6847 ай бұрын
And Wellington
@matthewtopping20617 ай бұрын
Sorry, we're Americans and we only know Napoleon from Looney Tunes
@dandanthesuitman60137 ай бұрын
I love chatting about it, but I think Wellington floored Napoleon. Duke of Wellington never lost a battle after he was given command, he earned his way to his rank as opposed to buying it and he is famously the one that outplayed Napoleon. I actually think it's a shame Napoleon is so much more famous than he is.
@saltymisfit65666 ай бұрын
I love how we're in France and I've heard every accent but French so far
@Jordashian937 ай бұрын
I'll give Ridley Scott credit for the battle on the ice, though. It's a fantastic scene rivaled only by Joaquin Phoenix and Vanessa Kirby goofing around as they portray their characters' silly flirtations.
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
It certainly is a cool visual. The shots from underneath the ice were particularly good. The thing I find funny and frustrating at the same time, is that while Ridley Scott is clearly trying to knock Napoleon down a few pegs, he inadvertently bought into one of Napoleon's greatest pieces of blatant propaganda. Yes it is true that towards the end of the Battle of Austerlitz, a number of Russian and Austrian soldiers retreated south over some frozen ponds. Yes it is true that the French artillery fired at them and some of the soldiers fell through the ice and drowned. But Napoleon is the one who played up the numbers of the dead, saying that hundreds if not thousands of soldiers were drowned by his artillery. In reality though, we have evidence that after the ponds were drained, only a couple dozen bodies were found. And even if there were more men who fell into the water, most accounts agree that the ponds were shallow, with men able to stand in them. Only the wounded were at greater risk of drowning. Again, I agree that the scene is visually stunning. The camera work is excellent and the effects are amazing. I just find it funny that while Ridley Scott is trying to present Napoleon as "not all that," he still perpetuates some of the Emperor's own propaganda. LOL😄
@thomasmuscat65277 ай бұрын
Not to mention the fact that the Napoleon actually used the dense mist on the battlefield to shield part of his troops until the right moment, which in itself would have been brilliant to see on screen. So it's not like Scott couldn't have kept more true to the Battle of Austerlitz without losing the sense of spectacle.
@ReelRejects7 ай бұрын
What is your FAVORITE Historical Epic / Biopic of a Historical Figure???
@Jordashian937 ай бұрын
Gladiator for sure
@dg7k7 ай бұрын
Gladiator, Kightfall, Exodus God and Kings, Gangster Squad, Kingdom of Heaven, The Prince of Egypt, Son of God, 13 Hours- The secret soldiers of Benghazi, and Born Racer
@Dachi6547 ай бұрын
The King. I am English so hard its hard for that movie to not hit me in the feels!
@aegon6targaryen6557 ай бұрын
Kingdom of Heaven (Saladin[Salahuddin] and King Baldwin)
@PeterSimone7 ай бұрын
Amadeus
@auslandermercury9727 ай бұрын
“French Joker” is probably as apt a description as possible. I was telling people that it wasn’t like Joaquin Phoenix was playing Napoleon. It was more like the Joker was playing Napoleon 😂
@cunningstunt695 ай бұрын
Joaquin Phoenix is one of the greatest actors ever no question and it’s funny how he’s had so many brilliant performances a lot of them are even better than the joker performance but all ppl compare his performances to is joker😂 don’t get me wrong it’s an amazing performance but he’s acted way better than that imo
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
@@cunningstunt69 Did you know he voiced Kenai in the Disney animated feature film Brother Bear (2003)?
@cunningstunt692 ай бұрын
@@StephenLuke yea I love that movie
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
@@cunningstunt69 When I heard Joaquin screaming or shouting all I hear is Kenai.
@shaneestes3727 ай бұрын
So I saw this in D-Box, okay, and I KID YOU NOT, because these seats MOVE with the movie, the chairs actually moved when they were doing IT! It was weird and strange, and it was the filthiest cinematic moment I've ever been immersed in! LOL
@ObsessiveGeek7 ай бұрын
Would have been funny if they used the protruding elements in the chair to give you a quick thrill lol
@ObligedUniform6 ай бұрын
Holy shit theybstill HAVE d-box? They ripped that out of even my areas good theaters like 7 years ago.
@shaneestes3726 ай бұрын
@@ObligedUniform Ya, my local Cinemark has had them since last June, and I really enjoy them (when worth it of course!)! They only have 2 rows of them but it's like I'm on a theme park attraction almost!
@thisishere7 ай бұрын
You guys should check out the Napoleonic Wars by Oversimplified, really interesting and informative stuff presented in an entertaining way.
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
Or Epic History TV's Napoleonic Wars videos. Those are really well done.
@Jeroen727 ай бұрын
About 30/40 minutes of this movie was accurate. The rest was complete fantasy or complete inaccurate history.
@steventomasi55576 ай бұрын
Thats generous I'd say more like 10 minutes was accurate
@matthewcharles58675 ай бұрын
They got the movie name right that's about all.
@Animeke-san7 ай бұрын
Napoleon's physician measured him at 5'2" upon death, by today's imperial measuring that'd be 5'6". Average for the time, shorter by today's standards.
@ObsessiveGeek7 ай бұрын
It’s still fairly average for today too. I can say this as someone who is 5.6 that the vast majority of folk aren’t much taller.
@matthewtopping20617 ай бұрын
1:04:00 "So they banished him to an island...🎶But he came back🎶 So they banished him to another island 🏝️
@louielouie222 ай бұрын
He was 5'7" that was an average height in france.
@louiemartinez76847 ай бұрын
funny you guys decided to watch this today because this week, i watched the 1927 version of napoleon, so, one can say, i am one with napoleon lore
@SLAPERZZ17 ай бұрын
You two are still my favourite reactors on KZfaq! Both Hilarious 🤣 From 🏴
@bigd49987 ай бұрын
Even with Napoleon you guys crack me up haha Greg side comments haha..not what I expected with this movie. Very rushed from one scene to the next timeline wise. I’m with Greg on this one. Again your commentaries made the watch enjoyable
@antonkarlsson45567 ай бұрын
This was the biggest dissapointment ive seen. The hype, and what it could have been..:/
@Spencer122336 ай бұрын
Let’s be honest, if it wasn’t for Joaquin it would’ve have gotten way worse. But with Joaquin he did really great job at being Napoleon, great actor.
@TheRealGunWhisperer6 ай бұрын
@@Spencer12233 …. He did a horrible job…. There was no accents at all. He didn’t gain his mannerisms as well… it was just bad all around
@Spencer122336 ай бұрын
@@TheRealGunWhisperer “He did horrible job” what kind of horrible job did he do? Exactly. At least he did really good at being Napoleon
@TheRealGunWhisperer6 ай бұрын
@@Spencer12233 ....
@TheRealGunWhisperer6 ай бұрын
@@Spencer12233 2 months old account, nice try communist bot
@chaost45447 ай бұрын
Napoleon was actually average to slightly above average height for his time. The reason why he gets labeled as short is due to English propaganda and the English/French measuring systems were slightly different. Napoleon also looked short because he always stood next to his Old Guard which had a minimum height requirement of 5'10 though most in the Old Guard were taller than the minimum height requirement.
@dandanthesuitman60137 ай бұрын
New thought: God, I would love to see your reaction to the original "Waterloo" movie. The amount of extras, the shots, the choreo, it's insane
@DezeraeJordan7 ай бұрын
Something I’ve learned, by watching you guys react to so many movies and TV shows, is that even if it’s a TERRIBLE tv show or movie… I’m obsessed with y’all’s commentary, jokes, reactions lolz. It’s way more comedic to watch “friends” have to go through it too. So thank you & I’m sorry 🤣
@auslandermercury9727 ай бұрын
All I heard during John’s intro was, "Monsieur Incroyable!" 😂 Love it 😆
@SilvershotStudios7 ай бұрын
Prediction before I start watching, Greg heard it wasn't good, so will judge every single scene
@SE-gs6gd7 ай бұрын
Fun fact: Beethoven's Eroica symphony was originally dedicated to Napoleon whom he thought was an enlightened democratic leader. Later he retracted the dedication after Napoleon crowned himself emperor for life, lol.
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
That I heard!
@AFKeveryday7 ай бұрын
thanks for this reaction.. i'm subscribed now.. i think most of all the people wanted a history lesson.. but i think this was perfect as an introspect for those that already know the history
@johnsnow945 ай бұрын
They should have gotten a younger actor to play napoleon. napoleon was 24 when promoted general, and 30 when he took power in france. Joaquin phoenix is in his 50s playing a 20 something year old character.
@shainewhite27817 ай бұрын
Ooh, I heard this film sucked! Man, Ridley Scott has certainly lost his touch after GLADIATOR. Oh, well, that's reality for you.
@Spidr-Man7 ай бұрын
Yup, sadly Gladiator was one of his last good films...
@carmelbeatty93427 ай бұрын
I saw this in the cinema. I was really looking forward to it although somewhat skeptical due to the decision to allow Joaquin to use his own accent. Decided to put that aside but regretted it. I don’t think timeline biographical movies work. Ridley should have focused on a specific period of time, or even just the battle at Waterloo. Just his love story would have been acceptable. On a positive note, Vanessa Kirby was great, as always.
@ronsoderstrom796712 күн бұрын
You guys managed to elevate a very dark comedy to a light and enjoyable experience, so thanks for that! We are in an age of cinema that seems to be focused on the death and destruction of icons and there are some who would say this is a good thing.
@rlg0047 ай бұрын
Speaking of Marie Antoinette... If you haven't seen it, you should totally check out Sofia Coppola's "Marie Antoinette" starring Kirsten Dunst and Jason Schwartzman. So good!
@hughmungus52714 күн бұрын
This film depicted Napoleon as a man child with an inferior complex, which seems like Hollywood just wanted to besmirch his name. Theres a reason as to why he was beloved as much as he was by the people and why his men return to him after his banishment. The 1970 waterloo film gives a much better representation of who he was while maintaining historically accurate. Plus that film gives a way better depiction of what went down at Waterloo. The best thing about this movie is the action. Also Josephine was heavily “Hollywood”
@sudsy71317 ай бұрын
Nice reaction. And yes George. I did find Waldo when i was looking at my phone from a distance.😮😅
@thWlfpack7 ай бұрын
To truly appreciate Napoleon's story through cinema, it's best to learn about his life yourself.
@danilanik-limedude5 ай бұрын
Наполеон,один из самых гениальных генералов за всю историю!!
@auslandermercury9727 ай бұрын
“Is Napoleon asleep?” 😂
@raven_11336 ай бұрын
In Cinematography standards, it’s a great movie…but historically, it’s very very shit. It doesn’t stay very true to history unfortunately. At least with, for example, Fury, you know you’re going into a historical fiction movie. A movie based on real larger scale events, but of course, fictional smaller scale events. In Napoleon, it’s been hyped up as a documentary, but it’s not. And that’s what pisses me off.
@auslandermercury9727 ай бұрын
I get your apprehension about ‘The Last Duel,’ but if you decide to watch it, I’d love to see your reaction to see what you guys think of it. I enjoyed it.
@EleventhCubFan7 ай бұрын
Destiny has brought me this Napoleon reaction!
@SchecterIsKING7 ай бұрын
I'm sorry but that "was there a post credit scene??" was god damn hilarious!!
@creed20557 ай бұрын
try reacting to oversimplified neoleon videos , it goes over the history in a fun and easy to understand sort of way
@Anthonycheesman337 ай бұрын
This movie single handedly makes me question if phoenix is a good actor anymore and is Scott a good director anymore Jesus Christ this was bad .
@Heyman115557 ай бұрын
I think you’re confusing writing with directing because in what way is the directing bad? It’s literally the best part of the movie. If you dislike the writing/decisions for the method of telling the story, that’s fine, but the direction is undeniably breathtaking.
@catcherinthesky41067 ай бұрын
Utterly terrible.
@Ay3shizzle7 ай бұрын
I wouldn’t call Phoenix a bad actor lol. I feel like he really did this movie because it gave him another chance for working with Ridley Scott again. Other than that, Phoenix gives his all in all his other movies.
@blinkachu52757 ай бұрын
@@Heyman11555 editing of a movie still falls under direction, and the editing of the pacing of this movie is terrible.
@TheAOTSdude7 ай бұрын
@@blinkachu5275 you dont know ball
@staliniosifvissarionovich55886 ай бұрын
he actually won the Borodino, but you can say both won. The French army won this battle and made Russia retreat. But Russia also achieved its goal of reducing French troops.
@John_Locke_1087 ай бұрын
I expected Joaquin Phoenix to be much better than this. Plus, he did not look like somebody in their late 20's.
@JohnDAmico-ci2hz7 ай бұрын
You know it's a movie, right? There are so many historical things wrong with it but in the end, it never claimed to be a accurate documentary....
@auslandermercury9727 ай бұрын
“Napoleonoisseur”! 😂
@muhammadhabibieamiro36397 ай бұрын
This was a surprise
@carlosjaimez90287 ай бұрын
Where's the part where the transformers show up?
@Say0nn.7 ай бұрын
Ask Michael Bay
@ericj1667 ай бұрын
Beavis and Butthead do "Napoleon" - but thanks guys. In his earlier years, Ridley Scott made a beautiful film set during this period - "The Duellists - which I guess you will enjoy. Similarly, Rod Steiger's portrayal of Napoleon in the 1974 film "Waterloo" was superb as was the film, made in an age before CGI.
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
1970 actually.
@ericj1662 ай бұрын
@@StephenLuke Yes you must be right, I was only 13 when I saw it at the cinema - couldn't count then, and can't count now.
@user-oj9hm6ss5i7 ай бұрын
Bastille day was earlier, at the beginning of the revolution.
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
July 14! 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
@mattquinn22156 ай бұрын
Yeah this one was a mess. And I know this isn't the only movie to do this but it bothered me that literally nobody in this movie even tried to speak with a French accent. Joaquin also seemed to, for the first time that I've experienced, really phoned in this performance.
@RailroadFanatic-hr6pf3 ай бұрын
God’s not here right now. Yeah he’s busy checking all the soldiers into heaven 😂
@imdil96147 ай бұрын
You guys should react to “the society of the snow” ❤
@Mia-wh3tj7 ай бұрын
My favorite reaction couple is back 🎉
@NixErdes_Ай бұрын
Joaquin is a great actor but he is twice as old as Napoleon was and it’s weird choice
@nashsanadiki31047 ай бұрын
We will see joker, the white widow, and maybe a face hugger 😂
@ellingtonGaming6 ай бұрын
9:58 apparently there was another film maker that was looking for a Sailing ship for their film (not sure who or what movie for) and everyone basically laughed at them and were like "dude, Ridley Scott has rented use of every period ship out there so good luck" lol
@copuim_dealer7 ай бұрын
Honestly Waterloo from 1970 something was 1000× better
@Eddieavina1237 ай бұрын
Love your video and keep up the great work and I like this movie
@anomalyg7 ай бұрын
John... lol😅😅😅😂 you had me rolling the whole time. Omgoodness your quips were hilarious.
@MoleyRusselsWart_7 ай бұрын
My only flaw would be that it’s impossible to cover everything. It would have been better had it focused on one part of his life; much like Waterloo did.
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
I think a pretty good film that could've show the negative side to Napoleon would be following his last campaign before his exile. When everything is coming apart for him and he is trying desperately to save everything. You could see political intrigue as Talleyrand secretly conspires against Napoleon with the Sixth Coalition. You'd have a pretty interesting character in his second wife, Maria Louise, as she tries to secure a future for her son. You'd see how his marshals were trying to do their best for him, while also questioning whether or not blind allegiance to Napoleon was best for France. That I think would be a great movie, if not maybe multi part mini series.
@MoleyRusselsWart_7 ай бұрын
@@tinmanbrigade7304 I really enjoyed it and think it’s getting way more hate than it deserves. Reviewers can be sheep sometimes
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
@@MoleyRusselsWart_ I feel you on that. I suppose I just have a different opinion. Glad you enjoyed it.
@generalshock43597 ай бұрын
@@MoleyRusselsWart_ nobody hates anything because other people hate it thats just a lie made up by morons who think anyone who doesn't agree with them are joking or making things up
@expiredbagel20017 ай бұрын
I was hoping that this movie would just be full of those sick Napoleon edits with his iconic theme song.
@dustythejoker04587 ай бұрын
What iconic theme song
@papahamdrew99627 ай бұрын
This film is something alright lol, I don’t hate it but I was kind of expecting the Oppenheimer treatment for Napoleon, sadly disappointed lol, expectations too high ig
@MOVIE.KNIGHTS7 ай бұрын
The way to describe The Sex scene in this film, Is a Dog Going at with Stuff Toys - It was Hilarious, I couldn't stop laughing.
@Skotavus7 ай бұрын
My take on this movie: The extras, art department, costume department and effects team showed up to work every day. The script writers and historians did not.
@beau01177 ай бұрын
This movie could've been way better especially with the cast they have. I liked certain scenes and while im not an expert i have read about napoleon. Idk it was a good watch definitely something im glad was available for streaming. Thank you guys for the reaction 💯🙏
@bcn1gh7h4wk7 ай бұрын
for those complaining about historical accuracy, the actual facts and nuisances of the story just PALE in comparison to the sheer production value. those are REAL BOATS you see there! timber-framed, rigged, gunned floating hulls, as per 18th century standard, made by actual workers, in the year 2023! that is REAL carpentry and REAL cutlery adorning the halls! that is REAL tailoring and REAL goldsmithing dressing the actors! did Napoleon do all these feats we see him do in the movie? yes... so, the movie is faithful. did he take 100 men when the record says 250? who cares!
@kylecasey70107 ай бұрын
The French won the battle of Borodino.
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
That’s right!
@michaeljones4225 ай бұрын
I loved this reaction video so much I subbed you guys!!!!! It was an ok movie but the reaction video was WAY BETTER!!!👍👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
@DannyUnchained7 ай бұрын
There is a 4 hour director's cut coming next month
@Ay3shizzle7 ай бұрын
Hopefully that justifies the film more better
@chefskiss61797 ай бұрын
As much as I didn't want to, I stopped watching this version about half way through when it kept occurring to me just how much 'in-between' scenes must have been cut for this to appear like a best-of/highlights reel. I'm really hoping to be literally shocked at how 'fluid' it ends up being in the extended cut. In the meantime the wait is killing me 😂
@chaost45447 ай бұрын
Sounds like another "Kingdom of Heaven" situation.
@tinmanbrigade73047 ай бұрын
I'm not necessarily looking forward to it on a script level. Yes there are more than likely a lot of scenes that were cut that would probably explain some more context, but in the end, I didn't enjoy this movie at a basic script level. The writing, in my own opinion was bad. So if the four hour cut is going to be the same script, but more, I'm not sure if it will be any better of a story.
@ObsessiveGeek7 ай бұрын
@@tinmanbrigade7304Agree typically scenes cut from the theatrical version are done to keep the pacing smoother as well as anything that feels out of place with the overall theme of the movie so I seriously doubt any of that will improve the experience.
@catcherinthesky41067 ай бұрын
'An unfortunate series of events' would've been a better titel. Alas, it was already taken.
@pepboblox8366Ай бұрын
i like the part where napoleons soldiers Just clear the way of the people who trying to kill him
@user-dz2cs1nl2j7 ай бұрын
Hello why did i think this movie would be really short with BO
@chocolate-teapot5 ай бұрын
I heard in one of his letters to Josephine he said "I'm coming home, don't wash" Napoleon was nasty.
@jaygraceffo22987 ай бұрын
I got to think...so they lost 3 million. Between them Russia. Then world War 1 and 2 and Vietnam and Korea. And all the other wars we got going on currently we still keep growing as a species. Its insane
@ellingtonGaming6 ай бұрын
Marie Antionette does get a LITTLE bit of a bad rap, but the French Monarchy was WAYYYYY out of touch and had been for years which is what led to the Revolution (obviously theres a lot that goes into this)
@SebastianAceFawkes7 ай бұрын
You Guys have gotta Watch 'The Bear' It's Fucking Great
@erwinwharton38376 ай бұрын
Your remark about the poor horses is interesting for Europe to this day has not recovered its horse population due to the loses of the napoleonic wars
@HK7Roiz4 ай бұрын
I found it amazing, and it baffles me that Americans know shit about a worldwide historical event and character like Napoleon that most of us learn about in junior high, even when The French used the American Declaration of Independence as a template when drafting the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen in 1789 and he massively changed history, politics and economy forever for everyone.
@davidfrost9017 ай бұрын
Looks like the (The Duelist) times a million. I'll wait patiently to see the 4 Hr cut.
@Proudtman6 ай бұрын
I actually really like this movie! I also really like Joaquin Phoenix in this
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
That movie is what made me learn about the history of Napoleon Bonaparte despite all of the historical inaccuracies. I wish it was done right and directed by a French director instead of Scott.
@Proudtman2 ай бұрын
@@StephenLuke Definitely should have been accurate and directed by someone French
@StephenLuke2 ай бұрын
@@Proudtman Yes! A French director who knows very well about the history of Napoleon Bonaparte and other events that happened in France from the French Revolution to the Battle of Waterloo. 🇫🇷🇫🇷🇫🇷
@LaytonEversaul7 ай бұрын
This definitely plays like a movie made in the edit.
@kryzieg7 ай бұрын
Apparently it wasn't really historically correct according to reviews from historians ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@jsclaim2game747 ай бұрын
If you look at this as a standard action film: It’s a really good time If your someone like me who is studying history in college and has studied significant parts of napoleon’s life: It’s slightly more…. Questionable
@MMircea6 ай бұрын
Why not build a blockbuster winner script out of Napoleon's real life when you can just make stuff up and waste everyone's time. Cheers Ridley Scott
@JosephDutra7 ай бұрын
Does anybody know what they’re singing during the survivor’s ball performance?
@thenerdywave20077 ай бұрын
Great Reaction Greg and John! This movie was ok and Mid! 👍
@Waterford19927 ай бұрын
The 3 million people that died were not all French as they were a small percentage of that number
@stephenmoney47227 ай бұрын
Greg was really really weird in this video
@geoafe667 ай бұрын
Surprised people think it’s “the worst movie ever” I think it’s ok but I’ve definitely seen worse movies lol
@bcn1gh7h4wk7 ай бұрын
28:50 probably the best scene in the movie. out of the rough 20 billion people that have existed in this planet since that time, show me even a handful who had spent *A WHOLE NIGHT* with their lovers, doing nothing but *TALKING* things through, with an open heart. one, here.... anyone else? show of hands? no? keep paying for therapists and counselors then.
@Crazeyd0g7 ай бұрын
Did you guys realise that after the baby was born it was the execution of the mother you could hear in the background?! I thought for sure that would be your biggest reaction of anything in the movie...
@sebastianplenkers20937 ай бұрын
Was that before or after the 101 gun-salute for the birth of their son? And how was it possible for Marie-Louise to survive her son by 15 years?
@Crazeyd0g7 ай бұрын
@@sebastianplenkers2093 Is that what it was? I thought I definitely heard screaming before the gunshots. I don't know how long she lived in real life. In the movie it looked like the reason for the Russians turning against France.
@sebastianplenkers20937 ай бұрын
Yes, it sure seemed that way due to the “disconnected” story-telling. But Marie-Louise returned safely to Austria after Napoleon was exiled.
@Crazeyd0g7 ай бұрын
@@sebastianplenkers2093 Well i missed that info. Thanks for the clarification!
@JoeWedgwood-ik9zo5 ай бұрын
@@Crazeyd0gread a book mate. Even a wiki will do tbh
@stephenmarley72814 ай бұрын
The reaction, with moronic memes, is almost as bad as the film.
@avengersassemble14587 ай бұрын
Even Gladiator was a more historical film than this (even though it's not a true story).
@codym63257 ай бұрын
Its so sad they reduced one of the greatest military leaders in history to a horny child. The cinematography is fantastic but the history is disgraceful
@dandanthesuitman60137 ай бұрын
Still going through your fun reaction, but you've kind of hit my issue: This is a very, very long movie where stuff just happens. None of it matters, relates, or tells a story, it just occurs. Also, sweet mercy does this movie have no idea about history. Just truly, really kills me.
@b-0495 ай бұрын
I’m literally him
@romanvincentjusay44647 ай бұрын
You guys should watch Waterloo (1970) as a palate cleanser. Before CGI and Hollywoodized scenes, Waterloo is even better than this disappointment.
@parsman99147 ай бұрын
Also, the Napoleon miniseries (2002)
@MoleyRusselsWart_7 ай бұрын
It’s dull as dishwater though
@EleventhCubFan7 ай бұрын
The second best movie about a guy named Napoleon
@slurpee237 ай бұрын
You guys should react to Alice in Borderland
@ellingtonGaming6 ай бұрын
I think this movie was badly represented in the Trailer and teasers. They give you the belief this is going to be a Grand Epic but it was really more focused specifically on Napoleon and Josephine. A lot of research was done into the letters from Napoleon to Josephine over the years which there are thousands of. I still was pretty disappointed in the movie as a whole... but maybe the 4hr directors cut will be better lol
@boomieboo7 ай бұрын
This movie seems like a highlight reel or cliffnotes version of Napoleon's journey that woudl've been more desired to see. Strange storytelling choice. Has Ridely lost it? Thanks for being honest as always Greg.