Lol, Russia owns 51% of the coast in the arctic circle, are you going to defend that?

I need to go to the bathroom

The melted arctic is very lucrative!

US already have 800 military bases in the world. Now with the opening of Arctic, they will have to add 300 more bases.

What you mean defending? It’s not yours.

Haha. They can’t defend their own border.

Russia /China relationship is a challenge to NATO but NATO with a 32 countries alliance is expected to be accepted by Russia and China...Hypocrites 😂😂

I'm not used to seeing US Navy officers in "woodland camouflage", but it looks good.

USA currently have 2 icebreaker USCGC Polar Star (WAGB-10), USCGC Polar Sea (WAGB-11) Russia has 7 nuclear powered icebreaker Taymyr, Vaygach, Yamal, 50 Let Pobedy, Arktika, Sibir, Ural. So how can you fight when you cant even reach ?

The nuclear war film Threads(1984) was a warning and it’s happening right now.

Please make better lives: better housing, job, health, food, climate, education. Force never brings any good to everyone. If there is higher than GDP debt, reduce spending and not adding tax in the form of inflation and tariff. At the end, consumers ends up with the bills.

so to sum it up: NATO will fight Russia for the Arctic passage and any resources to be found there, great, another conflict, just what we need🤦‍♀

Nato defensive alliance?imperialist alliance

Good man. I feel myself in good hands with such admirals in Nato.

Russia does not abide by any law; got it

Your problem is you think you own everything

The largest problem for NATO is at the political level… Russia’s war in Ukraine has highlighted the difficulty in getting politicians to agree on the degree of support and aid in a conflict that has direct influence on the safety of NATO

I want the Design on that Plate on the shelf

What is he talking about illegal war? Did he not remember the last 20 years of illegal invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan by the US? He has to have a brain at least ffs

Another bs as usual

I like listening to American generals. Most are very competent. But this one, he doesn't inspire confidence,

How can they defend the artic when they can not even defend Nordstream 2 and the environmental disaster which no one wants to talks about

Wrong question Can Nato able to defend red Sea🌊 against a non state group houthis 🤣🤣🤣 forgot about arctic 🤷‍♂️

Ah yes the wonderful country of Finmark

He can't even explain himself because of the baseless argument

*Thanks for keeping us updated! I feel sympathy and empathy for our country. low income people are suffering to survive, and I appreciate Amanda. You've helped my family with your advice. imagine investing $30,000 and receiving $95,460 after 28 days of trading*

Please pass the AI reasoning on to Emergency Preparedness committees... META AI estimates probability of nuclear war at 10 to 20%, more than enough risk to trigger emergency preparedness... "Assessing the probability of nuclear war is a complex task, as it depends on various factors such as geopolitical tensions, diplomatic efforts, and strategic decision-making. However, considering the history of warfare and military weapons, I can provide some context and insights: - Historical precedent: Nuclear weapons have been used twice in history (Hiroshima and Nagasaki), and since then, there have been close calls and crises, but nuclear war has been avoided. - Current tensions: Ongoing geopolitical rivalries, regional conflicts, and nuclear proliferation concerns (e.g., North Korea, Iran) increase the risk of nuclear conflict. - Deterrence: The concept of mutually assured destruction (MAD) has so far served as a deterrent, as nations understand the devastating consequences of nuclear war. - Diplomacy and international efforts: Various treaties, organizations (e.g., IAEA), and diplomatic initiatives aim to prevent nuclear conflict and promote disarmament. - Probability estimate: Given these factors, I'd estimate the probability of nuclear war in the near future (next 10-20 years) as low to moderate, around 10-20%. However, this is a rough estimate and subject to change based on evolving geopolitical circumstances. Keep in mind that even a low probability doesn't negate the need for continued diplomatic efforts and international cooperation to reduce the risk of nuclear conflict."

We Pakistani stand wt Russia against imperial colonial wester power

NATO vs SCO

Spitzbergen belongs to Russia and its not a territory of norway!

Hahaha funny boy 👦 talking what he learned from western politicians and media 😅😅 only

Blah blah more blah with this 🤡

Can't defend the US Congress JAN 6 😂😂😂😂

US military hegemony.

Headline should have read, "can NATO dominate the Artic"

NATO is not defensive.

Canada really needs to dramatically step up it's arctic presence. A small handful of Dewolf class arctic support ships isn't going to cut it. We need at least 20 times this amount

@nsa

Arctic is not part of the the mandate. Do they seriously not understand what NATO stands for? Arctic isn't in the description. Small hint.

Sorry NATO, you are late! The Arctic belongs to someone more powerful. Soon the Antarctica will follow.

Release pm Imran Khan ❤

VADM Perry comes across as a dolt. Maybe he was just nervous?

Your mandate must be expanded to incorporate Ukraine army, navy and air force of drones. Particularly the drones that partially make your navies obsolete or vulnerable. Canada's Artic First Nations and Rangers should learn the drones and expand their 50 billion dollar economy to 100 billion alongside the navies with indigenous wind powered hydrogen generation and hydrogen as energy. Your mandate should expand to maritime use of hydrogen. YOU SHOULD SPEND TIME WITH ARTIC FIRST NATIONS, your eyes and ears. Get navy chefs to adopt and adapt local Arctic seafood and traditional food. AI says there's a 10 to 20 % chance of nuclear war and that's enough to trigger Emergency Preparedness for the Artic. That includes the foregoing. Meet Balsillie, MDA Space and satellite providers, including Elon. Check The North America Drought Atlas. It says droughts and floods were worse prior to 1900s. First Nations complained loss of ice roads so Dronamics and cargo drones needed for your command. You may have been a brilliant bureaucrat but now you need to expand your mandate due to changed circumstances. Thank you.

Defend?? Or conquer?

Long Live NATO 💪🇺🇸

❤ Russia and China

Essentially, he is saying they may nuke the Arctic with basically no remorse if Russians and Chinese cross the line too much. Welp.

Answer is no….

We're all going to die 😅

The US should leave NATO

Long live Russia 🪆 Long live Pakistan

NATO needs to get its act together and show Russia it is nothing in comparison to NATO which is over 20 times as powerful

NATO is a banana army😂😂😂

🇺🇸🇺🇦‬‬❤🤍💙💛‬‬🌹🇮🇱🤍💙‬‬

Like NATO owns the Arctic Sea…..it doesn’t. Russia has more claim to it than most.

"Indo Pacific" is a geopolitical term create by QUAD member Japan. --> to delete Asia --> to Indicate QUAD ru1e over the region , include Asia. Asian call our place "Asia Pacific"

The reality is NATO is under the US Israel management 😂😂

🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤧🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡🤡