😊😊😊 have 😊😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅i😅i😅😅

Ii😅😅😅

and more hostile will they be.

@@matswessling6600llama op p n p😅😊p

@@matswessling6600 oh honey we know, how much you guys hate us, so we have to prepare ourselves

🇦🇴 ☝🏻 🕋 ☝🏻 🇦🇴

Believing won't lead anywhere

@@disbelieve6006 what do you suggest?

@@Just_logic I suggest you should study false belief like Islam more and not be ignorant towards Islam critics

@@disbelieve6006 how did you figure I am ignorant toward critiques? And how is that related to my initial comment? What is your opinion about the concept “belief”.?

@@disbelieve6006 what happened? You are quiet all of a sudden.

Wdym ?

@@sliceofzura deaf ,dumb and blind will never return to path.

But then students will learn and that's not good for an obedient consumer.

The atheists and secularists do not want to allow it.

Do you mean evolution and creationism? They aren’t both taught because one is an observable fact and the other is fairy tale bulls@@t. We shouldn’t give time or credence to baseless pseudoscience.

@@ObiJohnKenobi22 There are lots of criticisms to evolution as presented in academia as "facts". It's been exposed how different things are discussed behind closed doors than what is presented as "scientific fact". James Tour has something to say about that for example.

@@ObiJohnKenobi22 Also, modern Western education is heavily based in Marxism and atheism. It's very biased.

شتان بينه وبين المهرجين اللي انت ذكرتهم

@@reflectingsoul6704 لا يعرفون شيئًا عن المنطق أو العلم. هيثم طلعت كلامه كله مغالطات منطقية، وإياد قنيبي يرتكب مغالطات أيضًا في نقده للتطور. أما دانييل فيستند إلى دراسات علمية ولا يرتكب مغالطات منطقية، فيستطيع أن يستند إلى أرضية مشتركة بين المؤمن وغير المؤمن للتحاجج عليها.

@@reflectingsoul6704 هيثم طلعت يربط بين الداروينية الاجتماعية والإجهاض مثلًا في أحد ڤيديواته، ولا علاقة بين هذا وذاك؛ مجرد ربط عشوائي. في ڤيديو آخر أنكر أن أحد من المسلمين قال أن السماء خلقت قبل الأرض، رغم أن هذا موجود في التفاسير وقال به ابن عباس. إنه يكذب عمدًا ويستغفل متابعيه بدلًا من أن يخطيء التفاسير القديمة. إياد قنيبي ينتقد التشابه التشريحي كدليل على التطور، لكن هذا الدليل من أضعف الأدلة، وهناك أدلة أخرى أقوى تركها أو تناساها.

brother, is there an english translation of 40 errors in evolution book? do you know where can we download it from?

ليته رجع للتعريف الشامل الدقيق كما يوضحه الدكتور إياد القنيبي في سلسلة رحلة اليقين

لكلمة science

Subhan'Allah

and all because Christianity doesn't make sense

This is too easy of a statement. Allah takes many times His creation as a witness to his power. This is the way Ibrahim ( as ) forsook what his family taught him and went to look for the True God and found him. By looking at the creation. Now don't get me wrong, it's hard to justify half of what's currently happening with science but rebuking it is also the wrong path. There are many things that we don't understand, and understanding them can make you closer to Allah if you approach them with the right contemplative mindset.

Well, the fossil record directly contradicts Islam, since it leaves no room for Adam ever existing. The funny thing is that evolution doesn't contradict god, but more precisely, religions who claim that humans were created somehow separately from other animals. And while you are correct that scientific consensus changes, however some things will hardly change. If we discover a way to solve the P=NP problem, we would have a new consensus in math, however that 3+3=6 won't suddenly change, and unlikely ever will. The same applies to our current understanding of human evolution. The only thing which would challenge that is if suddenly people start thinking that human fossils and of related species where wrongly categorized. This is the only thing, which is really unlikely considering we a have several thousands of fossils.

science does change. Further and further from Islam and nearer and nearer the truth.

@@matswessling6600your just a fool

@ahmad hanbal no it doesn't, it's knowledge. Does believing in other religions as Muslim against Islam? Yes. Does Muslim learning about other religions is haram? No. The purpose of this education is for Muslims not to be mislead by their ignorance of evolution. Like i said *current* working model. By educating ourselves about it we can know exactly what's wrong with it .

The basics that you teach kids are continuously the same however

No thanks I don't want to study this BS in my country

@@salplayer9198 I agree with you. We need to know about Christianity and polytheism as well. As they're also against Islam, so that we make our kids aware of delusion

You do understand that a big majority of what he says is not even supported by his own sources? So yes, if you want to deceive people, then probably yes. But if people actually dig deeper, it quite apparent that he has either no clue or he is actively deceiving.

@@wothinit is supported with sources. Tell me which points are not supported by evidence

@FreePallestine quite a while ago since I watched this video. But AFAIK, he relies on the audience to be ignorant what the view on evolution is I scientific circles. He tackles strawmen and not actual arguments. He quotes authors but those authors wouldn't even agree with him

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

وعليكم السلام ورحمة الله وبركاته

what's the name of this syeikh's youtube channel?

Dr Eyad Qunaibi i assume, he uploaded a series about the fallacies in regards to the arguments for the theory of evolution. One of the best series i have found online on that matter.

@@dewyahyabore5981 It's the best I have ever seen about the topic. It's actually in the process of being translated in English now - I think they're almost done translating it. What other great videos about the topic do you recommend since that series is one of the best you've seen and not actually the best?

@@Overfloater777 Daniel and Dr. Eyad are connected.

They do back them up I think you simply need to read the quran and sunnah and actually reflect on what you actually know There are many ways of figuring it out, but each way requires at least some knoeledge of Islam You need to educate yourself by yourself of what you actually know and UNDERSTAND about Islam, Science and the history of both Also liberalism

I do not wish to debate with you, but you can not be agnostic and a Muslim at the same time. Being a Muslim literally means to adhere to the 5 Pillars of Islam, of submission to God and one of those is to say the Shahada with conviction. If you do not believe in Allah and the Prophet being his messanger, and if you doubt the message he has revealed (the Qu'ran), then you cannot be called a Muslim.

Hey wanna have a conversation?

Yeah this will unlikely happen. Because honest debate with (non-Muslim) experts would convince too many Muslims to start questioning Islam. I'm an atheist, not a Muslim, however I GENUINELY try to find good evidence that Islam is true (and other religions, but I mostly focus on Islam because they seem the most adamant about that), because I'm a person who likes to have my views challenged. (PS: I do mean objective evidence, not personal anecdotes or qur'an verses) It's even hard to simply find Islam scholars who don't simply quote from the Qur'an to show evidence (which is circular reasoning). And if one finds them, it's always the same old story. Either those Islam scholars heavily misrepresent the sciences, for example evolution or astronomy OR they do what Daniel did here. They use many buzz words why the current understanding of evolution (or a certain scientific understanding which contradicts the Qur'an) might be not as concrete as claimed to be, but they never actually give concrete arguments how it is wrong. It is always this "yeah, but maybe the scientific consensus changes in the future". Sure could be, and if it changes in the future they certainly will give a tons more evidences as to why this consensus change happened, compared to what those Islam scholars do. Just let's take human abiogenesis, as Daniel calls it. Our massive amount of fossil records in regards to humans and other apes, is so massive that there simply is no room for human abiogenesis. We have thousands of fossils, every fossil changes a little bit over those hundreds of thousands of years and the farther back one goes the more similar they become roughly speaking. If for some reason we would have societal amnesia of how human skeletons look like, Muslims would have no problem categorizing those fossils into the tree of life with other animals (note as you might now, many Muslims don't have a fundamental disagreement with evolution, but mostly the part which connects humans to the other species). This alone refutes the possibility of Adam existing, and because of how Islam is structured this also refutes all of Islam.

@@wothin Questioning Islam is not an issue. Questioning something is a part of our ability to think critically. Since you wrote such a long comment and claimed to be GENUINE, I'll respond. You try to find evidence that Islam is the true religion but you don't even believe in God. If you don't believe in God then the question which religion is the true religion is completely irrelevant. You first need to think about the existence of God and only AFTER you concluded that there is a creator of the universe you should search for the most logical religion. Searching for the true religion when you are not even sure about the existence of God is like thinking about which scientific theory is the correct one when you aren't even sure whether science is a correct method to understand the world. You need to ask yourself the correct questions and start with the fundamental questions. The fundamental question in this case is the question whether God exists. This is where you should start. You say you need evidence to believe in something. But you don't need evidence for everything. You can conclude certain things based on reason without evidence. Btw the fact that the universe has a design and patterns quite similar to how humans design things is in itself observable evidence for the existence of a concious being that created the universe. Just because you and other atheists keep on repeating that there is no evidence doesn't mean there is no evidence. There is clear evidence for someone that is open for the evidence and the option that God exists. How do you account for the fact that the universe appears to have a design and patterns in a similar way that humans create things? Atheists often claim that the design argument has been refuted which is just a blatant lie. It has absolutely never been refuted. You can't just say it just is or it's just a coincidence. That's not an answer. There are only 3 explanations: - A concious being - Coincidence - physical necessity, which basically means it just is the way it is, no further explanation needed. The only reasonable option is a concious being. But you might claim that there is a chance that it is not created. Well yeah but there is also a chance that dogs can understand the human language but they just act as if they don't understand it. There is also a chance that you are talking to an alien that looks like a human right now. There is simply nothing that can be proven with a 100% certainty except for things that are based on the law of non-contradiction. But we still give preference to the most plausible explanation. So we need to be consistent when it comes to God as well. We can't just make an exception when it comes to God just because we don't like it. You mentioned evolution. I interpret the Quran literally and there is no contradiction between evolution and Islam. let me explain. You correctly pointed out that muslims usually don't deny evolution when it comes to other organisms apart from humans since the Quran doesn't mention anything about them. The contradiction with science is human evolution the way science describes it. Now I don't deny evolution of humans nor do I deny the creation of Adam AS and Eve. The thing is science is a practical method to understand the reality but it is based on a presupposed assumption that is naturalism. Science presupposes for practical purposes that everything in the past happened according to natural laws, but that's just an assumption and there is no evidence for that. Clearly you don't have a problem accepting this baseless assumption. We as muslims acknowledge that science is a brilliant method to get knowledge but not the only method. We also acknowledge that science has limitations and is based on the assumption of naturalism which cannot be proven. We say science is just an approximation of the total reality. It has the problem of induction. It does not describe the reality fully. So for us not everything has to be in line with science because for us there are 2 foundations for our knowledge, science and the Word of God. The interpretation of the scientific data can be wrong the same way how the interpretation of the religious texts can be wrong. Ultimately science is just an interpretation of the scientific data based on naturalism. If the thesis is that God created humans and the antithesis is that evolution happened, then the synthesis is that God created humans through evolution in which he was involved in a supernatural way. Now how do I reconcile it with the literal interpretation of the Quran? It could be the case that God created Adam and Eve based on existing DNA of an evolved homo sapiens that lived at that time and used that DNA to create Adam and Eve in a supernatural way. If that is the case then we would still have the exact same scientific data but we would never be able to derive that God used the DNA of an existing species to create Adam based on scientific principles because science presupposes naturalism. The atheist needs to prove how he can know that the whole process of evolution happened in a natural way. It could be the case that God would create life through evolution and that he would create new species based on existing DNA of a species that lives at that time, so that he would be involved in the process of evolution in a supernatural way. So I don't deny evolution based on natural selection and gentic drift and other natural mechanisms, I'm just adding one more supernatural mechanism to it which is God. So if an atheist has any objections to this then he needs to provide the evidence for how he knows that the process of evolution happened completely according to natural laws without any intervention of a supernatural God. Otherwise evolution doesn't undermine the literal interpretation of the Quran nor does it refute Islam.

It means Seeker of Truth

haqiqatjou = truth Searcher

@@OmeroBello_ what language is it?

@@peachy7586 probably Persian. Daniel parents are from Iran.

it means "truther"

بسام الجرار أحطأ في تفسيره وقال بما يقل به أحد من السلف وعلماء الامة الثقات

​@@raghebalkayyali6609 بسام جرار (أخطأ), الصحيح أن تقول (خالف), استعمالك لكلمة (أخطأ) يجبرك على تقديم الدليل, قولك (السلف لم يقولوا بهذا)! هذا ليس بدليل, هذا رمي بالكلام على السلف. ▓1▓ قد رد عليك السلف أنفسهم, قال شيخ الإسلام ابن تيمية رحمه الله : "ليس من شرط أولياء الله المتقين ألا يكونوا مخطئين في بعض الأشياء خطأ مغفورًا لهم، بل ليس من شرطهم ترك الصغائر مطلقا, بل ليس من شرطهم ترك الكبائر أو الكفر الذي تعقبه توبة" و معلوم من الدين بالضرورة, أن الخطأ صفة ملازمة للبشر لا ينجو منه أحد إلا من عصمه الله من الأنبياء. ▓2▓ لا يوجد في القرآن ولا في السنة ما ينفي التطور كمبدئ, كل ما لدينا هو تأويلات مبنية على آراء وليس على نصوص صريحة.. ▓3▓ لا تتبع قول السلف, بل اتبع منهجهم. ولا تستهين بقولك, و انتبه أن تقول على الله الكذب, ولا تقف ما ليس لك به علم, فالسلف لن يغنوا عنك من الحق شيئا, فإن تبين لهم الحق لرجعوا عن الباطل ولأعلنوا توبتهم, وستحمل إثم اتباعك لهم مغمض العينين. وَإِذَا قِيلَ لَهُمُ اتَّبِعُوا مَا أَنزَلَ اللَّهُ قَالُوا بَلْ نَتَّبِعُ مَا أَلْفَيْنَا عَلَيْهِ آبَاءَنَا ۗ

بسام جرار لو تطلب منه يحكي بالذره ما عنده مشكله، فاتح ديوانيه و يتكلم في ما هب و دب و قليل الذكر للايات و الاحاديث، انا بنصحك بهذا الموضوع تحضر لعلماء مسلمين تناولو الموضوع بطريقة علميه ايمانيه متميزه أمثال د. هيثم طلعت و د. إياد القنيبي، و الباحثون المسلمون، و غيرهم من المتخصصين في نقد الالحاد

@@alial_hassanal_khashashneh3728 (بسام جرار يتكلم في ما هب ودب.. و قليل الذكر للايات و الاحاديث!!) اللهم صبرا.. 😁 على أي, لربا لم يصلك ماقاله من تنصحني بسماعه إياد قنابي عن الشيخ بسام من ثناء, إياد قنابي مدخله الأخطاء العلمية في نظرية التطور (الداروينية), وتوضيف بعض علماء الأحياء لها في نشر الإلحاد, بزعمهم أن الإنتقاء أعمى ولا حاجة للإله.. الشيخ بسام مدخله فقهي بحت, وحججه بالغة, إن كان لديك إعتراض على ما تقدم به, أنعم علينا بما وهبك العليم من علم.. وكي لا يكون الكلام عاما, في ما يلي الخلاصة كي يسهل عليك الرد: 1 - وَمَنْ أَظْلَمُ مِمَّن ذُكِّرَ بِآيَاتِ رَبِّهِ فَأَعْرَضَ عَنْهَا 2 - قُلْ سِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَانظُرُوا كَيْفَ بَدَأَ الْخَلْقَ (الله سبحانه يقول للخق (بداية) ابحثوا عنها) 3 - وَبَدَأَ خَلْقَ الْإِنسَانِ مِن طِينٍ (7) ثُمَّ جَعَلَ نَسْلَهُ مِن سُلَالَةٍ مِّن مَّاءٍ مَّهِينٍ (8) ثُمَّ سَوَّاهُ وَنَفَخَ فِيهِ مِن رُّوحِهِ (مرحلة الخلق والتناسل والتسوية ذُكِرت قبل النفخ) 4 - إِن يَشَأْ يُذْهِبْكُمْ وَيَسْتَخْلِفْ مِن بَعْدِكُم مَّا يَشَاءُ كَمَا أَنشَأَكُم مِّن ذُرِّيَّةِ قَوْمٍ آخَرِينَ (سياق الأية عن البشر, جرير الطبري أدرك المعنى, الله يخبرنا أنه قادر أن يستخلف من بعد البشر ما يشاء, كما أنشأنا من ذرية قوم اخرين) 5 - وَاللَّهُ أَنبَتَكُم مِّنَ الْأَرْضِ نَبَاتًا 6 - إِنَّ مَثَلَ عِيسَى عِنْدَ اللَّهِ كَمَثَلِ آدَمَ خَلَقَهُ مِنْ تُرَابٍ ثُمَّ قَالَ لَهُ كُنْ فَيَكُونُ

Midwits

racist pig. go back to killing native americans

Yes....He has hands......But we Don't know how Does it look like.....

@@iftakerahmmed5810 Astaghfirullah, saying Allah Almighty has hands already gives you an image of what it looks like in your mind. If you are Muslim, you need to repent brother because what you said is shirk.

@@fundamentalsiege we believe what the Quran and Hadith says without asking "how" or imagining.

what are you on about? show me where in the Qur'an where it says that? and on the hadith part, not all hadith is authentic. If hadith contradicts The Qur'an and Authentic Sunnah then you can say "how" because its not real. وَلَمْ يَكُن لَّهُ كُفُوًا أَحَدٌ - 112:4 Nor is there to Him any equivalent. Allah is Unique, there is no one like Him. end of story.

@@fundamentalsiege 5:64 وَ قَالَتِ الۡیَہُوۡدُ یَدُ اللّٰہِ مَغۡلُوۡلَۃٌ ؕ غُلَّتۡ اَیۡدِیۡہِمۡ وَ لُعِنُوۡا بِمَا قَالُوۡا ۘ بَلۡ یَدٰہُ مَبۡسُوۡطَتٰنِ ۙ یُنۡفِقُ کَیۡفَ یَشَآءُ ؕ وَ لَیَزِیۡدَنَّ کَثِیۡرًا مِّنۡہُمۡ مَّاۤ اُنۡزِلَ اِلَیۡکَ مِنۡ رَّبِّکَ طُغۡیَانًا وَّ کُفۡرًا ؕ وَ اَلۡقَیۡنَا بَیۡنَہُمُ الۡعَدَاوَۃَ وَ الۡبَغۡضَآءَ اِلٰی یَوۡمِ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ ؕ کُلَّمَاۤ اَوۡقَدُوۡا نَارًا لِّلۡحَرۡبِ اَطۡفَاَہَا اللّٰہُ ۙ وَ یَسۡعَوۡنَ فِی الۡاَرۡضِ فَسَادًا ؕ وَ اللّٰہُ لَا یُحِبُّ الۡمُفۡسِدِیۡنَ ﴿۶۴﴾ English - Abdul Haleem The Jews have said, ‘God is tight-fisted,’ but it is they who are tight-fisted, and they are rejected for what they have said. Truly, God’s hands are open wide: He gives as He pleases. What has been sent down to you from your Lord is sure to increase insolence and defiance in many of them. We have sown enmity and hatred amongst them till the Day of Resurrection. Whenever they kindle the fire of war, God will put it out. They try to spread corruption in the land, but God does not love those who corrupt. 39:67 وَ مَا قَدَرُوا اللّٰہَ حَقَّ قَدۡرِہٖ ٭ۖ وَ الۡاَرۡضُ جَمِیۡعًا قَبۡضَتُہٗ یَوۡمَ الۡقِیٰمَۃِ وَ السَّمٰوٰتُ مَطۡوِیّٰتٌۢ بِیَمِیۡنِہٖ ؕ سُبۡحٰنَہٗ وَ تَعٰلٰی عَمَّا یُشۡرِکُوۡنَ ﴿۶۷﴾ English - Abdul Haleem These people have no grasp of God’s true measure. On the Day of Resurrection, the whole earth will be in His grip. The heavens will be rolled up in His right hand- Glory be to Him! He is far above the partners they ascribe to Him!- 67:1 تَبٰرَکَ الَّذِیۡ بِیَدِہِ الۡمُلۡکُ ۫ وَ ہُوَ عَلٰی کُلِّ شَیۡءٍ قَدِیۡرُۨ ۙ﴿۱﴾ English - Abdul Haleem Exalted is He who holds all control in His hands; who has power over all things; As all the creatures legs and hands are not the same,Allah's hands will not be the same.He has hands Can't comprehensible for our minds...

Doesn't explains his argument of moths tho man..

Which one

Mutations don’t need to be strictly positive, they just need to help an organism survive better in their environment to be selected for.

@@ObiJohnKenobi22 yes but there are more into that, that we don't know, I mean a long nick, and an advantage (long nick) can't be used to justify the theory when it has its disadvantage.. nor it explain why the diversity, why didn't other animals in the desert develop for example longer necks to reach the canopy of the the extremely rare trees available etc.. this is just one example.

@Arianit Krasniqi does telling yourself these lies really comfort you?

@Arianit Krasniqi you really, really want to believe that scientists / atheists are abandoning evolution, don't you? It's adorable

If a Muslim truly believes in the Word of Allah as revealed in the Quran, and what His messenger said, then his faith will not be shaken by what any non Muslim has to say about the origins of humanity and life in earth which contradict Islam.

​@@mukalal2160 Eh, he doesn't really have to listen to or believe anyone in particular - the evidence that one can look up themselves is puzzling enough to make many reconsider. The only reliable way of avoiding belief in evolution is to never seriously engage with the topic at all.

I mean we believe as a part of being muslims that Allah is going to resurrect us all after death, u can't actually test macro evolution but u can physically prove that anything won't revive after death yet we believe it all. Why doesn't any athiest make a big fuss saying that it is un-scientific. Daniel is right in his approach, science today is mixed with dogmatic beliefs wrapped as the only rational way with a big side of liberalism many of the things are just dogmas that can never actually be tested, therefore out of scope of science. Idk if u are muslim or not but what do u think people were saying when Prophet PBUH told them about heaven and hell and day of jugdement? They asked the same questions as show us if u are truthful. Did HE PBUH demonstrated any miracle publically? No. Then how come it started from one man and now almost 2 billion people believe in him. Islam accepts science as valid but never depends on it, Allah is the one who holds command over everything

It is literally mentioned in the Quran that Allah created Adam as from mud by his hands and breathed his soul in him. If you reject it then you're rejecting the Quran and you are kafir.

@@azertyqwerty5946 As is frequently the case with Muslims, one can cherry pick more or less what one regards as literal and/or metaphorical.

@@wothin That is not his/her claim. They said nothing about it being a metaphor. He/she is saying that it is not even mentioned in the Quran while it is mentioned in the Quran.

If evolution is true, it means Islam is over. All you need to know about evolution is that materialistic atheism is impossible without it. It's not about science. It's about God. You believe in evolution because you don't want to believe in God. That is it. Science can exist without evolution, materialistic atheism cannot.

@@Musa-al-Khwarazmi I believe in God..

What if our religion is true and after death u find urself infront of Allah and he asks u wether u believed in him or not. Then what ?

​@@abdullahmuzaffar2483 Then I would say, you have given me free will and a brain. I used your gift and concluded that you are a tyrant and a really really dumb one. You have presented me with nothing to conclude otherwise. You create horribly written barbaric book, expecting us to believe in you but based on what? On top of that you have little to no value for human life, which is why YOU created insects that can crawl into children's eyes and blind them among many many other atrocities. You don't know how logic or justice works, how can one endure infinite punishment for finite sin especially when you dont even have the decency to at least show yourself so we can believe in you! What we have as humans is our own integrity without that what even are we? If allah wants to punish me because I cant bend the knee or believe in that maniac idiotic tyrant then so be it. Seriously, there is so much I can say about your sorry disgusting fucking cult.

@@YamnayaSintash from how you talk... I think u haven't even read the whole Quran... Read it by yourself first! Search very well for the truth... With honest intention in ur heart. So that when the time come (death) and IT WILL COME! There won't be sorrow and regret for you.

Yeah many scientists disagree with that definition. There is no actual scientific consensus on this issue. It can refer to survival in different environments, could refer to reproduction rate, could refer to population numbers, and many other things. There is no one specific definition

This comment is a proof of A Little learning is dangerous thing.

@@samiulislam4268 exactly. That's also why there are muslims who are against secular education. Since an understanding of the World makes belief in Islam less convincing

@@wothin That's provab is for So called Science Worsipper like you. I think you did not get a single Quote of DH that's the reason you posted such foul comment.

You're the one with the narrow vision and understanding. SMH.

Maybe you didn't here the next line where he says, "And that's my proposal to you."

Go back to making brown muslim tiktoks

Clearly you dont know much science or history Atheists get it wrong all the time. At a point in time they thought the universe was eternal and static And laughed at the Muslims for thinking it had a beginning and expanding Whos laughing now? Not to mention IBN AL HAYTHAM 9TH CENTURY MUSLIM FOUNDER OF SCIENCE, OPTICS AND THE UNBIASED EXPERIMENTATION METHOD

Stop attacking a straw man This is dumb

@@Raul-vs6ff how so? Pikachu says that one must deny any science which contradicts the Quran, which states that humans were created by magic

@@motherofcatfish2772 its a matter of basic logic and epistemological weight. a deductive argument objectively holds more weight than an inductive one (science). you shouldnt give preference to inductive reasoning over deductive.

@@harun3811 aha. So who created your magical god then? Or does god not need to be created? If not, why then does the universe need to have been created?

@@motherofcatfish2772 definition of god is uncaused and uncreated. universe had a beginning.