Done a fair amount of online lsat prep and starting to agree that Kevin is king.
@zachfinemusic Жыл бұрын
Kevin is a legend. Someone’s gotta say it. Loving your channel.
@butterfliesarecool387618 күн бұрын
This was incredibly helpful! Thank you
@babani84185 ай бұрын
my opinion, this guys works are much better than the lsat lab series. I admit that I'm not a smart one, I can't understand fully by watching other videos about assumptions, while he offers these useful techniques and clear mindset that we desperately need.
@schojdfjf649524 күн бұрын
Hey you are smart!! Never doubt yourself, the LSAT is intentionally hard so you’re doing a great job!
@pragaaskaur819722 күн бұрын
Thank you!
@omegaproductions6667 Жыл бұрын
Damn, even after reading the entire logical reasoning bible this still provided some help clearing some things up! Thanks!
@mamaobama7132 Жыл бұрын
Hey Kevin, I've only watched a few of your videos but I just want to say how impressed I am with your explanations. Your explanations often give me that "aha" moment i get from watching kahn academy back in highschool haha
@user-kx7db6wf5u Жыл бұрын
Having watched all your videos uploaded on the youtube, I immediately visited your website and purchased the full GAME lecture. By far, I believe your lecture outperforms all other lectures on youtube and private institution. Thank you so much Kevin for eliciting my confidence towards this test. BTW, if I purshase a private tutoring course on your website, do you consult a private online meeting via special platform, e.g. Zoom, with an appointment?
@LuminateLSAT Жыл бұрын
Thank you! Yes, if you are interested in discussing tutoring, feel free to email me or use the form on my website. We can set up a free consultation first.
@user-kx7db6wf5u Жыл бұрын
@@LuminateLSAT Thank you Kevin :)
@diegolam6118 Жыл бұрын
just saw your jess up moot championship round back from 2010, what a great speaker, calm and composed
@LuminateLSAT Жыл бұрын
Woah, how'd you get a hold of that? Such a long time ago...everybody at the championship tournament was very impressive.
@diegolam6118 Жыл бұрын
@@LuminateLSAT Jess up moot recently uploaded championship round recordings from before, kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sJ1nrbOXmNydmYk.html this is the link to your competition, ive been listening to it when i had free time 😄 learned a lot on how the oralist on how they tackle problems and their confidence is commendable
@r.p.8906 Жыл бұрын
super helpful!!
@lraoux9 ай бұрын
I’m confused about the 2nd example. What is the answer? When I read 4 I thought “Bingo” (and I still think that’s the correct answer), but I suppose that there could be an answer choice, hypothetically, that states “Judges who have negative public perceptions due to taking bribes serve no function in today’s society, and are applauded for resigning when doing so,” then that would be the correct answer (?).
@gedeon8139 ай бұрын
Hi Kevin, wouldn't no. 4 in the second example also be NA since negating it would dismiss one of the premises just like in no. 5?
@LuminateLSAT9 ай бұрын
Not exactly -- if 4. had started with "some" (like 5), then it would be necessary. If 4 had started with some, then the negation would be "No people credibly accused of bribes in connection with their jobs should resign." That negation would make one of the premises completely unsupportive of the conclusion. However, 4 actually starts with "anyone". So the negation of 4 = "Some people who are credibly accuesd of bribes should NOT resign." That does not hurt the argument, because the argument was saying that people who are credibly accused of bribes AND have that accusation damage their public legitimacy should resign. The author is saying that both of those premises together lead to the conclusion. Consider this argument: "Since I'm working overtime and I didn't get a good night's sleep, I will make more mistakes than normal." Is this necessary to the argument: "Anyone who works overtime will make more mistakes than normal." It's not -- the author wasn't saying that all people who work overtime make more mistakes than normal. They were saying all people who work overtime AND didn't get a good night's sleep will make more mistakes than normal. The author's reasoning can acknowledge that people who just worked over time might not make more mistakes than normal -- as long as they got a good night's sleep.
@IsabellaGiampaglia24 күн бұрын
@@LuminateLSAT thank you so much. This trips me up a bit because a common rule I got from Blueprint was that generally, necessary assumptions ARE more broad than sufficient. So when does this rule apply and when does it not?
@r.p.8906 Жыл бұрын
I did not think that 2 is necessary because the only premise supporting the MC is "never be viewed legitimate by the public". I missed this one...🙃