Yes I agree with you but All of this due to India Since it’s independence India destabilizing Nepal All the incidents proved it Maoist civil war helped by India 4 th time blockade in Nepal Nepal can’t use own water all India captured already

@@loktiwari561 Nepali Maoist chose to stay in India during civil war because Chinese side has difficult terrain and geography, and it is tough and expensive to train people and run operations from there. India refrained from overtly supporting the Maoists from 1996 to 2006, the period of the Nepalese Civil War. India was initially concerned about the Maoist insurgency in Nepal because of worries that the fighting would spread to Indian territory and cause instability in the area. India did interact with the Maoists to some degree and afterwards helped to arrange peace negotiations between the Maoists and the Nepalese government. India backed Nepal's eventual transition to a federal democratic republic as well as the peace process. About Blockade : Nepal police killed around 30 Madhesi people during the Madhes Aandolan, a protest against the Nepali government for the injustice done to them under the Nepali constitution. In fact, Madhesi people sat at all Indo-Nepal border entry points, refusing to allow necessary items to enter. India then implemented the embargo in response to Madhesi people's demands. While I agree that Indian leaders may have made mistakes ( and some may have secretly worked on behalf of western deep state or CCP))similar to those they did in India, which is why we lost our land, it is not fair to hold India accountable for all of Nepal's problems.

​@@loktiwari561 typical Nepali bro blaming india for everything.

Here, India and others have played a part. Even previous Indian Foreign secretary Amb. Kanwal Sibbal has said on record that : "India helped the Maoists to come to power in the garb of democracy."

Also : 1.1 KATHMANDU 002366 wiki leaks. On December 3 the Ambassador raised with Indian Ambassador Shyam Saran reports that intelligence agents assigned to the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu have been characterizing USG policy and motives in Nepal as malevolently aimed at undermining Nepal's sovereignty. The Ambassador told Saran that the reports had been passed to us by several Nepali political sources, who claimed to have had such conversations in the recent past with Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agents based at the Indian Embassy. He also briefed Saran about unsubstantiated reports suggesting that some Nepali Maoist women may have received training at a security facility in Dehra Dun in northern India (Ref A). Noting that Nepalis, both within the government and in the opposition, sometimes attempt to play off Indian and American interests, he stressed that the information passed on by these sources had not been verified. He noted that the reports predated the meeting between Nepali Maoists and Communist Party of Nepal - United Marxist Leninist General Secretary Madhav Nepal in Lucknow (Ref B)--an event that has SIPDIS set Nepali nationalists teeth on edge against India. The Ambassador emphasized that he was communicating these concerns to Saran as a friend and ally. 2. (S/NF) Ambassador Saran thanked him and expressed concern, describing the reports as "unfortunate" and not an accurate reflection of official GOI policy--a point confirmed in his recent policy discussions in New Delhi (see para 3). The GOI is committed to ensuring Nepal's stability, he said, adding that he has obtained unprecedented levels of development and security assistance for the kingdom. Nonetheless, sometimes people in different branches of the GOI "go off on their own," he acknowledged, and promised to look into the reports. 3. (S/NF) In a separate meeting on November 30, Saran briefed the Ambassador on the just-concluded policy deliberations in New Delhi. He stressed that his interlocutors had expressed concern about possible spill-over of the insurgency onto Indian territory. According to Saran, Indian Defense Minister George Fernandes told him that "the fight against the Maoists is also India's fight." Saran noted, however, that certain quarters within the GOI had argued that India should maintain contact with the Maoists in order to influence them and to keep open communication channels in the event of a worst-case scenario in which the Maoists ultimately gain power. 4. (S/NF) We cannot discount the possibility that our Nepali sources, many of whom resent India's influence in their country, may have their own motives in conveying to us reports of Indian double-dealing. We have always found Saran professional, collegial, and cooperative, and believe that he does not sanction--and may probably not be aware of--all of RAW's activities in Nepal. His acknowledgement that some in the GOI "go off on their own" and that some advocate maintaining contact and influence with the Maoists is his first admission to us that some elements within his Embassy may be working at cross-purposes to official GOI policy. 1.2 KATHMANDU 001197 wiki leaks. When asked by the Ambassador whether the Maoists had been invited back to New Delhi for consultations, Ambassador Mukherjee said that officials in New Delhi had refused the informal requests for a visit they had received from Maoist chief Pushpa Kamal Dahal (aka Prachanda). According to Mukherjee, Dahal's go-betweens were told by the Indian Embassy that it was not the time for a visit to New Delhi because the Maoists had continued to break their commitments to the peace process. The Maoists had reportedly lamented the fact that they had "lost their former channels" of communication to New Delhi. In response, GOI officials had made it clear that, since the Maoists had entered into the Interim Government, the intelligence community was no longer their conduit. "We are the conduit now," Ambassador Mukherjee noted, referring to his embassy. 1.3 KATHMANDU 002587 wiki leaks: That makes sense: New Delhi godfathered the working relationship between the Maoists and the Parties and doesn't want to acknowledge that it might have created a Frankenstein's monster.

Look what? We are the wrolds largest democracy.

​@@Babumoshai.. What have you achieved for being that compared to CCP.