Praise Jesus! 🌅✝️🌅

Stay Catholic brother, it’s the church founded by Christ

​@@michaelcontreras148 ‭Matthew 23:9 KJV‬ [9] And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven. Yeah, Jesus didn't found that church lol

@@michaelcontreras148 wrong

Nailed it lol pretty sure they wanted to rape the angels in sodom and gomorrah

Amen ✝

So where do Giants and Nephilim come from? Even today, people who see angels say they are 7-9 feet in stature. Also, we don't know what all God did to the Earth which brought about the flood. Scientifically, if there was a much more vast atmosphere it's vast amounts of hydrogen and oxygen as scientists presume, and the continents were closer together as both history and the Bible States before God divided the continents, and if our magnetic field was much stronger, it is totally not outside the realm of possibility that godly Man had an electric resonance which was similar enough to that of angels that they could interact with them. It is scientifically possible that God powered down the core of the Earth to reduce that resonance, electromagnetic field, and gravity which in turn caused such turbulence in the atmosphere as the Earth expanded that the hydrogen and oxygen became mixed, formed water, and literally poured down out of the sky like fountains. Therefore, creating a barrier between humans which now resonate at a lower frequency and the angels which resonate at a higher frequency.

when angels left their environment (angelic) became half human? that would be reasonable

@Nikolai Callum spot on mate!

The book of Job always translates "Sons of God" as Angels in the Old Testament.

@@canadiankewldude Sons is also translated as children in the old testament. Moses told the Israelites that they were the children of God.

I see scripture as the important stuff. Books that aren't i just see as history that goes in deph but is not necessary to know. Kind of like a fun fact

Angelic beings have the ability to slip through dimensions, so when they enter into our dimension they are able to become physical.

They only have human bodies when GOD gives them one. They cannot take one freely.

Yeah you are correct

Also, why and how do angels eat?

Not only did the angels had physical bodies, the men in the city wanted to have relations with them. Not that they were successful. That pretty much destroys his question if angels can take on human form and mate. The bigger problem is anytime you ask a bible question that only uses human intellect to answer, you are not understanding God by the Holy Spirit. He is asking us to lean on our own understanding to interpret the Bible.

@@briangeiger9307 hey bro, now that's an awesome big time observation 🙌🙏

@@briangeiger9307 You are so right!!

Exactly, and still with all of the proof in the Holy Word of God AGAINST this false teaching, many people will still choose to believe this lie!!

@@ToOpen6seven what proof? If anything where there is a "pile" of evidence to support the human claim, there is a mountain of evidence to support that the sons of God in the Old Testament were not human. Here are some Biblical examples. 1. Salvation was not available in the Old Testament. 2. The Spirit was not given to dwell in followers of God until after Christ was glorified. 3. Outside of Adam (man) who was created and not born, no human in the Old Testament is called a son of God. 4. In the Old Testament, no son/s of man/men/mankind are referring to Cainites or unbelievers. 5. The Nephilim who are unclean could not be the offspring of a believer and a nonbeliever. 6. Women are given a word of caution about wearing symbols of authority on them because of the angels. 7. The Hebrew and Greek words for sons of God and daughters of men do not go with the human idea. 8. Calling on the name of the Lord in the Old Testament could not give you salvation. 9. A prophecy cannot come true before it is spoken. 10. The law (first five books of the Bible) are a shadow on the good things to come (the New Testament), not the very things themselves. 11. The Nephilim were not around after the flood. 12. Sacrifices could not wash away sin, only cover sin. 13. Following the law could not bring salvation. 14. Jesus states angels are sons of God and we (believers) will be equal to them. Before Christ's Sacrifice, human followers of God were lower than angels. 15. Cain being the father of the sons and daughters of men and Seth being the father of the sons and daughters of God makes absolutely no sense. 16. Using Cain and Seth to say humans are sons of God in the Old Testament completely neglects Adam and Eve's other children. 17. Sacrifices were used to get right with God in the Old Testament. 18. If salvation was just for the Jews in the Old Testament, then how were there gentiles special to God? 19. Saying the sons of God in the Old Testament are human erases the covenants of God as well as the need for God to send a Priest. 20. People misunderstand the verse Hebrews 1:5 when they use it. 21. Human followers of God can only be adopted children of God because of Christ's Sacrifice. 22. Baptism is also a part of salvation, yet you will never find it in the Old Testament. 23. Angels are not ghosts. They have bodies. 24. Angels have taken human form many times in Scripture. 25. Angels are called spirits in Scripture and God is called the Father of spirits. 26. Angels are called sons of the Mighty in Scripture. 27. Scripture could not be fulfilled if salvation was always available. 28. "the Holy Spirit indicating this, that the way into the Holiest of All was not yet made manifest while the first tabernacle was still standing." 29. No man is justified by the law (Torah, first five books of the Bible) in the sight of God. And if righteousness came from the law, then Christ died in vain. The law is not of faith. If the inheritance is of the law, it is no longer a promise from God. 30. "Before there was faith there was the law" and the law could not give salvation. 31. Jesus states that we (believers) will be equal to the angels, sons of God. Yet how can this be if only humans can be sons of God? Especially since before Christ was glorified, all humans were lower than the angels.

@@tonyf4991 God's has imposed His natural law that all creation reproduces after its own kind and is emphasized 11 times for a reason. Are men and angels the same kind? Hebrews 1:14 says angels are 'ALL' ministering 'spirits', whereas mankind are all mortal flesh... vastly different. ~ John 3:6; “That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit." God is the Creator of ALL life and holds together ALL things, angels cannot independently produce life. It is ridiculous to believe that angels can overrule God and his natural law of reproduction. Also, if angels were able to incarnate and actually become men and then marry women and produce offspring, then that would contradict what Paul says to the Greeks in Athens, namely, that every person that has ever lived came from Adam, totally refuting and debunking the Greek mythology of humans having relations with the gods and producing hybrid offspring such as Hercules. From 'one man' he made ALL the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. Acts 17:26

+holladayministries good brother, thanks be unto God only, and yourself?

+Mark Hunter Some people love the word of God as their only real defense to the lies in this world and some people don't. If you have a particular argument with someone then argue with them, but please don't be here just to accuse about those things vaguely and apply them to those in the other camp. They would do the same if anyone took the blood out of Col 1:14. David himself said, before he fought the giant (or was he just a "great leader" - according to Daniels) is there not a cause.

+Mee “meesphht” Siphht I don't have a "camp" but I've taken note of those that do... :)

+Mark Hunter Yeah well, then sit on the fence. Order some popcorn and boo both teams. What can I say to those who can't handle the meat - drink the milk.

+Mark Hunter Which bible you reading?

Not every human being is a son of God but only a direct creation by him can be and is a son of God. So both angels and humans can be son's of God It goes like this first every angel is a direct creation of God so by nature they are the son's of God but Satan and his minions rebelled that estate and fallen so they are taken not to be son's of God so they are not but Adam is a direct creation of God in his image but he fell too same as Satan so he too got ridden of that estate and every human being followed after the image of Adam not of God so not every human being is a son of God but we Christians being born again in spirit into God by God for God are a new creation directly by God so we are called son's of God So the term son's of God can mean both human and angleic beings and both can be get ridden of that title if they choose so so by nature becoming the vessels of Gods justificatory presence i.e his wrath so that he can show the riches of his grace to the vessels of his good presence i.e son's of God

Their estate is their position & their presence of being within God's good presence. Yes they left that estate but not their given being so by rebellion they and their human counterparts became the vessels of his wrath(god's justificatory presence)so that God can show the riches of his grace to the vessels of his mercy.

And if you read verse 7 it specifically says theybwent after strange flesh is so clear there was something that happened that God was very much opposed to. Good point this has always been a passage that clears up a lot of missunderstandings in the subject.

@@mikeskrib510 that verse 7 speaks clearly about the people of Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities in the plain but not about angels, the people are those who went after strange flesh (maybe animals or their same gender counterparts) but you can clearly see verse 7 is separate from verse 6.

@@chetanpaulr bro is comparing what the angels did with what the people in Sodom and Gomorrah were doing they were going after flesh that was different from their nature IE animals like you said or same sex. The angel compared to this exaple did the same thing went after strange flesh ie human beings. In context 7 is clarifying what was being talked about in 6 just cuz they are separate verses doesnt mean they are not related to the same topic. Is okay like Daniels said you can beleive whatever you want in the end scripture always wins out.

@@mikeskrib510 ok good scripture always wins and I believe it says that every righteous person in those times got mingled with ungodly people and the fallen entities helped them in bringing up the gaints and nepahlim (the fallen ones) and none remained righteous save Noah , so I believe in scriptures where Jesus says angles do not marry or be given in marriage neither they have that potential so I believe angels some how messed up with the gaints genetics indirectly but not directly by mating with women(because they don't have reproductive systems like us do and some people experience of having some sexual experiences through demonic entities and that doesn't prove they have reproductive parts like us, you know they are demons they can decive everyone by having some of us feel by something they don't have) they somehow managed to mess up the genes of those godly men and ungodly women so that's my view even the word GAINTS do not necessarily mean of size but in terms of knowledge and power and brutality yet I believe some may exist in size also and the word NEPAHLIM refers to the fallen entities not necessarily gaints so we should carefully read and understand the overall picture of what happened. SATAN(Allah aka Hubaal) brags about being "the best of decievers" quote by Allah in Islam, so there you go they like anything except the truth

I believe the angels that appeared to Abraham and his nephew were Angels in the similar appearence of humans beings.

The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than you want to imply. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.

It was Fallen Angels that mated with women. I don't know exactly how but I know that's what it means. That is what created the giants

@@AmberDMcClure If you read the text, the giants were ALREADY there!!!

Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, king, messenger

The title 'sons of God' does apply to humans in the Bible: ‘...”You are the sons of the living God.”’ (Hosea 1:10) and ‘”You are the sons of the LORD your God...”’ (Deut. 14:1). Goliath was a giant also, but he has ordinary parents.

@@BRIrwin Except it doesn't say "sons of God" exactly. Note there are extra adjectives ("living", "LORD") in the verses that you quote and if you believe every word is inspired, it indicates a separate group.

Sam Garcia, it does not have to say 'sons of God' exactly. Human languages are not like that. How do you think the two extra words 'the living' alter the meaning in any way? In the NT, Jesus is given the names 'Jesus', 'Christ', 'Lord', 'Jesus Christ', 'Christ Jesus', 'Lord Jesus Christ', etc, but all these names refer to the same person.

@@BRIrwin "Human languages are not like that." Yeah, but the Bible is very specific because it says every word is preserved. "How do you think the two extra words 'the living' alter the meaning in any way?" If you don't believe every word is preserved, then there's no difference. However, the Bible is very clear that each word and each difference, however small, needs to be taken into consideration. (Hebrews 4:12) So, with that in mind: Every instance where "sons of God" appear in those words ONLY and EXACTLY are angels or angelic beings in the Old Testament. Every instance where the phrase has an addition refers to men ONLY. So we see clearly that the Genesis "sons of God" are angels, because we see all others that are exactly said like that are called angels. The only times we see where it diverges is when it talks about men. This is a more literal explanation, and prevents speculation whether these are men or angels, the Bible provides the distinction. " In the NT, Jesus is given the names 'Jesus', 'Christ', 'Lord', 'Jesus Christ', 'Christ Jesus', 'Lord Jesus Christ', etc, but all these names refer to the same person." But it is NOT proven that "sons of God" ONLY refer to ONLY men or ONLY angels. Hence your analogy fails. We have to dig deeper, and the difference in phrasing is what distinguishes them: "sons of God" = angels, "sons of"+(something)+"God" means men.

@@BRIrwin Also this statement "Goliath was a giant also, but he has ordinary parents." is actually not proven anywhere n the Bible. Nowhere in the Bible does it say Goliath had normal parents.

Son's of Seth theory not taught till the 5th century AD...means that everyone before that believed in the Angel theory. Also ask yourself what happens in 5th century? Christianity becomes blended with paganism and to not offend the pagans who worshiped these Nephilim gods...the Catholic church left it out.

Therr are ALREADY giants before the mating is described. "...giants..and then..."

The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than want to admit. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.

You're making a fatal error here. It's not nephilm and giants it's nephilm or Giants Nephilm is the Hebrew word and giants is the English. Giants are not another species they are also Humans.

Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, angel, king, messenger. this is all pretty simple and some how was all corrupted to something it is not with the '' fallen angels'' nonsense. Nephilim is not in KJV or Geneva etc..but if we look at the Hebrew meaning we find using Strongs concordance giant means- נְפִיל nᵉphîyl, nef-eel'; or נְפִל nᵉphil; from H5307; properly, a feller, i.e. a bully or tyrant: meaning -giant. (which is why Geneva, KJV etc put it bluntly - GIANT and not Nephilim..) look up what a feller is gada` gaw-dah' a primitive root; to fell a tree; generally, to destroy anything:--cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), hew down. I can't imagine who started this deception of fallen angels having sex with women but who ever did knew exactly what they were doing to cause confusion and discord in Gods word/people.

Mark 9:50 King James Version 50 Salt is good: but if the salt have lost his saltness, wherewith will ye season it? Have salt in yourselves, and have peace one with another.

Jesus was very disagreeable with the pharisees and saducees and scribes. And being his follower I will do the same.

@@debbiemartin2026 [Totally LOST] scribes and pharisees, that's how I see what IS today's professing "church" leaders and their followers on a world wide scale who lead themselves & their blind followers into the ditch. Sad news: the entire church has lost its savor, good for NOTHING but to be trampled on by men.

@@debbiemartin2026 Don't get hung up by the rapture nonsense.. there is more to life than living in fear that you might not make it. (We are supposed to live in perfect peace and blessed assurance in Christ.) There IS a catching away but we really have no idea when that is, or could the catching away be something that's outside of time and space. Nevertheless, remain simple & unobstructed in your child like faith & walk, and please walk away from the doctrines of men including the rapture doctrine which has many bound to the devil, a damnable heresy which is promoted by money loving wolves in sheep's clothing and by "spiritual" imbeciles. I have left the church life, I have no fear of doing that or even any guilt. I believe God has shown me that THIS very generation of what is called the church are what Psalms refers to as the dissemblers. Namely, it's all pretence! And don't listen to anyone no matter how "holy" that person appears to be if they say "we are a bible believing church". Big deal! Even the devils believe and THEY even tremble, but very few and rare indeed are there any humans who tremble.

Debbie. Please shut your imbecile attitude. I myself have nothing whatsoever to do with the church or church life. Your sanity is under scrutiny.

"Angels of God in heaven." Not angels of God on earth. The ones who disobey God wouldnt follow His will so they arent included in this verse or else it would have said all Gods angels.

@@truthisfreedom8039 Lies!! The bible does NOT say that and your info is coming from extra-biblical false and fake bibles.

@@truthisfreedom8039 "The ones who disobey God wouldnt follow His will so they arent included in this verse or else it would have said all Gods angels." Oh, wow! Nobody's ever heard _that_ "objection" before! Now, whence do you learn that angels are capable of procreation with women? Nowhere in the Bible.

@@djengo77 you mean other than the part where it says the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men? Look at the oldest book 'Job' to get an idea who the sons of God are. Also look every other time that phrase is used in the OT. If it were only men it wouldnt have needed to specify that it was sons of -God- daughters of -men-. Also if they were godly men from seth, why would God have the isrealites kill them all? Why wipe them out in the flood? Why would men and women mating make giants?

@@truthisfreedom8039 You wrote: _"you mean other than the part where it says the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men?"_ Begging the question is not going to help you sell your anti-Bible silliness. You wrote: _"Look at the oldest book 'Job' to get an idea who the sons of God are."_ Please, tell us: _Whom does the book of Job tell us the sons of God are?_ You wrote: _"If it were only men it wouldnt have needed to specify that it was sons of God daughters of -men-."_ Huh? You wrote: _"Also if they were godly men from seth, why would God have the isrealites [sic] kill them all? Why wipe them out in the flood?"_ Huh? What do the Israelites have to do with the events of Genesis 6, 7, and 8? You obviously have no clue what you're talking about, seeing as no Israelites were living on the earth until centuries after the flood. Also, you just contradicted yourself by claiming that the Israelites killed all the people whom, as you also affirm, the flood had already wiped out. You wrote: _"Why would men and women mating make giants?"_ What do you mean by _"giants"?_ Clearly, you either did not watch even so much as five seconds of this video, and are speaking out of inexcusable ignorance, or you are a shameless, lying troll.

Bruce Dressel also the descendents of Seth

The phrase "Sons of God" has a wider meaning than you want to imply. We are all the Children of God through Christ Jesus our Lord. The Context of this text is limited to the life and experience of the human sons of God. The sons of God in this context are are all human beings.

@@errolhenry9546 The context can not change sons of God, in Jude 6 those sons of God the fallen angels are still sons of God though going to hell. Their origin as first created by God will never change, they were sons of God only in this limited, specific sense.

The dispute is cleared up in one passage.. GV Hebrews 1:5 For unto which of the Angels said he at any time, Thou art my Son, this day begat I thee? and again, I will be his Father, and he shall be my Son: is that the only scripture you have read in Job??? Key word is 'before' It is mentioned many times before Job men, tribes, etc. in feasts etc coming before God. Making it clear that it is not talking about being in heaven with/before God. Exodus 18:12 And Jethro, Moses' father in law, took a burnt offering and sacrifices for God: and Aaron came, and all the elders of Israel, to eat bread with Moses' father in law before God. Judges 20:26 Then all the children of Israel, and all the people, went up, and came unto the house of God, and wept, and sat there before the Lord, and fasted that day until even, and offered burnt offerings and peace offerings before the Lord. List goes on.... also have you ever bothered looking at the Hebrew definition of angel?? *smh @ the laziness of so many! Just because so many are pushing the '' fallen angel' nonsense it doesn't make it correct! Angel..מֲלְאָךְ mălʼâk, mal-awk'; from an unused root meaning to despatch as a deputy; a messenger; specifically, of God, -- meaning i.e. an angel (also a prophet, priest or teacher):ambassador, angel, king, messenger. this is all pretty simple and some how was all corrupted to something it is not with the '' fallen angels'' nonsense. Nephilim is not in KJV or Geneva etc..but if we look at the Hebrew meaning we find using Strongs concordance giant means- נְפִיל nᵉphîyl, nef-eel'; or נְפִל nᵉphil; from H5307; properly, a feller, i.e. a bully or tyrant: meaning -giant. (which is why Geneva, KJV etc put it bluntly - GIANT and not Nephilim..) look up what a feller is gada` gaw-dah' a primitive root; to fell a tree; generally, to destroy anything:--cut (asunder, in sunder, down, off), hew down. I can't imagine who started this deception of fallen angels having sex with women but who ever did knew exactly what they were doing to cause confusion and discord in Gods word/people.

sons of God means different thing depending on context. Sometimes angels, sometimes humans.

That is is the only place in the bible (Job) that shows this, and if you did a study on it in hebrew, you would find this does not mean angels at all. Any other place in the bible clearly shows that the sons of God were and are God's children. Why people continue to want to believe this false doctrine, which basically says that the Lord God is not all powerful.. is sad. Think this through... I used to believe this nonsense too...until I saw the evidence in the language of the text saying otherwise. The book of Enoch is the book that says the son's of God are fallen angels... (if you believe that book- up to you - I don't).

@@SHEvans I guess we will find out on judgment day but seeing as how what I put as a comment is in The Bible I guess you should assume it is true right ?

The correct interpretation of Genesis 6: 4 There were tyrants in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the children of God came in unto pagan woman, and bare children unto them, the same became powerful men (the elite - think Rothschild), which were of old, men of renown. The giants in the bible were human - 7-13 ft - which we still have by the way. In addition, before the flood there was a lot more greenery - more oxygen all over the earth - oxygen makes things grow TALL. This would be why there were so many more giant's then - plus people lived to around 900 years before the flood.

lol did someone at the Smithsonian leak this information?? Seems like all hear say.

And you will notice the skeletons are between 7-13 ft tall ... these were HUMAN. We still have giants too, look it up on youtube - lots of pictures going back to 1900 and earlier...

Please read the Book of Enoch. It is not extra biblical. In the Book of Jude it is referenced and quoted. Knowledge of the Giants and Nephilim was common to believers at that time.

@@roygbiv4323 you are deceived. It's Ancient Jewish mysticism, from the Kabbalah.

They left heaven because God cast them out. Lucifer,(Satan)along with 1/3 of the angels led a rebellion, and were cast out. . They can never be allowed back in heaven. Ever. The giants in the earth, men of renown, are like the Rockefellers and and the 1% of the 1%. Hell is the other habitation.

Their own " habitation " is not location or a physical place but it is a moral spiritual condition that is Holiness or holy. A holy God can only create a holy being so when the angels that were under Lucifer ( Satan ) ( one third of the total number of the angels ) followed Satan they sinned or became unholy therefore leaving their original " first estate " .

I don't know. Let's place our attention on spreading the Gospel. 1 Corinthians 4:1-4.

I know this is 6 years old but it’s a good comment, well thought out and charitable. Well done brother.

+David Daniels The old testament uses sons of God for angels but new testament sons of God means believers (Job 38:6-7) "Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; {7} When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?" I am pretty sure this isnt talking about us...adam and even werent even created yet. (Job 1:6) "¶ Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan came also among them." You think we humans came with Satan to talk with God? No...it was satan with his angels he took with down from heaven.

+David Daniels I would like to know who does actually say that the sons of God term is ONLY for the fallen angels. It clearly is for angels - especially in Job. Is this some sort of made up argument to build up some sort of false rhetoric and besmirch other's reputations? This is just getting thicker and thicker. Instead of answering false rhetoric why don't you answer some of the honest objections on here?

+David Daniels "It doesn't sound like God uses the term for fallen angels, any more than unsaved humans. " Yes, it convinces me. Why should God use or let to use the same name, denomination, for both the holy and devilish being/creatures?!! Show less "

Excellent point.

The term Son of God is not something bestowed on this He loves but rather identifying them as His direct creation, ALL angels are sons of God as He created them, as he created Jesus, and as He created Adam, but no children after Adam are His sons but Adam's sons, and we by the new birth are His sons. When Genesis 6;4 speak of sons of God who came unto the daughters of men it is speaking of the angels Jude 6 speaks of.

The Angels at Sodom and Gomorrah weren’t desired for being Angels in human form. They were two new men there. And the people wanted to sodomize them, because that’s what they did. It had nothing to do with how they looked. Sodomy is anal sex with another man. This is why God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah.

Beware of having itching ears that turns away from the Truth unto fables. 1.Timothy..

@@holychristian9297 the genesis six narritive properly interpreted is not a "salvation by grace replacement", which is what you referred to withTimothy . The problem caused by those entities is apparent...and supported in and out of scripture.

Instead of Tom Horn, sci-fi garbage?

@william Tolbert The quotation of Enoch in Jude is inspired, but the so-called Book of Enoch is no better that the Gospel of Thomas or the Gospel of Judas. It has no authority.

@@Mcfirefly2 im not in agreement with tom horns view. I mostly disagree with his view, his hyperbole is over the top, im suspicious of his angle overall. The Bible on its own needs no embellishments with regards to gen 6 and its implications..

don't stop studying this subject...the truth is always just a little more study away.

@@user-mb7yk9pt4r what about KJV Luke 3:38 38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.

Very well explained! God bless you sir

Paracas, Peru has overwhelming evidence in Juan Navarro museum..... And it also Biblical.... DNA Manipulation is what it is..... Didn't satan tell Eve that she would be like God knowing right from wrong? Not only in Peru but also in megalithic Mexico, Egypt, Baalbek Lebanon etc..... These architectures can't be duplicated now even with all our technological advancements......

Angels are SPIRITS. Do spirits even have DNA? You are going WAY BEYOND Scripture!

@@johndisalvo6283 angels have bodies and they physically appear as men so they most likely did create giants by impregnating human women

Angels don’t reproduce. They have no reproductive organs or “angel sperm”!!! Stick to Scripture, not your wild imagination.

@@johndisalvo6283 Scriptures are not clear about it. We can just speculate. We know that before flood situation will repeat. Genetical manipulation with food, animals and man is underway today.

Yes, these findings can be false, period!!

@@ToOpen6seven what do you mean? That the skeletons are fake?

You have to remember that the fall of Adam introduced death into the human body. It was a corruption of our DNA by which it no longer replicated in the way it previously did. As errors in genetic replication occurs it manifests in mutations. I would bet that those mutations are where the giants came from. The most terrifying thing must have been watching the lifespan drop so rapidly as the fathers tried to pass down everything that they had figured out or been taught by God so that their children could survive and subdue the land. This is especially important considering the ground was still cursed at that time (pre flood).

It wasn't by having sex with women and causing ones who were half demon and half human to be born. No where in all the Bible is such a teaching ever supported.

@@bobbyadkins6983 The bible does not say "half demon and half human". It does say that the sons of God mated with human women and produced giants. Genesis 6:4 There were GIANTS in the earth in those days; and also after that, WHEN THE SONS OF GOD CAME IN UNTO THE DAUGHTERS OF MEN, and THEY BARE CHILDREN TO THEM, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

@@kgmail7364 That is a good question too.

Robert Lipscob - I assure you that fallen angels are NOT the sons of almighty God since he NEVER called angels his sons & daughters anywhere in the bible.

Hebrews 1:5

@@mishkakasalapiy3222 Judaism and Christianity have different beliefs, moses the author of gen while paul the author of hebrew, so many calls of an angels in ancient times, in the first place they do not believe in Jesus the only begotten son of God..

Robert Lipscob to make that argument is to say that God is so cruel that He would give His angels the physical equipment to rape mortal women. It would also make Jeshua a liar when He told the Sadducees that in the resurrection, they are “like the angels of God” (Matthew 21:30)

@@OneTrueVikingbard angels can take on physical forms as shown throughout the Bible , you have to realize that these are beings can enter in an out of this dimension, and when they do, they take on a form that can operate or translate properly with whatever plane their on

Mike Simpson im having having a hard time understanding weither you agree with me or not. But let me just add that more likely than not i tend to lean on the 40 scribes that translated the kjv. And i too agree that Sons of God, means that there were angles that slept with earthly women.

Mike Simpson so still dont know if you agree with my original point . So , can you be a little more direct. Not gonna add any new thoughts, so instead of pivoting , like Democrats do hahaha, just state your opinion, agree or disagree. Its ok to say ? Now i bet you are gonna address the Dem. statement and skip over or “pivot” from answering the opinion part.

Mike Simpson kjv says: and they bore children. And i didnt have to do research for that. Pretty straight forward. Bore is a old word but im pretty sure it still means that the child came from the “?” Angel that went in with them. So come on, unless your saying that in the hebrew that it says something different, which i do have a strongs concordance built into my kingjames. And its what i came up with.

The correct interpretation of Genesis 6: 4 There were tyrants in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the children of God came in unto pagan woman, and bare children unto them, the same became powerful men (the elite - think Rothschild), which were of old, men of renown. He went over this in the video.

@@SHEvans agree or disagree? With my point, im simply asking for your opinion, thats all im asking?

Ingunn Storesletten the Lord say angels can't mix with flesh in the gospel

@@crossman1611 you know what I mean🤣

@@crossman1611 i.m laughing right cuz I didn't to put an state🤣

@@crossman1611 we both don't have the answer, but when we go home, Yahsula will reveal it to us Amen

@@crossman1611 that His name in Hebrew

@@crossman1611 I'm not Jewish, I'm a Christian and believe Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life!I just study alot😊

Does Al this really matter that much? Consider this, nomatter what, all the corrupted people got drowned right ? So where did the evil come from after the flood ? This needs to be the question. Remember only Noah and his family were saved.

@@peterocha7341 there's more to it than that. When it says that Noah was just and perfect in his generation, it didn't mean that he was without sin since all mankind is corrupt down to their very core by sin. But it all does, in fact, matter because it is evidence that God rightfully judges sin and is only withholding His final judgment because of Grace, but that His long-suffering will not last forever. He's giving man every last chance to repent before the final judgement takes place. At that point, there will be no Second Chances.

@@RM3MB3R I was trying to see if you knew who evil came back into the world after the flood

Ok first, if Noah were corrupted by those (son's of God) regardless of who they are. He wouldn't have been able to preserve the uncorrupted seed that was to bring in the seed of Christ., Ok evil came back through Noah's son Ham. And through him Cannon got cursed. And through cannon came Nimrod. And it says that Nimrod was the first to become a giant on Earth after the flood. I suppose it means in a fallen state like that, he is corrupted but also he's a nephillim / a giant.

@@peterocha7341Noah wasnt corrupted genetically by the sons of God, but he still had the sin nature that everyone has.

Debra , you can't be serious. This is gooblegook and nonsense. Read jude 1:6 This is the funniest and worse teaching i have ever seen. This make you lose trust in this man. Please for the love of God don't count on pastor's , or men , bible scholar's as they are all taught by satan anyway , trust in God only and his word and not man. Satan is cunning and slick and so are his angent's.

Don’t be arrogant

It really isn’t.

Moses' writings always refer to angels as Mal'ak, Deuteronomy 14:1 ... sons (bene) of the Lord (Yehovah) your God (Elohim) these are God's people (humans). Can loyal angels and God's people both be called 'sons of God'? Romans 8:14; "For all who are being led by the Spirit of God, these are sons of God." The same God that inspired the Old Testament is the God that inspired the New Testament and the facts do not change.

Brian Johnson Where do you think giants come from? Some of these giants were so big, they made the Israelites look like grasshoppers. Now I realize the spies may have used some hyperbole here, but these weren’t just 8-10’ tall giants. Exaggerating to that point would be lying. These were huge creatures. The passage you’re referring to regarding the Sadducees and marriage, had to do with marriage in heaven between a man and a woman. Funny how still today there are Christians who actually hold on to hope that they’ll be reunited with their deceased spouse in heaven.