.NET 9 Changes The Way You're Using Dependency Injection with Blazor Forever 🔥

Рет қаралды 6,919

Ай бұрын

🚀 Join the .NET Web Academy: learn.dotnetwebacademy.com
💖 Support me on Patreon for exclusive source code access: / _patrickgod
🐦 Let's get social on Twitter/X: / _patrickgod
🔗 Let's connect on LinkedIn: / patrickgod
🚀 Get the .NET 8 Web Dev Jump-Start Course for FREE: dotnet8.patrickgod.com

Пікірлер: 25

@xelit3 20 күн бұрын

that's really interesting, and it standardize dependency injection in Blazor comparing with the rest of .NET ecosystem.

@oliverharvey7561 28 күн бұрын

Don’t know why anyone would want to do this - @inject seems perfect to me.

@kw-gz9fe Ай бұрын

Thank you for the update

@mehmetyirtici5322 Ай бұрын

Hello Patrick. Thank yor for this video.

@bartlomiejuminski Ай бұрын

You can also use constructor injection in the ".razor" file not only in ".razor.cs" file.

@CRBarchager Ай бұрын

This is great. Back to good old DI with naming that starts with _ for global variable for that class/page. The Pascal naming for variables always threw me of a bit.

@OeHomestead Ай бұрын

I kinda perfer using [Inject] as it makes the code a bit tidier. If one rely on a lot of services, the constructor args can get quite long and messy.

@zagoskintoto Ай бұрын

Yesssss!

@SteamF-nf2ts Ай бұрын

Hey Patrick, is it worth to change my .net 6 api to use the identity resources on .net 8? Or isnt that difference that big?

@thesandboxgamingvideos Ай бұрын

finally they thought about this.

@iyerpram Ай бұрын

How can we mock a dependency which is injected through attribute. Since the class members would have to be protected or public for mocking it. Isn't that against OOP Principles?

@10Totti Ай бұрын

Same coder for request keyedservices ?

@renynzea Ай бұрын

Can you use the new class level constructor in c# to avoid having to create the constructor and private variable. E.g.: class Home (IMyService MyService)?

@Cornelis1983 Ай бұрын

I would like to know this as well. Or else, this new, better way of DI would reintroduce a nasty side-effect I was glad we got rid of by using the primary constructors: the underscore

@nikolayrogchev9628 Ай бұрын

Finally :)

@SteamF-nf2ts Ай бұрын

Is it worth it to change my .net 6 API to use identity's resources on .net 8? Or this difference isnt that big?

@heda4341 Ай бұрын

Hi Patrick, first thank you. can you please explain why this approach is better than the [inject]-approach ?

@zagoskintoto Ай бұрын

I wouldn't say better, but I'm not expert so maybe there's something I'm not seeing that can be done this way and not the previous one. What I can say is that it's a far more coherent way to do it as it resonates with how DI is done in every other type of .NET class that is not a razor component.

@adrianspikes6454 Ай бұрын

So what happened to the global injection file 🤨? Oh and that's probably my one complaint about Blazor, those darn mysterious red squigglys for no apparent reason 🤷🤣