How to stay Anandam: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/iMeVeKmCybfDhGQ.html
@thomasbrouwer2771Ай бұрын
Sublime cut. Amazing answer. Sarvapriyananda is something else.
@swapnilpilankar-kb1rt16 күн бұрын
Chit is no only consciousness.. But pure devine consciousness
@bsr8255 Жыл бұрын
I think it was intentionally kept swamyji name as sarvapriyananda. He is really dear and liked by all people. His way of teaching is lucid and simple, even a lay man can understand the highest truth🙏🙏🙏
@vivekmanjeshwar2039 Жыл бұрын
Thanks Swamiji humble pranaams 🙏🙏🙏
@xwitzix Жыл бұрын
the humble villager from Kamarkupur is GOD ALMIGHTY...
@mahendrasheth2884 Жыл бұрын
Namaste! Thanks for the deeper meaning of Sat Chit Ananda! Concept got it more clarity! Thanks 3.00 minutes onward good contents! Sat Chit Anand are with deeper meaning! Thanks 🙏
@meeraesq Жыл бұрын
Pranams Swamyji. Thank you. My humble addition is Ananda is the word we give to the unexplainable. It is not a feeling, it is not an object for the subject to witness. Ananda is lack of lack - Purnamitham - completness. If we have to explain it is a realization where, no questions, wants etc arises. There is no ananda when there is a feeling/desire for things to be different. It is that realization where there is no-two- (A- Dwaitha) and it is all encompossing. When there is so much fullness in the heart the words that comes out is -"-ahhh... this " AKA Ananda. :-)
@Jax_66687 Жыл бұрын
Swamy Sharanam. Jai Sree Ramakrishna.
@pasupathil4113 Жыл бұрын
You are correct swamy lam sat chit Ananda and l realised. when realisation comes lam not at all feel boaring only ananda lam experiencing.
@mukeshdesai2862Ай бұрын
1:19. Rasik 3:37 7:14 10:00
@rajls285 Жыл бұрын
I strip myself from form and attributes and then know that this is what the Nirguna Brahman is. The knowing is the being. Thus am was, am and always be the Nirguna Brahman.
@scottwyckoff5483 Жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙌
@tickle296 Жыл бұрын
Things r like these only. Ananda is Ananda..
@InesAzaiez Жыл бұрын
Can you please share the talk preceding this QnA? Thank you 🙏🏼
@OfficialGOD8 ай бұрын
here you go ❤ kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLJjmtZ0s9O9kWw.html
@Ramkumar-uj9fo10 ай бұрын
Can satchitananda be a scientific hypothesis? Say yes or no and nothing else No ChatGPT ♥️🌹
@OfficialGOD10 ай бұрын
you choose to stay ignorant my friend
@sumanjoshi7902 Жыл бұрын
Gold is real. Ornaments are still real although time based and countable.
@OfficialGOD Жыл бұрын
Because it is time dependent it is not real. It is not that they do not exist, but rather that their existence is dependent on consciousness and is not independent or self-existent.