Shartemis

brartemis

Something never goes to plan in space travel

@@saladcat8305 that’s the whole idea of space travel, expecting the unexpected.

Oh come on, starship has made more progress in such a short period that this scrap heap

@@stephenmac3105 "more progress" Its not even launching yet, no matter how many times musk says "soon"

@@UlmDoesAnything SLS started development in 2011 I believe and has cost over $23 billion in its first 10 years. It's a well known fact its cost has ballooned well over budget. It uses technology that are relics of the past, while reliable, theres not much new here, and given the fact its cost and taken so much time to develop a rocket from relics of the past is hilarious. It's a single use rocket that's going to cost several billion to launch each time. It will carry less payload and have less thrust than Starship. Starship will produce nearly double the thrust and be able to lift over twice as much to orbit. Starship has developed engines that everyone said was impossible, brand new technology and systems my friend. It will cost an astronomical amount less to build, develop and launch Starship vs SLS. Starship is designed to be reusable further knocking down the cost, only the crew module will be reusable for SLS and I'm not even sure if it will be. I'm fully aware that Starship is being delayed but that should be expected with NEW technology and systems, not to mention the massive launch tower with equally bold technology planned for it. Just remember NASA has been around for over 50 years and SpaceX is a relatively new company that has developed new technologies and systems in such a short period of time in comparison. SpaceX's plans are bold and inspiring, while NASA's are too, I'm sorry, they dont match up when it comes to SpaceX. Old technology, relics of the past, massively over budget and nowhere near the capabilities starship could have when operational. I dont see NASA developing sustainable and reusable systems with bold and new tech buddy, and that it was I mean by SpaceX making more progress ✌

Yes very soon

ICPS won’t fire its engine immediately after stage sep, since separation will occur near perigee of its initial 30kmx1806km orbit. The first ICPS burn will be orbit circularization burn which will occur 45min after stage sep. The next burn will be for TLI

@@marekziba Is that going to be the same for Block 1B EUS?

@@FullyStaged EUS is heavier and has to fire for a few minutes to finish the orbit insertion. ICPS is much smaller and the core stage can essentially place it in orbit with only a small perigee raise burn needed

@@marekziba Bahahahaha, NOTHING LEAVES THE DOME.... NOTHING

april or may

@@DavidWillisSLS now its october😞😞

@@quadaerospacespacecat8061 keeps on slippin. But I ain’t quitting on SLS

No. only on the 5 minute version. i downloaded the 10 minute version for B-roll footage for my other videos, so no music

@@DavidWillisSLS right, makes sense

And that's the rest of the story. So disappointed

Well it just launched a couple days ago so maybe go watch that video

@@DavidWillisSLS That's the only real video seen. The launch.

@@richardcallihan9746 then you haven’t been looking hard enough