money

I agree with you on the lower centre of gravity but it's not a "bike" _[bi-cycle]_ since there are no peddles and two _["bi"]_ wheels _["cycle"]_ etc.. i would call it a MSE Sea-Ski / Motorcycle Style Electric Sea-Ski or E-Sea-Ski under the umbrella of PWC/Personal Water Craft.

And 80% better performance or something like that, because the air goes through that hole? That needs further analysis. I would spontaneously say no.

If you are wilfully ignorant of the greater picture.

Exciting ???? Yes. And deadly. Don't forget deadly.

Rudy the man in the video with the hovercraft is my local mechanic i donated some parts to him for that project & yeah he gets up off the water & flies to prove you can but it's not really proven safe or doesn't fly real effectively if you know what i mean .He landed hard once he said his error he bumped the control & face planted into the dash & broke his nose .But the company you mentioned were not that successful in flying it safe & effectively either so he thought he would have a go to see if he could do better, but yeah it would take serious development & improvements to do that & money & some a-hole rang the aviation authority on him they turned up & they did not like it but could not do anything to him as he was not flying over 500 feet & was flying over water but they said that if he flew it over land or residential they would shut him down, that it would need to comply fully to there laws they do not like them .I believe that company & others who have tried have ran into the same issues & honestly they fly but not well or safe they will never happened i don't think .I think they put the concept out there hoping some investor & some aviation manufacturer would come on board to try & make it work basically they are a fail .I only live around the corner from where he flies it & he offered to take me up in it & i declined ,bugger that .

Right? Research needs to write the headlines themselves.

I left a longer comment with a strong criticism of the so called intelligent tech inventions. Only a few are actually intelligent.

Thumbs up.... you are witnessing this: An American honourable woman "Charlotte Iserbyt", who worked at the department of education in the US Gov, who died not long ago, was yet again proven indisputably correct when she authored her book ***"The Deliberate 'Dumbing" Down of America"*** _[and the West in general]._ Rockefeller, John Dewey, Antonio Gramsci, played a huge role since 1950s to incrementally "Moronise" the West.

I clicked the video just to check that. Looks like UH went bankrupt. Maybe this person bought it up and putting it out as a new company. I'd meet Chris a few times but he moved before I got a chance to check one out

The craft that universal hovercraft built never cleared 6 in off the deck. Rudy Heeman's hovercraft would fly about 2 m off the deck. Moreover, he sold it over 10 years ago. So not sure how "innovative" this is.

@@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217 Wow, so sad to hear that Charlotte Iserbyt died.

​@@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217she was ...is scary accurate. Shedding light on the "method to the madness". Brilliant woman!

Digity is a German startup and a right now just selling to companies. But they want to make it available for all in a few years. More information you will find on their website 👍

If you mean God/Jesus is the Creator of thought.. then i agree, yes. Thumbs up.

If one correctly comprehends the Terminator series movies and how seriously it's quite saturated in science fantasy/fiction mixed with a minority of the actual God-created universe we subsist in, they will not be in fear of some supposed Skynet future where a very advanced super logic/arithmetic computation machine _[logic machine = a computer]_ gets inhabited with a spirit _[demon]_ and is able to manipulate space and time and use some form of time-travel ability to send spirit-possessed androids _[Terminators]_ back into the past having the ability to be clothed in synthetic flesh hair eyeballs etc to hunt those who seek to destroy the "AI" main super-computer etc. Quite a fantasy land. Also, the exoskeleton has non-body piercing bullet armour, not body piercing bullet armour.

Many of these ideas not all is evidence of the stultifying of society.

Wanted to see an engine fire? Just hearing it run should have been enough. Maybe next time?

All that thermal runaway reality is not helping fool people into thinking electric battery powered aircraft are a good idea.

@@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217 Electric airplanes are a farce. I can go 770 km on a single tank of gasoline in my minivan, and it takes me, what, 5 minutes to tank up; but an electrical car only goes half that distance (at most) and it takes an hour to charge it up. So NO, thanks, I prefer to keep my Nissan.

You make a salient point how they are not necessarily worthy of being inventions but branched iideas in certain areas of product progression. Somewhat a few might be called inventions.

@@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217 Let's look at it: Exosceletons .. constantly evolved for decades the 3D-printing here ... are they serious? finishing them will take longer than producing some conventional way, at worse material quality hypersonic aircraft ... every decade got its own, using some different engine or adapted design e-bike ... just wondered, if the high point of gravity might make it worse? Apart from that - classic evolution Jet-Packs ... first one - see Goldfinger. Today the use small RC-turbines, available for 20 years by anyone wave power plants ... another design, every 20 years, but no breakthrough another drone ... sure - they evolved rapidly sind the first ones, with the development of brushless engines, LiXX batteries, fast microcontrollers and expired patents on silicon micro machine based sensors instead of heavy and slow gyroscope ones the counter-rotating mars copter - principle had been used every now an then, first described by Jules Vernes (Robur the conqueror) box wing planes ... one of many designs already tried 90 years ago, dito VTOL this gravity triangle thing -- WELL - THATS NEW, at least, as it now got some physics base theory robot crab ... hexapods are amongst the oldest robot designs. pure evolution hovercraft + ground effect --- nice combination, see russian "ekranoplan", won't fly stable beyond the ground effect the pet door - simple idea, easily and perfectly solvable with todays means jet ski --- another variant. AI applying a learnt style to another image - I knew some project, where this was done with music/score sheets + analysis of certain pianists. Tough stuff and maybe the most interesting one here! HUD in the goggles ... when did jet helms start with this one? its lightweight micro electronics costs peanuts the motorized snowboard / RR E-plane / e-outboard motor .. all rely on the evolution and rise of high power motors and batteries another clever VTOL - maybe not the breakthrough, but can't take long, by now trailer with moving walls ... could have been built decades ago. these finger thingies .... combination of todays materials + a simple solution for providing tactile feedback. Niche product, but cleverly done So, what would you call an invention?!? I count maybe 3, deserving this title.

Looked more like it flew out of a Red Bull commercial to me . . . .

Just wait till ya buy one of them electric cars and it catches fire in your driveway. Then y'all will really know what toxic is. My neighbor got a $125,000 bill from out fire company about the hazmat cleanup on his Tesla...

It is, have seen it in action, a real back yard invention, was following behind it on a trailer, there is not much to it, inspirational the stuff people can do on their own these days.

That contraption would kill you in less than a heartbeat. Absolutely unstable.

👍👍@@oldmech619

@@tungzauzage977 It travels over water... you were following behind it on a trailer? Never heard of trailers used on the water, only the road.

It looks like universal hovercrafts model at a quick glance. You can find videos from 2009 on KZfaq. The owner used the hovercrafts for flood rescue

@@panzerswineflu I don't think it is. This "hoverwing" was built from scratch in New Zealand by Rudy Heeman after 11 years in development. He finished it in 2010. It appears to be a one off.

@@grantadamson3478 if that's the case it still doesn't belong under new inventions. Anyway thanks I'm have to see what I can find to compare

@@panzerswineflu You're correct it doesn't belong on here. For sure.

ahahahahha exactly. It is again overkill and evidence of becoming a physically weaker society. Just use proper gloves and technique...sigh.

I think you might have a very valid point there.

ask stockton rush, oh no you can't, his ego turned himself and his crew into fishfood.

Multimillion dollar US Navy vessels use game controllers, if it dies, grab a new one.

Thumbs up!

You stated it for me! Thumbs up!@@manofthewest67

@@user-wm3bf7pi3u That's how bad of an idea that is for them to use game controllers instead of use their own ideated and designed ones to ensure as much non-malfunction as possible.

has deep state cabal and darpa written all over it to push narratives

Make it more safe first.

Good point... wouldn't it be safer to race around on a custom made track that does not have hard road in case you crash and want to limit possibility of major injury?

"AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' _[a great made up lie by satan]_ by premier swindlers and their victims, is *not no matter how much they claim it is* and it *will never* exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist". *"Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful."* ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews _[insert the period]_ kom _[forward slash]_ editorial _[forward slash]_ machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine _[what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems]_ does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. *"Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them."* ~ Frank Herbert, Dune

Electric planes are one of the stupidest ideas yet for various reasons; The all electric plane by Mercedes is again just stupid.... batteries are so heavy.... what a waste of resources, STOP WITH THE LIES OF ZERO EMISSIONS! The electric aircraft after the previous, more idiocy of making such type of aircraft with how half or more of the weight of the aircraft is the weight of the batteries and the increasing thermal runaway / spontaneous fires occurring with lithium based chemistry batteries etc. It's just such an inefficient propulsion energy system for aircraft especially considering the chance of lithium battery fires / thermal runaway happening. Why do you think the laws are so strict and getting more strict for transporting lithium batteries on aircraft? There many other critical reasons why it does not make sound sense to use batteries to power an aircraft. As or "AI" ... *"Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful."* ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews _[insert the period]_ kom _[forward slash]_ editorial _[forward slash]_ machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine _[what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems]_ does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot. "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' _[a great made up lie by satan]_ by premier swindlers and their victims, is *not no matter how much they claim it is* and it *will never* exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist".

it did wobble a bit didnt it? and that would have been a pro riding it, it needs a lower riding position.

@@manofthewest67 Batteries are heavy, what do you think is in the bottom, it's a Weeble-Wooble.

@@user-wm3bf7pi3u for one thing the 'air scoop' is not going to make a huge difference unless they intend to break speed records, for everyday use? nah, but just my opinion.

Your reply about the air scoop... i agree with you... especially about everyday use is just pipedream...more of it as usual in an increasingly prideful/vanity poisoned _[thus wilfully blind]_ Western society.@@manofthewest67

Only for backup.

Been around since the 70s. The military wanted something quiet for sea/river incursions but don't know what happened to the program. Electric jet skis were a part of it too when governments were happy to waste budgets on potential developments.

This are not innovative, they are children of ideas that are born of already decades old inventions.

Overuse of the word 'thousand' is giveaway. Avoid multiple use of the same words. You can say insted like, 1200 hundred insted of one thousand and two hundred

Yes and ending a sentence with the first word of the next sentence and with a questioning expression 😆 hey 👋 hang on, are you a robot 🤖? 😅

You should line up for parking spots on Mars Elon is offering if you really believe you are looking at Mars. It's quite interesting how the behemoth Google search engine, with it's constantly growing database, is able to find pictures that match exactly via pattern recognition, terrain that is actually on earth, suggesting we are being extremely lied to that supposedly that mini-copter is on Mars.

Yep & on certain occasions they double as your bestus BBQ grill just not when ya want that mode..

Because a coyote carrying your dog is an issue

I think i saw that _[i was born in the 70s]_ when i was younger. Crichton was not all that stupid. . *"I want to pause here and talk about this notion of consensus, and the rise of what has been called consensus science. I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you are being had. Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest sciences in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. There is no such thing as consensus science. If it's consensus, it isn't science. If it's science, it isn't consensus. Period."* ~ Michael Crichton *"Science is not a matter of consensus, as the histories of Galileo, Copernicus, Pasteur, Einstein, and others will attest. Science depends not on speculation but on conclusions verified through experiment."* ~ James Schlesinger "AI" only "exists" in the realm of science fantasy/fiction and the NewWorldOrder kings/rulers refer to the great myriads of society they have been spending decades stultifying as the actual 'artificial intelligence'. The more dim-witted and dulled-down they make the society, the easier it is to deceive them that something is true, when it's not true. What is called ''AI'' _[a great made up lie by satan]_ by premier swindlers and their victims, is *not no matter how much they claim it is* and it *will never* exist in our God created nature of reality for it was never His plan. Leave it where it was born/gendered.... in the realm of science fantasy fiction. If you actually believe "AI" exists in our God created nature of reality, then you are the actual "AI." Go look up "Luc Julia", the man who invented SIRI, super tech nerd, who makes clear "Artificial Intelligence Does Not Exist". *"Science fiction writers, I am sorry to say, really do not know anything. We can't talk about science, because our knowledge of it is limited and unofficial, and usually our fiction is dreadful."* ~ Philip K. Dick This is for the materialist/naturalist/mechanist/evolutionist who has watched and read far far too many science fantasy/fiction movies, shows, cartoons and novels and comics etc that are based on that world-view; cybernews _[insert the period]_ kom _[forward slash]_ editorial _[forward slash]_ machine-learning-cannot-create-sentient-computers It's not even machine learning since only living creatures truly learn, it's actually SSITR = Sophisticated Software Instruction and Task Refinement. Sadly there is only a minority of people in this world who have experiential acute aptitude and assiduous erudition that understand our nature of reality enough to know a glorified calculator aka an electronic computation/logic machine _[what we call 'computers' when really 'computers' were people and still are people who compute math problems]_ does not 'think' for it is not a living creature nor will never become alive a living creature, it simply follows instructions and rules scripted by mankind, electronic sophisticated software designed by mankind to mirror and mimic mankind like a part, a fancy search-engine-term-completion stochastic parrot.

@@RemnantDiscipleLazzaro-Rev1217 WOW... I think I'll wait for the movie.