Definitely agree. It's really enjoyable to use

As should the rubber gasket. Silly that any lens over $100 doesn't have a rubber gasket.

My biggest complaint with the 7Artisans 60mm Macro lens is how easily I can bump the aperture when holding it. Too many pictures that should be F8 end up at F2.8!

@@aliendroneservices6621 Yes, I hate how all these companies force segmentation between consumer and pro lenses by leaving off a $0.50 gasket.

Funny thing is the aperture ring with a lock has been implemented on AF-D lenses by Nikon for decades until the G lenses took over.

I was just watching his video :-) I actually really liked that he was honest about a couple of the lens's slight weaknesses, he seems like such a nice guy.

Christopher Frost Photography that’s correct I was surprised too about this part and it was appreciated but nothing better than your review for my point of view 😉

There really are hehe. I literally don't have enough time in the day to do all the reviews I want (especially as I already have a full-time job!)

That's a great add-on. I wonder if sigma will ever come up with the teleconverters for Sony e-mount. I don't understand why they didn't already.

@@borjallanos201 Someone mentioned that the contract with Sony forbids it :/

@@fellowcitizen oh I see. So could you buy the L mount converter, swap the lens e bayonet with the tele body bayonet with a mini screwdriver so it all couples again. you would loose the electronic controls but use the lens in full manual?

I would like to upgrade to a Sony a7R III (I want to stay testing lenses in the 42-45mp area) but it will cost me £700 to do so, just so that I can show a slight difference in autofocus - I just can't afford that I'm afraid!

@@christopherfrost it's a huuuuge difference in autofocus. The a7riv is also a much better sensor so I would save up and go that route

Take a look at my review of that lens, or macro lens comparison video - you'll get all the infoz you need to compare them :-)

I would be interested as well. I want to dabble into macro photography and can't care less about auto focus. I have plenty of lenses in that focal range with AF

Exactly lol

Haha, those seductive reviews should contain a warning like: "Watching this review can harm your wallet" 😁

I’ve just picked up the Sony a7iii with the Sigma 24-70 f2.8. I wanted the Fuji X-T4 but the third party lens options stopped me from picking it up.

X mount license is pricey, fugi is bad for community

No but it will be great

Exactly this. RF version please Sigma!

Yup.. can't wait for this and 85mm for z mount

It's a shame that Canon and Nikon are keeping their lens mounts closed. There's a ton of excellent third-party glass out there!

@@HappyHubris you think that it makes sense to those companies to share what they have worked on for years? I shoot Sigma but I don't expect Canon or Nikon to help them take money away from themselves

Lol

It's very difficult for all three. Image stabilization does not work well at close distances

In fact, I am confused between the two lenses

If you're using a tripod then obviously it won't be a problem :-)

Just at A

Same, I have it on Canon mount and got it for $400 used and it’s super sharp!

Great lens for the price, although it has ugly look, OS is noisy, autofocus is a bit slow and hunting but I adjust the autofocus limiter switch and it focus faster. Great for handled macro and also portrait

I only really do coma tests for wider angle lenses with brighter apertures. With astigmatism, you can get a good indication of that on the test chart picture :-)

A few people keep asking me that! Maybe one day - I'm just so busy at the moment, though.

Christopher Frost Photography Ah no worries, keep up the good work!

@@christopherfrost Demand for your work must be very high, with the excellent quality of it. Keep it up!

Don't worry, I think they already know that everyone wants these lenses on RF and Z mount cameras, too :-) my guess is that it's just a question of manufacturing capacity, and getting the autofocus algorithms sorted out etc (that's just my guess, though)

@@christopherfrost Thank you for the reply. You know, this raises another interesting topic for potential discussion. As a long time Olympus, and Canon user, I naturally have observations about both systems, many positive and some not so positive. While people are always arguing the technical aspects of various cameras/lenses/systems, what is often missed is the relative financial considerations. I think, Canon, Olympus, Nikon, Pentax, Fuji, etc. probably all make superb equipment for the most part, along with the occasional "dog," but it would be very interesting to compare systems in terms of total cost of ownership--average lens price, maintenance costs, etc. While a camera body and a kit lens can be enough to lure you in, what may not be obvious is how expensive a particular brand can be as you seek to flush out your camera bag with the items you need to get the shots you want. Let's face it, if you're buying a camera with an interchangeable lens mount, it isn't because you plan to never use more than one lens. Over the years, I've found my Olympus System to be generally good value for the money. I've been able to afford professional spec'd optics, and get long and reliable service from everything. After buying the Canon EOR R, with the 24-105 f/4L, I have looked at other RF mount lenses, but to date, I have avoided buying any due to their remarkably serious price points, and weight penalties. Anyway, it would be interesting to see how systems compare in terms of price when, say, a body, wide zoom, standard zoom, and long lens are thrown in for consideration. This could be done in two parts--at the consumer level, and at the serious level. Just a thought, and thanks again for the excellent videos.

He have

You want me to make an entire video just about that specifically?!

Old sigma with OS is amazing for handheld macro shooting, OS is a bit noisy and focus not as fast but sharpness and price is great

thats my worries, buy the old with IS and save money, og would i be more happy with the new one? I have the sigma 35mm art, and 50mm Art for canon and use it om a 5D mrk4

I forget if it was Sigma or Tamron, but one of them used to make a 180mm macro lens, which I almost decided to get (for the exact same reason that you want that 135mm macro). I'm afraid they stopped making it though, but I still somewhat hope for an updated/new version of it.

Did you checked the new sony 70-200? It has 0.5x magnification and you can use the 2x and 1.4x teleconverters for more magnification and reach.

Just take a look at my review of that lens :-)

Yeah, looks like that to me too.

It seemed fine

@@d.k.1394 unfortunately not, the camera has to have!

Yes, Canon EF-S 10-18mm

Any lens can

The Sony lens's focus is not actually mechanical (although it does look like it) - check out my review :-)

It's quite noticeably sharper, with nicer build quality

KY does make direct comparisons here: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/sNV9f6Snv5-7kqs.html

@@christopherfrost Damn, if this makes it to Z mount and the Z6 II looks good this might be enough to finally get me to upgrade

Yes

That's a manual focus lens. The issue comes in getting the autofocus working correctly