Watch the video of the wolf luring away the Kangal to the other wolves. Wolfs are to smart and are capable of taking down a brown bear

Great insight into what the dog was doing? Or not. Most protection is more effective actually close to the problem site, problem individuals are more likely to be identified & sorted out. Rover Kangal might have been on French Leave, or locating rubbish bins too. A wolf 30 miles away minding it's own business is not a problem, and removing it might even cause problems by creating vacancies for problem individuals.

A wild burro is a good choice to

These are the experts in F&W influencing public opinion.

Try Turkish Sheppard

I read on article suggesting to use several different big dog breeds at once to protect your herd. As the Pyrenees can be too gentile, but still fierce!

Looks like more than one breed shown here.

i believe there are different types of pyrenees.. ive see some in action where you would not want to get out of your truck on the other hand my buddy has one that wouldnt hurt a kitten@@sonjaohlmann510

Wolves kill livestock when they are hunted. Wolves kill people when they are not hunted. Anyone, state and federal, who is responsible for re-releasing wolves, and that wolf kills or maims anyone, should go to prison for life for negligent homicide. It is a pernicious lie that wolves have not killed Americans in Lower 48. A federal FWS Predator Control Officer personally told me that Pyrenees dogs predate as much as wild dogs will, but on other people's animals and that he caught a lot of them while trapping. Flags off the fence are a sad pathetic joke. The Endangered Species Act's anti social affects deindustrializing America put us in staggering debt, stops high paying jobs and was authored by bribery convict Pete Williams who likely sold out to the Russians to get the ESA act passed. Contemporaneously, Krushchev bragged that the Soviets would achieve its goals against the US without international violence. IMO, wolf releases are a statutory form of psychosociopathy. The word Stakeholder does not mean what the enviros claim it means. Enviro groups have no stake in wolf releases, only Americans.

I’ve heard the same

Watch the video of the wolf luring away the kangal to the wolves these dogs don’t stand a chance when outnumbered

@@hockeyplayer0241 you got a link

I have worked Pyrenees/Anatolian/and sometimes with a bit of Maremma in the cross with my sheep. Have had a few conflicts as well, got the dogs back alive though. Need to run dogs in high enough numbers that they are not overwhelmed.

Depends on how much you trust "lab grown meat" cause that's gonna be all that's available pretty quick. The wolves have decimated elk herds in norther and central idaho and the wreak havoc on livestock. One of the only animals that kills just for fun.

@@jacktrout5807 Decimated? Deer in the US seem seriously overpopulated if videos are anything like true. Despite plenty of .hunting, and no doubt some illegal efforts. Having seen the comments interfering US Safari Club input to pest management elsewhere in the world it's evident self interest to keep populations at upper pest levels is desired by many "hunters". And seeing a few killed by wolves would infuriate the inept, who would have little chance of recognising animals being moved around & becoming a bit wary vs "decimated". Wolves don't usually kill for fun, it's wasting energy, and wolves don't have burger king and Kentucky fry guts to waddle intelligently around with.

@@johnmead8437 your response is extrachromosomal to the extent that a reply is probably futile. But here goes anyway. 1st I was talking about elk (look up the difference between elk and deer) and I was talking about Northern and Central Idaho (not the entire us). The entire US is largely devoid of wolves but Idaho has many especially in northern and Central Idaho. That's why I spoke of that area specifically. 2nd . Wolves do kill for fun or sport this is well documented its happened several times where a pack of wolves killed a whole flock (150 plus) of sheep in one night. 3rd. You don't know as much about wildlife, wildlife management, predators, or livestock and the interactions there of as you think you do. The main reason for this is you're not a participant. So for you to call someone "inept" is absurd.

Some older information indicates the current US deer population is way overpopulated. Without better data it could be the wolves are doing a good job. If indeed the deer population is low. From another country where wild mammals are pests, the hunter groups are always moaning about low populations (including deer) while the deer etc have absolutely destroyed the vegetation and in some places, soils, they are so overpopulated. Native ecosystems have not been protected by the hunters, who loudly assert they are vastly better than they are. Seeing US Safari Club weighing in on some of this (foreign interference) shows how ignorant some US hunters are also. Provide victims for canned hunts though, amusing to see pompous suckers posing with dead tame farmed stags specifically bred for big antlers, having paid ridiculous money to show how good they are. Incidentally, with legally imported firearms and correct firearm possession documentation, and a hunting permit for public land (no cost) they can hut independently for free, and have a chance of getting a real trophy wild animal, or shoot as many as they desire.

@@johnmead8437bet you don’t live in northern Minnesota.

@@timgallagher393Genius can't be suppressed....

And all those 3500 wolves are in northen MN..a place the metro/Walz doesn't care about...unless they are on vacation

Your governor "doesn't allow"!? Read that as a supposed free citizen, an American. "Doesn't allow" seems to be your problem not the wolf.

My lady friend from BC told me their program.Collar a wolf,wait for it to return to its pack then take out the whole pack.A few years back she sent me a picture of 2 or 3 pickup trucks loaded with dead wolves.They had a local program wack a wolf

The Yellowstone fires had the impact your describing not the wolves.

@@yougonnaeatthat9889 No. It was the wolves. Maybe do the research I stated to, rather than spouting off false claims.

They will hunt to train there young, not being hungry they will eat the tongue and unborn embryo. Whan a pack brings down its pray,, one wolf has nose another has the tail while the others go for throat and stomach. It's a wonder site to see with intestines wrapped around brush and animal eaten alive. Since making Ariel wolf hunting illegal the caribou and moose hurds of Alaska are a fraction of there normal population. People saving wolves are fools at best.

80% of caribou and moose hurds calfs are going to preditors. The numbers are a fraction of what they were when they made Ariel wolf hunting illegal. It is a sight that must be seen to truly appreciate the wolf. Seen them train there young to hunt, not being hungry they will eat the tongue and unborn embryo and leave the rest. Watch them take down an animal with gut torn open , intestines wrapped around brush while being eaten, still alive. Do some research.

@@Th1sUsernameIsNotTaken how did the wolves reduce the invasive plant species so native plants could rebound? The research your pointing to was debunked by actual wildlife biologists not someone pushing a narrative. If your not paying attention wolves are decimating wildlife populations everywhere they have been reintroduced. Use your brain, what your describing isn't possible.

At least in Idaho I can say that wolf management is primarily in the hands of the state F+G and hunters and trappers. State F+G is solely funded by hunter license cost. The bulk of the wolves taken off the landscape to manage our wolf population to 1300-1500 has been by trappers. F4WM has really helped pay trappers for harvested wolves, all monies raised by the private sector. USFW has done nothing to help with cost.

Take 5000-6000 out of your yearly income, most of which was headed to paying bills and see if it bothers you. Then if you get a little help with a solution, we will call it welfare.

Welfare is welfare... the definition is a type of government support intended to ensure that members of a society can meet basic human needs such as food and shelter. That's the point if it a single parent in the inner city or a rancher, in the country sometimes help is need. Folks like you are hypocrites. @@jeanettegray7462

That is an uninformed comment about cattle and wolves.

Not just cattle any animal can have its population destroyed within only a year or two. Don’t let politicians and liberals make decisions for people that actually live it